Objective To investigate the levels and influencing factors for eye lens dose of interventional radiology workers, and to provide a basis for reasonable and scientific radiation protection. Methods Thermoluminescent eye lens dosimeters were used to monitor the left and right eye lens doses of interventional radiology workers in real time during different surgical positions and varying eye protection conditions. The annual eye lens doses for the operators were estimated based on their yearly workload. The differences in eye lens doses under different conditions were analyzed and the influencing factors were identified. Results For individual interventional operations, the range of personal dose equivalent H_p(3) of the left eye of interventional radiology workers was ( < MDL ~ 418.33) μSv, the median (Q₁, Q₃) was 9.29 ( < MDL, 40.79) μSv, and the mean was 40.79 ± 70.36 μSv. The estimated annual eye lens doses were 4.05 mSv and 17.80 mSv based on the median and mean values of the eye lens dose of a single operation multiplied by average annual frequency of operations per person, respectively. The left eye lens dose was higher than the right eye lens dose of the same operator (Z = −4.24, P < 0.05), and the dose of the right eye lens was strongly positively correlated with that of the left eye lens. The left eye lens dose of the first surgeon was higher than that of the second surgeon in the same operation (Z = −3.10, P < 0.05). The eye lens dose was influenced by operator position (χ² = 9.149, P = 0.002, OR = 8.343), eye protection (χ² = 4.619, P = 0.032, OR = 4.352), and air kerma area product (χ² = 8.032, P = 0.005, OR = 5.488). Conclusion According to the results of this study, a significant portion of interventional operators have eye lens doses that approach or exceed international occupational dose limits. It is recommended to pay attention to the operation frequency of the first operator and the air kerma area product of interventional operation, and strengthen radiation protection and dose monitoring for the eye lens of interventional radiology workers.

Objective To evaluate the selected dosimetric performance of four types of thermoluminescent extremity dosimeters, and to provide a reference for selecting devices for extremity and skin dose monitoring. Methods In accordance with the IEC 62387-2020 standard, photon and β-ray irradiation tests were conducted on four types of thermoluminescent extremity dosimeters (A, B, C, D), which were composed of different dose holders and detector configurations. Linear regression analysis was performed. Technical indicators including nonlinear response, coefficient of variation, and energy response were calculated. Results Dosimeters A, B, C, and D all exhibited excellent linearity with R² > 0.999. The nonlinear response ranges were 0.93-1.03, 0.99-1.06, 0.92-1.04, and 0.95-1.02 for dosimeters A, B, C, and D, respectively. The coefficients of variation were all below the standard limits. The energy response ranges were 0.79-1.27, 0.83-1.24, 0.76-1.21, and 0.15-0.36 for dosimeters A, B, C, and D, respectively. Conclusion Dosimeters A, B, and C meet the technical requirements of IEC 62387-2020 for extremity dosimeters used in photon monitoring in terms of nonlinear response, coefficient of variation, and energy response. They are suitable for extremity and skin dose monitoring in photon-dominated scenarios, such as radiological diagnosis/therapy and industrial radiation. Dosimeter D satisfies the technical requirements in the standard for extremity dosimeters used in β-ray monitoring in terms of nonlinear response and coefficient of variation, but exhibits a defect in β-ray energy dependence. It is recommended to optimize the dosimeter window and detector sensitive layer or introduce an energy compensation algorithm to enhance its adaptability to a broad energy spectrum. This study provides experimental support for the quality control and technical improvement of extremity dose monitoring equipment.