Objective To assess the efficacy of an innovative operational management model in enhancing the refined operational management of a public hospital.Methods An innovative operational management model,"One Body,Two Wings and Three Drives",was developed,which involved establishing a systematic operational management system,strengthening per-formance and cost control,and reinforcing the supporting roles of discipline construction,scientific and technological innovation,and smart hospital initiatives.This comprehensive approach aimed to systematically promote hospital operational management re-forms and improve overall efficiency and quality.Results After using this model,the hospital presented continuous improve-ments in operational efficiency and medical quality,with key performance indicators trending positively.Over the past three years,the average annual growth rate of outpatient and emergency service visits reached 6.6％,inpatient service visits increased by 5.7％,and the Case Mix Index(CMI)rose by 0.22 over two consecutive years.Conclusion This model is highly systemat-ic,practical,and policy-compatible,providing a replicable path for the high-quality development of public hospitals.

Objective:To compare the immobilization effect of two different immobilization methods in treatment with CyberKnife for intracranial tumors.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 patients with intracranial tumors who received treatment with CyberKnife in the Department of Radiotherapy at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from June 2023 to July 2024.Based on the different immobilization method,patients were divided into two groups:the Double Shell Positioning System(DSPS)group(n=22)and the Qfix group(n=26).The DSPS group was immobilized using an American full-body integrated positioning frame combined with a carbon fiber bracket and DSPS film,while the Qfix group was immobilized using an Encompass board and Qfix film.All patients were treated with 6 dimensions(6D)-skull tracking technique.During treatment,images were acquired as one times per 60 seconds,which were registered with digitally reconstructed radiograph(DRR)to record and compare the overall relative errors.The data of relative displacement error during treatment was calculated as|dx|=d1-d0,and differences between the two groups were compared.The maximum displacement(|d|=dmax-dmin)was also calculated,and difference in maximum displacement between the two kinds of immobilization methods was analyzed.Results:In the comparison of the overall relative errors between the two kinds of immobilization methods,the median values in the errors of superior-inferior(SI),anterior-posterior(AP),Roll,Pitch,and Yaw directions in the Qfix group were respectively 0.174,0.309,0.150,0.147,and 0.477,which were significantly less than those(0.224,0.316,0.175,0.221,and 0.584)of DSPS group,and the differences were statistically significant(Z=-4.358,-1.698,-2.595,-6.833,-5.371,P<0.05).The difference of the relative displacement errors between two kinds of immobilization methods was not significant(P>0.05),while the median values in all directions were not zero.The comparison of the maximum displacement value between the two kinds of immobilization methods indicated the displacement amounts of Qfix group was less than those of DSPS group on SI,left-right(LR),AP,roll,pitch,and yaw directions,and the differences of them were significant(Z=-3.373,-2.525,-2.488,-3.169,-5.130,-5.166,P<0.05).Conclusion:Both immobilization methods can meet the requirements of clinical treatment.The results of comparison indicate the immobilization effect of Qfix group is best,and the combination of Encompass board and Qfix film is recommended as the immobilization method of CyberKnife-based radiotherapy for intracranial tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking exacerbates the progression of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). The role of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in chronic lung diseases has gained attention; however, it remains unclear whether smoking-exacerbated lung damage in TB is associated with TLS. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of pulmonary TLS in smokers with TB and to explore the possible role of TLS in smoking-related lung injury in TB. METHODS: Lung tissues from 36 male patients (18 smokers and 18 non-smokers) who underwent surgical resection for pulmonary TB were included in this study. Pathological and immunohistological analyses were conducted to evaluate the quantity of TLS, and chest computed tomography (CT) was used to assess the severity of lung lesions. The correlation between the TLS quantity and TB lesion severity scores was analyzed. The immune cells and chemokines involved in TLS formation were also evaluated and compared between smokers and non-smokers. RESULTS: Smoker patients with TB had significantly higher TLS than non-smokers ( P < 0.001). The TLS quantity in both the lung parenchyma and peribronchial regions correlated with TB lesion severity on chest CT (parenchyma: r = 0.5767; peribronchial: r = 0.7373; both P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased B cells, T cells, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) expression in smoker patients with TB ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Smoker TB patients exhibited increased pulmonary TLS, which was associated with exacerbated lung lesions on chest CT, suggesting that cigarette smoking may exacerbate lung damage by promoting TLS formation.
Humans ; Male ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/immunology* ; Middle Aged ; Tertiary Lymphoid Structures/pathology* ; Adult ; Lung/pathology* ; Smoking/adverse effects* ; Smokers ; Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), and to analyze the factors that may affect their efficacy and prognosis, in order to provide a clinical basis for the choice of treatment options for patients with MDS/MPN. METHODS: 35 patients with newly diagnosed MDS/MPN who received hypomethylating therapy from January 2018 to April 2024 in the Department of Hematology of Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were included. The patients were divided into decitabine group (15 cases) and azacitidine group (20 cases) according to the treatment regimen. The efficacy, median overall survival (OS), and median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients after HMA treatment were evaluated. The differences in efficacy and survival between the two groups were compared, and factors affecting efficacy and prognosis of MDS/MPN patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of the 35 MDS/MPN patients treated with HMA was 51.4%. The ORR was 73.3% in decitabine group and 35.0% in azacitidine group, with a statistically significant difference (P =0.041). Survival analysis showed that the median OS was 12 months and the median PFS was 10 months in the entire cohort of the patients. There was no difference in median OS between decitabine group and azacitidine group. The median PFS in decitabine group was 12 months, higher than that in azacitidine group (7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.505). Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment regimen and platelet count were independent influencing factors for the efficacy of HAM treatment; The course and therapeutic efficacy of HMA treatment were independent influencing factors for OS in MDS/MPN patients. The main adverse reactions of HMA treatment were myelosuppression and pulmonary infection. Gastrointestinal reactions were more likely to occur in the azacitidine group than in the decitabine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.027). CONCLUSION HMA treatment is effective and well-tolerated in some MDS/MPN patients. Decitabine shows superior efficacy compared with azacitidine and is less likely to cause gastrointestinal reactions. Patients who received ≥4 courses of HMAs and responded to hypomethylating therapy had longer OS.
Humans ; Prognosis ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Azacitidine/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases/drug therapy* ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged ; Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy* ; Adult ; DNA Methylation

Apical microsurgery is accurate and minimally invasive, produces few complications, and has a success rate of more than 90%. However, due to the lack of awareness and understanding of apical microsurgery by dental general practitioners and even endodontists, many clinical problems remain to be overcome. The consensus has gathered well-known domestic experts to hold a series of special discussions and reached the consensus. This document specifies the indications, contraindications, preoperative preparations, operational procedures, complication prevention measures, and efficacy evaluation of apical microsurgery and is applicable to dentists who perform apical microsurgery after systematic training.
Microsurgery/standards* ; Humans ; Apicoectomy ; Contraindications, Procedure ; Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging* ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Consensus ; Treatment Outcome

Pulpotomy, which belongs to vital pulp therapy, has become a strategy for managing pulpitis in recent decades. This minimally invasive treatment reflects the recognition of preserving healthy dental pulp and optimizing long-term patient-centered outcomes. Pulpotomy is categorized into partial pulpotomy (PP), the removal of a partial segment of the coronal pulp tissue, and full pulpotomy (FP), the removal of whole coronal pulp, which is followed by applying the biomaterials onto the remaining pulp tissue and ultimately restoring the tooth. Procedural decisions for the amount of pulp tissue removal or retention depend on the diagnostic of pulp vitality, the overall treatment plan, the patient's general health status, and pulp inflammation reassessment during operation. This statement represents the consensus of an expert committee convened by the Society of Cariology and Endodontics, Chinese Stomatological Association. It addresses the current evidence to support the application of pulpotomy as a potential alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) on mature permanent teeth with pulpitis from a biological basis, the development of capping biomaterial, and the diagnostic considerations to evidence-based medicine. This expert statement intends to provide a clinical protocol of pulpotomy, which facilitates practitioners in choosing the optimal procedure and increasing their confidence in this rapidly evolving field.
Humans ; Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Consensus ; Dental Pulp ; Dentition, Permanent ; Oxides/therapeutic use* ; Pulpitis/therapy* ; Pulpotomy/standards*

Intentional tooth replantation (ITR) is an advanced treatment modality and the procedure of last resort for preserving teeth with inaccessible endodontic or resorptive lesions. ITR is defined as the deliberate extraction of a tooth; evaluation of the root surface, endodontic manipulation, and repair; and placement of the tooth back into its original socket. Case reports, case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of ITR in the retention of natural teeth that are untreatable or difficult to manage with root canal treatment or endodontic microsurgery. However, variations in clinical protocols for ITR exist due to the empirical nature of the original protocols and rapid advancements in the field of oral biology and dental materials. This heterogeneity in protocols may cause confusion among dental practitioners; therefore, guidelines and considerations for ITR should be explicated. This expert consensus discusses the biological foundation of ITR, the available clinical protocols and current status of ITR in treating teeth with refractory apical periodontitis or anatomical aberration, and the main complications of this treatment, aiming to refine the clinical management of ITR in accordance with the progress of basic research and clinical studies; the findings suggest that ITR may become a more consistent evidence-based option in dental treatment.
Humans ; Tooth Replantation/methods* ; Consensus ; Periapical Periodontitis/surgery*

Objective:To compare the immobilization effect of two different immobilization methods in treatment with CyberKnife for intracranial tumors.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 patients with intracranial tumors who received treatment with CyberKnife in the Department of Radiotherapy at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from June 2023 to July 2024.Based on the different immobilization method,patients were divided into two groups:the Double Shell Positioning System(DSPS)group(n=22)and the Qfix group(n=26).The DSPS group was immobilized using an American full-body integrated positioning frame combined with a carbon fiber bracket and DSPS film,while the Qfix group was immobilized using an Encompass board and Qfix film.All patients were treated with 6 dimensions(6D)-skull tracking technique.During treatment,images were acquired as one times per 60 seconds,which were registered with digitally reconstructed radiograph(DRR)to record and compare the overall relative errors.The data of relative displacement error during treatment was calculated as|dx|=d1-d0,and differences between the two groups were compared.The maximum displacement(|d|=dmax-dmin)was also calculated,and difference in maximum displacement between the two kinds of immobilization methods was analyzed.Results:In the comparison of the overall relative errors between the two kinds of immobilization methods,the median values in the errors of superior-inferior(SI),anterior-posterior(AP),Roll,Pitch,and Yaw directions in the Qfix group were respectively 0.174,0.309,0.150,0.147,and 0.477,which were significantly less than those(0.224,0.316,0.175,0.221,and 0.584)of DSPS group,and the differences were statistically significant(Z=-4.358,-1.698,-2.595,-6.833,-5.371,P<0.05).The difference of the relative displacement errors between two kinds of immobilization methods was not significant(P>0.05),while the median values in all directions were not zero.The comparison of the maximum displacement value between the two kinds of immobilization methods indicated the displacement amounts of Qfix group was less than those of DSPS group on SI,left-right(LR),AP,roll,pitch,and yaw directions,and the differences of them were significant(Z=-3.373,-2.525,-2.488,-3.169,-5.130,-5.166,P<0.05).Conclusion:Both immobilization methods can meet the requirements of clinical treatment.The results of comparison indicate the immobilization effect of Qfix group is best,and the combination of Encompass board and Qfix film is recommended as the immobilization method of CyberKnife-based radiotherapy for intracranial tumors.

Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Objective:To investigates the efficacy and safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)in treating older patients(≥60 years old)with hematologic malignancies.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study involving 67 patients aged 60 years and above, diagnosed with malignant hematological diseases, who received allo-HSCT at the Clinical Research Centrer for Haematologic Diseases of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between June 2015 and March 2023.We collected pre-transplant data, including the patients' age, gender, pre-transplantation disease risk stratification, disease status, and the haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index(HCT-CI). We retrospectively analyzed clinical data regarding treatment-related toxicity, infections, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease(a/cGVHD), as well as recurrent and non-recurrent deaths, to estimate the overall survival(OS)rate and event-free survival (EFS)rate.Results:Sixty-seven patients were included in the study, comprising 55 males(82.1%)and 12 females(17.9%), with a median age of 63(61, 65) years .The cohort consisted of 42 cases of acute myeloid leukaemia, 22 cases of myelodysplastic syndromes, and 3 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 1-year OS and EFS rates were 62.9% and 59.2%, respectively, while the 2-year OS and EFS rates were 55.3% and 51.8%, respectively.The cumulative incidence of 1-year non-relapse mortality and relapse was 25.4% and 21.2%, respectively.A total of 13 patients developed grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD, with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 22.0%, and 7 patients developed cGVHD requiring treatment.When stratified by age group, the OS rate was higher in patients aged 60~64 years compared to those aged ≥65 years; however, this difference was not statistically significant(Log-rank χ2=0.99, P=0.317). In contrast, when stratified by disease load, the OS rate was significantly higher in the complete remission(CR)group than in the non-CR group, with a statistically significant difference(Log-rank χ2=15.04, P<0.001). When stratified by donor type, the OS rate was higher in the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) allogeneic group compared to the haploinsufficiency group; however, the difference was not statistically significant(Log-rank χ2=2.71, P=0.100). Twenty-seven patients died at an average of 125 days (range 3-1 054 days) after HSCT.The causes of death included leukemia recurrence in 9 cases (33.3%), infection in 8 cases (29.6%), GVHD in 5 cases (18.5%), poor implantation in 3 cases (11.1%), multi-organ failure in 1 case (3.7%), and cerebrovascular accident in 1 case (3.7%). The results of multifactorial analysis indicated that a pre-transplant tumor load greater than 5% was an independent risk factor for OS after transplantation ( HR=4.59, 95% CI: 2.01-10.42, P<0.001)as well as for disease recurrence ( OR=13.11, 95% CI: 1.96-87.87, P=0.008). Additionally, the occurrence of infection was identified as an independent risk factor for non-recurrent death after transplantation( OR=3.95, 95% CI: 1.13 to 13.71, P=0.031). Conclusions:For patients aged 60 years or older with hematologic malignancies, HSCT can serve as a viable treatment option, particularly for those with refractory recurrence and high cytogenetic risk, as it has the potential to significantly enhance prognosis and increase both EFS and OS rates.