1.Influencing Factors of Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Differences in Hypertensive Population Aged 40 Years and Younger
Qihuan CAO ; Yinan SU ; Ying ZHU ; Wenli DONG ; Yuxi WANG ; Jing GE ; Shouling WU
Chinese Circulation Journal 2024;39(2):164-170
Objectives:To explore the influencing factors of inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference(sIAD)in young hypertensive population. Methods:A total of 12 895 young Kailuan employees aged≤40 years,who participated in the physical examination from 2010 to 2020,were enrolled in this study.All of them underwent blood pressure measurements of four limbs in supine position.Young hypertensive group(n=3 584)and young non-hypertensive group(n=3 584)were 1∶1 matched by sex and age(±1 year),and participants were further divided into sIAD<10 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)and sIAD≥10 mmHg subgroups.A stepwise multivariate logistic regression model was established to analyze the determinants of sIAD≥10 mmHg. Results:The detection rate of sIAD≥10 mmHg was significantly higher in the young hypertensive group than in the young non-hypertensive group(31.72%vs.27.76%,P<0.001).Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in young hypertensive population,ankle-brachial index(ABI)<0.9,male,obesity,overweight,elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C)level,and systolic blood pressure were positively associated with sIAD≥10 mmHg,while college education or above,physical exercise were negatively correlated with sIAD≥10 mmHg(all P<0.05).In the young non-hypertensive population,ABI<0.9,systolic blood pressure were positively correlated with sIAD≥10 mmHg,while age was negatively associated with sIAD≥10 mmHg(all P<0.05). Conclusions:The detection rate of sIAD≥10 mmHg is higher in young hypertensive population than in young non-hypertensive population.Decreased ABI,male sex,obesity,overweight,increased LDL-C level,systolic blood pressure,college education and above,and physical exercise are the influencing factors of sIAD≥10 mmHg in young hypertensive population.
2.Immune-associated pneumonitis caused by sintilimab
Fenfang WANG ; Jingya BAO ; Qihuan WU
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(3):190-192
A 56-year-old male patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma had progressed disease after receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, etc. Then he received chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (capecitabine and sintilimab). Before receiving the 3rd immunotherapy, no abnormality was found in the relevant examination in the patient. On the 3rd day of treatment, he developed cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms, and chest CT imaging indicated inflammatory lesion of both lungs. The results of sputum culture, sputum smear examination, G test, GM test, and autoantibody examination were all negative. Infectious pneumonia and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features were excluded. The common respiratory adverse reaction to capecitabine was pharyngeal discomfort, and no large-scale pneumonia caused by capecitabine was reported. Therefore, it was considered to be immune-associated pneumonitis cause by sintilimab. Treatments such as intravenous injection of methylprednisolone, IV infusion of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium and moxifloxacin were given and the patient′s condition was improved. After that, methylprednisolone dose was gradually reduced, and then changed to oral prednisone. On the 10th day of oral prednisone, the symptom of shortness of breath worsened. Chest CT imaging indicated that the pneumonitis was more severe than before. Intravenous methylprednisolone was re-given but the condition was not improved.
3.Immune-associated pneumonitis caused by sintilimab
Fenfang WANG ; Jingya BAO ; Qihuan WU
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(3):190-192
A 56-year-old male patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma had progressed disease after receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, etc. Then he received chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (capecitabine and sintilimab). Before receiving the 3rd immunotherapy, no abnormality was found in the relevant examination in the patient. On the 3rd day of treatment, he developed cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms, and chest CT imaging indicated inflammatory lesion of both lungs. The results of sputum culture, sputum smear examination, G test, GM test, and autoantibody examination were all negative. Infectious pneumonia and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features were excluded. The common respiratory adverse reaction to capecitabine was pharyngeal discomfort, and no large-scale pneumonia caused by capecitabine was reported. Therefore, it was considered to be immune-associated pneumonitis cause by sintilimab. Treatments such as intravenous injection of methylprednisolone, IV infusion of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium and moxifloxacin were given and the patient′s condition was improved. After that, methylprednisolone dose was gradually reduced, and then changed to oral prednisone. On the 10th day of oral prednisone, the symptom of shortness of breath worsened. Chest CT imaging indicated that the pneumonitis was more severe than before. Intravenous methylprednisolone was re-given but the condition was not improved.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail