Objective To explore the effects of different modes of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS)on response inhibition function in healthy adults and the underlying mechanisms.Methods Eighty-one healthy adult volunteers were randomly divided into 5 Hz repetitive TMS(rTMS)group(n=28),intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS)group(n=26)and sham stimulation group(n=27).The TMS stimulation target was the cerebellar Crus Ⅱ region,and the stimulation site was accurately located by the neuronavigation system.The stimulation intensity was 80％of the individual resting motor threshold(RMT).The Go/No-Go task response time(RT)and response inhibition ability and synchronous EEG were measured before and after intervention in each group.The changes of N2 wave and time-frequency in the time window related to response inhibition function in the event-related potential(ERP)were analyzed.Results Compared with that pre-stimulation,RT after stimulation in rTMS group and iTBS group was significantly shortened(all P＜0.05).There was a significant difference in the difference of RT before and after stimulation among the three groups(P＜0.001).Compared with that in the sham stimulation group,the RT after stimulation in the rTMS group and the iTBS group was significantly shortened(P＜0.05-0.01).There was no significant difference in RT changes before and after stimulation between rTMS group and iTBS group(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the correct rate of Go task and No-Go task before and after stimulation in the rTMS group,iTBS group and sham stimulation group(all P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the changes of correct rate in Go task and No-Go task among the three groups(P＞0.05).In the No-Go condition,compared with pre-TMS intervention,the N2 amplitude at Fz and FCz electrodes in rTMS group and iTBS group significantly decreased after intervention(all P＜0.05).Compared with that in the sham stimulation group,the changes of N2 amplitude in the frontal electrodes of the rTMS group and the iTBS group were statistically significant(all P＜0.01),but there was no significant difference in the N2 amplitude changes before and after intervention between the rTMS and iTBS groups(all P＞0.05).In the Go condition,there was no significant difference in N2 amplitude before and after intervention in each group(all P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the latency changes of Go/No-Go task before and after intervention in each group(all P＞0.05).In the No-Go task,the theta frequency power was increased significantly after rTMS intervention(P＜0.01),and the alpha,beta and gamma frequency powers were decreased significantly(all P＜0.05).Theta frequency power at the Fz channel in the iTBS group was significantly increased after intervention(P＜0.05).No significant time-frequency changes were observed in the sham group before and after the intervention.There were no significant differences in the frequency changes(alpha,theta,beta,gamma)between the rTMS and iTBS groups after intervention(all P＞0.05).In the Go task,there was no significant change in each frequency before and after intervention in each group.Correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between RT and N2 amplitude and theta oscillation activity in each group(all P＞0.05).Conclusions Both 5 Hz rTMS and iTBS interventions significantly improve response inhibition ability in healthy adults.The two types of stimulation may modulate cerebellar executive control functions through similar neuroregulatory mechanisms,providing new evidence for the clinical application of cerebellar TMS in cognitive control-related disorders.

In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation has been widely used in clinical rehabilitation due to its safe and non-invasive features.Particularly for stroke patients, this technique has become a new type of rehabilitation by virtue of its role in improving gait disorders, aphasia, dysphagia, and other complications. Previous research on stroke rehabilitation mainly focused on the cerebral cortex, while the recent evidences suggest that the cerebellum, with its rich synaptic plasticity and extensive structural and functional connectivity with the brain, has emerged as a promising target for non-invasive intervention in stroke rehabilitation. Non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum is expected to improve patients' impaired function and quality of life. This review discusses the possible mechanisms and clinical applications of non-invasive cerebellar stimulation technology in regulating stroke rehabilitation, aiming to provide new treatment directions and application value for individualized stroke rehabilitation.

In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation has been widely used in clinical rehabilitation due to its safe and non-invasive features.Particularly for stroke patients, this technique has become a new type of rehabilitation by virtue of its role in improving gait disorders, aphasia, dysphagia, and other complications. Previous research on stroke rehabilitation mainly focused on the cerebral cortex, while the recent evidences suggest that the cerebellum, with its rich synaptic plasticity and extensive structural and functional connectivity with the brain, has emerged as a promising target for non-invasive intervention in stroke rehabilitation. Non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum is expected to improve patients' impaired function and quality of life. This review discusses the possible mechanisms and clinical applications of non-invasive cerebellar stimulation technology in regulating stroke rehabilitation, aiming to provide new treatment directions and application value for individualized stroke rehabilitation.

Objective To explore the effects of different modes of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS)on response inhibition function in healthy adults and the underlying mechanisms.Methods Eighty-one healthy adult volunteers were randomly divided into 5 Hz repetitive TMS(rTMS)group(n=28),intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS)group(n=26)and sham stimulation group(n=27).The TMS stimulation target was the cerebellar Crus Ⅱ region,and the stimulation site was accurately located by the neuronavigation system.The stimulation intensity was 80％of the individual resting motor threshold(RMT).The Go/No-Go task response time(RT)and response inhibition ability and synchronous EEG were measured before and after intervention in each group.The changes of N2 wave and time-frequency in the time window related to response inhibition function in the event-related potential(ERP)were analyzed.Results Compared with that pre-stimulation,RT after stimulation in rTMS group and iTBS group was significantly shortened(all P＜0.05).There was a significant difference in the difference of RT before and after stimulation among the three groups(P＜0.001).Compared with that in the sham stimulation group,the RT after stimulation in the rTMS group and the iTBS group was significantly shortened(P＜0.05-0.01).There was no significant difference in RT changes before and after stimulation between rTMS group and iTBS group(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the correct rate of Go task and No-Go task before and after stimulation in the rTMS group,iTBS group and sham stimulation group(all P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the changes of correct rate in Go task and No-Go task among the three groups(P＞0.05).In the No-Go condition,compared with pre-TMS intervention,the N2 amplitude at Fz and FCz electrodes in rTMS group and iTBS group significantly decreased after intervention(all P＜0.05).Compared with that in the sham stimulation group,the changes of N2 amplitude in the frontal electrodes of the rTMS group and the iTBS group were statistically significant(all P＜0.01),but there was no significant difference in the N2 amplitude changes before and after intervention between the rTMS and iTBS groups(all P＞0.05).In the Go condition,there was no significant difference in N2 amplitude before and after intervention in each group(all P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the latency changes of Go/No-Go task before and after intervention in each group(all P＞0.05).In the No-Go task,the theta frequency power was increased significantly after rTMS intervention(P＜0.01),and the alpha,beta and gamma frequency powers were decreased significantly(all P＜0.05).Theta frequency power at the Fz channel in the iTBS group was significantly increased after intervention(P＜0.05).No significant time-frequency changes were observed in the sham group before and after the intervention.There were no significant differences in the frequency changes(alpha,theta,beta,gamma)between the rTMS and iTBS groups after intervention(all P＞0.05).In the Go task,there was no significant change in each frequency before and after intervention in each group.Correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between RT and N2 amplitude and theta oscillation activity in each group(all P＞0.05).Conclusions Both 5 Hz rTMS and iTBS interventions significantly improve response inhibition ability in healthy adults.The two types of stimulation may modulate cerebellar executive control functions through similar neuroregulatory mechanisms,providing new evidence for the clinical application of cerebellar TMS in cognitive control-related disorders.