Objective:To compare the effects of 5 prone ventilation positions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with network Meta-analysis.Methods:The randomized controlled trials on various prone ventilation positions in patients with ARDS were retrieved from Cochrane Library, EMbase, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, Chinese Medical Association Guideline Database, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine disc, VIP Information and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry from their inception to December 31, 2023. Literature screening, quality assessment and data extraction were done following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Network Meta-analysis of outcome indicators was done using Stata 18.0.Results:A total of 19 articles, covering 1 284 patients and 5 prone ventilation positions (0°, 10°, 30°, 25° and 45°) were included. Cochrane risk assessment results showed that 15 articles were grade B and 4 articles were grade C. In direct comparisons, heterogeneity was acceptable ( I2≤50% and P≥0.1). In network analysis, the global and local consistency test result showed good consistency ( P>0.05). Network Meta-analysis result showed that the incidences of pressure injury in patients with 10°, 25°, 30° and 45° prone ventilation were significantly lower than that in patients with 0° prone ventilation, the incidence of pressure injury in patients with 25° prone ventilation was significantly lower than that in patients with 10° prone ventilation, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05); the oxygenation index in patients with 25° prone ventilation was significantly better than that in patients with 0°, 30° and 45° prone ventilation, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The 25° prone ventilation can both effectively improve oxygenation and maximally reduce the incidence of pressure injury in patients with ARDS.

Objective:To compare the effects of 5 prone ventilation positions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with network Meta-analysis.Methods:The randomized controlled trials on various prone ventilation positions in patients with ARDS were retrieved from Cochrane Library, EMbase, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, Chinese Medical Association Guideline Database, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine disc, VIP Information and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry from their inception to December 31, 2023. Literature screening, quality assessment and data extraction were done following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Network Meta-analysis of outcome indicators was done using Stata 18.0.Results:A total of 19 articles, covering 1 284 patients and 5 prone ventilation positions (0°, 10°, 30°, 25° and 45°) were included. Cochrane risk assessment results showed that 15 articles were grade B and 4 articles were grade C. In direct comparisons, heterogeneity was acceptable ( I2≤50% and P≥0.1). In network analysis, the global and local consistency test result showed good consistency ( P>0.05). Network Meta-analysis result showed that the incidences of pressure injury in patients with 10°, 25°, 30° and 45° prone ventilation were significantly lower than that in patients with 0° prone ventilation, the incidence of pressure injury in patients with 25° prone ventilation was significantly lower than that in patients with 10° prone ventilation, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05); the oxygenation index in patients with 25° prone ventilation was significantly better than that in patients with 0°, 30° and 45° prone ventilation, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The 25° prone ventilation can both effectively improve oxygenation and maximally reduce the incidence of pressure injury in patients with ARDS.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of three kinds of foam dressings in the wound healing.Methods Totally 30 BALB/C mice were divided into three groups, and 1×1 cm full-thickness defects on the back of mice were prepared. The wounds were covered with Comfeel dressing, Mepilex dressing and Allevyn dressing, and then the wounds were sutured and fixed. Five mice were selected in each group randomly at day 3 and day 7 after surgery, then the results were analyzed with Image-pro plus 6. 0 software. Situation of epithelization and granulation tissue were analyzed by quantitative observation analysis from the perspective of pathology.Results Wound healing rate of Allevyn dressing group at day 3 and day 7 after surgery were 31.79% and 78.45%, which were higher than the data of the other two groups (P<0.05). Pathological analysis found that, in the Allevyn dressing group at 7 d after surgery, the length of new epithelium of the wound tissue was longer than the other two groups; at the same time, the wound granulation tissue of the Allevyn dressing group was thicker than that of the Mepilex dressing group.Conclusions Among the three kinds of foam dressings, Allevyn dressing can significantly promote the granulation tissue growth of wound and epithelization, and then promote the wound healing.