OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effects of ibrutinib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RRDLBCL). METHODS: A total of 101 patients with RRDLBCL in Daqing People's Hospital from September 2019 to September 2022 were selected. 45 patients were received ibrutinib monotherapy, 36 patients were received a combination therapy of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide, and 20 patients were received a combination therapy of ibrutinib and lenalidomide. The clinical effects were observed. RESULTS: The median duration of treatment for all patients was 4 (2-9) months. The disease control rates(DCR) and objective response rates(ORR) in the ibrutinib monotherapy group were 46.67% and 26.67%, respectively. In the combination therapy group of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide, the DCR and ORR were 69.44% and 44.44%, respectively. In the combination therapy group of ibrutinib and lenalidomide, the DCR and ORR were 60.00% and 35.00%, respectively. The DCR and ORR in the combination therapy group of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide were significantly higher than those in the ibrutinib monotherapy group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between the combination therapy group of ibrutinib and lenalidomide and the ibrutinib monotherapy group (P >0.05). The median follow-up time of all patients was 15 (5-35) months, with a median overall survival(OS) of 21.0 (15.8-26.2) months and a median progression-free survival(PFS) of 14.0 (12.1-15.9) months. In the ibrutinib monotherapy group, the median OS and PFS were 15.0 (12.1-17.9) months and 12.0 (11.0-13.0) months, respectively. In the combination therapy group of ibrutinib and lenalidomide, the median OS and PFS were 22.0 (13.3-30.7) months and 16.0 (14.1-19.7) months, respectively. In the combination therapy group of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide, the median OS and PFS were 23.0 (19.7-26.3) months and 17.0 (14.8-19.1) months, respectively. The median OS and PFS in the combination therapy group of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide were significantly higher than those in the ibrutinib monotherapy group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in median OS and PFS between the combination therapy group of ibrutinib and lenalidomide and the combination therapy group of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide (P >0.05). Hematological adverse reactions included neutropenia in 14 cases (13.86%), thrombocytopenia in 16 cases (15.84%), and leukopenia in 13 cases (12.87%). Non-hematological adverse reactions mainly included nausea and vomiting in 33 cases (32.67%) and fatigue in 44 cases (43.56%). CONCLUSION Ibrutinib has certain clinical effects and good safety in the treatment of RRDLBCL.
Humans ; Piperidines/therapeutic use* ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy* ; Adenine/therapeutic use* ; Rituximab/therapeutic use* ; Lenalidomide/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Adult ; Aged ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in the treatment of autoimmune cytopenia (AIC) secondary to indolent B-cell lymphoma (iBCL). METHODS: A total of 23 patients with iBCL complicated with AIC who were admitted to our hospital from December 2019 to September 2023 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were administered zanubrutinib 160 mg, twice daily, and continued oral administration. The objective response rate (ORR) of AIC, the therapeutic effect on lymphoma, and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 20 (5 to 48) months, the median duration of response was 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-24)months. AICA efficacy assessment showed that there were 10 cases of complete remission (CR), 9 cases of partial remission (PR), and 4 cases of no response (NR), and the ORR was 82.6% (19/23) (95%CI : 61.2-95.0). Among them, for the 14 patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), 7 achieved CR, 5 had PR, and 2 had NR. For the 4 patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), 1 reached CR, 2 had PR, and 1 had NR. Regarding the 5 patients with Evans syndrome (ES), 2 achieved CR, 2 had PR, and 1 had NR. The assessment of lymphoma efficacy showed that there were 10 cases of CR , 7 cases of PR , 6 cases of stable disease (SD), and no progressive cases, with an ORR of 73.9% (17/23) (95%CI : 51.6-89.8). The main adverse reactions during the treatment were infection, hemorrhage, neutropenia, elevated lymphocyte count, rash, and anemia. Most of these adverse reactions were grade 1-2 and tolerable. No arrhythmia and hypertension occurred, and no deaths due to adverse reactions. CONCLUSION Zanubrutinib is effective and safe for AIC secondary to iBCL.
Humans ; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use* ; Lymphoma, B-Cell/complications* ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Piperidines/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Male ; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/etiology* ; Thrombocytopenia/etiology* ; Middle Aged ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/etiology* ; Treatment Outcome ; Adult ; Aged ; Cytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different previous treatments on the efficacy of flumatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: The clinical data of 69 patients with CML treated with flumatinib in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a first-line flumatinib group and a first-line non-flumatinib group according to whether flumatinib was used as first-line treatment. The molecular response (MR) at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment was compared between the two groups to evaluate the early efficacy. The first-line non-flumatinib group was further divided into imatinib group, nilotinib group, and dasatinib group according to the previous first-line drugs used. The efficacy data of these three groups at 3, 6 and 12 months after switching to flumatinib were collected, and the MR was evaluated to compare efficacy differences. RESULTS: The rate of early molecular response (EMR) in the first-line flumatinib group was significantly higher than that in the first-line non-flumatinib group (P < 0.05). At 6 months and 12 months of treatment, the proportion of patients achieving MR 4.5 in the first-line flumatinib group was significantly higher than that in the first-line non-flumatinib group (P < 0.05). Compared with the imatinib and nilotinib groups, the previous dasatinib group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving MR 5.0 at 3, 6, and 12 months after switching to flumatinib (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with the previous treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), initial use of flumatinib at diagnosis enable patients to achieve deeper molecular remission more rapidly. Compared with previous use of imatinib or nilotinib, previous use of dasatinib is associated with deeper molecular remission after switching to flumatinib.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use* ; Dasatinib/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Male ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Middle Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*

The discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase gene rearrangement mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has driven continuous advancements in ALK-targeted therapies. The next generation of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Brigatinib, has demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, offering clinical benefits in deep response of tumor, treatment of brain metastases patients, quality of life, and long-term survival. This review will provide current advancements and exploratory directions for Brigatinib.
.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/enzymology* ; Lung Neoplasms/enzymology* ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Organophosphorus Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

INTRODUCTION: Since 2016, several therapies have been approved for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in Singapore, including biologics, oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and topical crisaborole. This study supplements the 2016 Singapore treatment guidelines for AD, focusing on newer therapies for moderate-to-severe disease, while revisiting older treatment regimens to accommodate changes in knowledge and practice. METHOD: A modified Delphi panel was held, led by 2 co-chairs. The voting expert panel consisted of 12 dermatologists experienced in managing AD in Singapore. Delphi survey rounds were conducted between 24 July and 27 October 2023. Panellists indicated their agreement with drafted statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. An expert meeting was held to facilitate the consensus process between rounds 1 and 2 of voting. RESULTS: All expert panellists participated in both survey rounds, with a 100% response rate. Thirty-nine statements, classified into general principles, conventional treatments, biologics and JAK inhibitors, were proposed. Of these, 27 statements reached consensus at the end of round 1. After the expert meeting, 17 statements were included in round 2, of which 16 statements reached consensus. One statement did not reach consensus. Key updates are the inclusion of dupilumab and JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatments for moderate-to-severe AD, in certain populations. CONCLUSION This modified Delphi study generated consensus among Singapore dermatology experts, to update treatment guidelines in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The consensus statements developed are intended to supplement the 2016 Singapore treatment guidelines for AD. Further revisions may be required when new evidence and/or treatments become available.
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Singapore ; Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Biological Products/therapeutic use* ; Delphi Technique ; Consensus ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use* ; Severity of Illness Index ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use* ; Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Boron Compounds

Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.
Adult ; Humans ; Adolescent ; Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects* ; Incidence ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Pyrimidines/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; Benzamides/adverse effects* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy* ; Aminopyridines/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor and can block the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signal transduction pathway and reduce the production and release of a variety of cytokines. It has great potential in the treatment of various rheumatic diseases with a rapid onset of action and can reduce corticosteroid dependence and related adverse events. The therapeutic effect of tofacitinib in adult patients has been confirmed, and it has been increasingly used in pediatric patients in recent years. This article reviews the clinical application of tofacitinib in the treatment of pediatric autoimmune diseases.
Adult ; Child ; Humans ; Janus Kinases/metabolism* ; Piperidines/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the second-line nilotinib and third-line dasatinib on chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) with failed first- and second-line treatments, and analyze the influencing factors of the efficacy. METHODS: Selected 83 patients in The Third People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Jiangsu Province with CML who were treated with nilotinib as the second-line treatment after the failure of the first-line treatment with imatinib as the second-line treatment group (referred to as the second-line group) from January 2014 to December 2018, and 61 CML patients who were treated by dasatinib as the third-line treatment group (referred to as the third-line group) after the failure of the second-line treatment with nilotinib; the first-line treatment with imatinib failed, but due to various reasons, the patients were fully after being informed of the possible serious consequences of not changing the drug treatment, 37 CML patients who were still required to continue imatinib treatment served as the control group. The hematological, genetic and molecular responses of each group were compared for 3, 6, and 24 months of treatment. LogistiC regression was used to analyze the factors affecting the second and third line curative effects. RESULTS: The three groups had statistically significant differences in the rates of achieving CHR, MCyR, and MMR at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment (P<0.05). Compared the two groups, the CHR rates of the second-line group at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment were 100.00%, 97.59%, and 95.18%, respectively; higher than the third-line group's 90.16%, 86.89%, 83.61% and the control group's 83.78%, 75.68% and 72.97%; the CHR rate of the third-line group was higher than that of the control group at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The rates of reaching MCyR at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment in the second-line group were 87.95%, 93.98% and 93.98%, respectively, while those in the third-line group were 80.33%, 88.52% and 86.89%, which were higher than those of the control group of 67.57%, 64.86% and 48.65%. The rates of achieving MMR at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment in the second-line group were 19.28%, 33.72% and 60.24%, respectively, and those in the third-line group were 11.48%, 26.23% and 49.18%, which were higher than those of the control group of 0.00%, 2.70% and 0.00%; The rate of reaching MMR within 12 months of treatment in the second-line group was higher than that of the third-line group, and the differences was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of reaching MCyR between the second-line group and the third-line group at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the rate of reaching MMR at 3 and 6 months (P>0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting among the three main non-hematological adverse reactions, and the incidence of grade 1~2 anemia among the hematological adverse reactions were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of rash, eyelid edema, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and neutropenia in the three groups (P>0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting and grade 1~2 anemia in the second-line group and the third-line group were higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in Sokal score, medication compliance, and hematological adverse reactions between the MMR group and the non-MMR group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that dose reduction or withdrawal during the treatment period, and grade 3~4 hematological adverse reactions were the main factors affecting the second and third line curative effects (OR=22.160, 2.715, 95% CI=2.795-93.027, 1.882-48.834). CONCLUSION The second-line nilotinib and the third-line dasatinib have a better effect on CML patients who have failed the first and second-line treatments. Grade 3~4 hematological adverse reactions, dose reduction or withdrawal are risk factors that affect the efficacy of second and third-line treatments.
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Dasatinib/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

Lung cancer is the sixth leading cause of death worldwide and one of the leading cause of death from malignant tumors. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation is a common mutation in NSCLC. For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as Gefitinib, Afatinib, Oxitinib and other targeted therapies have become the first-line treatment recommended by many guidelines, but many patients develop acquired drug resistance after about 1 year of medication. Patients with drug resistance will have earlier disease progression than patients without drug resistance, which has an important impact on the prognosis of patients. At present, the main treatment for patients with acquired resistance is new target inhibition for resistant mutation. For example, if patients with T790M mutation are resistant to the first or second generation drugs such as Gefitinb and Afatinib, they can be treated with the third generation drugs (Osimertinib or Almonertinib), which can delay the progression of the disease. Therefore, the study of drug resistance mechanism and treatment of drug resistance patients are essential. This paper mainly reviews targeted therapy and drug resistance mechanism of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, in order to provide reference for clinical application of EGFR-TKIs.
.
Acrylamides ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology* ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics* ; ErbB Receptors/genetics* ; Genes, erbB-1 ; Humans ; Indoles ; Lung Neoplasms/pathology* ; Mutation ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Pyrimidines

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with PV treated with ruxolitinib in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The starting dose of oral ruxolitinib was 10 mg twice daily and could be increased after 3 months of treatment if hematocrit (HCT) control was not achieved. HCT control was defined as HCT<45% in the absence of phlebotomy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (17 males and 16 females) were treated with ruxolitinib at a median age of 50 (21-72) years. JAK2V617F and JAK2exon12 alleles were detected in 31 and 2 patients, respectively. Before treatment, median hemoglobin level was 187 (166-208) g/L, median white blood cell and platelet level was 10.4 (5.0-15.8)×10⁹/L and 457(237-677)×10⁹/L, respectively. Totally 17 patients (51.5%) who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea were treated with ruxolitinib as second-line therapy, and 16 patients (48.5%) were treated with ruxolitinib as first-line therapy voluntarily. The median time since PV diagnosis to treatment of ruxolitinib was 47 (3-188) months. By December 31, 2019, all the patients continued to receive ruxolitinib. The median duration of ruxolitinib exposure was 19 (2-91) months. Both in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group, 15 cases (accounting for 93.8% and 88.2%, respecitvely) achieved HCT control. The median time from start of therapy to HCT control was 2.2 (0.8-11.6) months. One patient (3.0%) had disease progression after HCT control. The most common hematologic adverse events included anemia and thrombocytopenia, according to CTCAE classification, including 1 case of grade 1 anemia (3.0%) and 1 case of grade 2 thrombocytopenia (3.0%). There was no thromboembolic event occurred during the therapy of ruxolitinib. CONCLUSION The remission rate of HCT in PV patients treated with ruxolitinib is high, and adverse reactions are rare. Ruxolitinib is effective in HCT control and generally well tolerated in patients with PV.
Adult ; Aged ; Anemia ; Female ; Hemoglobins/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Hydroxyurea/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nitriles ; Polycythemia Vera/drug therapy* ; Pyrazoles ; Pyrimidines ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombocytopenia ; Young Adult