1.Economic evaluation of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, versus permethrin, in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine setting
Rowena F. Genuino ; Mac Ardy J. Gloria ; Clarence Pio Rey S. Yacapin ; Maria Christina Filomena R. Batac ; Fernando B. Garcia jr. ; Francis R. Capule ; Mary Ann J. Ladia ; Malaya P. Santos ; Ailyn M. Yabes ; Ma. Stephanie Fay S. Cagayan
Acta Medica Philippina 2025;59(1):18-40
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies.
METHODSWe used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty.
RESULTSIvermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.
CONCLUSIONBoth ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.
Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Cost-benefit Analysis ; Cost-effectiveness Analysis
2.A randomized controlled trial comparing 1% permethrin shampoo versus 5% permethrin lotion for treating scabies in adults
Deannie Mae R. Loreto ; Bernadette Chua-macrohon
Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2025;29(2):47-53
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE
Scabies, caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is a highly contagious condition with significant public health implications. Standard treatments for scabies can be expensive, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of 1% permethrin shampoo compared to the standard 5% permethrin lotion in treating scabies, assessing Total Lesion Count (TLC), Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS), clinical response, adverse events, and treatment acceptability.
METHODOLOGYThis is an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in Barangay Malagutay, Zamboanga City, Philippines, involving 28 participants (14 per group). After dermatologic confirmation of diagnosis and a skin irritation test, participants were randomly assigned to receive either 5% permethrin lotion or 1% permethrin shampoo. Outcome measurements included Total Lesion Count (TLC) and SIRS, which evaluated erythema, crusting, purulence, itching, and pain. These were assessed on Days 0, 3, and 7. Clinical response, treatment acceptability, and adverse events were also monitored throughout the 7-day study period.
RESULTSResults showed both treatments were effective with comparable outcomes on Day 3. Improvement in lesions, SIRS-erythema, crusting, purulence, pain, and itching was observed for both groups from Day 0 to Day 7. No significant difference was noted between the groups (p > 0.05) on Day 3. Both 1% and 5% permethrin treatments showed complete symptom resolution by Day 7, achieving 100% treatment success with 1% permethrin shampoo and 93% with the 5% permethrin lotion.
CONCLUSION1% permethrin shampoo offers effective treatment for scabies, with comparable efficacy to 5% permethrin lotion.
Human ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Scabies ; Permethrin ; Dermatology
3.Comparative effectiveness of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin, and its combination, in the treatment of scabies
Rowena F. Genuino ; Ma. Christina Filomena R. Batac ; Malaya P. Santos ; Ma. Stephanie Fay S. Cagayan
Journal of the Philippine Dermatological Society 2024;33(Suppl 1):34-35
BACKGROUND
Scabies, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is a prevalent and burdensome skin disease in the Philippines, ranking second in disability. Recognized as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) by the WHO, scabies management is targeted for inclusion in universal healthcare programs worldwide by 2030. Current treatment involves topical neurotoxic drugs like permethrin, but issues such as expense and inconvenience hinder compliance. Oral ivermectin, recommended by the WHO only recently, is more cost-effective and easier to administer but is considered a second-line option in clinical practice guidelines. This research aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with topical permethrin, versus topical permethrin alone, in the treatment of classic scabies among Filipino patients.
METHODSThis 4-part study was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023 and aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin alone or in combination with topical permethrin versus topical permethrin alone for treating classic scabies among Filipino patients. Quantitative methods included a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a pharmacoeconomic evaluation using decision tree modeling. Qualitative methods involved a multiple case study of patient experiences and perceptions and in-depth interviews with physicians.
RESULTSThere seems to be comparable efficacy between oral ivermectin and permethrin, with limited evidence favoring the combination ivermectin/permethrin regimen. Adverse events were minor, and cost-effectiveness analyses favored ivermectin-based regimens over permethrin. Patient and physician perspectives supported the effectiveness of all treatments, with oral ivermectin recognized as safe but underutilized.
CONCLUSIONEvidence synthesis suggests that oral ivermectin, especially in combination with permethrin, could be a viable and cost-effective alternative for scabies treatment in the Philippines. The optimal dosing regimen, safety in specific populations, and factors influencing treatment choice need further exploration. Recommendations include advocating for oral ivermectin inclusion in regulatory guidelines and national formulary, considering it as a first- or second- line treatment, and conducting further research, including mixed-methods designs, to confirm efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in different settings. Shared decision-making, considering ethical, logistical, socioeconomic, and psychological aspects, is crucial in implementing effective scabies control programs.
Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Scabies
4.Economic evaluation of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, versus permethrin, in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine Setting
Rowena F. Genuino ; Mac Ardy J. Gloria ; Clarence Pio Rey S. Yacapin ; Maria Christina Filomena R. Batac ; Fernando B. Garcia Jr. ; Francis R. Capule ; Mary Ann J. Ladia ; Malaya P. Santos ; Ailyn M. Yabes ; Ma. Stephanie Fay S. Cagayan
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(Early Access 2024):1-23
Background and Objective:
Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies.
Methods:
We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty.
Results:
Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.
Conclusion
Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.
Scabies
;
Ivermectin
;
Permethrin
;
Cost-Benefit Analysis
5.Understanding perceptions and experiences on acceptability of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin, and their combination in the treatment of adult Filipino patients with scabies: A multiple case study.
Rowena F. Genuino ; Ma. Christina Filomena R. Batac ; Alena Marie B. Mariano ; Ma. Carla E. Buenaflor ; Ma. Veronica Pia N. Arevalo ; Francis R. Capule ; Fernando B. Garcia Jr. ; Mary Ann J. Ladia ; Malaya P. Santos ; Ailyn M. Yabes ; Maria Stephanie Fay S. Cagayan
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(17):24-41
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Oral ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug, alone or in combination with permethrin, may be a cheaper and more convenient alternative drug to topical permethrin alone in the treatment of classic scabies. There are no previous studies on the treatment acceptability of the three interventions among individual patients with scabies in the Philippines. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perceptions on treatment acceptability for oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or combination treatment among patients with scabies using the multiple-case study approach.
METHODSWe conducted a qualitative multiple case study among adult Filipino patients with classic scabies who were prescribed oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or its combination at a government tertiary hospital dermatology outpatient clinic from December 2022 to September 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary source of data and analyzed together with chart reviews, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and clinical images. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and triangulated with other secondary data. A three-person research team employed a reflexive and iterative process of familiarization, coding, and thematic analysis using a modified Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to generate case descriptions, within-case analyses, and cross-case syntheses.
RESULTSThe acceptability of scabies treatments (permethrin, ivermectin, and combination therapy) was generally positive. Permethrin, used in three patient cases, was generally perceived as effective but itch relief varied. The burden of whole-body application of permethrin was context-dependent, influenced by living arrangements and family support. Perceived affordability of permethrin was linked to socioeconomic status. Ivermectin, used by one patient case, was perceived as highly effective with no side effects. Its single dose use did not interfere with patient routine. Combination therapy was also considered effective but potential antagonistic effects and the cost of adding permethrin made it less preferred. Reluctance in taking oral pills was noted. All patients valued medical advice and deferred to their physicians for treatment decisions.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSAll three treatment options were considered effective and safe. Patients generally preferred permethrin over oral ivermectin due to its topical nature and perceived lower side effects. However, affordability and logistical challenges, especially for large households and low-income families, were noted with permethrin. Oral ivermectin elicited hesitation due to its controversial role in COVID-19 and veterinary use. Concerns about added costs and potential antagonism in combination therapy were raised. Despite these considerations, patients ultimately relied on physicians for treatment decisions. This study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives, experiences, and the patient-physician relationship in choosing scabies interventions. Addressing patient concerns, providing education, and ensuring ease of use and affordability can enhance treatment acceptability and adherence for better outcomes.
Human ; Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Case Study ; Case Reports ; Qualitative Research
6.Crusted scabies in a 35-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus
Arielle Joy Rosales ; Victoria P. Guillano
Journal of the Philippine Dermatological Society 2024;33(Suppl 1):14-14
Crusted scabies, characterized by hyperkeratosis and significant mite proliferation, is particularly prevalent in immunocompromised patients, such as those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This report presents a case of J.A., a 35-year-old female with SLE on prednisone and hydroxychloroquine, who developed pruritic erythematous papules on her palms and fingers. Over several months, these progressed to crusted hyperkeratotic plaques with fissures on her face, scalp, neck, and extremities.
Clinical evaluation revealed positive ink burrow tests and mineral oil preparation showing scabies mites and eggs. Histopathology confirmed the presence of intracorneal mites and scybala. Treatment involved permethrin 5% lotion applied daily for 14 hours over 7 days, followed by keratolytic soap and petroleum jelly twice weekly. Due to ivermectin unavailability, albendazole 400 mg was administered daily for three doses. Significant improvement was noted within two weeks.
Crusted scabies carries a high mite burden up to 4000 mites/gram of skin compared to 20 in typical scabies. The immunocompromised state in SLE patients, often marked by lower CD4+ counts and increased CD8+ T cells, lead to epidermal hyperproliferation. Early recognition and prompt combination treatment with permethrin and albendazole are essential for effective management. This case underscores the need for vigilance in diagnosing crusted scabies in patients with altered immune responses.
Human ; Female ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Albendazole ; Permethrin ; Scabies
7.Three cases of acute chlorfenapyr poisoning.
Ji Lai QU ; Hai Yan YAN ; Xue Chuang ZHU ; Yu Gui HAO
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2023;41(6):461-462
This paper reported 3 cases of poisoning caused by chlorfenagyr. Chlorfenapyr poisoning has gradually increased in clinical practice. The early stage after poisoning is digestive tract symptoms, followed by sweating, high fever, changes in consciousness, changes in myocardial enzymology, etc. Its main mechanism of intoxication is uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation. Since there is no specific antidote after poisoning, the fatality rate of chlorfenapyr poisoning remains high. The therapeutic measures are early gastrointestinal decontamination, symptomatic and supportive treatments, and early blood purification may be an effective treatment.
Humans
;
Pyrethrins
;
Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Insecticides
;
Poisoning/diagnosis*
8.A case of poisoning caused by intramuscular injection of esfenvalerate.
Jin LI ; Guang Min TANG ; Shi Zhao XIANG ; Ming Yang YANG ; Li YANG
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2023;41(3):225-227
Esfenvalerate is a kind of commonly used highly effective pyrethroid insecticide. It is common for people who are poisoned by contact or misuse, but rarely reported for people who are poisoned by intramuscular injection. This paper reports a case of intramuscular injection of esfenvalerate in the Department of Infection, West China Hospital of Sichuan University in November 2021. The patient was intramuscularly injected with about 20 ml of esfenvalerate, inducing the sense of swelling and tingling, degeneration and necrosis of striated muscle tissue at the injection site, also liver function damage and other manifestations. The patient was discharged from hospital after rehydration, accelerating poison metabolism, anti-infection, liver protection and local puncture.
Humans
;
Insecticides
;
Injections, Intramuscular
;
Pyrethrins
;
Nitriles/metabolism*
9.Surveillance on dengue vector Aedes albopictus in Ningbo City in 2021.
Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control 2023;35(4):379-382
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the density, distribution and insecticide resistance of Aedes albopictus in Ningbo City in 2021, so as to provide insights into formulation of dengue fever control strategies.
METHODS:
Four administrative villages were randomly selected from each county (district) in Ningbo City from April to November, 2021, to investigate the indoor population density of Aedes larvae, and the Breteau index (BI) was calculated. The population density of adult mosquitoes was investigated in residential areas, parks/bamboo forests, waste tire stacking sites/waste stations/construction sites in each county (district). On June 2021, larvae of the natural strain A. albopictus were collected from epidemic sites of dengue fever in Ningbo City in 2018, and raised in laboratory. Then, larvae and female mosquitoes without blood feeding were selected for insecticide resistance bioassays, while insecticide-sensitive strains of A. albopictus served as controls. The resistance of A. albopictus larvae to deltamethrin, beta-cypermethrin, propoxur, temephos and dichlorvos using the impregnation method, and the medium lethal concentration (LC50) and resistance ratio (RR) were calculated. The resistance of adult A. albopictus to beta-cypermethrin, permethrin, deltamethrin, propoxur and malathion was determined using the tube bioassay, and the mosquito mortality was calculated.
RESULTS:
A total of 10 072 small water containers from 9 935 households were investigated in Ningbo City in 2021, and there were 1 276 containers with Aedes larvae detected, with an average BI of 12.89. Totally 1 422 mosquito nets were allocated and 954 female A. albopictus were captured, with an average net trapping index of 1.34 mosquitoes/(net·hour). Both larval and adult A. albopictus mosquitoes were found from April to November, and the density of larval A. albopictus peaked in September (BI = 21.21), while the density of adult A. albopictus peaked in August, with a net trapping index of 2.38 mosquitoes/(net·hour). The LC50 values of delta-methrin, beta-cypermethrin, propoxur, temephos and dichlorvos were 0.017 4, 0.000 9, 0.364 1, 0.038 1 mg/L and 0.001 6 mg/L against larvae of natural strains of A. albopicchus, with RRs of 49.66, 25.53, 9.65, 2.24 and 6.06, and the mortality rates of adult mosquitoes were 66.00% (66/100), 69.39% (68/98), 25.00% (25/100), 98.97% (96/97) and 100.00% (98/98) 24 hours post-treatment with 0.08% beta-cypermethrin, 0.03% deltamethrin, 0.4% permethrin, 0.05% propoxur, and 0.5% malathion for 24 h, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
A. albopictus is widely distributed in Ningbo City, with a high population density and presents high-level resistance to common pyrethroid insecticides. The population density and insecticide resistance of A. albopictus requires to be reinforced.
Animals
;
Female
;
Malathion
;
Temefos
;
Aedes
;
Propoxur
;
Permethrin
;
Dichlorvos
;
Mosquito Vectors
;
Larva
;
Dengue/prevention & control*
10.Simultaneous quantification of pyrethroid metabolites in urine of non-toilet-trained children in Japan.
Jun UEYAMA ; Yuki ITO ; Risa HAMADA ; Naoko OYA ; Sayaka KATO ; Taro MATSUKI ; Hazuki TAMADA ; Kayo KANEKO ; Shinji SAITOH ; Mayumi SUGIURA-OGASAWARA ; Takeshi EBARA ; Michihiro KAMIJIMA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2022;27(0):25-25
BACKGROUND:
Pyrethroid (PYR) insecticides are widely used for controlling various pests. There are two types that differ in terms of usage: agricultural-purpose PYR (agriculture-PYR) and hygiene purpose PYR (hygiene-PYRs). Few studies exist on the exposure to these chemicals in small children. In this study, we conducted biomonitoring of urinary pyrethroid metabolites in 1.5-year-old children throughout the year.
METHODS:
Study subjects were 1075 children participating in an Aichi regional sub-cohort of the Japan Environment and Children's Study as of 18-month health check-up. The concentrations of four specific hygiene-PYR metabolites including 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-1,4-benzenedimethanol (HOCH2-FB-Al), and five common metabolites of hygiene- and agriculture-PYRs including 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3PBA) and cis- and trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (DCCA), were measured in urine samples extracted from soiled diapers using a triple quadrupole gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer.
RESULTS:
The highest detection frequencies were for 3PBA, followed by DCCA, 1R-trans-chrysanthemum dicarboxylic acid, and HOCH2-FB-Al. Among the six metabolites, urinary concentrations were seasonally varied. However, this variation was not observed in the most studied PYR metabolite, 3PBA. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between FB-Al and DCCA (r = 0.56) and HOCH2-FB-Al and 4-methoxymethyl-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzyl alcohol (r = 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS
This biomonitoring survey found widespread and seasonally specific exposure to multiple hygiene- and agriculture-PYRs in 1.5-year-old Japanese children.
Agriculture
;
Child, Preschool
;
Environmental Exposure/analysis*
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Insecticides
;
Japan
;
Mass Spectrometry
;
Pyrethrins/urine*


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail