Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background/Aims: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways. Methods: This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75% pred). Results: Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25–75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

Background/Aims: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways. Methods: This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75% pred). Results: Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25–75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

Background/Aims: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways. Methods: This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75% pred). Results: Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25–75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

Background/Aims: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways. Methods: This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75% pred). Results: Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25–75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

Background/Aims: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways. Methods: This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75% pred). Results: Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25–75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

Purpose: In Korea, KoKo dosimetry and Aerosol Provocation System (APS) are used in the methacholine provocation test (MBPT). In this study, three protocols of the MBPT were compared. Methods: In patients showing a positive MBPT using short 2-concentration methods for APS with cumulative provocative doses of methacholine which results in a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1) (PD20) ≤ 962.81, the MBPT was repeated, using 14-breaths methods for APS. In them, PD20 of those 2 protocols were compared to each other. Provocative concentration of methacholine which results in a 20% fall in FEV 1 (PC20) in 14-breaths methods was also compared with that of 5-breaths methods in other patients showing a positive MBPT with KoKo dosimettry during the study period. Results: The positive rate in short 2-concentration methods was 18.1% (43 of 238), while that in 5-breaths methods was 14.0% (6 of 43). They were not different from each other (P= 0.342). In 7 patients who underwent the MBPT twice, using short 2-concentration and subsequent 14-breaths methods. The median of PD20 with a positive MBPT using short 2-concentration methods was 573.8 μg with interquartile range (IQR) of 147.8–682.3 μg, whereas that in repeated MBPT using 14-breaths methods was 526.4 μg (IQR, 95.0– 907.1 μg). They did not differ from each other (P= 0.735). The median of PC20 in MBPT using 14-breaths methods was 4.76 mg/mL (IQR, 0.066–10.3 mg/mL) tended to be higher than that in other 6 patients who showed a positive MBPT using 5-breaths methods, 1.95 mg/mL (IQR, 0.42–4.85 mg/mL), but it was not significant (P = 0.534). Conclusion Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was not different in 3 protocols of MBPT.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the environmental measures and healthcare service utilization against laboratory animal allergy (LAA) in Korea. Methods: A total of 213 subjects who attended the 2018 Korean Association for Laboratory Animal Science Annual Symposium were enrolled in the study. The participants were given questionnaires on work practice controls, environmental measures, and healthcare service utilization for LAA, and underwent skin prick tests with mouse and rat epithelial allergens. Those parameters were compared between the LAA and non-LAA groups. Results: The LAA group more frequently minimized the time of exposure to all laboratory animals, frequency of exposure to allergic laboratory animals, and exposure time to allergic laboratory animals than the non-LAA group (22.9% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.003; 12.9% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.001; 14.3% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). However, in the LAA group, wet preparation before shaving was performed less frequently (10.0% vs. 21.7%, P< 0.025), so was animal handling permission only at LAA-preventing facilities (2.9% vs. 11.9%, P < 0.030). Over 30% of the LAA group was referred to the physicians. Meanwhile, about half of them did not use any healthcare service for LAA. Conclusion Korean laboratory researchers with LAA tried to reduce exposure to allergic laboratory animals. However, they missed some potentially critical points, with half of them not using healthcare services for LAA. Further efforts are warranted to focus on the nationwide surveillance, prevention, and control for LAA in Korea.

Background: Optimizing endotracheal tube (ETT) shape is important for successful videolaryngoscope-aided intubation. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the tube-handling time between a C-curved and hockey stick-shaped stylet in infants and neonates using the C-MAC® videolaryngoscope Miller blade. Methods: A total of 110 infants (age < 1 year) were randomly assigned to either the hockey stick-curved stylet group (group H, n = 53) or the C-curved stylet group (group C, n = 57). The primary outcome was tube handling time after glottis visualization and the secondary outcomes were the total intubation time, incidence of successful intubation, initial tube tip location at the laryngeal inlet, and numerical rating scale for ease of intubation. Results: Tube insertion time and total intubation duration (both in seconds) were significantly shorter in group C than in group H (13.3 ± 8.9 vs. 25.1 ± 27.0, P = 0.002; 19.9 ± 9.4 vs. 32.8 ± 27.1, P = 0.001, respectively). Group C displayed a higher rate of intubation success within 30 s than group H (87.7% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.029). The initial tube tip was located at the center in 34 children in group C (59.6%) and 12 children in group H (26.1%, P < 0.001). Laryngoscope operators rated intubation as easier when provided with a C-curved stylet. Conclusions In neonates and infants, modification of the ETT shape into a C-curve may reduce tube handling time compared to the conventional hockey stick-shaped tube during intubation using a C-MAC® video laryngoscope Miller blade.