Academic publishing is at a critical juncture. The challenges faced by the academics are mired in controversy. Among theseare three hotly debated concerns. First is the issue of whether technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI)improves research efficiency or if its use sacrifices research integrity.Another is the controversy between paywall publishingand open access. Lastly, adapting an appropriate business model for sustainability is a contentious issue and the choice betweena commercial or a university-based publishing platform is a difficult one.

Traditional models of scientific investigation relied on tedious intellectual calisthenics in all aspects of research —identifying research gaps, reviewing of published literature, devising valid methodology, collecting data, analysing results, and,finally, drawing conclusions. With the advent of powerful tools employing artificial intelligence, these heavy tasks are efficientlycarried out. The dilemma lies in determining which parts of the work can be attributed to the authors and which are ascribedto the output of large language models (LLMs) and other automated assistance employed.Despite requiring adequate vettingby experts of these AI-aided output, many in the scientific community still question these methods. Can research employingAI be considered honest work? Will full disclosure answer doubts as to the integrity of the scientific work?

Indeed, LLMs just gather information that is already out there, albeit more efficiently. After all, science progresses bystanding on the shoulder of giants. AI makes such work comprehensive and efficient. Standing on those proverbial shoulders,however, require access to prior work, hence our next challenge in academic publishing--open access versus paid access.Paywalls limit the benefits of valuable research to institutions and universities with the capacity to pay. Excluded from these arethose from low resourced countries, with nations from the global south being affected disproportionately. Additionally, whilenumerous authors appreciate the features of open access as it improves their impact and visibility, many feel unduly burdenedsince the cost of publishing in this format is passed on to them.

This brings us to our third issue: who bears the cost of academic publishing? Indeed, it is a lucrative industry, generatingan annual revenue of US$19 billion and an estimated 40 percent profit margin. Many, however, find fault in this businessmodel as concerns about the profit motives of the commercial publishers far overshadow their sustainability goals.

How do we navigate this landscape of controversies? We, at the ACTA, as part of the community of scholars, would needto clarify our mission. Our goals for this publication should be consistent with our values. These values, such as scientific rigor,integrity, and accountability, should be reflected in our policies. We should be cognizant of the role we play in national scientificdiscourse while we endeavor to make an impact in the global scene. We are accountable to our stakeholders — nurturingearly career scholars, supplying evidence to health policymakers, and being accountable to those who provide resources tosustain us. This stewardship is essential so that ACTA will stand shoulder to shoulder with the giants on which science buildsupon to benefit future generations.

Artificial Intelligence ; Commerce ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; Disclosure ; Drawing ; Efficiency ; Family Characteristics ; Forecasting ; Goals ; Gymnastics ; Health ; Health Resources ; Industry ; Intelligence ; Inventions ; Language ; Literature ; Methods ; Play And Playthings ; Policy ; Publications ; Publishing ; Research ; Residence Characteristics ; Role ; Science ; Shoulder ; Social Responsibility ; Universities ; Ursidae ; Volition ; Work ; World Health Organization

Scientific publishing faces growing challenges from rapid technological change, artificial intelligence (AI), research integrity concerns, and resource limitations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Editors, authors, and peer reviewers must navigate increasingly complex editorial requirements while operating within constrained institutional and financial environments. The emergence of AI-generated content and fabricated citations further threatens scholarly integrity and adds to editorial burdens. The unique challenges confronting regional journals necessitate strengthening editorial capacity, ethical governance, reviewer competency, and requires collaborative effort to sustain scientific publication that is relevant to the region.

Artificial Intelligence ; Peer Review ; Publishing ; Research ; Editorial ; Publications

Scientific publishing faces growing challenges from rapid technological change, artificial intelligence (AI), research integrity concerns, and resource limitations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Editors, authors, and peer reviewers must navigate increasingly complex editorial requirements while operating within constrained institutional and financial environments. The emergence of AI-generated content and fabricated citations further threatens scholarly integrity and adds to editorial burdens. The unique challenges confronting regional journals necessitate strengthening editorial capacity, ethical governance, reviewer competency, and requires collaborative effort to sustain scientific publication that is relevant to the region.

Artificial Intelligence ; Peer Review ; Publishing ; Research ; Editorial ; Publications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Mouth retractors are essential in ensuring efficient yet safe exposure of the oral cavity and oropharynx. However, when applied improperly or haphazardly, retractors can cause tissue injuries and compromise patient safety. In addition, there are gaps in the usability of existing designs. This study aimed to identify the issues encountered by otorhinolaryngology surgeons in the use of commercially available mouth retractors, design and fabricate an improved retractor, and explore the use of additive manufacturing (popularly known as 3D printing) for retractor prototyping.

METHODS

The study used the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Design Control as its framework. End-user requirements from otorhinolaryngologists were collected through key informant interviews. Results were organized into a Design Input template which was used to guide the design and development process. Prototype designs were iteratively created using computer-aided design software and 3D printing. Once design specifications were satisfied, a beta prototype was fabricated and given to another cohort of otorhinolaryngologists. The participants assessed the usability of the beta prototype. System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to quantify participant's feedback.

RESULTS

Five designs were created in the course of the study. The final prototype was fabricated using a Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer. Several features were developed to address user requirements. The primary modification was to make the retractor modular to facilitate easier and shorter mounting and assembly. Gingival injury was addressed with the replacement of the maxillary alveolus hook with support bars. Five participants evaluated the beta prototype which received a mean SUS score of 75, well above the 50th percentile threshold.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the applicability of the US FDA Design Control Process in the local setting to improve the mouth retractor design. Clinical and ergonomic issues were identified and design solutions were proposed and some have been implemented in a low-fidelity prototype. Results of the small-scale usability test suggest that the present form factor can be the basis for further iterations. Future studies can implement the proposed features to address other clinical and ergonomic needs.

Human ; 3d Printing ; Printing, Three-dimensional ; Devices, Medical ; Equipment And Supplies

Human ; Research ; Publishing ; Publications

Drug administration via hollow microneedles (HMN) have the advantages of painlessness, avoidance of first-pass effect, capability of sustained infusion, and no need for professional personnel operation. In addition, HMN can also be applied in the fields of body fluid extraction and biosensors, showing broad application prospects. However, traditional manufacturing technologies cannot meet the demand for low-cost mass production of HMN, limiting its widespread application. This paper reviews the main manufacturing technologies used for HMN in recent years, which include photolithography and etching, laser etching, sputtering and electroplating, micro-molding, three-dimensional (3D) printing and drawing lithography. It further analyzes the characteristics and limitations of existing manufacturing technologies and points out that the combination of various manufacturing technologies can improve production efficiency to a certain extent. In addition, this paper looks forward to the future trends of HMN manufacturing technology and proposes possible directions for its development. In conclusion, it is expected that this review can provide new ideas and references for follow-up research.
Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Needles ; Humans ; Drug Delivery Systems/methods* ; Equipment Design ; Microinjections/methods*

The three-dimensional (3D) printed bone tissue repair guide scaffold is considered a promising method for treating bone defect repair. In this experiment, chitosan (CS), sodium alginate (SA), and mineralized collagen (MC) were combined and 3D printed to form scaffolds. The experimental results showed that the printability of the scaffold was improved with the increase of chitosan concentration. Infrared spectroscopy analysis confirmed that the scaffold formed a cross-linked network through electrostatic interaction between chitosan and sodium alginate under acidic conditions, and X-ray diffraction results showed the presence of characteristic peaks of hydroxyapatite, indicating the incorporation of mineralized collagen into the scaffold system. In the in vitro collagen release experiments, a weakly alkaline environment was found to accelerate the release rate of collagen, and the release amount increased significantly with a lower concentration of chitosan. Cell experiments showed that scaffolds loaded with mineralized collagen could significantly promote cell proliferation activity and alkaline phosphatase expression. The subcutaneous implantation experiment further verified the biocompatibility of the material, and the implantation of printed scaffolds did not cause significant inflammatory reactions. Histological analysis showed no abnormal pathological changes in the surrounding tissues. Therefore, incorporating mineralized collagen into sodium alginate/chitosan scaffolds is believed to be a new tissue engineering and regeneration strategy for achieving enhanced osteogenic differentiation through the slow release of collagen.
Chitosan/chemistry* ; Alginates/chemistry* ; Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry* ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Osteogenesis ; Collagen/chemistry* ; Cell Differentiation ; Animals ; Tissue Engineering/methods* ; Cell Proliferation ; Biocompatible Materials ; Glucuronic Acid/chemistry* ; Hexuronic Acids/chemistry*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short-term effectiveness and safety of personalized three-dimensional (3D) printed customized prostheses in severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 8 patients with severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects and met the selection criteria between January 2023 and June 2024. There were 3 males and 5 females, with an average age of 64.6 years ranged from 56 to 73 years. All primary replacement prostheses were non-cemented, including 1 ceramic-ceramic interface, 1 ceramic-polyethylene interface, and 6 metal-polyethylene interfaces. The time from the primary replacement to the revision was 4 days to 18 years. The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening in 5 cases, revision after exclusion in 2 cases, and repeated dislocation in 1 case. The preoperative Harris score was 39.5±3.7 and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.1±0.8. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The hip function was evaluated by Harris score, and the degree of pain was evaluated by VAS score. The acetabular cup abduction angle, anteversion angle, rotational center height, greater trochanter height, and femoral offset were measured on X-ray film. RESULTS: The operation time was 95-223 minutes, with an average of 151.13 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 600-3 500 mL, with an average of 1 250.00 mL. The hospital stay was 13-20 days, with an average of 16.88 days. All 8 patients were followed up 2-12 months, with an average of 6.4 months. One patient had poor wound healing after operation, which healed well after active symptomatic treatment. One patient had lower limb intermuscular vein thrombosis, but no thrombosis was found at last follow-up. No serious complications such as aseptic loosening, infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture occurred during the follow-up. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 72.0±6.2 and the VAS score was 1.8±0.7, which were significantly different from those before operation ( t=-12.011, P<0.001; t=16.595, P<0.001). On the second day after operation, the acetabular cup abduction angle ranged from 40° to 49°, with an average of 44.18°, and the acetabular cup anteversion angle ranged from 19° to 26°, with an average of 21.36°, which were within the "Lewinneck safety zone". There was no significant difference in the rotational center height, greater trochanter height, and femoral offset between the healthy side and the affected side ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION The use of personalized 3D printed customized prostheses for the reconstruction of severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects can alleviate pain and enhances hip joint function, and have good postoperative prosthesis position, without serious complications and have good safety.
Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Acetabulum/surgery* ; Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Prosthesis Design ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation* ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the research progress of bioactive scaffolds in the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects. METHODS: Recent literature on bioactive scaffolds for the repair of osteoporotic bone defects was reviewed to summarize various types of bioactive scaffolds and their associated repair methods. RESULTS: The application of bioactive scaffolds provides a new idea for the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects. For example, calcium phosphate ceramics scaffolds, hydrogel scaffolds, three-dimensional (3D)-printed biological scaffolds, metal scaffolds, as well as polymer material scaffolds and bone organoids, have all demonstrated good bone repair-promoting effects. However, in the pathological bone microenvironment of osteoporosis, the function of single-material scaffolds to promote bone regeneration is insufficient. Therefore, the design of bioactive scaffolds must consider multiple factors, including material biocompatibility, mechanical properties, bioactivity, bone conductivity, and osteogenic induction. Furthermore, physical and chemical surface modifications, along with advanced biotechnological approaches, can help to improve the osteogenic microenvironment and promote the differentiation of bone cells. CONCLUSION With advancements in technology, the synergistic application of 3D bioprinting, bone organoids technologies, and advanced biotechnologies holds promise for providing more efficient bioactive scaffolds for the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects.
Humans ; Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry* ; Bone Regeneration ; Osteoporosis/therapy* ; Tissue Engineering/methods* ; Biocompatible Materials/chemistry* ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Calcium Phosphates/chemistry* ; Osteogenesis ; Ceramics ; Cell Differentiation ; Hydrogels ; Bioprinting ; Bone and Bones

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of digital three-dimensional (3D) printing osteotomy guide plate assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with femoral internal implants. METHODS: The clinical data of 55 KOA patients who met the selection criteria between July 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases combined with femoral implants were treated with digital 3D printing osteotomy guide plate assisted TKA (guide plate group), and 29 cases were treated with conventional TKA (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, Kellgren-Lawrence classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, knee range of motion, and other baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative first ambulation time, surgical complications; VAS score, knee HSS score, knee range of motion before operation, at 1 week and 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up; distal femoral lateral angle, proximal tibial medial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle and other imaging indicators at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative first ambulation time in the guide plate group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05). In the control group, there were 1 case of incision rupture and bleeding and 1 case of lower limb intermuscular venous thrombosis, which was cured after symptomatic treatment. There was no complication such as neurovascular injury, incision infection, or knee prosthesis loosening in both groups. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 16.25 months. The VAS score, HSS score, and knee range of motion improved at each time point after operation in both groups, and further improved with time after operation, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). The above indicators in the guide plate group were significantly better than those in the control group at 1 week and 3 months after operation ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the distal femoral lateral angle, the proximal tibial medial angle, and the hip-knee-ankle angle in the guide plate group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION The application of digital 3D printing osteotomy guide plate assisted TKA in the treatment of KOA patients with femoral implants can simplify the surgical procedures, overcome limitations of conventional osteotomy guides, reduce surgical trauma, achieve individualized and precise osteotomy, and effectively restore lower limb alignment and knee joint function.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation* ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery* ; Osteotomy/instrumentation* ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Femur/surgery* ; Middle Aged ; Bone Plates ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods* ; Knee Prosthesis ; Knee Joint/surgery* ; Operative Time