BACKGROUND: With the development of traditional Chinese medicine research, berberine has shown good efficacy and safety in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy containing berberine, amoxicillin, and vonoprazan for the initial treatment of H. pylori. METHODS: This study was a single-center, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with H. pylori infection were randomly (1:1:1) assigned to receive berberine triple therapy (berberine 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, vonoprazan 20 mg, A group), vonoprazan quadruple therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, colloidal bismuth tartrate 220 mg, B group), or rabeprazole quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 10 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, colloidal bismuth tartrate 220 mg, C group). The drugs were taken twice daily for 14 days. The main outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary outcomes were symptom improvement rate, patient compliance, and incidence of adverse events. Furthermore, factors affecting the eradication rate of H. pylori were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 300 H. pylori-infected patients were included in this study, and 263 patients completed the study. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed that the eradication rates of H. pylori in berberine triple therapy, vonoprazan quadruple therapy, and rabeprazole quadruple therapy were 70.0% (70/100), 77.0% (77/100), and 69.0% (69/100), respectively. The per-protocol (PP) analysis showed that the eradication rates of H. pylori in these three groups were 81.4% (70/86), 86.5% (77/89), and 78.4% (69/88), respectively. Both ITT analysis and PP analysis showed that the H. pylori eradication rate did not significantly differ among the three groups (P >0.05). In addition, the symptom improvement rate, overall adverse reaction rate, and patient compliance were similar among the three groups (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of berberine triple therapy for H. pylori initial treatment was comparable to that of vonoprazan quadruple therapy and rabeprazole quadruple therapy, and it was well tolerated. It could be used as one choice of H. pylori initial treatment.
Humans ; Amoxicillin/therapeutic use* ; Helicobacter pylori ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Clarithromycin/therapeutic use* ; Rabeprazole/therapeutic use* ; Berberine/therapeutic use* ; Bismuth ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Treatment Outcome ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Objective: To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose dual therapy compared with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for treating Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection in servicemen patients. Methods: A total of 160 H. pylori-infected, treatment-naive servicemen, including 74 men and 86 women, aged from 20 years to 74 years, with a mean (SD) age of 43 (13) years, tested in the First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 2022 to May 2022 were enrolled in this open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the 14-day high-dose dual therapy group and the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group. Eradication rates, adverse events, patient compliance, and drug costs were compared between the two groups. The t-test was used for continuous variables, and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. Results: No significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates were found between high-dose dual therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy by ITT, mITT and PP analysis[ITT:90.0% (95%CI 81.2%-95.6%) vs. 87.5% (95%CI 78.2%-93.8%), χ²=0.25, P=0.617;mITT:93.5% (95%CI 85.5%-97.9%) vs. 93.3% (95%CI 85.1%-97.8%), χ²<0.01, P=1.000; PP: 93.5% (95%CI 85.5%-97.9%) vs. 94.5% (95%CI 86.6%-98.5%), χ²<0.01, P=1.000 ]. The dual therapy group exhibited significantly less overall side effects compared with the quadruple therapy group [21.8% (17/78) vs. 38.5% (30/78), χ²=5.15,P=0.023]. There were no significant differences in the compliance rates between the two groups [98.7%(77/78) vs. 94.9%(74/78), χ²=0.83,P=0.363]. The cost of medications in the dual therapy was 32.0% lower compared with that in the quadruple therapy (472.10 RMB vs. 693.94 RMB). Conclusions: The dual regimen has a favorable effect on the eradication of H. pylori infection in servicemen patients. Based on the ITT analysis, the eradication rate of the dual regimen is grade B (90%, good). Additionally, it exhibited a lower incidence of adverse events, better compliance and significantly reduced cost. The dual regimen is expected to be a new choice for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection in servicemen but needs further evaluation.
Male ; Humans ; Female ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Helicobacter Infections ; Helicobacter pylori ; Bismuth ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Amoxicillin/adverse effects* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Treatment Outcome ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) has long been recommended for Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication in China. Meanwhile, in the latest national consensus in China, dual therapy (DT) comprising an acid suppressor and amoxicillin has also been recommended. In recent years, the eradication rate of H. pylori has reached >90% using DT, which has been used not only as a first-line treatment but also as a rescue treatment. Compared with BQT, DT has great potential for H. pylori eradication; however, it has some limitations. This review summarizes the development of DT and its application in H. pylori eradication. The H. pylori eradication rates of DT were comparable to or even higher than those of BQT or standard triple therapy, especially in the first-line treatment. The incidence of adverse events associated with DT was lower than that with other therapies. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the effects of dual and quadruple therapies on gastrointestinal microecology. In the short term, H. pylori eradication causes certain fluctuations in the gastrointestinal microbiota; however, in the long term, the gastrointestinal microbiota eventually returns to its normal state. In the penicillin-naïve population, patients receiving DT have a high eradiation rate, better compliance, lower incidence of adverse reactions, and lower primary and secondary resistance to amoxicillin. These findings suggest the safety, efficacy, and potential of DT for H. pylori eradication.
Humans ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology* ; Helicobacter pylori ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Amoxicillin/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

Humans ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Deprescriptions

INTRODUCTION: H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of gastric malignancies and peptic ulcer disease. First-line therapies include 14-day PAC (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin, clarithromycin) and PBMT (PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline). Second-line therapies include 14-day PBMT and PAL (PPI, amoxicillin, levofloxacin). This clinical audit examined current treatment outcomes in Singapore. METHODS: Clinical data of H. pylori-positive patientswho underwent empirical first- and second-line eradication therapies from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 were reviewed. Treatment success was determined by ¹³C urea breath test performed at least 4 weeks after treatment and 2 weeks off PPI. RESULTS: A total of 963 patients (862 PAC, 36 PMC [PPI, metronidazole, clarithromycin], 18 PBMT, 13 PBAC [PAC with bismuth], 34 others) and 98 patients (62 PMBT, 15 PAL, 21 others) received first-and second-line therapies respectively. A 14-day treatment duration was appropriately prescribed for first- and second-line therapies in 65.2% and 82.7% of patients, respectively. First-line treatment success rates were noted for PAC (seven-day: 76.9%, ten-day: 88.3%, 14-day: 92.0%), PMC (seven-day: 0, ten-day: 75.0%, 14-day: 69.8%), PBMT (ten-day: 100%, 14-day: 87.5%) and PBAC (14-day: 100%). 14-day treatment was superior to seven-day treatment (90.8% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.028). PAC was superior to PMC (P < 0.001) but similar to PBMT (P = 0.518) and PBAC (P = 0.288) in 14-day therapies. 14-day second-line PAL and PBMT had similar efficacy (90.9% vs. 82.4%; P = 0.674). CONCLUSION First-line empirical treatment using PAC, PBMT and PBAC for 14 days had similar efficacy. Success rates for second-line PBMT and PAL were similar.
Humans ; Helicobacter pylori ; Clarithromycin/therapeutic use* ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Metronidazole/therapeutic use* ; Bismuth/therapeutic use* ; Singapore ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Amoxicillin/therapeutic use* ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Clinical Audit

Gastric acid suppressants, such as proton pump inhibitors, are one of the most widey used drugs worldwide. There is a very high frequency of abuse of gastric acid suppressants, leading huge waste of medical resources. Moreover, numerous studies have showed that acid suppressants were associated with a variety of adverse events, such as fractures and intestinal infections. Increasing guidelines and consensuses have been made to guide the appropriate use of acid suppressants. Gastrointestinal surgery is one of the fields with the largest prescriptions of acid suppressants. Acid suppressants are widely used for preventing anastomotic bleeding after upper gastrointestinal surgery, treating gastrointestinal bleeding and etc. However, most of these prescriptions are off-label uses lacking adequate evidentiary basis. Thus far, there is no guideline specific for appropriate use of acid suppressants in digestive surgeries. Therefore, Chinese Society of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (CSUGS) and Chinese Gastric Cancer Association (CGCA) developed this clinical practice guideline based on the best research evidence and clinical expertise. The aim is to guide the appropriate use of gastric acid suppressants in gastrointestinal surgery, which in turn, increase the benefits of patients.
Humans ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Gastric Acid ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control* ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Objective: To produce the Chinese version of a new reflux symptom score (RSS) of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and to evaluate its reliability, validity and clinical value. Methods: This was a retrospective study which contained 42 healthy volunteers and 135 possible LPRD patients. RSI,RFS,oropharyngeal pH monitoring (Dx-pH monitoring) and RSS of each patient were performed. RSS was performed again after 1 week. Confirmed LPRD patients were treated with proton pump inhibitor for 8 week. And RSS was performed again after treatment. Reliability and validity of RSS were evaluated. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of RSS was 0.77, which indicated good internal reliability of the new score. The results of test-retest found all P values were less than 0.05, which supported good external reliability. Comparing RSS with laryngopharyngeal reflux test results, the diagnostic coincidence rate was 84.44% (114/135), and the positive predictive value was 85.71% (114/133), which showed good criterion validity. After 8 weeks treatment of PPI, RSS decreased significantly (pretreatment 84.79±42.50,posttreatment 20.11±22.82,t=-10.54, P<0.001), indicating good reactivity of RSS. The score of quality of life impact (Qol) in possible LPRD patients was obviously higher than that of healthy volunteers (t=7.15,P<0.001). All patients and volunteers believed that RSS was a good way to evaluate their symptoms. Conclusions: The new score RSS have good internal and external reliability, criterion validity and reactivity. RSS can be one of the important reference indexes to evaluate LPRD.
Humans ; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/diagnosis* ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; China

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to lessen symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the effects of PPI therapy on the gastrointestinal microbiota in GERD patients remain unclear. We examined the association between the PPI usage and the microbiota present in gastric mucosal and fecal samples from GERD patients and healthy controls (HCs) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. GERD patients taking PPIs were further divided into short-term and long-term PPI user groups. We showed that PPI administration lowered the relative bacterial diversity of the gastric microbiota in GERD patients. Compared to the non-PPI-user and HC groups, higher abundances of Planococcaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, and Sphingomonadaceae were found in the gastric microbiota from the PPI-user group. In addition, the Methylophilus genus was more highly abundant in the long-term PPI user group than in the short-term PPI-user group. Despite the absence of differences in alpha diversity, there were significant differences in the fecal bacterial composition of between GERD patients taking PPIs and those not taking PPIs. There was a higher abundance of Streptococcaceae, Veillonellaceae, Acidaminococcaceae, Micrococcaceae, and Flavobacteriaceae present in the fecal microbiota from the PPI-user group than those from the non-PPI-user and HC groups. Additionally, a significantly higher abundance of Ruminococcus was found in GERD patients on long-term PPI medication than that on short-term PPI medication. Our study indicates that PPI administration in patients with GERD has a significant effect on the abundance and structure of the gastric mucosal microbiota but only on the composition of the fecal microbiota.
Adult ; Aged ; Bacteria ; genetics ; isolation & purification ; Feces ; microbiology ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa ; microbiology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; drug effects ; Humans ; Male ; Microbiota ; Middle Aged ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S ; genetics

To investigate the efficacy of bismuth containing quadruple therapies on Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication in patients with history of antibiotic treatment. 
 Methods: Hp infected patients (n=327) were allocated into 3 groups. Group A (n=52), patients had no antibiotic history and they took medicine of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and livzon triple (clarithromycin, tinidazole, and bismuth); group B (n=80), patients had the antibiotic history except for amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and they were treated with PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and bismuth; group C (n=195), patients suffered failures of Hp therapy or with history of antibiotic abuse, and they were treated with PPI, doxycycline, furazolidone, and bismuth.
 Results: Both the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (group A 63.5%, group B 76.2%, group C 82.6%, P<0.05) and the pre-protocol (PP) analysis (group A 76.7%, group B 92.4%, group C 96.4%, P<0.05) showed significant difference among the 3 groups, revealing higher elimination in group B and C. The side-effects (20.2%) were mild and tolerable (group A, 28.0%; group B, 10.7%; group C, 22.0%).
 Conclusion: Proton pump inhibitors together with the livzon triple regimen have a low rate of Hp eradication and a higher incidence of adverse reactions. The quadruple therapy containing clarithromycin and metronidazole drugs can achieve the satisfactory outcomes based on patient's antibiotic history. For patients with multiple antibiotics, the quadruple therapy containing furazolidone and doxycycline may achieve the satisfactory outcomes, but the adverse resction would be relatively higher.
Amoxicillin ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Bismuth ; therapeutic use ; Clarithromycin ; therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; methods ; Furazolidone ; therapeutic use ; Helicobacter Infections ; drug therapy ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Metronidazole ; therapeutic use ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Tinidazole ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used drugs worldwide. PPI use has recently been linked to adverse changes in semen quality in healthy men; however, the effects of PPI use on semen parameters remain largely unknown specifically in cases with male factor infertility. We examined whether PPI use was associated with detrimental effects on semen parameters in a large population of subfertile men. We retrospectively reviewed data from 12 257 subfertile men who had visited our fertility clinic from 2003 to 2013. Patients who reported using any PPIs for >3 months before semen sample collection were included; 7698 subfertile men taking no medication served as controls. Data were gathered on patient age, medication use, and conventional semen parameters; patients taking any known spermatotoxic medication were excluded. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to test the effect of PPI use on semen parameters adjusting for age. A total of 248 patients (258 samples) used PPIs for at least 3 months before semen collection. In regression models, PPI use (either as the only medication or when used in combination with other nonspermatotoxic medications) was not associated with statistically significant changes in semen parameters. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to compare PPI use with semen parameters in subfertile men. Using PPIs was not associated with detrimental effects on semen quality in this retrospective study.
Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Humans ; Infertility, Male/epidemiology* ; Male ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Semen Analysis ; Sperm Count ; Sperm Motility/drug effects* ; Spermatozoa/drug effects*