Prostate cancer represents a prevalent malignancy within the male genitourinary system. In recent years, its incidence in China has gradually increased, becoming a significant public health issue. While early detection correlates strongly with improved prognosis, the majority of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in China are already in intermediate or advanced stages, precluding curative-intent interventions and contributing to marked survival disparities. The progression of prostate cancer is lengthy, typically encompassing diagnosis, treatment, progression, metastasis, and death, accompanied by a decline in quality of life. Personalized treatment plans should be developed based on the disease stage and patient preferences. In non-metastatic prostate cancer, where the tumor is confined to the prostate, surgery and radiotherapy are the primary treatments, supplemented by neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies to delay metastasis. For metastatic prostate cancer, systemic therapy is prioritized to prolong survival. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, controlling androgen levels is crucial, while treatment options for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer are relatively limited, necessitating individualized and precise treatment. During prostate cancer management, prostate-specific antigen levels are closely linked to prognosis and require monitoring. Bone metastasis, the most common site in prostate cancer patients, often triggers skeletal-related events, demanding effective prevention and management. Treatment-related adverse reactions are also a clinical challenge, requiring balanced risk-benefit assessments and judicious drug selection to preserve quality of life. Rapid advancements in screening technologies, surgical innovations, drug development, and China-specific epidemiological factors further complicate decision-making in holistic prostate cancer management. To optimize the standardization of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, the Genitourinary Oncology Committee of Chinese Anti-cancer Association synthesized global guidelines, clinical evidence and clinical expertise, and addressed critical challenges in the whole-course management of prostate cancer to formulate a multidisciplinary consensus. The expert consensus on whole-course management of prostate cancer (2025 edition) establishes standardized protocols to guide clinical practice, improve treatment outcomes, and enhance patient quality of life.
Humans ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Consensus ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood* ; Quality of Life ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology* ; China ; Bone Neoplasms/secondary* ; Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use*

We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of chromogranin A (CgA) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for citations published prior to September 2017 that described CgA and CRPC and performed a standard meta-analysis on survival outcomes. Our meta-analysis included eight eligible studies with 686 patients. The results were as follows: progression-free survival (PFS) was associated with CgA level (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-4.14, P = 0.0006); PFS was relative to CgA change (HR = 9.22, 95% CI: 3.03-28.05, P < 0.0001); and overall survival (OS) was relative to CgA level (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.15-1.87, P = 0.002). When we divided the patients into two groups according to therapy status, the result for OS relative to CgA level was an HR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.09-1.45, P = 0.001) in the first-line hormonal therapy group, and an HR of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.40-3.89, P = 0.001) in the second-line hormonal therapy or chemotherapy group. This meta-analysis indicated that a high CgA level had a negative influence on OS and PFS in CRPC patients. In addition, CRPC patients with a rising CgA had a shorter PFS. Further studies are needed to verify the prognostic value of CgA in CRPC.
Chromogranin A/analysis* ; Humans ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnosis* ; Reproducibility of Results ; Survival Analysis

Authors raised that staging based strategies and practice of integrative medicine (IM) by combining syndrome typing and disease identification, and choosing suitable measures in accordance with different persons and seasonal conditions after more than ten years' clinical practice and researches. Radical operation as prior (as evil eliminating) and strengthening vital qi in perioerative period are best strategy for promoting rapid rehabilitation of early stage prostate cancer patients. Strengthening body resistance to eliminate evil was used in treating advanced prostate cancer patients. For example, a comprehensive treatment program for hormone-dependent patients was combined with endocrinotherapy and Chinese herbs for synergisic efficacy-enhancing actions. In this way, these patients' quality of life (QOL) were improved and time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was delayed, even some patients were clinically cured. There are lack of effective medicines and methods for CRPC patients. Greatly tonifying original qi is mainly used for improving their clinical symptoms and prolonging survivals. Practice has proved staging based strategies and practice of IM has favorable advantages in treating prostate cancer, especially showing prospect in prolonging survival and postponing progression of advanced prostate cancer patients. Besides, it also could provide beneficial considerations and inspiration for combination of syndrome typing and disease identification.
Disease Progression ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant ; diagnosis ; Quality of Life

PURPOSE: To investigate predictors of progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 440 consecutive treatment-naive patients initially diagnosed with mPCa between August 2000 and June 2012. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA nadir, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, Visual Analogue Scale pain score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS), PSA response to hormone therapy, and metastatic sites were assessed. Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses were used to evaluate survivals and predictive variables of men with bone metastasis stratified according to the presence of pain, compared to men with visceral metastasis. RESULTS: Metastases were most often found in bone (75.4%), followed by lung (16.3%) and liver (8.3%) tissues. Bone metastasis, pain, and high BMI were associated with increased risks of progression to CRPC, and bone metastasis, pain, PSA nadir, and ECOG PS> or =1 were significant predictors of CSM. During the median follow-up of 32.0 (interquartile range 14.7-55.9) months, patients with bone metastasis with pain and patients with both bone and visceral metastases showed the worst median progression to CRPC-free and cancer-specific survivals, followed by men with bone metastasis without pain. Patients with visceral metastasis had the best median survivals. CONCLUSION: Metastatic spread and pain patterns confer different prognosis in patients with mPCa. Bone may serve as a crucial microenvironment in the development of CRPC and disease progression.
Aged ; Bone Neoplasms/secondary ; *Disease Progression ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Pain/diagnosis/etiology/prevention & control ; Pain Measurement ; Prognosis ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality/*pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality/*pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Treatment Outcome