Introuduction: Psychiatric symptoms such as depression and anxiety can have a strong impact on mental health status. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of stress, depression, and anxiety in relation to coping styles among university students. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic information, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)-21 and the Brief-Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) inventory was used. The collected data were analyzed, and descriptive statistics and correlational tests were applied in this study. Results: The majority of respondents were female (n=84). A total of 100 university students aged from 18-44 years old were included in the study. The students were pursuing either a bachelor (n=33), diploma (n=66) or master’s program (n=1). About 26% of the respondents had different grades of stress with 12%, 6% and 8% of respondents experiencing mild, moderate and severe degrees of stress respectively. The results also showed that 33% of the respondents had different grades of depression with 10%, 13%, 5% having mild, moderate and severe degrees of depression respectively. Another 5% had extremely severe depression. As many as 61% of the respondents had different grades of anxiety with mild (8%), moderate (25%), severe (9%) and extremely severe (19%) degrees of anxiety. Stress was associated with venting coping styles (r=0.287; p=0.004), behavioral disengagement (r=0.425; p<0.001) and self-blame (r=0.469; p<0.001). Depression correlated with behavioral disengagement (r=0.383; p<0.001) and self-blame (r=0.375; p<0.001) and correlated negatively with positive reframing (r=-0.221; p=0.027). Finally, anxiety had a significant relationship with behavioral disengagement (r=0.383; p<0.001) and self-blame (r=0.403; p<0.001). Conclusion Maladaptive coping styles such as venting, behavioral disengagement and self-blame have a significant impact on increased stress, anxiety and depression levels among university students.
Mental Disorders

This study aimed to assess the association between major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders and the quality of life of neurological disorder (brain tumour/brain disorder) patients. The study was conducted at Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Malaysia, a tertiary referral center hospital for neurological disorder patients. The cross-sectional study design was applied. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire were used in the study.A total of 100 neurological disorder patients were included in the study. The study found that the Major depressive disorder correlated with almost all domains of the quality of life, except the nausea and vomiting scores. Logistic regression showed that emotional functioning and pain were related to major depressive disorder. Different anxiety disorders also correlated with quality of life in specific domains. The leading anxiety disorders that associated mostly with quality-of-life scales were post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder lifetime and current, panic disorder with agoraphobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder and with agoraphobia current and social phobia current (p < 0.05). There is a significant relationship between psychiatric disorders and quality of life neurological disorder patients. Therefore treatment along with psychiatricintervention should be implemented to improve the overall curability of the neurological disorder patients.

Background: The paper examined the quality of life of haematological cancer patients according to their socio-demographic profiles and clinical diagnoses. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the tertiary referral centre of Ampang Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, involving 105 patients. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire was used to measure their quality of life. Results: The study involved patients diagnosed with all types of haematological cancer, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and multiple myeloma (MM), with a response rate of 83.3%. The patients with ALL, HL, without NHL, and without MM were younger than other patients. There were significant differences in quality of life scores in different socio-demographic groups and types of cancer diagnosis. The global quality of life of the female patients was much better than that of the male patients. Patients who were 40 years old or younger had a better global quality of life and physical functioning, as well as fewer symptoms of constipation, nausea, and vomiting. Employed patients were in less pain but showed greater impairments of cognitive function than did unemployed patients. Patients who earned a monthly wage of RM1000 or less had reduced physical function, more symptoms of pain, and more financial difficulties compared with patients who earned more. Patients with AML tended to have better physical functioning than did patients with MM, whose physical functioning was impaired. Comparatively, more symptoms of dyspnoea were found in ALL and HL patients than in other types of lymphoma. Compared with other patients, those with ALL had a greater loss of appetite, and other lymphoma patients had fewer symptoms of pain. Patients with NHL had impaired role functioning and more constipation compared with other patients. The results were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The quality of life of haematological cancer patients is affected by sociodemographic factors and clinical diagnoses. Efforts should be made to improve the overall quality of life of these patients.