BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) was introduced by the Department of Health through AO 2012-0029. This is anchored to WHO PEN, a prioritized set of cost-effective interventions that can be carried out to provide an acceptable standard of care at the primary health care level, even in low-resource settings. The study aims to evaluate the availability and adequacy of primary health care facilities in providing the PhilPEN package of interventions using the WHO assessment tool.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 25 randomly selected primary health care facilities in Metro Manila. Data were collected through structured interviews with facility staff and direct observation using a standardized questionnaire aligned with PhilPEN and WHO PEN guidelines. The tool assessed PhilPEN inputs (infrastructure, human resources, basic tools and equipment, essential medicines, record-keeping, financing) and services (risk assessment and screening, early diagnosis and monitoring, treatment and follow-up, counseling, referral of patients).

All facilities met the basic standards for infrastructure, human resources, record keeping, and financing. However, only 40% had all essential medicines, and just 16% had complete tools, including urine ketone/protein test strips. Risk assessment and patient counseling were consistently implemented, but early diagnosis and follow-up services were inconsistent due to training and supply gaps.

Primary health care centers in Metro Manila demonstrate partial readiness for PhilPEN implementation. Gaps in tools, medicines, and protocol availability should be addressed to optimize NCD service delivery.

Introduction: Insulin therapy is essential in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but is often associated with treatment burden, hypoglycemia, and potential overtreatment. Insulin deintensification is increasingly recommended for appropriately selected patients; however, there is limited real-world evidence to guide patient selection and to identify modifiable factors that influence successful insulin deintensification. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors, including modifiable factors, associated with successful insulin deintensification in a primary care setting. Methodology: A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted across seven government primary care clinics in the Petaling District. Adult patients with T2DM undergoing insulin deintensification were included. Successful insulin deintensification was defined as maintenance or improvement of hemoglobin A1c following insulin discontinuation, dose reduction, or reduction in injection frequency. Paired outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of successful insulin deintensification. Results: A total of 261 patients were included. Glycemic control remained stable following insulin deintensification (p = 0.334). Significant reductions in body weight (−0.41 kg, p = 0.012) and total daily insulin dose (23.1% reduction, p <0.001) were observed. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between groups. However, multivariable logistic regression identified SGLT-2 inhibitor use (aOR 3.23, 95% CI 1.28–8.18, p = 0.013) and regular SMBG (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.05–3.81, p = 0.035) as independent predictors of successful insulin deintensification. Conclusion Insulin deintensification can be successfully implemented without compromising glycemic control. Identified predictors, including modifiable factors such as SGLT-2 inhibitor use and SMBG, provide clinically actionable insights to guide patient selection and treatment optimization. These findings challenge the traditional reluctance toward insulin deintensification and support a more evidence-based and individualized approach in routine clinical practice.
Primary Health Care ; Insulins

Introduction: Insulin deintensification is an emerging strategy to reduce hypoglycemia and treatment burden in patients on multiple daily injection (MDI ≥3), with potential to improve adherence and glycemic control. However, evidence in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited. This study evaluated its effectiveness and identified factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control following deintensification among patients with poorly controlled T2DM attending Malaysian primary care. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 107 T2DM patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >9%, attending Enhanced Diabetic Clinic at Cheras Health Clinic between 2021 and 2025. All patients on basal-bolus insulin (BBI) underwent deintensification. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control (HbA1c <7.5%). Changes in HbA1c following deintensification were assessed using paired t-tests. Results: Overall, 50.5% of patients achieved adequate glycemic control. Hypoglycemia events (AOR 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–58.3; p = 0.015), MDI (AOR 9.6, 95% CI 1.4–67.1; p = 0.023) and Diabetes Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (DMTAC) visits (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0– 1.2; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with achieving HbA1c <7.5%. Conversely, patients transitioned from BBI to premixed regimens were less likely to achieve HbA1c <7.5% (AOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.93, p = 0.039). All insulin deintensification strategies were associated with significant HbA1c improvements with transitioned from BBI to premixed human insulin (mean difference -2.54%, 95% CI 1.77–3.31, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.09), BBI to premixed analogue insulin (mean difference -3.38%, 95% CI 2.26– 4.49, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.62), BBI to basal insulin (mean difference -3.67%, 95% CI 1.79–5.54, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 2.05). Conclusion Insulin deintensification is an effective strategy for improving glycemic control in poorly controlled T2DM. These findings highlight the importance of deintensification with careful consideration of hypoglycemia, MDI-related treatment burden, and patient engagement through regular DMTAC visits, which are integral to achieving optimal outcomes and support a personalized approach to diabetes management in primary care.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glycemic Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Primary Health Care ; Insulins

Palliative care has emerged as a crucial component of healthcare, particularly in the context of an aging population and the increasing prevalence of chronic and life-limiting illnesses. In the Philippines, however, access to palliative care remains significantly limited, especially in rural and underserved areas. This disparity is primarily driven by systemic challenges such as inadequate healthcare infrastructure, a shortage of trained professionals, and insufficient public awareness. While the inclusion of palliative care in the Universal Health Care (UHC) Act of 2019 (Republic Act No. 11223) reflects a progressive step toward addressing these needs, the implementation of comprehensive palliative services continues to face considerable hurdles. This paper advocated for the stronger integration of palliative care into primary health care systems at the barangay level, emphasizing the need to strengthen policy frameworks, ensure adequate resource allocation, and actively engage communities in this endeavor. Such efforts are essential to guaranteeing equitable, compassionate, and dignified care for all individuals, regardless of their stage of life or even socioeconomic status.

BACKGROUND

The Universal Health Care (UHC) Act of 2019 aims to improve health outcomes by strengthening primary care. The Konsulta outpatient benefit package is a key component of this reform. However, package availability does not guarantee utilization. Factors such as awareness, perceptions, and attitudes influence benefit use.

This study aimed to determine the awareness, perceptions, and attitudes regarding the Konsulta outpatient benefit package among working-age Filipino adults consulting at a tertiary government hospital.

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 218 respondents. The questionnaire covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, awareness, perceptions, and attitudes regarding Konsulta package. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistics.

Twenty-one percent (45/218) of Filipino adults were familiar with Konsulta package. Respondents who were aware of Konsulta were generally aged 51-59, female, unemployed, completed secondary education, lived in Metro Manila, diagnosed with chronic disease, and had previous PhilHealth benefit use. Konsulta facilities were found to be moderately accessible, and the package was reported to reduce out-of-pocket healthcare expenses and to be easy to avail with short waiting times. However, there were limitations in coverage of health services. Negative attitudes predominated among those who were aware of the package (29/45, 64%), particularly concerning program value and effectiveness.

Filipino adults consulting at the Philippine General Hospital-Family Medicine Clinic have low awareness level on PhilHealth Konsulta Package. It was perceived to reduce healthcare expenses and to be easy to avail with short waiting times, but limitations in accessibility and appropriateness were reported. Negative attitudes toward program value and effectiveness were identified.

Contraceptive Agents ; Health Personnel ; Primary Health Care ; Philippines

INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to determine the levels of self-care and health literacy (HL) and their associations among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted in a public primary care setting in Singapore. A total of 289 participants aged 21-80 years with hypertension were recruited. Self-care profiles were measured using the Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HTN-SCP; range 0-240, domain range 0-80). Health literacy was measured using the Short-Form Health Literacy Scale (HLS-SF12; range 0-50, limited literacy ≤33). RESULTS: The mean self-care score was 182.7 (standard deviation [SD] 23.2). The median HL score was 34.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.9-40.3), and 31.1% of participants had limited HL. Self-care was not associated with age, CKD status, household income and education, but was associated with gender and HL score. In the final regression model, lower HL scores (adjusted β = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 to 1.36, P < 0.001) and male gender (adjusted β = -5.29, 95% CI -10.56 to -0.03, P = 0.049) were associated with lower self-care scores. The HL scores were associated with self-care domains of self-efficacy (HL: β = 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.42, P < 0.001), motivation (HL: β = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.53, P < 0.001) and behaviour (HL: β = 0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Thirty-one percent of the participants had limited HL. Self-care was not associated with age, race, CKD status, household income or education. Male gender and limited HL were associated with lower self-care. Self-care was associated with self-efficacy, motivation and behaviour. Future research could focus on more targeted approaches to improve self-care and HL among patients with CKD.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Health Literacy ; Middle Aged ; Self Care ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Aged ; Adult ; Primary Health Care ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy* ; Singapore ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Aged, 80 and over ; Young Adult ; Hypertension/therapy*

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, patient complexity is increasing, intensifying the demand for well-resourced, coordinated care. A deeper understanding of the factors contributing to this complexity is essential for optimising resource allocation. This study evaluates the prevalence of complex care needs in Singapore's primary care settings and identifies the factors associated with these needs. METHOD: Using a qualitative study design, we developed a patient complexity questionnaire to assess how Singapore family physicians recognise patient complexity. Sixty-nine experienced primary care physicians applied this tool to assess patient encounters, categorising each as "routine care" (RC), "medically challenging" (MC), or "complex care" (CC). We compared the care needs across these categories and used mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to determine the independent predictors of complexity. RESULTS: Of the 4327 encounters evaluated, 15.0% were classified as CC, 18.5% as MC, and 66.4% as RC. In both CC and MC encounters, the most common medical challenges were polypharmacy (66.2% in CC, 44.9% in MC); poorly controlled chronic conditions (41.3% in CC, 24.5% in MC); and treatment interactions (34.4% in CC, 26.0% in MC). Non-medical issues frequently identified included low health literacy (32.6% in CC, 20.8% in MC); limited motivation for healthy lifestyle behaviours (27.2% in CC, 16.6% in MC); and the need for coordinated care with hospital specialists (24.7% in CC, 17.1% in MC). The top 3 independent predictors of complexity included mobility limitations requiring assistance (odds ratio [OR] for requiring wheelchair/trolley: 7.14 for CC vs RC, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.74-10.74); longer consultation times with physicians (OR for taking >20 minutes for doctor's consultation: 3.96 for CC vs RC, 95% CI 2.86-5.48); and low socioeconomic status (OR for living in 1- or 2-room HDB flats: 2.98 for CC vs RC, 95% CI 1.74-5.13). CONCLUSION High care needs, encompassing both CC and MC encounters, were prevalent in primary care interactions. These findings highlight that relying solely on chronic disease count is insufficient to capture the full spectrum of patient complexity.
Singapore/epidemiology* ; Humans ; Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Adult ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Prevalence ; Polypharmacy ; Qualitative Research ; Chronic Disease/therapy* ; Logistic Models

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the level of health system responsiveness of Rural Health Units (RHUs) in Cagayan Valley Region along seven domains of responsiveness namely dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, choice of provider, prompt attention, communication, and quality of basic amenities, and five core components of the health system namely health governance, health human resource, health information system, access to medicines and technology, and service delivery.

A cross-sectional research design was adopted using survey as the primary means of data collection using a researcher-developed questionnaire. The study was conducted in RHUs of 15 identified municipalities in the region. The municipalities were chosen based on their low performance in the LGU health score cards for 2019. A total of 618 clients and 235 health workers were included in the study. Frequency, percentage, and mean were used to analyze the profile and level of health system responsiveness. T test and one-way ANOVA were used to test significant differences.

The results showed that the RHUs included in the study have very good level of health system responsiveness, with overall percentage scores ranging from 73.55 to 88.08, in all domains assessed. However, choice of providers within the facilities (62.71%) and access to medicine and technology (77.45%) were the least responsive among all the identified domains. Significant differences in the clients’ assessment of the responsiveness of the RHUs were seen when grouped according to their sex, age, educational attainment, income level, overall level of health, frequency of visits, and distance of home to facility. The RHUs’ location, whether in an urban or rural area, number of staff, and number of barangays catered also were found to determine the level of health system responsiveness. Moreover, not all RHUs were able to comply with basic requirements of the Department of Health specifically along the services offered.

It can be concluded therefore that the RHUs, despite the limitations in certain aspects are still able to meet the expectations of the clients and health workers in the delivery of health services. However, in order to maximize responsiveness of these facilities, DOH requirements for these facilities should be met.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Primary care providers are key players in providing quality care to patients and advancing Universal Health Care (UHC). However, effective and quality healthcare delivery may be affected by inadequate knowledge and failure to adhere to evidence-based guidelines among providers. The Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS) is a five-year program that pilot tested interventions aimed at strengthening the primary care system in the country. Evidence-based training modules for healthcare providers were administered in Sorsogon and Bataan from the years 2018 to 2021. Module topics were selected based on common health conditions encountered by providers in rural and remote settings. This program aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of training in increasing provider knowledge.

A series of training workshops were conducted among 184 remote- and 210 rural-based primary care providers [nurses, midwives, barangay or village health workers (BHWs)]. They covered four modules: essential intrapartum and newborn care (EINC), integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI), non-communicable diseases (NCD), and geriatrics. A decision support system (UpToDate) was provided as a supplementary resource for all participants. We administered pre-tests and post-tests consisting of multiple-choice questions on common health conditions. Data was analyzed using paired one-tailed t-test, with an alpha of 0.05.

The knowledge of nurses, midwives, and BHWs improved after the training workshops were conducted. The largest increase from pre-test to post-test scores were observed among the midwives, with a mean difference (MD) of 32.9% (95% CI 23.9 to 41.9) on the EINC module, MD of 25.0% (95% CI 16.6 to 33.4) in the geriatrics module, and MD of 13.5% (95% CI 6.9 to 20.1) in the NCDs module. The nurses had the greatest improvement in the IMCI module (MD 10.8%, 95% CI 2.5 to 19.1). The knowledge of BHWs improved in all participated modules, with greatest improvement in the NCD module (MD 9.0%, 95% CI 5.77 to 12.14).

Primary care workshops, even if conducted as single-sessions and on a short-term basis, are effective in improving short-term knowledge of providers. However, this may not translate to long-term knowledge and application in practice. Furthermore, comparisons across provider categories cannot be made as participant composition for each training workshop varied. Ultimately, this study shows enhancing provider knowledge and competence in primary care will therefore require regular and diverse learning interventions and access to clinical decision support tools.