1.Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Mild Repetitive Head Injury in Awake Rats: Modeling the Human Experience and Clinical Condition.
Nicole BENS ; Arnold CHANG ; Richard ORTIZ ; Joshua LEASTON ; Praveen KULKARNI ; Rosemarie HIGHTOWER ; Sophia PROM ; Nicholas O'HARE ; Eno EBONG ; Craig F FERRIS
Neuroscience Bulletin 2025;41(9):1603-1616
Mild repetitive head injury is a serious health problem with long-term negative consequences. Changes in brain neurobiology were assessed with MRI in a model of head injury designed to reflect the human experience. Rats were maintained on a reverse light-dark cycle and head impacted daily at 24 h intervals over three days while fully awake under red light illumination. There was no neuroradiological evidence of brain damage. Rats were imaged for changes in blood brain barrier permeability, edema and gray matter microarchitecture, and resting state functional connectivity. Data were registered to a 3D MRI rat atlas with 173 segmented brain areas providing site-specific information on each imaging modality. Changes in BBB permeability were minimal and localized to the hippocampus and cerebellum. There was evidence of cytotoxic edema in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum. There was a global decrease in connectivity and an increase in gliosis in the thalamus, cerebellum, and hippocampus. This study shows a sequelae of neuropathology caused by mild repetitive head injury that is commonly observed in clinical practice using MRI in patients. As such, it may serve as a model for testing the efficacy of new therapeutics using any or all of the measures as biomarkers to assess drug efficacy.
Animals
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*
;
Disease Models, Animal
;
Brain/physiopathology*
;
Male
;
Rats
;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
;
Blood-Brain Barrier/diagnostic imaging*
;
Multimodal Imaging
;
Wakefulness/physiology*
;
Craniocerebral Trauma/physiopathology*
2.Optimising deformity correction: a retrospective comparative analysis of two techniques in high magnitude curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Arvind Gopalrao KULKARNI ; Priyambada KUMAR ; Thonangi YESHWANTH ; Sharvari GUNJOTIKAR ; Praveen GOPARAJU ; Yogesh Madhavrao ADBALWAD ; Aditya Raghavendra Sai Siva CHADALAVADA ; Arvind UMARANI ; Shankargouda PATIL
Asian Spine Journal 2024;18(6):794-802
Methods:
Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group).
Results:
The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group.
Conclusions
IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.
3.Optimising deformity correction: a retrospective comparative analysis of two techniques in high magnitude curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Arvind Gopalrao KULKARNI ; Priyambada KUMAR ; Thonangi YESHWANTH ; Sharvari GUNJOTIKAR ; Praveen GOPARAJU ; Yogesh Madhavrao ADBALWAD ; Aditya Raghavendra Sai Siva CHADALAVADA ; Arvind UMARANI ; Shankargouda PATIL
Asian Spine Journal 2024;18(6):794-802
Methods:
Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group).
Results:
The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group.
Conclusions
IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.
4.Optimising deformity correction: a retrospective comparative analysis of two techniques in high magnitude curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Arvind Gopalrao KULKARNI ; Priyambada KUMAR ; Thonangi YESHWANTH ; Sharvari GUNJOTIKAR ; Praveen GOPARAJU ; Yogesh Madhavrao ADBALWAD ; Aditya Raghavendra Sai Siva CHADALAVADA ; Arvind UMARANI ; Shankargouda PATIL
Asian Spine Journal 2024;18(6):794-802
Methods:
Twenty-four patients with AIS (Cobb >65°) underwent surgery at a single center between January 2014 and December 2021. The first 10 patients underwent surgery using only IOT (T group), whereas the subsequent 14 patients underwent surgery with a combination of IOT and PO (TP group).
Results:
The mean preoperative Cobb angles in the T and TP groups were 89.35°±6.05° and 92.32°±9.28°, respectively (p=0.59). The mean flexibility index (FI) of the T and TP groups were 0.31±0.016 and 0.36±0.03, respectively (p=0.41). The mean postoperative Cobb angle in the T and TP groups were 40.25°±5.95° and 19.1°±3.20°, respectively (p=0.041). Apical vertebral rotation improved from mean grade 3.2 (2–4) to grade 2.6 (1–3) in the T group and from mean grade 3.6 (2–4) to mean grade 1.8 (1–3) in the TP group. Postoperatively, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 13.84°±2.10° and 21.02°±1.68° in T and TP groups (p=0.044). Transient signal-loss intraoperatively was noted in two patients, one in each group. No episodes of postoperative neurological deficits were reported. No incidences of pseudarthrosis/implant-related complications were reported at the end of 2 years in either group.
Conclusions
IOT and PO complement one another and can be safely combined without an attributable risk of neurological injury.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail