No abstract available.
Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) — a combination of a P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor and aspirin — has revolutionized antithrombotic treatment. Potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit a strong and more consistent platelet inhibition when compared to clopidogrel. Therefore, ticagrelor and prasugrel significantly reduce ischemic events, but at an expense of an increased bleeding risk in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These observations have engaged intensive clinical research in alternative DAPT regimens to achieve sufficient platelet inhibition with an acceptable bleeding risk. Our review focusses on P2Y₁₂ receptor therapy de-escalation defined as a switch from a potent antiplatelet agent (ticagrelor or prasugrel) to clopidogrel. Recently, both unguided (platelet function testing independent) and guided (platelet function testing dependent) DAPT de-escalation strategies have been investigated in different clinical studies and both switching strategies could be possible options to prevent bleeding complications without increasing ischemic risk. In light of the still limited data currently available, future large-scale trials should accumulate more data on various DAPT de-escalation regimens with both ticagrelor and prasugrel in unguided and guided de-escalation approaches. In the current review we aim at summarizing and discussing the current evidence on this still emerging topic in the field of antiplatelet treatment.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Aspirin ; Blood Platelets ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride

No abstract available.
Intracranial Aneurysm* ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride*

Thromboembolism is one of the major complications of stent assisted coiling in treatment of cerebral aneurysm. Clopidogrel resistance is so common and prasugrel is more effective in its rapid and potent effect. We investigated changes in the value of P2Y12 resistance unit (PRU) when prasugrel was administered to patients with clopidogrel resistance. One hundred mg of aspirin and 75 mg of clopidogrel were administered for 5 days before the procedure, and PRU were examined. The resistance to clopidogrel was defined as the inhibition of PRU was less than 20%. PRU was re-examined after loading 20 mg of prasugrel. We treated 98 consecutive patients between January 2018 and July 2018, and 24 patients (24.5%) had resistance to clopidogrel. Nineteen patients were female. The mean PRU value at admission was 238.5±36.9 and the percentage inhibition value was 4.8±6.3%. After the use of prasugrel, the mean PRU and percentage inhibition values were measured as 124.9±49.9 and 48.0±19.24, respectively. All patients except one patient had a PRU inhibition value as a responder. There was no hemorrhage or thromboembolic complication during mean 1.5 months follow-up after embolization procedure. In conclusion, in patients resistant to clopidogrel, the low dose prasugrel seems to be effective in keeping the percentage inhibition value of PRU within the normal range in treatment of cerebral aneurysm. Further study will be needed to determine the optimal dose of prasugrel to enhance prevention effect of thromboembolism and to reduce hemorrhagic complications during stent assisted coiling.
Aspirin ; Drug Resistance ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm* ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride* ; Reference Values ; Stents ; Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the favorable efficacy of new antiplatelet agents demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, their clinical implications in Korea are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in antiplatelet agent use for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and their impact on 30-day clinical outcomes. METHODS: AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention between 2010 and 2015 were assessed using claim data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. RESULTS: The use of new antiplatelet agents has rapidly increased since 2013 and has been preferred over clopidogrel (Plavix; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals) since 2015. Both prasugrel (Effient; Eli Lilly and Company) (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–0.67; p < 0.001) and ticagrelor (Brilinta; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP) (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98; p=0.032) had an independent effect on lowering 30-day mortality in a weighted multivariable logistic regression model. However, new antiplatelet agents had no significant effect on other clinical outcomes including myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, and readmission within 30 days. CONCLUSION: The use of new antiplatelet agents is rapidly increasing, and they have been used more commonly than clopidogrel since 2015. We demonstrated that new antiplatelet agents have a favorable effect on reducing 30-day mortality in AMI patients in Korea.
Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Insurance, Health* ; Korea* ; Logistic Models ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction* ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors* ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride* ; Stroke

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) is imperative for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome, particularly during the re-endothelialization period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). When patients undergo surgery during this period, the consequences of stent thrombosis are far more serious than those of bleeding complications, except in cases of intracranial surgery. The recommendations for perioperative DAPT have changed with emerging evidence regarding the improved efficacy of non-first-generation drug (everolimus, zotarolimus)-eluting stents (DES). The mandatory interval of 1 year for elective surgery after DES implantation was shortened to 6 months (3 months if surgery cannot be further delayed). After this period, it is generally recommended that the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor be stopped for the amount of time necessary for platelet function recovery (clopidogrel 5–7 days, prasugrel 7–10 days, ticagrelor 3–5 days), and that aspirin be continued during the perioperative period. In emergent or urgent surgeries that cannot be delayed beyond the recommended period after PCI, proceeding to surgery with continued DAPT should be considered. For intracranial procedures or other selected surgeries in which increased bleeding risk may also be fatal, cessation of DAPT (possibly with continuation or minimized interruption [3–4 days] of aspirin) with bridge therapy using short-acting, reversible intravenous antiplatelet agents such as cangrelor (P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (tirofiban, eptifibatide) may be contemplated. Such a critical decision should be individually tailored based on consensus among the anesthesiologist, cardiologist, surgeon, and patient to minimize both ischemic and bleeding risks.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Aspirin ; Blood Platelets ; Consensus ; Glycoproteins ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Perioperative Period ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride ; Recovery of Function ; Stents ; Thrombosis

Stent thrombosis is a rare, but potentially catastrophic complication of stent implantation. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) is essential to minimize the risk of stent thrombosis in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding antiplatelet therapy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and bleeding. Here, we report a case of a 59-year-old man with acute stent thrombosis immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention combined with acute coronary syndrome and gastrointestinal bleeding.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Aspirin ; Blood Transfusion ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; Hemorrhage* ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Stents* ; Thrombosis* ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride

Stent thromboses due to multifactorial causes including hypercoagulable conditions and high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), which means a low response to anti-platelet therapy, especially clopidogrel. Prasugrel is a third generation thienopyridine and inactive pro-drug requiring metabolic activation in vivo, which improves the rate of HTPR with clopidogrel. This drug is mostly effective, with a potent, fast, and consistent anti-platelet action, but rare cases of inadequate platelet inhibition with prasugrel have been reported. Here we describe the case of a 47-year-old man who presented with a recurrent acute myocardial infarction and ST during an intravascular ultrasound pullback and was resistant to prasugrel, was successfully treated with ticagrelor.
Activation, Metabolic ; Blood Platelets ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride* ; Stents* ; Thrombosis* ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVETo investigate the impact of novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors including prasugrel or ticagrelor on platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and provide clinical data for novel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors use among Chinese patients.

METHODSBetween October 2011 to February 2014, 174 consecutive patients (135 males; (67.8±11.8) years old) with ACS undergoing PCI in Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau were prospectively enrolled in this study. Oral aspirin and one P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor were administered for 5 days or above after PCI, patients were divided into clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor groups in accordance with the agent administered. Platelet reactivity of the patients was detected by VerifyNow P2Y(12) reaction unit (PRU); and the high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and non-HPR were defined as PRU≥208 and PRU<208 respectively. Patients with HPR during clopidogrel therapy were switched either to prasugrel or ticagrelor, or continued the same treatment; and then the platelet reactivity was monitored again.

RESULTSThere were 113 clopidogrel cases (64.9%), 20 prasugrel cases (11.5%) and 41 ticagrelor cases (23.6%). Fifty-seven cases (32.8%) were defined as HPR post P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor use, in which 55 cases (55/113, 48.7%) were treated with clopidogrel. The degree of inhibition of platelet reactivity was significantly different in patients on clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor therapy, percent inhibition assayed by the VerifyNow P2Y(12) system was 28.2%±23.5%, 61.4%±26.7% and 81.3%±19.8% respectively (P<0.05). Different degree of platelet reactivity was achieved by the 3 P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors at multiple time points. The among-group differences in platelet reactivity became apparent at the early treatment stage (P<0.05). Platelet aggregation decreased significantly in patients switched from clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONNovel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors are more effective in inhibiting platelet reactivity in ACS patients, and our results show that novel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors provide a new option for ACS patients with HPR post clopidogrel or high-risk features of ischemic complications, including stent thrombosis and post-PCI ischemic events.

Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Adenosine ; analogs & derivatives ; Aged ; Aspirin ; Blood Platelets ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; Platelet Function Tests ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride ; Prospective Studies ; Ticlopidine ; analogs & derivatives

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Newer P2Y12 inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have greater antiplatelet efficacy but may increase the risk of bleeding. In this study, we compared the pharmacodynamic efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We selected 83 ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were discharged with 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (n = 24), 10 mg prasugrel daily (n = 39) or 5 mg prasugrel daily (n = 20). After 2 to 4 weeks, on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) was assessed in terms of P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics). We compared East Asian (85 < PRU < or = 275) and Caucasian (85 < PRU < or = 208) criteria for assessing the therapeutic window of OPR. RESULTS: OPR was lowest in the ticagrelor group, followed by the 10 mg prasugrel and 5 mg prasugrel groups (49.1 ± 29.9 vs. 83.7 ± 57.1 vs. 168.5 ± 60.8, respectively; p < 0.001). The 5 mg prasugrel group had the highest proportion of patients with OPR values within the therapeutic window, followed by the 10 mg prasugrel and ticagrelor groups (90.0% vs. 46.2% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.001 for East Asian criteria; 60.0% vs. 43.6% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.001 for Caucasian criteria). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration of 5 mg prasugrel facilitated maintenance within the therapeutic window of OPR compared with the 10 mg prasugrel and ticagrelor groups. Thus, 5 mg prasugrel daily may be the optimal antiplatelet regimen for stabilized East Asian ACS patients.
Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood/diagnosis/ethnology/*therapy ; Adenosine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/pharmacology ; Aged ; *Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Blood Platelets/*drug effects/metabolism ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Monitoring/methods ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; Hemorrhage/chemically induced ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects ; Pilot Projects ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Platelet Function Tests ; Prasugrel Hydrochloride/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*pharmacology ; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*pharmacology ; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/blood/*drug effects ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome