Achondroplasia (ACH) is a common inherited skeletal dysplasia (inherited dwarfism) that compromises quality of life across the lifespan. In 2021, vosoritide became the first approved precision therapy for ACH and is now available in more than 40 countries. Compared with prior symptomatic measures, vosoritide has demonstrated favorable efficacy and a reassuring safety profile. Nevertheless, existing international ACH guidelines largely emphasize complication management and symptomatic care, and there is no unified consensus on pharmacologic therapy. To address this gap, an international expert group developed the International Consensus Guidelines for the Implementation and Monitoring of Vosoritide Therapy in Patients with Achondroplasia providing systematic recommendations that span the continuum of care - from initial patient contact and pre-treatment assessment to medication counseling, injection training, and long-term outcome monitoring. These recommendations complement and refine current management and nursing protocols for individuals with ACH and offer practical guidance for clinicians across diverse regions. This article highlights key elements of the guideline to provide evidence-based support and clinical direction for healthcare professionals in China treating children with ACH using vosoritide.
Humans ; Achondroplasia/drug therapy* ; Consensus ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Child

Walking through the wards of a crowded public hospital and seeing suffering and tragedy from easily preventable conditionsmakes one wonder what it takes for a facility to change the outcomes. The evidence is there, and guidelines have beendeveloped from it; yet practices remain difficult to change—whether in screening, prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation.

Recently, the Department of Health has put up a compendium of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) crafted accordingto the standards set by the Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development of DOH-Philhealth.Guidelines stipulatethat dissemination and implementation be considered, and applicability issues are discussed. The uptake of the guidelinesshould be evaluated, and facilitators and barriers should be identified. Thus, there is a need for implementation andapplicability studies to assess how effective guidelines are. For breast cancer, the Philippine Guidelines were published in 2022and updated in 2026.Identified as barriers against implementation are financial constraints and out-of-pocket costs. Actahas since responded to these concerns by publishing articles on financing cost assessment, and in this issue, by Mondragonand co-authors, an “Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in a Tertiary CancerCenter and Private Clinics in the Philippines.”

These types of studies are necessary in the translation of evidence to practice, allowing organizations to adopt, scale,and sustain recommendations to real-world settings.

Where CPGs on malnutrition cite resource constraints as the only significant barrier for implementation, the article byde Luna and co-authors on the “A Qualitative Program Evaluation Study on the Perceived Impact of Health and NutritionPrograms among Beneficiaries of a Civil Society Organization in the Philippines” in this issue of the Acta add fear ofsustainability by families and competition from readily accessible instant food of poor nutritional value as barriers in implementingsuch programs.

These studies help us go beyond information dissemination of evidence-based practice to create pathways for impactfulintegration of recommended interventions. Implementation studies sharpen our analysis and focus our efforts on strategies thatcan help pilot, roll out, and scale up guidelines.

New modalities to carry out recommendations can also be part of how guidelines are implemented in the communitysetting. Where the Philippine Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (PARM) recommends early home-based rehabilitation,the Stroke Society of the Philippines recommends telerehabilitation to augment the efforts of care providers.The articleby Laxamana and co-authors in this issue on “The Acceptance of Stroke Telerehabilitation among Rehabilitation Providersand Consumers in Two Tertiary Hospitals in the Philippines” not only identifies but also provides suggestions to addressimplementation barriers.

We support and encourage articles on implementation science. These works provide tools to convert evidence into outcomes.These transform organizations and help us accomplish meaningful, lasting structural change that should come withoutany delay to provide relief to our patients in our crowded public wards.

Walking through the wards of a crowded public hospital and seeing suffering and tragedy from easily preventable conditionsmakes one wonder what it takes for a facility to change the outcomes. The evidence is there, and guidelines have beendeveloped from it; yet practices remain difficult to change—whether in screening, prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation.

Recently, the Department of Health has put up a compendium of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) crafted accordingto the standards set by the Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development of DOH-Philhealth.Guidelines stipulatethat dissemination and implementation be considered, and applicability issues are discussed. The uptake of the guidelinesshould be evaluated, and facilitators and barriers should be identified. Thus, there is a need for implementation andapplicability studies to assess how effective guidelines are. For breast cancer, the Philippine Guidelines were published in 2022and updated in 2026.Identified as barriers against implementation are financial constraints and out-of-pocket costs. Actahas since responded to these concerns by publishing articles on financing cost assessment, and in this issue, by Mondragonand co-authors, an “Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in a Tertiary CancerCenter and Private Clinics in the Philippines.”

These types of studies are necessary in the translation of evidence to practice, allowing organizations to adopt, scale,and sustain recommendations to real-world settings.

Where CPGs on malnutrition cite resource constraints as the only significant barrier for implementation, the article byde Luna and co-authors on the “A Qualitative Program Evaluation Study on the Perceived Impact of Health and NutritionPrograms among Beneficiaries of a Civil Society Organization in the Philippines” in this issue of the Acta add fear ofsustainability by families and competition from readily accessible instant food of poor nutritional value as barriers in implementingsuch programs.

These studies help us go beyond information dissemination of evidence-based practice to create pathways for impactfulintegration of recommended interventions. Implementation studies sharpen our analysis and focus our efforts on strategies thatcan help pilot, roll out, and scale up guidelines.

New modalities to carry out recommendations can also be part of how guidelines are implemented in the communitysetting. Where the Philippine Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (PARM) recommends early home-based rehabilitation,the Stroke Society of the Philippines recommends telerehabilitation to augment the efforts of care providers.The articleby Laxamana and co-authors in this issue on “The Acceptance of Stroke Telerehabilitation among Rehabilitation Providersand Consumers in Two Tertiary Hospitals in the Philippines” not only identifies but also provides suggestions to addressimplementation barriers.

We support and encourage articles on implementation science. These works provide tools to convert evidence into outcomes.These transform organizations and help us accomplish meaningful, lasting structural change that should come withoutany delay to provide relief to our patients in our crowded public wards.

OBJECTIVES: Obtaining informed consent from research participants is an ethical and legal obligation for medical researchers in clinical studies. Electronic informed consent (eIC) is increasingly being adopted in clinical research worldwide. However, there is limited data on Chinese medical researchers' knowledge and attitudes toward eIC. This study aims to investigate their knowledge, attitudes, and influencing factors regarding eIC use in clinical research. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified random sampling. From June to August 2022, medical researchers from 8 tertiary hospitals were surveyed via an online platform (Wenjuanxing). A self-developed eIC knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale were used to assess participants' understanding and perceptions of eIC. Univariate analysis was employed to explore factors influencing attitude scores and the correlation between knowledge and attitudes. A generalized linear model was used to analyze associations between demographic characteristics and attitude scores, including the frequency of difficulties in using smartphones or computers, preferred device for using eIC, and their interaction effects. Stratified analysis was further performed for significant interactions. RESULTS: A total of 399 valid questionnaires were collected. The mean accuracy rate on the eIC knowledge questionnaire was (94.88±15.50)%. Of the respondents, 74.9% had heard of eIC, and 84.5% preferred using mobile devices over computers to access eIC. The median attitude score was 3.41 (3.18, 3.76), indicating generally positive attitudes. Specifically, 81.7% found eIC more convenient than paper-based consent, 79.7% considered it more efficient, and 51.1% believed it could fully replace paper forms. However, 60.7% expressed concerns about data security and privacy, and 89.7% believed that relevant laws and regulations need improvement. Spearman correlation analysis showed a weak positive correlation between knowledge and attitude scores (r=0.171, P=0.001). Univariate analysis indicated that the frequency of difficulty using devices and preferred device for eIC were significantly associated with attitude scores (P<0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the generalized linear model demonstrated that participants who occasionally experienced had difficulty using devices had significantly lower attitude scores compared to those who never had difficulty (β=-0.040, 95% CI -0.071 to -0.009, P=0.012). Those who preferred using PCs had significantly lower attitude scores than those who preferred mobile devices (β=-0.066, 95% CI -0.108 to -0.023, P=0.002). Interaction analysis showed a significant interaction analysis showed a significant interaction between age and preferred device (P=0.011), particularly among participants aged ≥45-year (P<0.001). No other interactions were found to be significant (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Medical researchers in China generally have a high level of knowledge and positive attitudes toward eIC, though concerns remain regarding data security and privacy. Future promotion of eIC in Chinese clinical research should be grounded in ethical considerations and address the specific needs of older users and mobile device users, while also enhancing researchers' competencies in using digital tools and eIC systems.
Humans ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Informed Consent ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Female ; Male ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Adult ; Biomedical Research ; Research Personnel/psychology* ; Middle Aged ; China

OBJECTIVES: With the accelerating aging of the population and the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, the number of patients with pressure injuries (PIs) has increased markedly, prolonging the period of disease-related care. Informal caregivers play a critical role in the daily care of patients with pressure injuries, and their care burden has become increasingly prominent. This study aims to investigate the current status and influencing factors of care burden among informal caregivers of patients with PIs, providing evidence for targeted intervention strategies. METHODS: A total of 170 informal caregivers of patients with PIs were selected by convenience sampling from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. General demographic and clinical data of both patients and caregivers were collected. The Zarit Caregiver Burden Inventory (ZBI), Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of Patients with PIs, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and Family Caregiver Task Inventory (FCTI) were used to assess caregiving burden, knowledge-attitude-practice level, self-efficacy, and caregiving ability, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate relationships among ZBI, Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of Patients with PIs, GSES, and FCTI scores. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing caregiving. RESULTS: Among the 170 patients with pressure injuries, the age was (65.52±15.88) years; 118 (69.41%) were male and 52 (30.59%) were female. The duration of PIs was less than 1 month in 108 (63.53%) cases and 1 to 6 months in 40 cases (23.53%). Stage II injuries were predominant (135 cases, 79.41%). A total of 193 pressure injury sites were recorded, most commonly located at the sacrococcygeal region (127 sites, 65.80%), followed by the head (3 sites, 1.55%), shoulder and back (9 sites, 4.66%), feet (24 sites, 12.44%), and other regions (30 sites, 15.55%). Informal caregivers were 48.82% aged 46 to 59 years, 54.71% female, 41.77% primarily spouses and 47.06% children of the patients, and 77.06% lived with the patients. Caregivers who received assistance from others or had higher family per-capita monthly income reported significantly lower caregiver burden scores than those without assistance or with lower income (all P<0.001). The total ZBI score was 50.89±14.95, indicating a moderate burden. The total scores of the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers, GSES, and FCTI were 50.61±7.22, 26.03±7.11, and 14.76±8.70, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that ZBI scores were correlated with scores on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of Patients with PIs (r=-0.543, P<0.001), GSES scores (r=-0.545, P<0.001), and FCTI scores (r=0.800, P<0.001). The scores on Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of patients with PIs were correlated with GSES scores (r=0.500, P<0.001) and FCTI scores (r=-0.461, P<0.001); GSES scores was negatively correlated with FCTI scores (r=-0.415, P<0.001). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that assistance availability, family per-capita monthly income, total scores on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of Patients with PIs, total GSES score, and total FCTI score were the main influencing factors of caregiver burden, jointly explaining 79.38% of its variance. CONCLUSIONS The main factors influencing the caregiving burden of informal caregivers of patients with PIs include the availability of assistance, family per-capita monthly income, total score on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice Scale for Informal Caregivers of PI patients, total score on the GSES, and total score on the FCTI. Developing targeted intervention strategies addressing these factors may help alleviate the caregiving burden among informal caregivers of patients with PIs.
Humans ; Caregivers/psychology* ; Pressure Ulcer/nursing* ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Cost of Illness ; Adult ; Aged ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Self Efficacy ; Caregiver Burden ; China

Day surgery is an important part of the comprehensive reform of public hospitals, which is conducive to improving hospital management level, enhancing medical service efficiency, and controlling medical expenses. The National Health Commission has included tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in the recommended list of daytime surgeries. However, there is no unified understanding and clinical practice of tonsillar and/or adenoid day surgery in China. Currently, there is an urgent need to develop clinical practice guidelines for tonsillar and/or adenoid day surgery to standardize the procedure. To this end, the guideline expert group developed this guideline through literature review and two rounds of Delphi voting, selecting and focusing on the clinical key issues in tonsillar and/or adenoid day surgery, in order to provide specific and feasible guidance for otolaryngologists, anesthesiologists, nursing staff, and related medical staff engaging in pediatric tonsillar and adenoid day surgery, and promote standardized management of tonsillar and/or adenoid day surgery.
Humans ; Tonsillectomy ; Adenoids/surgery* ; Adenoidectomy ; Child ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Palatine Tonsil/surgery* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; China

Patients with periodontal disease often require combined periodontal-orthodontic interventions to restore periodontal health, function, and aesthetics, ensuring both patient satisfaction and long-term stability. Managing these patients involving orthodontic tooth movement can be particularly challenging due to compromised periodontal soft and hard tissues, especially in severe cases. Therefore, close collaboration between orthodontists and periodontists for comprehensive diagnosis and sequential treatment, along with diligent patient compliance throughout the entire process, is crucial for achieving favorable treatment outcomes. Moreover, long-term orthodontic retention and periodontal follow-up are essential to sustain treatment success. This expert consensus, informed by the latest clinical research and practical experience, addresses clinical considerations for orthodontic treatment of periodontal patients, delineating indications, objectives, procedures, and principles with the aim of providing clear and practical guidance for clinical practitioners.
Humans ; Consensus ; Orthodontics, Corrective/standards* ; Periodontal Diseases/complications* ; Tooth Movement Techniques/methods* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Bronchial asthma is a kind of heterogeneous respiratory disease, and its emergency diagnosis and treatment face multiple challenges. This article, based on the evolution of domestic and international guidelines and consensus, explores the current confusions and shortcomings in the emergency treatment of asthma, considering the clinical specifics of emergency medicine. Due to the limited applicability of classifications such as "refractory asthma" and "severe asthma" in emergency settings, as well as the complex diagnostic process that makes clinical operations difficult, it is proposed to unify the diagnostic terminology as "acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma" (mild, moderate, severe, critical severe) in emergency work. Assessment indicators, such as arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂), partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂), peak expiratory flow (PEF). Simplified were simplified. The clinical diagnosis and emergency management should prioritize the approach outlined in the Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of bronchial asthma (basic version). For mild-to-moderate and severe exacerbations, a tiered treatment strategy is recommended, focusing on rapid symptom relief, standardized glucocorticoid use, and dynamic efficacy assessment. Additionally, the urgent need for formulating a Chinese expert consensus on emergency diagnosis and treatment of bronchial asthma is highlighted, along with promoting multicenter prospective studies to optimize emergency protocols and improve patient prognosis.
Humans ; Asthma/therapy* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

OBJECTIVE: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) incorporates traditional diagnostic methods and several major treatment modalities including Chinese herbal medicine, Chinese patent medicine, and non-pharmacological methods such as acupuncture and tuina. Even though TCM is used daily by more than 70,000 healthcare facilities and over 700,000 clinical practitioners in China, there is a poor understanding of the extent to which TCM diagnostic methods are used, how different treatment modalities are deployed in general, and what major factors may affect the integration of TCM and Western medicine. This study aimed to fill this void in the literature. METHODS: In the 2021 National Healthcare Improvement Evaluation Survey, we included three questions gauging the perception and practices of TCM amongst physicians working in TCM-related facilities, investigating the frequency of their deployment of TCM diagnostic methods, and predominant TCM treatment methods. Our empirical analysis included descriptive statistics, intergroup chi-square analysis, and binary logistic regression to examine the association between different types of facilities and individual characteristics and TCM utilization patterns. RESULTS: A total of 7618 clinical physicians comprised our study sample. Among them, 84.27% have integrated TCM and Western medicine in their clinical practice, and 80.77% of TCM practitioners used the 4 diagnostic methods as a tool in their clinical practice. Chinese herbal medicine was the most widely utilized modality by Chinese TCM physicians (used by 88.49% of respondents), compared with the Chinese patent medicine and non-pharmacological TCM methods, which were used by 73.14%, and 69.39%, respectively. Herbal tea as an out-of-pocket health-maintenance intervention is also a notable practice, recommended by 29.43% of physicians. Significant variations exist across certain institutions, departments, and individual practitioners. CONCLUSION Given that most of the surveyed physicians integrated TCM with Western medicine in their clinical practices, the practice of "pure TCM" appears to be obsolete in China's tertiary healthcare institutions. Notably, remarkable variation exists in the use of different TCM modalities across institutions and among individuals, which might be related to and thus limited by the practitioners' experience. Future research focusing on the efficacy and safety of TCM interventions for specific diseases, the development of standardized clinical guidelines, and the enhancement of TCM education and training are called for to optimize TCM-Western medicine integration. Please cite this article as: Guo R, Zeng D, Zhao Q, Zhang XY, Zhang XK, Liu YL. How are different traditional Chinese medicine modalities deployed by clinical practitioners in China? Findings from a national survey. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(1): 36-45.
Medicine, Chinese Traditional/statistics & numerical data* ; Humans ; China ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Female ; Male ; Physicians/statistics & numerical data* ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data* ; Adult ; Middle Aged

Functional dyspepsia (FD), characterized by persistent or recurrent dyspeptic symptoms without identifiable organic, systemic or metabolic causes, is an increasingly recognized global health issue. The objective of this guideline is to equip clinicians and nursing professionals with evidence-based strategies for the management and treatment of adult patients with FD using traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The Guideline Development Group consulted existing TCM consensus documents on FD and convened a panel of 35 clinicians to generate initial clinical queries. To address these queries, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database, China Biology Medicine (SinoMed) Database, Wanfang Database, Traditional Medicine Research Data Expanded (TMRDE), and the Traditional Chinese Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System (TCMLARS). The evidence from the literature was critically appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The strength of the recommendations was ascertained through a consensus-building process involving TCM and allopathic medicine experts, methodologists, pharmacologists, nursing specialists, and health economists, leveraging their collective expertise and empirical knowledge. The guideline comprises a total of 43 evidence-informed recommendations that span a range of clinical aspects, including the pathogenesis according to TCM, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic interventions, efficacy assessments, and prognostic considerations. Please cite this article as: Zhang SS, Zhao LQ, Hou XH, Bian ZX, Zheng JH, Tian HH, Yang GH, Hong WS, He YY, Liu L, Shen H, Li YP, Xie S, Shu J, Zeng BF, Li JX, Liu Z, Xiao ZH, Xiao JD, Zheng PY, Huang SG, Chen SL, Fei GJ. International clinical practice guideline on the use of traditional Chinese medicine for functional dyspepsia (2025). J Integr Med. 2025; 23(5):502-518.
Dyspepsia/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use*