PURPOSE: Femur fractures are among the most common fractures treated surgically, representing a significant challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) represent a rare complication of the surgical treatment. It is necessary to pay attention during osteosynthesis, evaluating not only the fracture site but the entire femoral skeletal structure, the characteristics of the fracture, the health comorbidities, and the risk of malunion and pseudarthrosis. There are few studies on the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of PIFFs near osteosynthesis. This study aimed to investigate PIFF after osteosynthesis of femoral fractures and evaluate the mortality after surgery and the morbidity associated with these types of fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at the IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy, between January, 2017 and December, 2022. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a femur fracture around an intramedullary nail to treat a previous fracture, follow-up ≥ 12 months, and patients aged ≥ 65 years. Exclusion criterion was intraoperative periprosthetic fractures. The data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and range. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients were enrolled (88.0% female) and the mean age was 84.5 years (range of 70 - 92 years). There were 20 patients having type B PIFF and 5 having type C. In 22 patients, multiple comorbidities were found with an average Charlson comorbidity score of 5.5 and the mean time to peri-implant fracture was 38 months. After surgery, 1 patient (4.0%) presented renal failure, 1 (4.0%) needed removal surgery for their loosening, and 2 (8.0%) presented surgical site infection. Nine patients (36.0%) died within 1 year with a mortality rate of 20.0% at 30 days, 8.0% at 3 months, and 8.0% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS PIFFs in elderly patients are associated with high short-term mortality and morbidity, so careful planning for primary fracture surgery and patient awareness to ensure prolonged compliance and a healthy lifestyle are essential for prevention.
Humans ; Female ; Male ; Aged ; Femoral Fractures/mortality* ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged, 80 and over ; Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects* ; Postoperative Complications/mortality*

To evaluate the early and mid-term results after surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm(TAAA)in patients with DeBakey typeⅠor Ⅲ aortic dissection. The clinical data of 130 patients who underwent TAAA repair for chronic DeBakey typeⅠ(groupⅠ, =47)or type Ⅲ(group Ⅲ, =83)aortic dissections in our center between January 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Early postoperative results,midterm survival,and re-interventions were compared between these two groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.9%(=9)in the overall cohort,with no statistic difference between groupⅠand group Ⅲ(10.6% 4.8%;=0.803, =0.370).The incidence of major adverse events(38.3% 51.8%;=2.199, =0.138),5-year actuarial survival rate [(81.7±5.9)% (87.2±4.2)%;=0.483, =0.487],and 5-year actuarial freedom from all reinterventions [(84.5±6.7)% (85.5±4.8)%;=0.010, =0.920] showed no significant differences between these two groups. The early and mid-term outcomes after surgical repair of TAAA are similar for DeBakey typeⅠ and type Ⅲ patients.However,studies with larger sample sizes are still required.
Aneurysm, Dissecting ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid ; adverse effects ; Benzodiazepines ; adverse effects ; Cognitive Dysfunction ; chemically induced ; mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Risk Factors

PURPOSE: The use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (r-AAA) is steadily increasing. We report early experiences of EVAR for r-AAA performed in two tertiary referral centers in Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed r-AAA patients treated by EVAR from May 2013 to December 2017. An EVAR-first strategy for r-AAA was adopted whenever feasible. The demographic information, anatomic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications with special attention to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and 30-day mortality were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 13 patients who underwent EVAR for r-AAA. Mean age was 74.2 years and mean AAA size was 74.2 mm. Two patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation at initial presentation. Bifurcated stent grafts were used in 12 out of 13 cases and physician-modified endografts with fenestrated/chimney techniques were performed in 2 cases with short neck. Successful stent graft deployment was achieved in all cases. Three patients were suspected of having ACS and 2 of them underwent laparotomy for decompression. The 30-day mortality was 7.7% (1 of 13), the only mortality being a patient that refused decompressive laparotomy for suspected ACS. CONCLUSION: Despite the small numbers, the outcomes of EVAR for treatment of r-AAA were very promising, even in selected cases with unfavorable anatomy. These outcomes were achieved by a dedicated and well-trained team approach, and by use of high-end angiographic technology. Finally, ACS after EVAR is not uncommon, and requires a high index of suspicion as well as liberal use of decompressive surgery.
Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Decompression ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension ; Korea ; Laparotomy ; Mortality ; Neck ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Tertiary Care Centers

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision in difficult cases including obese patients or patients with bulky tumors or threatened mesorectal fascias. METHODS: We performed laparoscopy-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma located 3–12 cm from the anal verge as part of a prospective, single arm, pilot trial. The primary endpoint was resection quality and circumferential resection margin involvement. Secondary endpoints included the number of harvested lymph nodes and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (9 men and 3 women) were enrolled: one obese patient, 7 with large tumors and 8 with threatened mesorectal fascias (4 patients had multiple indications). Tumors were located a median of 5.5 cm from the anal verge, and all patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Median operating time was 191 minutes, and there were no intraoperative complications. One patient needed conversion to open surgery for ureterocystostomy after en bloc resection. Complete or near-complete excision and negative circumferential resection margins were achieved in all cases. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15.5. There was no postoperative mortality and 3 cases of postoperative morbidity (1 postoperative ileus, 1 wound problem near the stoma site, and 1 anastomotic dehiscence). CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that transanal total mesorectal excision is also feasible in difficult laparoscopic cases such as in obese patients or those with bulky tumors or tumors threatening the mesorectal fascia. Additional larger studies are needed.
Adenocarcinoma ; Arm ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Fascia ; Humans ; Ileus ; Intraoperative Complications ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Nodes ; Male ; Mortality ; Pilot Projects ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Transanal Endoscopic Surgery ; Wounds and Injuries

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the indicators of nutritional risk screening tool are associated with postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: We investigated whether nutritional risk is associated with postoperative complications based on the medical records of 128 patients who underwent PD from 2010. The tool was composed of 6 risk factors: albumin, total lymphocyte count, body mass index, weight loss, dietary intake loss, and nutritional symptoms. The patients were divided into 2 groups: a nutritional risk group and a nonrisk group. The rates of general complications and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were investigated according to this nutritional status. RESULTS: There were 65 patients who did not have any risk factors. However, 63 patients had one risk factor or more. In the nonrisk group, the overall complication rate and serious complication rate were 30.8% and 15.4%, respectively. If there were one or more risk factors, the overall and serious complication rates were 59.5% and 41.3%, respectively (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). The rate of clinically relevant POPF (grade B or C) was 9.2% in the nonrisk group. However, this rate was 23.8% in the NRS risk group (P = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, the NRS risk group was a significant factor of clinically relevant POPF (odds ratio, 9.878; 95% confidence interval, 1.527–63.914; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: There were statistically significant associations between complications and nutritional indicators. A comprehensive analysis of nutritional parameters will help predict postoperative complications.
Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Lymphocyte Count ; Mass Screening ; Medical Records ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nutritional Status ; Pancreatic Fistula ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Weight Loss

PURPOSE: Safe and effective surgical treatment of peptic ulcer perforations is fundamental to achieve favorable outcomes. We present laparoscopic single figure of eight suturing omentopexy for perforated duodenal ulcer and review associated clinical outcomes. This is a new formulaic surgical technique for laparoscopic omentopexy. METHODS: Laparoscopic single figure of eight suturing omentopexies for perforated duodenal ulcer were completed in 15 consecutive patients between April 2008 and November 2017 at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Using prospectively collected data, we performed an observational study on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair was 41.7±13.9 years. The perforation site was the anterior duodenal bulb in all patients. The median perforation size was 5 mm (range: 3~8 mm). The mean operation time was 66.7±19.6 minutes. There was no evidence of leakage from the omentopexy site clinically or in the postoperative upper gastrointestinal series. One patient (6.7%) experienced the postoperative complication of pneumothorax. There were no cases of postoperative mortality or reoperation within 30 days after surgery. The median time to tolerance of regular diet was 6 (range: 4~9) days. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range: 5~11 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic single figure of eight suturing omentopexy can be a viable option in the surgical management of perforated duodenal ulcer in selected patients without surgical risk factors. Laparoscopic single figure of eight suturing omentopexy is safe and easy to perform, and may therefore reduce operation time.
Diet ; Duodenal Ulcer ; Humans ; Korea ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Observational Study ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; Pneumothorax ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; Risk Factors ; Seoul

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has been widely performed for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) involving the body or tail of the pancreas. However, it has not been established whether spleen preservation in LDP is oncologically safe for the treatment of SPN with malignant potential. In this study, we compared the short- and long-term outcomes between patients with SPN who underwent laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 46 patients with SPN who underwent LDP between January 2005 and November 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to spleen preservation: the LSPDP group (n=32) and the LDPS group (n=14). Clinicopathologic characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pathologic variables, including tumor size, tumor location, node status, angiolymphatic invasion, or perineural invasion between groups. Median operating time was significantly longer in the LSPDP group vs the LDPS group (243 vs 172 minutes; p=0.006). Estimated intraoperative blood loss was also significantly greater in the LSPDP group (310 vs 167 ml; p=0.063). There were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo class IIIa) or pancreatic fistula between groups. After a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 3S153 months), there was no recurrence or disease-specific mortality in either group. CONCLUSION: The results show that LSPDP is an oncologically safe procedure for SPN involving the body or tail of the pancreas.
Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Medical Records ; Mortality ; Pancreas ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic Fistula ; Postoperative Complications ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen ; Splenectomy ; Tail

PURPOSE: Donor safety is the most important problem of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Although laparoscopic liver resection has gained popularity with increased surgical experience and the development of laparoscopes and specialized instruments, a totally laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) technique has not been investigated for efficacy and feasibility. We describe the experiences and outcomes associated with LDRH in adult-to-adult LDLT in order to assess the safety of the totally laparoscopic technique in donors. METHODS: Between May 2016 and July 2017, we performed hepatectomies in 22 living donors using a totally laparoscopic approach. Among them, 20 donors underwent LDRH. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records to ascertain donor safety and the reproducibility of LDRH; intra-operative and post-operative results including complications were demonstrated after performing LDRH. RESULTS: The median donor age was 29 years old and the median body mass index was 22.6 kg/m2. The actual graft weight was 710 g and graft weight/body weight (GRWR) was 1.125. No donors required blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery, or reoperation. The postoperative mortality was nil and postoperative complications were identified in two donors. One had fluid collection in the supra-pubic incision site for graft retrieval and the second had a minor bile leakage from the cutting edge of the right hepatic duct stump. All the liver function tests returned to normal ranges within one month. CONCLUSION: LDRH is a feasible operation owing to low blood loss and few complications. However, LDRH can be initially attempted after attaining sufficient experience in laparoscopic hepatectomy and LDLT techniques.
Bile ; Blood Transfusion ; Body Mass Index ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Hepatic Duct, Common ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Liver ; Liver Function Tests ; Liver Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Medical Records ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Reference Values ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

BACKGROUND: Although aortic valve repair can reduce prosthesis-related complications, rheumatic aortic regurgitation (AR) caused by leaflet restriction is a significant risk factor for recurrent AR. In this study, we evaluated the long-term results of the leaflet extension technique for rheumatic AR. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2016, 33 patients underwent aortic valve repair using the leaflet extension technique with autologous pericardium for rheumatic pure AR. Twenty patients had severe AR and 9 had combined moderate or greater mitral regurgitation. Their mean age was 32.2±13.9 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18.3±5.8 years. RESULTS: There were no cases of operative mortality, but postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. Overall survival at 10 and 20 years was 93.5% and 87.1%, respectively. There were no thromboembolic cerebrovascular events, but 4 late deaths occurred, as well as a bleeding event in 1 patient who was taking warfarin. Twelve patients underwent aortic valve reoperation. The mean interval to reoperation was 13.1±6.1 years. Freedom from reoperation at 10 and 20 years was 96.7% and 66.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of the leaflet extension technique showed acceptable durability and a low incidence of thromboembolic events and bleeding. The leaflet extension technique may be a good option for young patients with rheumatic AR.
Aortic Valve ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency ; Follow-Up Studies ; Freedom ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Incidence ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency ; Mortality ; Pericardium ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Rheumatic Diseases ; Risk Factors ; Warfarin