The Baveno VII workshop held in October 2021 was featured by the subject of personalized care in portal hypertension. The workshop focused on the following 9 topics including: the relevance and indications for measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient as a gold standard; the use of non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of compensated advanced chronic liver disease and clinically significant portal hypertension; the impact of etiological and of non-etiological therapies in the course of cirrhosis; the prevention of the first episode of decompensation; the management of the acute bleeding episode; the prevention of further decompensation; as well as the diagnosis and management of splanchnic vein thrombosis and other vascular disorders of the liver. This essay provides a compilation and summary of recommendations regarding the abovementioned topics, and presents the most recent research proceedings and the corresponding consensus to our readers.
Consensus ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal/therapy* ; Liver Cirrhosis/therapy* ; Portal Pressure

The liver is abundant in blood supply and receives 25% of the cardiac output via the hepatic artery and portal vein. Circulatory disorders may cause hepatic injury, resulting in congestive hepatopathy(CH) and ischemic hepatitis(IH). Hepatic congestion arising from increased hepatic venous pressure and decreased cardiac output is the common pathophysiological basis of both CH and IH. In addition, extensive arteriovenous shunts affect portal pressure and cardiac function, leading to alterations of hepatic blood supply. The current review summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic interventions of the above diseases, in order to provide reference for clinical practice.
Cardiovascular Diseases ; Hepatic Artery ; Humans ; Liver ; Liver Diseases ; Portal Pressure ; Portal Vein

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In recent years, greater assessment accuracy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to ascertain prognosis has become important in decompensated cirrhosis due to portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess the ratio of the portal pressure gradient (PPG) pre-TIPS (pre-PPG) to albumin (PPA), which influence ascites formation in cirrhotic patients in the 6-months after TIPS placement, and is a metric introduced in our study. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 58 patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to an academic hospital for the purpose of TIPS placement. We collected the following data: demographics, laboratory measures, and PPG during the TIPS procedure. Then we analyzed the association between the above data and ascites formation post-TIPS in cirrhosis patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with ascites and 28 without ascites were evaluated. Univariate and binary logistic regression analysis were adjusted for the following variables: to determine prognosis; Child-Pugh scores, lymphocyte count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, albumin level and pre-PPG or PPA. The outcome showed that PPA was better than pre-PPG and albumin for predicting ascites according to area under receiver operating characteristic curves and a statistical model that also showed PPA’s influence 6-months post-TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: The combined measurement of pre-PPG and albumin, defined as PPA, may provide a better way to predict post-TIPS ascites in decompensated cirrhosis, which underlines the need for a large clinical trial in the future.
Ascites ; Cohort Studies ; Demography ; Fibrosis ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; Logistic Models ; Lymphocyte Count ; Models, Statistical ; Platelet Count ; Portal Pressure ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Serum Albumin

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prognostic role of the categorized hemodynamic stage (HS) based on the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with portal hypertension. METHODS: Of 1,025 cirrhotic patients who underwent HVPG measurement, data on 572 non-critically-ill patients were collected retrospectively between 2008 and 2013. The following two HS categorizations were used: HS-1 (6–9, 10–12, 13–16, 17–20, and > 20 mmHg; designated as groups 1–5, respectively) and HS-2 (6–12, 13–20, and > 20 mmHg). Clinical characteristics, mortality rates, and prognostic predictors were analyzed according to the categorized HS. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 25 months, 86 (15.0%) patients died. The numbers of deaths in HS-1 groups were 7 (6.3%), 7 (6.9%), 30 (18.0%), 20 (15.6%), and 22 (34.4%), respectively (P < 0.001). However, the traditional HVPG cutoffs of 10 and 16 mmHg did not improve the discrimination of mortality. In contrast, the mortality rates did differ significantly between the three HS-2 groups (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, all models revealed that HS-2 was a common prognostic factor in predicting mortality. The mortality rates increased significantly according to HS-2 in patients with hypoalbuminemia (HVPG, 13–20 mmHg; hazard ratio [HR], 2.54 and HVPG > 20 mmHg; HR, 5.45) and intermediate model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (HVPG, 13–20 mmHg; HR, 3.86 and HVPG > 20 mmHg; HR, 8.77; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Categorizing HVPG values according to HS-2 is a useful prognostic modality in patients with portal hypertension and can play an independent role in predicting the prognosis in patients with hypoalbuminemia and an intermediate MELD score.
Discrimination (Psychology) ; Fibrosis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; Hypoalbuminemia ; Liver Diseases ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Venous Pressure

A growing number of studies have explored endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided vascular catheterization. Potential clinical applications of EUS-guided portal venous access include angiography, measurement of the portosystemic pressure gradient, EUS-guided transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation and portal vein sampling for the evaluation in gastrointestinal cancer. The following article reviews the different devices and techniques employed in these applications.
Angiography ; Endosonography ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; Portal Pressure* ; Portal Vein ; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical ; Ultrasonography ; Vascular Access Devices

Pathologic increase in portal pressure can be caused by increased resistance to blood flow at the level of the portal vein (pre-hepatic), hepatic sinusoids (hepatic) or hepatovenous outflow (post-hepatic). This results in recruitment and dilatation of tiny portosystemic collateral pathways, diverting portal venous blood flow to low pressure systemic veins. Based on the location of the causative factor of portal venous resistance, different collateral pathways and shunts may develop, resulting in unique syndromes of portal hypertension and in-turn requiring unique treatment options. Knowledge of the common and less-common portosystemic collateral pathways have important implication for clinicians and interventionalists. The objective of this pictorial review is to illustrate the various collateral pathways using diagrammatic and conventional non-invasive and invasive radiologic examples. Additionally, we will briefly address minimally invasive interventional techniques used to treat the sequelae of portal hypertension.
Dilatation ; Hypertension, Portal ; Portal Pressure ; Portal Vein ; Radiology, Interventional ; Varicose Veins ; Veins

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a disease with an uncertain etiology consisting of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and portal pressure increase in the absence of liver cirrhosis. In INCPH, patients exhibit normal liver functions and structures. The factors associated with INCPH include the following: Umbilical/portal pyremia, bacterial diseases, prothrombic states, chronic exposure to arsenic, vinyl chloride monomers, genetic disorders, and autoimmune diseases. Approximately 70% of patients present a history of major variceal bleeding, and treatment relies on the prevention of complications related to portal hypertension. Autoimmune disorders associated with INCPH are mainly systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. To the best of our knowledge, a case of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) associated with INCPH has not been reported thus far. Therfore, we report our experience of a patient with AS accompanied by INCPH, who showed perisplenic varices with patent spleno-portal axis and hepatic veins along with no evidence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy, and provide a brief literature review.
Arsenic ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Autoimmune Diseases ; Biopsy ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; Fibrosis ; Hepatic Veins ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; Liver ; Liver Cirrhosis ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ; Portal Pressure ; Scleroderma, Systemic ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing ; Varicose Veins ; Vinyl Chloride

PURPOSE: Posthepatectomy liver failure is a serious complication and considered to be caused by increased portal pressure and flow. Splanchnic vasoactive agents and propranolol are known to decrease portal pressure. The aim of this study was to identify optimal candidates with potential for clinical use among somatostatin, terlipressin, and propranolol using rats with 90% hepatectomy. METHODS: Rats were divided into 5 groups: sham operation (n = 6), control (n = 20), propranolol (n = 20), somatostatin (n = 20), and terlipressin group (n = 20). Seven-day survival rates and portal pressure change were measured, and biochemical, histologic, and molecular analyses were performed. RESULTS: Portal pressure was significantly decreased in all 3 treatment groups compared to control. All treatment groups showed a tendency of decreased liver injury markers, and somatostatin showed the most prominent effect at 24 hours postoperatively. Histologic liver injury at 24 hours was significantly decreased in propranolol and terlipressin groups (P = 0.016, respectively) and somatostatin group showed borderline significance (P = 0.056). Hepatocyte proliferation was significantly increased after 24 hours in all treatment groups. Median survival was significantly increased in terlipressin group compared to control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Terlipressin is considered as the best candidate, while somatostatin has good potential for clinical use, considering their effects on portal pressure and subsequent decrease in liver injury and increase in liver regeneration.
Animals ; Hepatectomy* ; Hepatocytes ; Liver Failure ; Liver Regeneration* ; Liver* ; Portal Pressure ; Propranolol ; Rats* ; Somatostatin ; Survival Rate ; Vasoconstrictor Agents*

BACKGROUNDEvaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic changes in the liver and systemic hemodynamic changes during fluid challenge and during passive leg raising (PLR) by measuring hepatic venous flow (HVF) velocity.

METHODSThis is an open-label study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Shock patients with hypoperfusion who required fluid challenge were selected for the study. Patients <18 years old and those with contraindications to PLR were excluded from the study. Baseline values were measured, PLR tests were performed, and 500 ml of saline was infused over 30 min. Parameters associated with cardiac output (CO) in the left ventricular outflow tract were measured using the Doppler method. In addition, HVF velocity and right ventricular function parameters were determined.

RESULTSMiddle hepatic venous (MHV) S-wave velocity was positively correlated in all patients with CO at baseline (r = 0.706, P< 0.01) and after volume expansion (r = 0.524, P= 0.003). CO was also significantly correlated with MHV S-wave velocity in responders (r = 0.608, P< 0.01). During PLR, however, hepatic venous S-wave velocity did not correlate with CO. For the parameter ΔMHV D (increase in change in MHV D-wave velocity after volume expansion), defined as (MHV DafterVE - MHV DBaseline)/MHV DBaseline× 100%, >21% indicated no fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.918.

CONCLUSIONSDuring fluid expansion, hepatic venous S-wave velocity can be used to monitor CO, whether or not it is increasing. ΔMHV D ≥21% indicated a lack of fluid responsiveness, thus helping to decide when to stop infusions.

Aged ; Blood Pressure ; physiology ; Cardiac Output ; physiology ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Fluid Therapy ; Hemodynamics ; physiology ; Hepatic Veins ; physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; methods ; Portal Vein ; physiology ; ROC Curve ; Shock ; physiopathology ; Stroke Volume ; physiology

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers access to many intra-abdominal vessels that until now have only been accessible to the surgeon and interventional radiologist. In addition to assisting with diagnostics, this unique access offers the potential for therapeutic intervention for a host of indications. To date, this has had the most clinical impact in the treatment of gastroesophageal varices, with EUS-guided coil and glue application growing in use worldwide. Although randomised controlled trial data is lacking, we discuss the growing body of literature behind EUS-guided therapy in the management of varices. EUS has also been used in specialized centres to assist in non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. The treatment of bleeding from Dieulafoy lesions, tumours and pancreatic pseudoaneurysms has all been described. The potential applications of EUS have also extended to the placement of portal vein stents and porto-systemic shunts in animal models. As medicine continues to move to increasingly less invasive interventions, EUS-guided therapies offer substantial promise for the safe and effective delivery of targeted treatment for a widening array of vascular disorders.
Adhesives ; Aneurysm, False ; Endosonography ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; Hemorrhage ; Models, Animal ; Portal Pressure ; Portal Vein ; Stents ; Ultrasonography ; Varicose Veins