1.Improved Specificity for Breast Cancer Screening Using an Oncogenic (miRNA-21) and a Gene Suppressor (miRNA-195) miRNA in the Serum for a Point of Care (POC) Screening Solution.
Kokilavani KRISHNAMOORTHY ; Ancy Terryna CHANAYILTHARAYIL JOHN ; Bindu SALIM ; Madhulika VIJAYAKUMAR ; Sankar Ganesh JEYARAJ
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2023;36(6):549-552
2.Interpretation of the clinical guideline for point-of-care ultrasonography in the neonatal intensive care unit in the United States.
Wen-Hui DONG ; Bo-Yin DENG ; Guang YUE ; Yasser ELSAYED ; Rong JU ; Jian-Hui WANG ; Yuan SHI
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2023;25(7):672-677
In December 2022, the American Academy of Pediatrics released a clinical guideline for point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The guideline outlined the development and current status of POCUS in the NICU, and summarized the key elements and implementation guidelines for successful implementation of POCUS in the NICU. This article provides an overview of the key points of the clinical guideline and analyzes the current status of POCUS in China, providing a reference for the implementation of POCUS in neonatal care in China.
Infant, Newborn
;
Humans
;
United States
;
Child
;
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
Ultrasonography
;
China
3.Point of care ultrasound: a clinical decision support tool for COVID-19.
Suneel Ramesh DESAI ; Jolin WONG ; Thangavelautham SUHITHARAN ; Yew Weng CHAN ; Shin Yi NG
Singapore medical journal 2023;64(4):226-236
The COVID-19 global pandemic has overwhelmed health services with large numbers of patients presenting to hospital, requiring immediate triage and diagnosis. Complications include acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocarditis, septic shock, and multiple organ failure. Point of care ultrasound is recommended for critical care triage and monitoring in COVID-19 by specialist critical care societies, however current guidance has mainly been published in webinar format, not a comprehensive review. Important limitations of point of care ultrasound include inter-rater variability and subjectivity in interpretation of imaging findings, as well as infection control concerns. A practical approach to clinical integration of point of care ultrasound findings in COVID-19 patients is presented to enhance consistency in critical care decision making, and relevant infection control guidelines and operator precautions are discussed, based on a narrative review of the literature.
Humans
;
COVID-19/complications*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
;
Ultrasonography
4.Point-of-care hepatitis C screening with direct access referral to improve linkage to care among halfway house residents: a pilot randomised study.
John Chen HSIANG ; Pream SINNASWAMI ; Mui Yok LEE ; Meng Meng ZHANG ; Kwang Ee QUEK ; Keng Hwee TAN ; Yew Meng WONG ; Prem Harichander THURAIRAJAH
Singapore medical journal 2022;63(2):86-92
INTRODUCTION:
Linkage to care among individuals with substance misuse remains a barrier to the elimination of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). We aimed to determine whether point-of-care (PoC) education, screening and staging for liver disease with direct access to hospitals would improve linkage to care among this group.
METHODS:
All participants were offered PoC education and HCV screening. HCV-positive participants were randomised to standard care (controls) or direct access, which provided a direct pathway to hospitals. Linkage to care was determined by reviewing electronic medical records. Linkage of care cascade was defined as attendance at the specialist clinic, confirmation of viraemia by HCV RNA testing, discussion about HCV treatment and initiation of treatment.
RESULTS:
351 halfway house residents were screened. The overall HCV prevalence was 30.5% (n = 107), with 69 residents in the control group and 38 in the direct access group. The direct access group had a significantly higher percentage of cases linked to specialist review for confirmatory RNA testing (63.2% vs. 40.6%, p = 0.025), HCV treatment discussion (p = 0.009) and treatment initiation (p = 0.01) compared to the controls. Overall, only 12.6% (n = 13) had treatment initiation during follow-up. PoC HCV screening with direct access referral had significantly higher linkage to HCV treatment initiation (adjusted odds ratio 9.13, p = 0.005) in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION
PoC HCV screening with direct access improves linkage to care and simplifies the HCV care cascade, leading to improved treatment uptake. PoC education, screening, diagnosis and treatment may be an effective strategy to achieving HCV micro-elimination in this population.
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use*
;
Halfway Houses
;
Hepacivirus/genetics*
;
Hepatitis C/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Pilot Projects
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
RNA
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology*
5.Performance of point-of-care testing for cervical cancer screening.
Suang ZHAO ; Xue Lian ZHAO ; Shang Ying HU ; Jun Fei MA ; Cai Feng SU ; De Bin WANG ; Xun ZHANG ; Fang Hui ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022;56(2):165-170
Objective: To evaluate the performance of point-of-care testing for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions screening. Methods: In September 2020, 197 and 273 women were selected by using simple random sampling method from "self-sampling" cohort and "physician-sampling" cohort established in Xiangyuan county, Shanxi Province, China, respectively. Cervical exfoliated cells were collected by women themselves or gynecologists. All samples were detected by POCT and women with positive result were directly referred for colposcopy. Subsequently, all the samples were detected by careHPV and PCR test. Colposcopy and punch biopsy were performed for women with POCT negative but careHPV or PCR test positive at another visit. Using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard, we calculated sensitivity, specificity and drew the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The accuracy of POCT was analyzed and compared to that of careHPV and conventional PCR test in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions screening. Results: The median (Q1 , Q3) age of 470 women was 51 (45, 57) years old. Based on self-sampling, the sensitivity and specificity of POCT for CIN2+ were 100.00% (95%CI: 56.56%-100.00%) and 28.95% (95%CI: 22.97%-35.76%), respectively. Compared with POCT, POCT HPV16/18 test had similar sensitivity and higher specificity of 89.47% (95%CI: 84.30%-93.08%). Self-sampling POCT HPV16/18 test had an AUC of 0.947 (95%CI:0.910-0.985), which was higher than that of careHPV and PCR test. Physician-sampling POCT test had 100.00% sensitivity (95%CI: 64.57%-100.00%) and 55.85% specificity (95%CI: 49.83%-61.70%) for detecting CIN2+. POCT HPV16/18 test had lower sensitivity (71.43%, 95%CI: 35.90%-91.76%) and higher specificity (92.45%, 95%CI: 88.63%-95.06%). POCT HPV16/18 test generally showed similar AUC on both self-collected samples and clinician-collected samples (0.947 vs 0.819, P=0.217). Conclusion: POCT HPV16/18 test is an effective method with relatively high sensitivity and specificity for cervical cancer screening.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/diagnosis*
;
Colposcopy
;
Early Detection of Cancer/methods*
;
Female
;
Human papillomavirus 16/genetics*
;
Human papillomavirus 18
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening/methods*
;
Papillomaviridae
;
Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis*
;
Point-of-Care Testing
;
Pregnancy
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
6.Clinical Guidance for Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency and Critical Care Areas after Implementing Insurance Coverage in Korea
Wook Jin CHOI ; Young Rock HA ; Je Hyeok OH ; Young Soon CHO ; Won Woong LEE ; You Dong SOHN ; Gyu Chong CHO ; Chan Young KOH ; Han Ho DO ; Won Joon JEONG ; Seung Mok RYOO ; Jae Hyun KWON ; Hyung Min KIM ; Su Jin KIM ; Chan Yong PARK ; Jin Hee LEE ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Dong Hyun LEE ; Sin Youl PARK ; Bo Seung KANG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(7):54-
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a useful tool that is widely used in the emergency and intensive care areas. In Korea, insurance coverage of ultrasound examination has been gradually expanding in accordance with measures to enhance Korean National Insurance Coverage since 2017 to 2021, and which will continue until 2021. Full coverage of health insurance for POCUS in the emergency and critical care areas was implemented in July 2019. The National Health Insurance Act classified POCUS as a single or multiple-targeted ultrasound examination (STU vs. MTU). STU scans are conducted of one organ at a time, while MTU includes scanning of multiple organs simultaneously to determine each clinical situation. POCUS can be performed even if a diagnostic ultrasound examination is conducted, based on the physician's decision. However, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service plans to monitor the prescription status of whether the POCUS and diagnostic ultrasound examinations are prescribed simultaneously and repeatedly. Additionally, MTU is allowed only in cases of trauma, cardiac arrest, shock, chest pain, and dyspnea and should be performed by a qualified physician. Although physicians should scan all parts of the chest, heart, and abdomen when they prescribe MTU, they are not required to record all findings in the medical record. Therefore, appropriate prescription, application, and recording of POCUS are needed to enhance the quality of patient care and avoid unnecessary cut of medical budget spending. The present article provides background and clinical guidance for POCUS based on the implementation of full health insurance coverage for POCUS that began in July 2019 in Korea.
Abdomen
;
Budgets
;
Chest Pain
;
Critical Care
;
Dyspnea
;
Emergencies
;
Heart
;
Heart Arrest
;
Insurance Coverage
;
Insurance
;
Insurance, Health
;
Korea
;
Medical Records
;
National Health Programs
;
Patient Care
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
Prescriptions
;
Shock
;
Thorax
;
Ultrasonography
7.Application of paper-based microfluidics in point-of-care testing.
Jiasu XU ; Ya ZHANG ; Xiaosong SU ; Shiyin ZHANG ; Shengxiang GE
Chinese Journal of Biotechnology 2020;36(7):1283-1292
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is a test method performed on the sampling site or patient bedside. Accurate results can be achieved rapidly by the application of portable analytical instruments and compatible reagents. It has been widely used in the field of in vitro diagnosis (IVD). Paper-based microfluidics technology has great potential in developing POCT due to its advantages in low cost, simple operation, rapid detection, portable equipment, and unrestricted application conditions. In recent years, the development of paper-based microfluidic technology and its integration with various new technologies and methods have promoted the substantial development of POCT technology and methods. The classification and characteristic of the paper are summarized in this review. Paper-based microfluidic sample pretreatment methods, the flow control in the process of reaction and the signal detecting and analyzing methods for the testing results are introduced. The research progress of various kinds of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) toward POCT in recent years is reviewed. Finally, remaining problems and the future prospects in POCT application of paper-based microfluidics are discussed.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Microfluidic Analytical Techniques
;
instrumentation
;
Paper
;
Point-of-Care Testing
8.Difference Analysis of System Accuracy Criteria between Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System and Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2020;44(4):338-342
According to users and places, blood glucose monitoring systems(BGMSs) can be divided into self-monitoring blood glucose test systems(SMBGs) and Point-of-Care Blood Glucose monitoring systems(POC-BGMSs). The Food and Drug Administration(FDA) believes that standards for SMBGs and POC-BGMSs should be different because of different operators, different use environments, different intendance uses and different applicable populations. Now the international standards for evaluating BGMSs include ISO 15197:2013 issued by International Organization for Standardization(ISO), two guidelines on blood glucose monitoring systems issued by FDA, and POCT12-A3 guidelines issued by the American Association for Clinical and Laboratory Standardization(CLSI), ISO standard and FDA guideline-OTC are applicable in SMBGs, CLSI guideline and FDA guideline-POCTI2-A3 are suitable for POC-BGMSs. By analyzing the accuracy evaluation processes of BGMSs based on four standard documents, it is found that the accuracy evaluation of medical BGMSs is more stringent. It is proposed that SMBGs and POC-BGMSs should be supervised separately.
Blood Glucose
;
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
Reference Standards
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
United States
;
United States Food and Drug Administration
9.A Feasibility Study for Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Using an IGRA Point-of-Care Platform in South Korea
Yun Gyoung HUR ; Ji Young HONG ; Dong Hwan CHOI ; Ahreum KIM ; So yeong PARK ; Minsuk KWON ; Kyungjoon KANG ; Jeong Min LEE ; Hazel M DOCKRELL ; Yoonsuk LEE ; Hoodon JOO ; Sang Nae CHO
Yonsei Medical Journal 2019;60(4):375-380
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate ichroma™ IGRA-TB, a novel point-of-care platform for assaying IFN-γ release, and to compare it with QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 60 healthy subjects, and blood samples were obtained in QFT-GIT blood collection tubes. The blood collection tubes were incubated at 37℃, and culture supernatant was harvested after 18–24 hours. IFN-γ responses were assessed by the ichroma™ IGRA-TB cartridge and the QFT-GIT IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Three active TB patients were recruited as a positive control for M. tb infection. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ichroma™ IGRA-TB test for differentiating between infected and non-infected individuals was 0.9706 (p < 0.001). Inconsistent positivity between the two tests was found in three participants who showed weak positive IFN-γ responses ( < 1.0 IU/mL) with QFT-GIT. However, the two tests had excellent agreement (95.2%, κ=0.91, p < 0.001), and a very strong positive correlation was observed between the IFN-γ values of both tests (r=0.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy demonstrated in this study indicates that the ichroma™ IGRA-TB test could be used as a rapid diagnostic method for detecting latent TB infection. It may be particularly beneficial in resource-limited places that require cost-effective laboratory diagnostics.
Diagnosis
;
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
;
Feasibility Studies
;
Healthy Volunteers
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Latent Tuberculosis
;
Methods
;
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
ROC Curve
;
Tuberculosis
10.Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Antigen Test Kit Ribotest Mycoplasma® for the Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Song I YANG ; Mi Seon HAN ; Sun Jung KIM ; Seong Yeon LEE ; Eun Hwa CHOI
Pediatric Infection & Vaccine 2019;26(2):81-88
PURPOSE: Early detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is important for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in children with pneumonia. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of a rapid antigen test kit in detecting M. pneumoniae from respiratory specimens in children with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). METHODS: A total of 215 nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) were selected from a pool of NPAs that had been obtained from children admitted for LRTI from August 2010 to August 2018. The specimens had been tested for M. pneumoniae by culture and stored at −70°C until use. Tests with Ribotest Mycoplasma® were performed and interpreted independently by two investigators who were blinded to the culture results. RESULTS: Among the 215 NPAs, 119 were culture positive for M. pneumoniae and 96 were culture negative. Of the culture-positive specimens, 74 (62.2%) were positive for M. pneumoniae by Ribotest Mycoplasma®, and 92 of the 96 (95.8%) culture-negative specimens were negative for M. pneumoniae by Ribotest Mycoplasma®. When culture was used as the standard test, the sensitivity and specificity of Ribotest Mycoplasma® were 62.2% and 95.8%, respectively. Additionally, the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall agreement rates with Ribotest Mycoplasma® were 94.9%, 67.2%, and 77.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive test result of Ribotest Mycoplasma® suggests a high likelihood of culture-positive M. pneumoniae infection. However, a negative test result should be interpreted with caution because nearly one-third of negative test results reveal culture-positive M. pneumoniae infections.
Child
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Immunochromatography
;
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
;
Mycoplasma
;
Pneumonia
;
Pneumonia, Mycoplasma
;
Point-of-Care Systems
;
Research Personnel
;
Respiratory Tract Infections
;
Sensitivity and Specificity

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail