1.Drug clinical comprehensive evaluation of tetrandrine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis.
Zhi Ling ZHANG ; Na HE ; Xiao Han XU ; Peng MEN ; Li GUAN ; De Hong LI ; Suo Di ZHAI
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2023;41(3):217-221
Objective: To analyze the safety, effectiveness, economics, innovation, suitability and accessibility of tetrandrine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis, and provide evidence-based basis for health policy decision-making and clinical practice. Methods: In July 2022, the system searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed databases (the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2022), screened the documents that meet the standards, extracted and evaluated the data, and used the "HTA checklist" developed by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) to evaluate the HTA report. AMSTAR-2 Scale was used to evaluate the quality of systematic evaluation/Meta analysis. CHEERS Scale was used to evaluate the quality of pharmacoeconomics research. The included cohort study or case-control study was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool (Cochrane RCT) quality evaluation criteria. Comprehensive comparison and analysis based on the characteristics of the data included in the study. Results: A total of 882 related literatures were detected from the initial screening. According to relevant standards, 8 RCT studies were finally selected for analysis. Statistical results showed that basic treatment with tetrandrine could better improve FEV(1) (MD=0.13, 95%CI: 0.06-0.20, P<0.001), FEV(1)/FVC (MD=4.48, 95%CI: 0.61-8.35, P=0.02) and clinical treatment efficiency. Tetrandrine had a low incidence of adverse reactions. The affordability coefficient of tetrandrine tablets was 0.295-0.492. Conclusion: Tetrandrine can improve the clinical symptoms and pulmonary ventilation function of pneumoconiosis patients, most of the adverse reactions are mild, and the clinical application is safe.
Humans
;
Pneumoconiosis/drug therapy*
;
Benzylisoquinolines/therapeutic use*
;
Drugs, Chinese Herbal
;
Case-Control Studies
2.Clinical efficacy of comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns on patients with pneumoconiosis: a pilot double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study.
Jiansheng LI ; Hulei ZHAO ; Yang XIE ; Jieya LI ; Qingwei LI ; Xuexin CHEN ; Weiyu ZHANG
Frontiers of Medicine 2022;16(5):736-744
Effective therapy options for pneumoconiosis are lacking. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) presents a favorable prospect in the treatment of pneumoconiosis. A pilot study on TCM syndrome differentiation can evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TCM and lay a foundation for further clinical research. A double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial was conducted for 24 weeks, in which 96 patients with pneumoconiosis were randomly divided into the control and treatment groups. Symptomatic treatment was conducted for the two groups. The treatment group was treated with TCM syndrome differentiation, and the control group was treated with placebo. The primary outcomes were the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score. The secondary outcomes were the modified British Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and pulmonary function. Only 83 patients from the 96 patients with pneumoconiosis finished the study. For the primary outcome, compared with the control groups, the treatment group showed a significantly increased 6MWD (407.90 m vs. 499.51 m; 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.25 to 135.97; P < 0.001) and improved SGRQ total score (44.48 vs. 25.67; 95% CI -27.87 to -9.74; P < 0.001). The treatment group also significantly improved compared with the control group on mMRC score (1.4 vs. 0.74; 95% CI -1.08 to -0.23; P =0.003), CAT score (18.40 vs. 14.65; 95% CI -7.07 to -0.43; P =0.027), and the total symptom score (7.90 vs. 5.14; 95% CI -4.40 to -1.12; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred. This study showed that TCM syndrome differentiation and treatment had a favorable impact on the exercise endurance and quality of life of patients with pneumoconiosis.
Humans
;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods*
;
Quality of Life
;
Pilot Projects
;
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use*
;
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy*
;
Pneumoconiosis/drug therapy*
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Syndrome
7.Alprostadil the pneumoconiosis rheology and respiratory function of patients with pulmonary heart disease clinical research.
Chui-yun LUI ; Xiang-wen GONG ; Qian CHEN
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2012;30(9):694-696
Adult
;
Aged
;
Alprostadil
;
therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Hemorheology
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pneumoconiosis
;
blood
;
drug therapy
;
physiopathology
;
Respiratory Function Tests
8.Comparison of medication for pneumoconiosis combined with lung infection between two types of hospitalization.
Xun-Qin DU ; An LI ; Shi-Ping HU
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2010;28(4):286-288
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Anti-Infective Agents
;
pharmacology
;
therapeutic use
;
Cross Infection
;
drug therapy
;
microbiology
;
Female
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Inpatients
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pneumoconiosis
;
microbiology
;
Pneumonia
;
drug therapy
;
microbiology
;
Retrospective Studies

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail