BACKGROUND

Central diabetes insipidus (CDI) is a common complication following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas, but CDI as an initial presentation in pituitary adenomas is extremely rare. We report a case of a 67-year-old Filipino male with pituitary macroadenoma presenting as central diabetes insipidus, manifesting as a two-month history of severe frontotemporal headache, increased thirst, and polyuria, which was managed with desmopressin followed by transsphenoidal surgery. Three months postoperatively, the thyroid and adrenocorticotropic axis remained intact, and pituitary bright spot recovery was observed. He was clinically stable; hence, desmopressin was gradually tapered and discontinued. This case report presents a unique case of a pituitary adenoma that initially presented with central DI but later showed a complete resolution of symptoms along with the normalization of the "bright spot" seen on MRI, a hallmark of the posterior pituitary. Treatment options for preoperative CDI may include surgical or medical management, with some cases reported as self-limiting. However, the rarity of such cases underscores the urgent need for more clinical studies to fully understand the course of this condition. This case highlights a unique presentation of central diabetes insipidus in a pituitary macroadenoma and the possibility of complete resolution of symptoms coinciding with pituitary bright spot recovery post operatively.

Introduction: Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women utilizes estrogen and an anti-androgen like cyproterone acetate (CPA) which can both lead to hyperprolactinemia. Although mild prolactin elevations are common, the development of prolactinomas in transgender women on GAHT is rare. Case: A 23-year-old trans-woman on self-purchased estradiol hemihydrate (17β-estradiol) 4 mg and CPA 12.5 mg daily for GAHT presented with galactorrhea. Investigations revealed markedly elevated prolactin at 2,369 mIU/L and elevated estradiol at 848 pmol/L. A pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified a 0.4 × 0.5 cm microprolactinoma. She declined clinical advice to reduce her medication dose and continued on the same treatment. In the subsequent year, her peak prolactin was 1,383 mIU/L, and a repeat MRI showed the microprolactinoma remained stable. She continues to be on close clinical monitoring. Transgender females experience approximately a fourfold higher rate of developing prolactinomas. The patient’s choice to persist with GAHT reflects the challenges in managing gender dysphoria alongside medical complications. A recent paper by BJ Nolan et al. suggests using prolactin levels exceeding 2,000–3,000 mIU/L to guide further investigations including a pituitary MRI to rule out a prolactinoma. In most cases, the serum prolactin levels will return to the normal range with a reduction or discontinuation of the GAHT. Normalization of prolactin levels have been reported after gonadectomy and CPA cessation in transgender females on GAHT, which suggests that CPA usage may be associated with higher risk of hyperprolactinemia compared to estrogen therapy. Conclusion This case highlights that GAHT can lead to development of prolactinomas. Prolactin monitoring and MRI investigations should be reserved for symptomatic patients, and for those with significantly elevated or increasing prolactin levels. While treatment using dopamine agonists have been reported, this case demonstrates that conservative management and close monitoring can be a viable approach for structurally stable microprolactinomas.
Female ; Prolactinoma ; Transgender Persons

Introduction: Prolactinomas are the most common functioning pituitary adenomas, accounting for 50% of all pituitary tumors. Microprolactinomas (<10 mm) are the most frequent subtype and usually follow a benign course, with tumor progression reported in only 5% of cases. We report a rare case of microprolactinoma that progressed to macroprolactinoma over 16 years. : A 39-year-old female was initially diagnosed with a microprolactinoma at the age of 23 during evaluation for irregular menses since menarche. Baseline pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at that time revealed a lesion measuring 2 × 2 × 0.8 mm. She was treated with bromocriptine for 2 months but subsequently lost to followup. The patient had been married for 10 years without conceiving and continued to have irregular menses. She decided to repeat prolactin before seeking fertility treatment after 16 years. Laboratory investigations revealed markedly elevated serum prolactin (>42,000 mIU/L) with suppressed gonadotropins, while thyroid and adrenal axes were normal. She reported no galactorrhea, headache, or visual disturbances and notably did not develop amenorrhea. Visual field assessment was normal. Repeat pituitary MRI demonstrated that the previously diagnosed microprolactinoma had progressed to a macroprolactinoma, measuring 2.1 × 2.3 × 1.6 cm, with extension into the left cavernous sinus and encasement of the left internal carotid artery, without optic chiasm compression. Oral cabergoline 0.25 mg twice weekly was initiated. She was counselled regarding potential risks of dopamine agonist therapy and advised to use mechanical contraception during treatment. At the 2-week follow-up, she tolerated therapy well. Follow-up imaging and prolactin monitoring were planned at 3 months to assess treatment response and guide fertility planning. Conclusion This case highlights the rare progression of microprolactinoma to macroprolactinoma, underscoring the importance of long-term monitoring in patients with prolactinoma. A careful balance between tumor control and fertility management is essential for optimizing care in women of reproductive age.
Prolactinoma

Introduction: Giant prolactinomas represent 2–3% of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas and show a male predominance. They present with mass effect symptoms and hypogonadism, but may be overlooked, leading to delayed diagnosis. Although dopamine agonists are first-line therapy, management remains challenging due to the large size and invasive behavior. This study aims to describe the clinical and radiological features, treatment modalities, and outcomes of three cases of giant prolactinomas. We retrospectively reviewed three men with giant prolactinomas, including their clinical, biochemical, and radiological features, along with treatment and outcomes. Cases: Three male patients aged 35–59 years with giant prolactinomas were included. Two patients presented with visual disturbances, headache, and features of hypogonadism, while one patient had acute confusion and visual loss secondary to obstructive hydrocephalus requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Imaging in all cases demonstrated large invasive pituitary macroadenomas with extensive local extension. Baseline serum prolactin levels were markedly elevated, ranging from 86,568 to 441,116 uIU/mL (86–324 uIU/mL). All patients had secondary hypogonadism, while secondary hypothyroidism and hypocortisolism were each identified in two patients. One patient also had poorly controlled diabetes mellitus at presentation. Dopamine agonist therapy was initiated as the primary therapy for all the patients. Two patients developed cerebrospinal fluid leak following initiation of low-dose dopamine agonist therapy (one patient received cabergoline 0.25 mg weekly, while another received 0.5 mg weekly), which resolved spontaneously with conservative management. Serum prolactin levels decreased markedly, with significant improvement in symptoms related to mass effect following treatment. Conclusion Giant prolactinomas may present with significant mass effect and multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. Dopamine agonists remain the cornerstone of management and can result in substantial biochemical and clinical improvement even in large invasive tumors. However, rapid tumor shrinkage may lead to complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leak, highlighting the importance of close monitoring during treatment initiation.
Prolactinoma

Introduction: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) may cause central hypothyroidism due to pituitary compression, often presenting with low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). However, suppressed TSH in this setting should not automatically be attributed to pituitary dysfunction, as primary hyperthyroidism—such as Graves’ disease—may rarely coexist. Distinguishing between these disorders is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Case: A 42-year-old female presented with intermittent headache, visual field impairment, palpitations, fine tremors, and weight loss. Physical examination revealed visual field deficits and no goiter. Laboratory evaluation showed cortisol level of 1 µg/dL (normal: 3.7–19.4 µg/dL), luteinizing hormone 1.62 mU/L (normal: 2.4–12.6 mU/L), follicle-stimulating hormone 5.01 mU/L (normal: 3.5–12.5 mU/L), free thyroxine 4 28.32 pmol/L (normal: 12–22 pmol/L), TSH 0.02 µIU/mL (normal: 0.27–4.2 µIU/mL), and prolactin 70.84 ng/mL. Thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) was 3.53 IU/L, confirming Graves’ disease. Contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a pituitary macroadenoma (2.13 × 2.28 × 3.05 cm) with optic chiasm compression. The patient was diagnosed with NFPA, Graves’ disease, secondary adrenal insufficiency, possible hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and hyperprolactinemia likely due to the stalk effect. Preoperative management included hydrocortisone replacement and antithyroid therapy. The patient subsequently underwent transsphenoidal surgery with appropriate perioperative care. Postoperatively, no new pituitary hormone deficiencies were observed. She was maintained on thiamazole 10 mg daily with clinical improvement and remains under regular follow-up. Conclusion This case highlights a rare but clinically important coexistence of NFPA and Graves’ disease. Suppressed TSH in patients with pituitary adenoma should not be assumed to reflect pituitary dysfunction without thorough evaluation. Comprehensive thyroid assessment is crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.
Pituitary Neoplasms ; Graves Disease

Introduction: Discordant thyroid function tests (TFTs), characterized by elevated free thyroxine 4 (FT4) with non-suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), pose a significant diagnostic challenge. Differentiating between Resistance to Thyroid Hormone (RTH) and TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma (TSH-oma) is essential, as management strategies differ substantially. Case: A female with a history of hyperthyroidism diagnosed in 2011 was treated with antithyroid drugs for 1 year before defaulting on follow-up. She was later found to have discordant TFTs at a private centre, where a brain computed tomography scan was reportedly normal. She was referred to our centre for optimization of thyroid function prior to planned thyroidectomy for a solitary large right thyroid nodule measuring 4.2 × 2.8 × 4.7 cm. Fine-needle aspiration cytology demonstrated a benign follicular lesion (Bethesda II). Despite restarting antithyroid medication, she remained clinically euthyroid with no overt thyrotoxic symptoms apart from intermittent palpitations without documented tachycardia. Antithyroid therapy was discontinued. Serial TFTs across multiple assay platforms consistently demonstrated elevated FT4 with inappropriately normal TSH levels. Thyroid autoantibodies, including TSH receptor and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies, were negative. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging showed no evidence of adenoma, and serum α-subunit level was normal (0.3 ng/ mL), making TSH-oma unlikely. Dynamic testing was not performed as thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation was unavailable at our centre, while T3 suppression testing was deemed inappropriate due to symptomatic palpitations. Family screening was not possible as the patient was not in contact with her relatives. In the absence of pituitary pathology and given her largely euthyroid clinical status, RTH was considered the most likely diagnosis. Conclusion This case highlights the importance of considering RTH in patients with persistent discordant TFTs, particularly when clinical findings do not correlate with biochemical abnormalities. Early recognition and appropriate pituitary evaluation are essential to prevent misdiagnosis and avoid unnecessary antithyroid therapy or thyroidectomy.
Pituitary Neoplasms ; Thyroid Hormones ; Thyrotropin

Intracranial lipomas are benign tumors that may occasionally be found in the suprasellar cistern while pituitary adenomas are far more common brain tumors. Pituitary adenomas may rarely coexist with other intracranial tumors in the sellar-suprasellar region. We share a unique case of a patient with coexisting non-functioning pituitary adenoma and sellar-suprasellar lipoma presenting with blurring of vision.

We report a 55-year-old male presenting with a two-year history of blurring of vision with findings of a 2.7 x 3.0 x 3.2 cm homogeneously enhancing lobulated isointense mass on the sellar-suprasellar region. Hormonal workups revealed low cortisol and mildly elevated prolactin. He initially underwent endonasal transsphenoidal excision of the tumor which revealed to be a lipoma on histopathology. Due to minimal improvement of vision from the subtotal excision, he underwent repeat surgery through the transcranial approach which in turn showed a pituitary adenoma.

The co-occurrence of two sellar-suprasellar tumors with different histology is rare, as most of the evidence is based on only a handful of case series. Intracranial lipomas result from persistence and abnormal differentiation of the meninx primitiva during the development of the subarachnoid cisterns. On the other hand, pituitary tumorigenesis is still largely unclear but appears to involve multiple tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, cell cycle deregulation factors, and miRNAs. Given the differing pathogenesis of each tumor type, the coexistence may only be coincidental. The best surgical approach in this situation is unknown but the focus is on complete excision of the adenoma.

Objective:To assess the efficacy of "three-step" strategy for preparing autologous pedicled nasal mucosal flaps in repairing cerebrospinal fluid（CSF） leaks following transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 25 patients who developed CSF leaks after transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between July 2012 and June 2022. Surgical repair was selected step by step using nasal septal mucosal flap with either the posterior septal artery or septal branch of the sphenopalatine artery as the pedicle, or a pedicled middle turbinate mucosal flap. All patients underwent ≥2-year endoscopic follow-up to assess flap viability and CSF leak recurrence. Results:The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. Five patients developed intracranial infections postoperatively. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 12 years. Nasal endoscopic examinations showed good mucosal flap growth, with no recurrence of CSF leakage in any of the patients. Conclusion:High-flow cerebrospinal fluid（CSF） leaks following pituitary tumor surgery pose significant challenges for clinical repair. Based on intraoperative nasal septal mucosal preservation and the condition of sellar base CSF leakage, the "three-step" strategy for preparing autologous pedicled nasal mucosal flaps-utilizing posterior septal artery, ethmoidal artery-based, or pedicled middle turbinate mucosal flaps sequentially-is a safe and effective repair method.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery* ; Surgical Flaps ; Nasal Mucosa/surgery* ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/surgery* ; Adenoma/surgery* ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Aged

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A parachiasmal lesion is defined as a mass or growth arising from structures around or near the chiasm. Ophthalmologic signs and symptoms may be observed in such condition, such as blurring of vision, visual field defects, and binocular double vision. The primary objective of this study was to describe the presenting ophthalmologic signs and symptoms of parachiasmal lesions among patients consulting at a single institution in the Philippines.

This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Medical records of patients with parachiasmal lesions seen in the Neuro-Ophthalmology clinic of a tertiary Philippine hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 were reviewed. Clinical profile, neuro-ophthalmologic presentation, diagnosis, management, and visual outcomes were summarized by descriptive statistics.

One hundred thirty-three (133) patient records satisfied the study criteria. Most common presenting symptoms were blurring of vision. headache, and loss of vision. Visual acuity at initial visit ranged from 20/20 to no light perception. A relative afferent pupillary defect was present in half of the study population. Almost half presented with normal-looking discs or disc pallor. Bitemporal hemianopia is the most common visual field defect pattern seen in both confrontation and automated visual field testing. Histopathology was significantly associated with visual outcome.

Parachiasmal lesion should be suspected in patients who complain of unilateral blurring of vision, and those who present with normal or pale optic discs. Pituitary adenoma is the most common radiologic and histopathologic diagnosis. Visual outcome after intervention has improved or remained stable in two-thirds of patients; visual recovery is multi-factorial, which is influenced by duration, surgery, and histopathology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Prolactinoma is the most common functioning tumor of the pituitary gland. While its clinical course and outcomes among different populations have been vastly described in the past, data of prolactinoma among Filipinos has not been explored. This paper aims to describe the clinical profile and outcome of prolactinoma among adult Filipino patients.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 41 patients with prolactinoma seen at the Philippine General Hospital. The clinical profile, cranial imaging features, treatment modalities given, and their outcomes over a mean follow up of 16 months were evaluated.

The mean age at diagnosis was 36.76 ± 13.99 years. Majority of our cohort were females. Macroprolactinoma were found in 75.61% and giant prolactinoma in 9.76%. The remaining 12.2% were mixed GH and PRL secreting tumors. Most common symptoms at presentation were blurring of vision, headache, and amenorrhea. Median PRL levels was 353 (200-470) ng/ml. Medical therapy with Bromocriptine was the primary treatment modality used in 78% of patients. We found no significant difference between patients who underwent surgical and medical primary treatment modalities in terms of outcomes. At the end of follow up, 82.6% of patients achieved at least more than 50% reduction in their prolactin levels.

Overall, our study showed that adult Filipino patients with prolactinoma have a larger tumor size at diagnosis and a lower rate of improvement of gonadal function after treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and biochemical outcomes between the treatment modalities used.