Introduction: Aside from religious circumcisions, the indications for circumcision are few. However, in the cultural context, many patients are unnecessarily referred for circumcision for physiological phimosis (adhesions). Due to parental concerns and misperceptions by general practitioners, nonretractile prepuce is one of the most common indications for referral to a paediatric surgeon in many countries. This study aimed to determine whether preputial adhesiolysis successfully managed symptomatic non-retractile foreskin and therefore prevented the need for circumcision. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the health records of children who presented with preputial adhesion. We included 65 symptomatic patients (ballooning of the prepuce in all cases and additional dysuria in three cases) who underwent preputial adhesiolysis. All cases were followed up for 2 years. Circumcision was subsequently carried out for patients who developed fibrous scarring resulting in difficult retraction due to the development of thick adhesions or skin fissuring with persistence of symptoms. Results: Of the 65 boys, 58 (89.2%) achieved complete retraction of the prepuce. The remaining 7 boys (10.8%) presented with recurring symptoms and thick fibrosed prepuce, and they underwent circumcision due to the dense adhesions. Histopathological examination of the circumcised prepuces revealed balanitis xerotica obliterans in two cases. Conclusion Preputial adhesiolysis is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic preputial adhesions in boys younger than 5 years old. The procedure avoids circumcision and its associated risks. Preputial adhesiolysis should be offered as a primary treatment instead of circumcision.
Phimosis ; Circumcision, Male ; Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans

ObjectiveHuman papilloma virus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and is also closely related to penile cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, and anal cancer in males. However, few studies are reported on male HPV. This study aimed to investigate HPV infection of the external genitalia in men whose female partners have cervical HPV infection.

METHODSWe collected the relevant data on the male outpatients whose partners had cervical HPV infection in our Department of Urology and Andrology from August to December 2016. We obtained samples with nylon swabs from the glans penis, corona, inner layer of the prepuce and penile body and detected different types of HPV infection using the Hybribio HPV typing kit, PCR and membrane hybridization.

RESULTSValid data were collected from 140 males, which showed 83.5% of HPV infection of the external genitalia, including 60 cases of HPV6 (43.2%), 27 cases of HPV16 (19.4%), 14 cases of HPV39 (10.1%), 13 cases of HPV18 (9.4%), 13 cases of HPV58 (9.4%), and 13 cases of HPV52 (9.4%). Redundant prepuce was found in 75.5% of the males, but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of HPV infection between the normal and redundant prepuce groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMen who have the female partners with positive cervical HPV are at high risk of HPV infection and therefore need to be screened and treated so as to reduce HPV infection in both sexes.

Female ; Foreskin ; virology ; Genital Diseases, Female ; virology ; Genital Diseases, Male ; virology ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; isolation & purification ; Humans ; Male ; Papillomaviridae ; isolation & purification ; Papillomavirus Infections ; diagnosis ; Penile Neoplasms ; virology ; Penis ; abnormalities ; virology ; Phimosis ; virology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Sexual Partners ; Specimen Handling ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; virology

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effects of circumcision by surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce.

METHODSFrom September 2016 to June 2017, we treated 250 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce, 127 by conventional circumcision (the control group) and the other 123 by surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device (the observation group). We compared the operation time, intra-operative bleeding, preputial frenulum alignment, postoperative ecchymosis, and postoperative penile appearance between the two groups of patients.

RESULTSCompared with the controls, the patients in the observation group showed significantly longer operation time (［4.48 ± 1.18］ vs ［7.17 ± 1.42］ min, P<0.05), lower rates of intra-operative frenulum bleeding (15.0% ［19/127］ vs 4.1% ［5/123］, P<0.05) and frenulum misalignment (26.8% ［34/127］ vs 0.8% ［1/123］, P<0.05), higher incidence of postoperative ecchymosis (41.7% ［53/127］ vs 21.1% ［26/123］, P<0.05), and higher satisfaction of the patients with the postoperative penile appearance (92.9% ［18/127］ vs 98.4% ［121/123］, P<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the control and observation groups in intra-operative non-frenulum bleeding (4.7% ［6/127］ vs 1.6% ［2/123］, P = 0.164).

CONCLUSIONSCircumcision by surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device can effectively avoid preputial frenulum misalignment, reduce intra-operative bleeding, and improve postoperative penile appearance.

Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; Disposable Equipment ; Ecchymosis ; etiology ; Foreskin ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Operative Time ; Penis ; abnormalities ; surgery ; Personal Satisfaction ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Postoperative Period ; Suture Techniques ; instrumentation

No abstract available.
Animals ; Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus* ; Lichens* ; Paraphimosis*

Objective: To investigate the effect of the frenulum identification positioning method with a disposable suture device in circumcision for the prevention of postoperative penile frenulum malposition. METHODS: Totally 212 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce underwent circumcision from March 2015 to September 2016, including 109 cases of conventional circumcision (the control group) and 103 cases treated by frenulum identification positioning with a disposable suture device (the observation group). We observed the postoperative position of the penile frenulum and median raphe and compared the deviation angles of the frenulum between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The median of penile frenulum deviation angle (interquartile range) was 0 (3.56) in the observation group, significantly smaller than 12.41 (19.59) in the control (P <0.001, P = 0.000). And the rate of frenulum deviation was remarkably lower in the former (8.74% ［9/103］) than in the latter group (66.06% ［72/109］) (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS Circumcision using the frenulum identification positioning method with a disposable suture device can effectively avoid postoperative penile frenulum malposition. With the advantages of safety and easy operation, it deserves clinical application and popularization.
Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; methods ; Disposable Equipment ; Foreskin ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Penis ; surgery ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Suture Techniques ; instrumentation ; Sutures

Objective: To investigate the attitudes of the parents toward circumcision for 6－14 years old children and their satisfaction with the results. METHODS: We performed circumcision in the Department of Urology of Zhongda Hospital for 220 children aged 6－14 years from 220 families between January 2010 and August 2016, including 70 cases of traditional and 150 cases of Shang Ring circumcision. We conducted telephone follow-ups among the parents of the patients concerning the decision-maker, reasons and regret for circumcision, acceptance of a second operation, source of information, satisfaction with surgical results, and reasons for dissatisfaction. RESULTS: Most decisions for circumcision were made by the father, chiefly for health and hygiene. Their main sources of information on circumcision were Internet and friends. The parents of 29 patients were dissatisfied for long recovery or peri- and post-operative pain, including 19 cases (27.1%， 19/70) of traditional and 10 cases (6.7%， 10/150) of Shang Ring circumcision, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Most parents were satisfied with circumcision, and the main reasons for dissatisfaction were long recovery and pain. The rate of satisfaction with Shang Ring circumcision was higher than that with traditional circumcision. Shang Ring circumcision is recommended for children aged 6－14 years old.
Adolescent ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Attitude ; Child ; China ; Circumcision, Male ; methods ; psychology ; Convalescence ; psychology ; Fathers ; Humans ; Male ; Pain, Postoperative ; psychology ; Parents ; psychology ; Personal Satisfaction ; Phimosis ; Time Factors

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of a novel disposable ring versus that of the suture device in circumcision for redundant prepuce and phimosis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 470 male patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis to receive circumcision with a novel disposable ring (the DR group, n = 235) or the suture device (the SD group, n = 235) and compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pain scores, wound healing time, and postoperative complications and penile appearance between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: All the operations were completed smoothly. Compared with the SD group, the DR group showed significantly shorter operation time (［7.49 ± 1.84］ vs ［3.83 ± 0.42］ min, P <0. 05), less intraoperative blood loss (［3.34 ± 2.59］ vs ［2.41 ± 1.01］ ml, P <0.05), lower intraoperative pain score (0.57 ± 0.76 vs 0.20 ± 0.47, P <0.05) and 6-hour postoperative pain score (3.42 ± 1.12 vs 0.48 ± 0.94, P <0.05), shorter wound healing time (［12.05 ± 2.80］ vs ［7.79 ± 1.65］ d, P <0.05), lower incidence rates of postoperative glans congestion or edema (36.17% ［85/235］ vs 2.56% ［6/235］, P <0.05), dysuria or strenuous urination (34.04% ［80/235］ vs 2.13% ［5/235］, P <0.05) and bleeding or hematoma (5.11% ［12/235］ vs 1.28% ［3/235］, P <0.05), and higher satisfaction with postoperative penile appearance (90.6% ［213/235］ vs 95.8% ［228/235］, P <0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the SD and DR groups in the pain scores at the sixth night after operation (1.31 ± 0.96 vs 1.34 ± 1.07, P >0.05) or while the staples scraping the underpants or at the ring removal (3.49 ± 1.22 vs 3.36 ± 1.41, P >0.05). No obvious postoperative infection or delayed healing was observed except for 3 cases of wound dehiscence (1 in the DR and 2 in the SD group) and 8 cases of delayed removal of the staples in the SD group. CONCLUSIONS The novel disposable ring, with its advantages of short operation time, less bleeding and pain, good penile appearance, high safety, and simple operation, is obviously superior to the suture device in circumcision and deserves to be applied and popularized clinically. .
Blood Loss, Surgical ; Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; Disposable Equipment ; Edema ; etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Operative Time ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; Penis ; abnormalities ; surgery ; Personal Satisfaction ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Postoperative Period ; Suture Techniques ; instrumentation ; Sutures ; Wound Healing

Objective: To compare the clinical effect of a novel disposable circumcision device Ring with that of conventional circumcision in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. METHODS: Totally, 750 patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis underwent Ring circumcision (group A, n = 450) or conventional circumcision (group B, n = 300). We recorded the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) intraoperative pain scores, postoperative complications, wound healing time, and patients' satisfaction with postoperative penile appearance, followed by comparison of the collected data between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: All the operations were successfully completed. Group A, as compared with B, showed significantly shorter operation time (［3.78 ± 0.42］ vs ［26.24 ± 3.99］ min, P <0.05), less intraoperative blood loss (［2.39 ± 1.01］ vs ［10.80 ± 3.57］ ml, P <0.05), lower pain scores intraoperatively (0.14 ± 0.36 vs 2.30 ± 1.46, P <0.05), 6 hours postoperatively (0.32 ± 0.78 vs 3.03 ± 1.56, P <0.05) and at the ring removal (3.35 ± 1.42 vs 2.78 ± 1.43, P <0.05), shorter wound healing time (［7.61 ± 1.60］ vs ［8.57 ± 1.37］ d, P <0.05), higher satisfaction with postoperative penile appearance (97.8% ［440/450］ vs 86% ［258/300］, P <0.05), and lower incidence of postoperative bleeding or hematoma (0.89% ［4/450］ vs 3% ［9/300］, P <0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups A and B in the nocturnal pain score before the ring removal (1.45±1.02 vs 1.38 ± 0.92, P >0.05) or the postoperative incidence rate of edema (0.89% ［4/450］ vs 2.33% ［7/300］, P >0.05). There were no significant postoperative infections or delayed incision healing except for 1 case of wound dehiscence in each group. CONCLUSIONS Ring circumcision, with its advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss and pain, higher safety, and better postoperative penile appearance, is easily accepted by the patients and deserves wide clinical application.
Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; Disposable Equipment ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Operative Time ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; Penis ; abnormalities ; anatomy & histology ; surgery ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; Postoperative Period ; Wound Healing

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of 0.02% clobetasol propionate cream (CPC) on phimosis in prepubertal children. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 237 prepubertal children with phimosis present at the Outpatient Department from June 2012 to December 2015. The patients were aged 2－14 (mean 8.6) years, all treated by topical application of 0.02% CPC to the narrowed opening and adhered part of the foreskin twice a day, in the morning and evening respectively. At the time of CPC application, the foreskin was slightly retracted. We evaluated the therapeutic effect every week from the end of the first week of treatment. RESULTS: Totally, 233 of the patients completed the 8-week treatment, of whom 181 (77.68%) showed full retraction of the foreskin, 28 (12.01%) experienced improvement (disappearance of the phimotic ring), and 24 (10.30%) failed to respond, with a total effectiveness rate of 89.70%. No significant local or systemic adverse reactions were observed during the treatment. CONCLUSIONS Topical application of 0.02% Clobetasol Propionate Cream is a safe, effective, painless, and inexpensive option for the treatment of phimosis in prepubertal chilodren.
Administration, Topical ; Adolescent ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents ; administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clobetasol ; administration & dosage ; Foreskin ; Gels ; Humans ; Male ; Outpatients ; Phimosis ; drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficiency of Shang Ring with that of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce.

METHODSFrom June 2013 to March 2015, we treated 320 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce using Shang Ring (n=158) or DCSD (n=162). We compared the operation time, intra-operative blood loss, incision healing time, postoperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, and treatment cost between the two groups of patients.

RESULTSComparison between the Shang Ring and DCSD groups showed that the operation time was (5.6±1.3) vs (5.4±1.2) min, intra-operative blood loss (1.2±0.8) vs (1.3±0.9) ml, postoperative delayed hemorrhage 3.16% (5/158) vs 4.32% (7/162), incision healing time (16.1±7.2) vs (7.5±2.3) d, wound infection 15.82% (25/158) vs 7.41% (12/162), 1-month postoperative incision edema 29.11% (46/158) vs 9.26% (15/162), overall postoperative satisfaction rate 63.92% (101/158) vs 90.12% (146/162), and treatment cost (1121.2±15.6) vs (2142.6±10.8) RMB ¥. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the latter five parameters (P<0.05 ), but not in the first three (P>0.05 ).

CONCLUSIONSThe DSCD has an obvious superiority over Shang Ring for its relatively lower complication rate, shorter incision healing time, and better cosmetic appearance.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; Edema ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Operative Time ; Penis ; surgery ; Personal Satisfaction ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; Postoperative Period ; Prostheses and Implants ; Surgical Wound ; pathology ; Sutures