Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis worldwide and represents a growing global health burden. It arises from hyperuricemia resulting from disordered purine metabolism, leading to monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition and recurrent inflammatory arthritis. Although hyperuricemia is the principal risk factor, genetic susceptibility, impaired urate transport, and emerging factors such as the gut microbiota also contribute to disease development. Acute flares are mediated by MSU crystal-induced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent interleukin-1β production, whereas chronic inflammation results in tophus formation and structural joint damage. Gout is closely associated with metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease, which contribute to persistently elevated mortality. Although advances in imaging and pharmacologic therapy have improved diagnosis and management, the real-world use of urate-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Further research and sustained efforts by healthcare professionals are needed to improve long-term disease control.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal scan timing for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and to evaluate a new timing method based on the arteriovenous circulation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic examinations were performed mainly in the extremities. A 1.5T scanner with a 3-D turbo-FLASH sequence was used, and during each study, two consecutive arterial phases and one venous phase were acquired. Scan delay time was calculated from the time-intensity curve by the traditional (n = 48) and/or the new (n = 41) method. This latter was based on arteriovenous circulation time rather than peak arterial enhancement time, as used in the traditional method. The numbers of first-phase images showing a properly enhanced arterial phase were compared between the two methods. RESULTS: Mean scan delay time was 5.4 sec longer with the new method than with the traditional. Properly enhanced first-phase images were found in 65% of cases (31/48) using the traditional timing method, and 95% (39/41) using the new method. When cases in which there was mismatch between the target vessel and the time-intensity curve acquisition site are excluded, erroneous acquisition occurred in seven cases with the traditional method, but in none with the new method. CONCLUSION: The calculation of scan delay time on the basis of arteriovenous circulation time provides better timing for arterial phase acquisition than the traditional method.
*Contrast Media ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA/*diagnostic use ; Human ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Injections, Intravenous ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography/*methods ; Male ; Middle Age ; Time Factors