Stroke remains a major cause of death and disability, highlighting the intimate relationship between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Despite substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment, marked disparities in access to care and clinical outcomes continue to exist. As such, stroke remains a shared challenge for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and neurologists, emphasizing the need for effective prevention, timely intervention, structured rehabilitation, and optimal secondary prevention. In this issue, we feature the Executive Summary of the 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Philippines, an important resource for promoting evidence-based, patient-centered care and improving stroke outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide and remains a major cause of death among Filipinos. Despite being the most common neurological disease, wide variations in management persist among clinicians. This CPG aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute stroke.

A systematic synthesis of evidence was conducted to address the diagnosis and management of both acute hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed. The process included: (1) generation of critical questions and outcomes (2) retrieval of current and relevant evidence, (3) synthesis and appraisal of the evidence base, (4) formulation of draft recommendations, (5) deliberation by a multi-sectoral stakeholder panel on feasibility, values and preferences to assess the strength of recommendations and (6) planning for dissemination, implementation, impact evaluation and updating.

Sixteen clinical questions were addressed leading to 21 recommendations. Most were strong recommendations supported by moderate to high certainty of evidence. The recommendations span the spectrum of acute stroke care, including early diagnosis with imaging, admission to stroke units, reperfusion therapies, surgical options, prevention of complications and the role of adjunctive treatments.

The recommendations in this CPG are intended to guide clinicians and other stakeholders in the diagnosis and management of acute stroke. They are meant to supplement, not replace, the sound clinical judgment of healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the Philippines. Despite strong recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), local data reveal low rates of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and early invasive strategies due to financial constraints and system inefficiencies. The recent expansion of the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) AMI benefits package presents an opportunity to improve access to appropriate care. A standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway is needed to guide healthcare providers and ensure consistent, high-quality care of AMI across various healthcare settings.

To develop a standardized, evidence-based national clinical pathway for the management of AMI patients eligible under the PHIC IHD-AMI benefits package.

Existing AMI clinical pathways from nine public and private hospitals in the Philippines were collected and reviewed. A multidisciplinary Technical Working Group (TWG) appraised current guidelines using the AGREE II tool and evaluated the collected pathways to identify strengths, gaps and variations in practice. A draft pathway was created and refined through consensus-building with cardiology experts and stakeholders to develop the final pathway.

The final national AMI clinical pathway integrates evidence-based best practices and accounts for differences in institutional resources. It standardizes the use of ECG and cardiac biomarkers for diagnosis, provides clear criteria and timelines for reperfusion therapy, defines indications for coronary angiography and PCI, and recommends optimal medical therapy and cardiac rehabilitation.

The national AMI clinical pathway is a critical step toward improving the quality, equity and efficiency of AMI care in the Philippines. Developed through a collaborative, evidence-based process, it aligns clinical management with international standards while addressing local healthcare system realities. Adoption by PHIC as a quality standard is expected to enhance guideline adherence, inform health policy and financing, and drive improvements in health outcomes. Continued implementation support, monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure its impact, particularly in under-resourced or geographically isolated settings.

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Filipinos. The guideline-recommended treatment for AMI includes emergency care, early electrocardiogram, emergent coronary angiogram and angioplasty, intensive care, medical management and cardiac rehabilitation. However, the cost of treatment is very high and not affordable for most Filipinos. To address this, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) released the ischemic heart disease – acute myocardial infarction (IHD-AMI) Benefits Package under Circular No. 2024-0032 on December 21, 2024. This package significantly increased the insurance coverage for AMI to include invasive procedures and cardiac rehabilitation. The UP-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) was the first to implement this package. This paper documents the initial planning, system changes and innovations undertaken by UP-PGH to support implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study used retrospective document review to detail revision of the existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pathway and development of the AMl pathway, restructuring of patient flow and upgrades in infrastructure and hospital capabilities. Meeting minutes from the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and UP-PGH were reviewed to describe the hospital's preparation and implementation process.

UP-PGH established an efficient, evidence-based ACS and AMI pathway. Hospital protocols, staffing, infrastructure and equipment were aligned to implement the PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package. Key steps included resources upgrade, stakeholder consultations, pathway redesign, workflow development, process alignment and monitoring systems.

The PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package can be successfully implemented in a tertiary hospital with catheterization laboratory. The documented process at UP-PGH can serve as a model for other institutions planning to utilize the package.

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization is a major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its burden has been rising across Asia. In Korea alone, AF-related hospitalizations increased by 420% from 2006 to 2015. However, comparable data are lacking in the Philippines. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of AF-related hospitalizations among adult patients aged 19 years or older using database claims of the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) in 2017 and 2018.

In both 2017 and 2018, approximately 19–20 per 10,000 total hospital admissions were due to AF. The median patient age was 68 years in 2017 and 69 years in 2018. Most admissions occurred in private tertiary hospitals located in urban areas, with a median length of stay of three days. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.1% for both years.

Among the arrhythmias, AF was the most common cause of hospitalization in the Philippines in 2017 and 2018, which accounted for 19 per 10,000 hospitalizations. Despite this burden, the associated in-hospital mortality rate remained low.

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains the most common cause of death while cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is the third most common in the Philippines. IHD and CVD represent complications resulting from prevalent non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and risk factors which present important opportunities for primary and secondary prevention.

This study aimed to pilot a sustainable multisectoral approach for community-based screening and management of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and determine the effects of a multisectoral collaboration approach on the rate of screening, prevalence and control rates for selected risk factors.

This is a quality improvement project that determines the baseline prevalence and control rates of CV risk factors followed by intense screening efforts with support from private partnerships. The project's core components are: (a) capacity building (b) information dissemination; (c) service provision; and (d) health monitoring. Rates of screening, prevalence and control were monitored over a two-year period.

A total of 94,125 patients were screened through the ONE Cavite Project over two years (January 2021 to December 2022). A total of 61,271 were newly identified as having hypertension (65.1%), 24,069 diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 (25.6%), 29,257 diagnosed to have dyslipidemia (31.1%) and 13,204 smokers (14.0%) were identified.

Intensification of screening was successful in improving identification of individuals with NCDs. The impact of continued educational support for both providers and patients in this study reaffirmed its role as a central component of NCD diagnosis, management and prevention.

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has become a cornerstone in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, aspirin intolerance poses a problem in the lack of guideline-based alternatives with proven benefit. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT as an alternative treatment for aspirin among patients undergoing PCI.

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All studies that investigated cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin on top of P2Y12 inhibitors for patients undergoing PCI were included. Outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis were reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

Three cohort studies including 1,227 patients on cilostazol and 1,480 on aspirin, both with a P2Y12 inhibitor were analyzed. Pooled estimates showed no significant difference in MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79–2.23; p = 0.29) or acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46–1.89; p = 0.85) between groups. However, cilostazol-based DAPT was associated with significantly less bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–0.99; p = 0.05). All outcomes were statistically homogeneous (p>0.1, I²CONCLUSION

Cilostazol compared to aspirin, both on top of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is as efficient in the reduction of MACE and acute myocardial infarction; and even safer in terms of bleeding. Cilostazol-based DAPT may serve as an alternative to standard DAPT among aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI.

BACKGROUND

Cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) accounts for 20% of all cardiac malformations with an estimated incidence of 2.5–3 per 1,000 live births. An increasing number of patients now survive into adolescence, with or without intervention, forming a unique group requiring specialized care.

To determine factors influencing survival among adolescents with unrepaired cyanotic CHD.

This single-center case-control study was conducted from 2017 to 2022 in a specialized tertiary center in the Philippines. Sample size was based on a 2.6% total fatality rate among infants who underwent CHD operations. Binary logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of survival, with pRESULTS

Among 125 subjects, 58% (72/125) were males with a median age of 16 years. The median age at diagnosis was 1 year and 1 month; 73% resided outside Metro Manila. Most patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I (49%), with Tetralogy of Fallot as the most common diagnosis (52%) and 26% had palliative procedures. Predictors of survival included place of origin (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15–0.95, p = 0.039), oxygen saturation (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06–1.17, pCONCLUSION

Optimizing oxygenation, improving access to care and strengthening targeted interventions are crucial for enhancing survival among adolescents with unrepaired cyanotic CHD.

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Although advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent technology have improved outcomes, in-stent restenosis (ISR) persists as a significant challenge contributing to repeat revascularization, rehospitalization, increased healthcare costs and adverse outcomes.

A single-center retrospective cohort study reviewed medical records from January 2021 to December 2024 to determine the incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with ISR.

Among 200 patients, ISR occurred in 58 (29%). Factors significantly associated with ISR included hypertension (p = 0.048), smaller stent diameter (OR=0.23, pCONCLUSION

ISR remains a substantial and multifactorial clinical burden highlighting the need for vigilant post-PCI surveillance, aggressive risk factor management and individualized interventional strategies—including optimal stent sizing, lesion preparation and adjunctive imaging use—to reduce restenosis risk and improve long-term outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Early, high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival in cardiac arrest. In the Philippines, guidelines specify chest compression depth, but challenges like fatigue and limited staff affect outcomes. This has led to interest in devices like the LUCAS, a portable, battery-powered machine that provides consistent compressions. This study evaluates the clinical profile, outcomes and risks of patients treated with LUCAS at a private tertiary hospital in the Philippines.A

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a private tertiary hospital, reviewing records of patients who received LUCAS-assisted compressions (March 2023–September 2024) and manual compressions (March 2023–January 2024) based on inclusion criteria.

Out of the 188 cases, 63 patients received mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (mCPR) and 122 received manual compressions. Demographics were similar between the groups with notable differences in hypertension and coronary artery disease prevalence. The causes of arrest varied: arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock were more common in the mCPR group, while septic shock and COVID-19 were predominant in the manual compression group. The mCPR group showed higher survival rates, improved rhythm recovery and lower asystole rates. However, no significant differences in long-term survival or other vital signs were observed between the groups.

The study suggests mCPR may improve immediate outcomes, particularly in cases of arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock, though long-term effects remain unclear. Chest fractures were commonly observed in LUCAS recipients. As the first Philippine study on mechanical CPR, it highlights potential benefits and underscores the need for further research on its risks and broader applications.