BACKGROUND

The Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) is a patient-reported outcome measure that provides a holistic assessment on the quality of in-hospital postpartum functional recovery. Validated across several countries in various languages, it has shown great potential for widespread global acceptance in both clinical practice and research. We aimed to develop a Filipino version of the ObsQoR-10 and to evaluate its validity, reliability, and feasibility.

One hundred women who had elective cesarean delivery (CD) completed the ObsQoR-10-Filipino and EuroQol five-dimensional 3 L Filipino version questionnaires (including a Global Health Visual Analog Scale [GHVAS]) 24 h after delivery. Twenty-five women completed the ObsQoR-10-Filipino survey again 25 h after delivery. Validity was assessed by evaluation of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and hypothesis testing. Reliability was assessed by evaluating internal consistency, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.

The ObsQoR-10-Filipino scores showed good and moderate correlation to the EQ-5D-3 L scores (r = −0.636; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.740–−0.503, P < 0.001) and to the GHVAS scores (r = 0.387; 95% CI: 0.207–0.543, P < 0.001), respectively. ObsQoR-10-Filipino discriminated well between good (GHVAS score ≥ 70, 68.4 ± 12.9) and poor recovery (GHVAS score < 70, 55.1 + 12.9). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α =0.76), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman–Brown Prophesy Reliability Estimate = 0.87). Test–retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.973; 95% CI: 0.873–0.976). No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The recruitment rate and completion rate were 92% and 91%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the ObsQoR-10-Filipino scores and factors such as maternal age, gestational age, blood loss, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.

The ObsQoR-10-Filipino is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing inatient postpartum recovery in Filipino-speaking women undergoing elective CD.

BACKGROUND

The Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) is a patient-reported outcome measure that provides a holistic assessment on the quality of in-hospital postpartum functional recovery. Validated across several countries in various languages, it has shown great potential for widespread global acceptance in both clinical practice and research. We aimed to develop a Filipino version of the ObsQoR-10 and to evaluate its validity, reliability, and feasibility.

One hundred women who had elective cesarean delivery (CD) completed the ObsQoR-10-Filipino and EuroQol five-dimensional 3 L Filipino version questionnaires (including a Global Health Visual Analog Scale [GHVAS]) 24 h after delivery. Twenty-five women completed the ObsQoR-10-Filipino survey again 25 h after delivery. Validity was assessed by evaluation of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and hypothesis testing. Reliability was assessed by evaluating internal consistency, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.

The ObsQoR-10-Filipino scores showed good and moderate correlation to the EQ-5D-3 L scores (r = −0.636; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.740–−0.503, P < 0.001) and to the GHVAS scores (r = 0.387; 95% CI: 0.207–0.543, P < 0.001), respectively. ObsQoR-10-Filipino discriminated well between good (GHVAS score ≥ 70, 68.4 ± 12.9) and poor recovery (GHVAS score < 70, 55.1 + 12.9). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α =0.76), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman–Brown Prophesy Reliability Estimate = 0.87). Test–retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.973; 95% CI: 0.873–0.976). No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The recruitment rate and completion rate were 92% and 91%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the ObsQoR-10-Filipino scores and factors such as maternal age, gestational age, blood loss, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.

The ObsQoR-10-Filipino is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for assessing inatient postpartum recovery in Filipino-speaking women undergoing elective CD.

Background: Cesarean section is associated with moderate to severe pain and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly employed. The optimal NSAID, however, has not been elucidated. In this network meta-analysis and systematic review, we compared the influence of control and individual NSAIDs on the indices of analgesia, side effects, and quality of recovery. Methods: CDSR, CINAHL, CRCT, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing a specific NSAID to either control or another NSAID in elective or emergency cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Network plots and league tables were constructed, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. Results: We included 47 trials. Cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h, the primary outcome, was examined in 1,228 patients and 18 trials, and control was found to be inferior to diclofenac, indomethacin, ketorolac, and tenoxicam (very low quality evidence owing to serious limitations, imprecision, and publication bias). Indomethacin was superior to celecoxib for pain score at rest at 8–12 h and celecoxib + parecoxib, diclofenac, and ketorolac for pain score on movement at 48 h. In regard to the need for and time to rescue analgesia COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib were inferior to other NSAIDs. Conclusions Our review suggests the presence of minimal differences among the NSAIDs studied. Nonselective NSAIDs may be more effective than selective NSAIDs, and some NSAIDs such as indomethacin might be preferable to other NSAIDs.

Objective: Pain following the insertion of separators and archwires varies with age, sex, race, ethnicity, threshold, and health status. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of pain in orthodontic patients after the insertion of elastomeric separators, its effects on daily life, and its association with age and sex in a population not previously studied in this regard. Methods: A crosssectional study of 130 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment included collecting data on demographics, pain experienced following the placement of separators, time of onset, duration, characteristics, change in dietary pattern or chewing side, intake of analgesics, and severity of pain on the Wong Baker’s scale. The results are reported as counts and percentages. Associations between sex and age were evaluated using Pearson’s chi-square test. Results: Among the 130 patients, 56.2% were 9–20 years old, 63.8% experienced pain following the insertion of separators, 22.9% had their first episode of pain at 4 hours, 56.6% experienced intermittent pain, and 37.3% experienced discomfort; 18.1% males and 81.9% females experienced pain following the insertion of separators.Pearson’s chi-square test showed a significant association between pain and sex (P = 0.04). Most patients (37.3%) reported “hurts little more” for pain intensity on Wong Baker’s scale and 21.7% reported all four quadrants as sites of pain. Conclusions The pain experienced after separator insertion was associated with sex and age. Females experienced more pain than males and patients between the age range of 21 and 36 years suffered more pain during mastication than between 9 and 20 years old.