1.Recent progress and future prospects of treatment for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(5):414-418
Peritoneal metastasis is one of the most frequent patterns of metastasis in gastric cancer, and remains a major unmet clinical problem. Thus, systemic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. In well-selected patients, the reasonable combination of cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy will bring significant survival benefits to patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. In patients with high-risk factors, prophylactic therapy may reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence, and improves survival after radical gastrectomy. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials will be needed to determine which modality is better. The safety and efficacy of intraoperative extensive intraperitoneal lavage as a preventive measure has not been proven. The safety of HIPEC also requires further evaluation. HIPEC and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy have achieved good results in conversion therapy, and it is necessary to find more efficient and low-toxicity therapeutic modalities and screen out the potential benefit population. The efficacy of CRS combined with HIPEC on peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer has been preliminarily validated, and with the completion of clinical studies such as PERISCOPE II, more evidence will be available.
Humans
;
Stomach Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary*
;
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*
;
Hyperthermia, Induced/methods*
;
Peritoneum/pathology*
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Survival Rate
2.Landmark vessel in membrane anatomy-based colorectal surgery.
Chen Xiong ZHANG ; Hao TAN ; Jia Ming DING ; Han XU ; Feng SUN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(7):650-655
The theory of membrane anatomy has been widely used in the field of colorectal surgery. The key point to perform high quality total mesorectal excision (TME) and complete mesocolic excision (CME) is to identify the correct anatomical plane. Intraoperative identification of the various fasciae and fascial spaces is the key to accessing the correct surgical plane and surgical success. The landmark vessels refer to the small vessels that originate from the original peritoneum on the surface of the abdominal viscera during embryonic development and are produced by the fusion of the fascial space. From the point of view of embryonic development, the abdominopelvic fascial structure is a continuous unit, and the landmark vessels on its surface do not change morphologically with the fusion of fasciae and have a specific pattern. Drawing on previous literature and clinical surgical observations, we believe that tiny vessels could be used to identify various fused fasciae and anatomical planes. This is a specific example of membrane anatomical surgery.
Humans
;
Mesentery/surgery*
;
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Colorectal Surgery
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
;
Peritoneum/surgery*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Laparoscopy
3.Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(8):717-728
China is a country with a high incidence of gastric cancer, and the majority of patients are in the advanced stage. The peritoneum is the most common site of metastasis and recurrence in advanced gastric cancer. Attention to the standardized diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer is expected to significantly improve the prognosis and quality of life of some patients. Based on evidence-based medicine and the internationally accepted Delphi method, this consensus revises the Chinese expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (2017 edition), reaches a preliminary consensus on the definition, classification, risk factors, diagnosis and prediction, grade assessment, prevention, treatment and management of complications of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer, and provides guidance for clinical work.
Humans
;
Peritoneum/pathology*
;
Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Stomach Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Consensus
;
East Asian People
;
Quality of Life
;
China
4.Advances on pathogenesis of acquired peritoneal ultrafiltration failure in peritoneal dialysis.
Na JIANG ; Wei Zhen XIE ; Le Yi GU ; Zhao Hui NI ; Wei FANG ; Jiang Zi YUAN
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2023;39(1):42-47
Peritoneal ultrafiltration failure is a common reason for peritoneal dialysis (PD) withdrawal as well as mortality in PD patients. Based on the three-pore system, inter-cellular small pores and trans-cellular ultra-small pores (aquaporin-1) are mainly responsible for water transfer across the peritoneum. Both small and ultra-small pores-dependent water (free water) transport decline accompanied with time on PD, with more significant decrease in free water, resulting in peritoneal ultrafiltration failure. The reduction of free water transport is associated with fast peritoneal solute transfer, reduced crystalloid osmotic gradient due to increased interstitial glucose absorption, and declined osmotic conductance to glucose resulted from impaired aquaporin-1 function and peritoneal interstitial fibrosis. The decline of small pore-based water is mainly because of fast loss of crystalloid osmotic gradient, decrease of hydrostatic pressure mediated by peritoneal vasculopathy, as well as reduced absolute number of small pores. The current review discusses the advance on pathogenesis of acquired peritoneal ultrafiltration failure in long-term PD.
Humans
;
Peritoneum
;
Ultrafiltration
;
Dialysis Solutions
;
Peritoneal Dialysis/methods*
;
Water
;
Glucose
5.Application and prospect of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer.
Si Cheng ZHOU ; Wei PEI ; Hai Tao ZHOU ; Jian Wei LIANG ; Zhi Xiang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2022;44(1):73-78
Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors in China, and its incidence is increasing with years. As the second most common metastatic site of colorectal cancer, peritoneum is difficult to diagnose early and with a poor prognosis. Systemic intravenous chemotherapy was used as the main treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis in the past, but its systemic toxic and side effects were obvious, and it could not effectively control tumor progression. In recent years, the continuous development of surgical techniques, concepts, and equipment, as well as the introduction of new chemotherapy drugs and targeted drugs have significantly improved the quality of life and prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can effectively eradicated the intraperitoneal free cancer cells and subclinical lesions, while reducing systemic side effects of chemotherapy drugs, and achieve the radical cure of the tumor at the macro and micro levels to the greatest extent. It has been used as the first-line treatment program for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer at home and abroad. This article focuses on the analysis and summary of the survival efficacy, prognostic factor analysis, and chemotherapy safety of CRS+ HIPEC in the treatment of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis. The existing problems and controversies of HIPEC therapy are discussed simultaneously.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
;
Humans
;
Hyperthermia, Induced
;
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
;
Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Peritoneum
;
Prognosis
;
Quality of Life
;
Survival Rate
9.Cognition and reflection on the "lateral ligament of rectum".
J M DING ; H TAN ; H XU ; X Q CHEN ; X S WU ; F SUN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(12):1126-1131
As total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is widely carried out in China, lateral ligament of rectum, as an important anatomical structure of the lateral rectum with certain anatomical value and clinical significance, has been the focus of attention. In this paper, by comparing and analyzing the characteristics about ligaments of the abdomen and pelvis, reviewing the membrane anatomy and the theory of primitive gut rotation, and combining clinical observations and histological studies, the author came to a conclusion that lateral ligament of rectum does not exist, but is only a relatively dense space on the rectal side accompanied by numerous tiny nerve plexuses and small blood vessels penetrating through it.
Humans
;
Rectum/anatomy & histology*
;
Pelvis/anatomy & histology*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Peritoneum
;
Collateral Ligaments
;
Cognition
10.Effect of peritoneum reconstruction on postoperative complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Lin Feng GAO ; Dong Lin CHEN ; Bo Yu CHEN ; Chuan LI ; Xiao Song WANG ; Pei Wu YU ; Bo TANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(12):1079-1085
Objective: To determine the effect of peritoneum reconstruction on postoperative complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Methods: Retrospective cohort study and propensity score matching were conducted. Case inclusion criteria: (1) pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma; (2) 18 to 80 years; (3) patients with middle to low rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic LAR; (4) patients staging cT1-4aN0-2M0 or ycT1-4aN0-2M0 after neoadjuvant therapy; (5) the distance of 4-10 cm from tumor low margin to anal verge. Exclusion criteria: (1) abdominal surgery history (except appendicitis, cholecystitis, ectopic pregnancy); (2) anastomosis above the peritoneal reflection; (3) tumor distant metastasis or clinical staging of T4b during surgery; (4) conversion to open surgery; (5) severe incapacitating disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification IV or V, ASA). A total of 666 patients with middle to low rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic LAR in The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2017 to June 2020 were enrolled. There were 473 males and 193 females with the median age of 59 (18-80) years. Laparoscopic LAR with peritoneum reconstruction was performed in 188 cases (PR group), and laparoscopic LAR without peritoneum reconstruction was performed in 478 cases (NPR group). After 1:1 propensity score matching according to 1:1 based on age, gender, body mass index, TNM staging, ASA classification, intraoperative blood loss, distance from tumor low margin to anal edge, 153 cases were included in each group. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Anastomotic leakage was defined and graded according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC) criteria. Results: After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic characteristics between the 2 groups (all P>0.05), indicating that these two groups were comparable. (1) Operative conditions: All the patients in both groups completed operation successfully. Compared with the NPR group, the PR group had longer operation time [(181.3±60.3) minutes vs. (168.9±51.5) minutes, t=2.185, P=0.029], shorter postoperative median hospital stay [8 (7, 10) days vs. 9 (7, 11) days, Z=-2.282, P=0.022], and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). (2) Postoperative complications: The overall morbidity of postoperative complication in PR group and NPR group was 20.3% (31/153) and 24.2% (37/153) respectively, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 9.8% (15/153) and 11.1%(17/153) respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). Compared with NPR group, PR group had lower morbidity of grade III to IV complications [3.9% (6/153) vs. 11.1% (17/153), χ(2)=5.688, P=0.017] and lower secondary operation rate [1.3% (2/153) vs. 5.9% (9/153), χ(2)=4.621, P=0.032], the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.05). Though PR group had lower incidence of grade C anastomoic leakage [1.3% (2/153) vs. 3.9% (6/153), χ(2)=2.054, P=0.152], but the differences were not statistically significant. (3) Postoperative inflammation: The difference of the procalcitonin level of both PR and NPR groups at postoperative 1-d, 3-d, and 5-d was statistically significant (F=5.222, P=0.010) in time-dependent manner, while the difference was not significant in the interaction effect (P>0.05). No statistically significant differences in the C-reactive protein level between two groups at postoperative 1-d, 3-d, and 5-d were found (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Peritoneum reconstruction in laparoscopic LAR can decrease the morbidity of postoperative complication of grade III to IV and the reoperation rate, and plays an important role in controlling the inflammatory reaction, which has great clinical value.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Anastomotic Leak
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Middle Aged
;
Peritoneum
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail