OBJECTIVE: To observe the long-term health condition of the single-tooth dental implant at the first molar site, and to evaluate the related factors affecting the peri-implant health. METHODS: In this study, 82 patients who were treated in the Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hos-pital of Stomatology from January 2008 to December 2020 were enrolled. Peri-implant tissue conditions were assessed by clinical and radiographic examination. The peri-implant probing depth (PPD), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), modified plaque index (mPLI) and papilla index (PI) were recorded for 278 implants. The X-ray analysis included the restoration emergence angle (REA), the clinical crown-implant ratio (cC/I), the horizontal tooth-implant distance (HTID), the contact point level (CPL) and the embrasure surface area (ESA), etc. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and generalized estimation equation were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was (40.2±9.5) years (19 to 84 years), with 33 males and 49 females. The follow-up time was (4.9±3.3) years (1 to 10 years). According to the diagnostic criteria in 2018, the prevalence of peri-implantitis in this study was 14.03% on the implant level and 21.95% on the patient level. The peri-implant health rate was 19.06% on the implant level and 18.29% on the patient level. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was 66.91% on the implant level and 59.75% on the patient level. At the baseline, there were statistically significant differences between the peri-implant health group and peri-implantitis group in PPD, distal HTID and mesial/distal CPL, cC/I (P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in mSBI, mPLI, PI, mesial HTID, mesial/distal REA and mesial/distal ESA between the two groups. Among the differences between follow-up and baseline, there were statistically significant dif-ferences between the two groups in PPD, mesial/distal HTID, mesial/distal CPL and mesial/distal ESA (P < 0.05). Generalized estimation equation showed that PPD, mesial/distal HTID, mesial CPL, and mesial ESA had significant positive correlations with the risk of peri-implantitis in the difference between baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSION Based on the results of this study, the peri-implant health rate is still unsatisfied, and the PPD, HTID, CPL, ESA may be related to the long-term health of the implant.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth/adverse effects* ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Periodontal Index ; Young Adult ; Peri-Implantitis/epidemiology*

Peri-implant disease is a serious problem that plagues today's dentistry, both in terms of therapy and epidemiology. With the expansion of the practice of implantology and an increasing number of implants placed annually, the frequency of peri-implant disease has greatly expanded. Its clinical manifestations, in the absence of a globally established classification, are peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, the counterparts of gingivitis and periodontitis, respectively. However, many doubts remain about its features. Official diagnostic criteria, globally recognized by the dental community, have not yet been introduced. The latest studies using metagenomic methods are casting doubt on the assumption of microbial equivalence between periodontal and peri-implant crevices. Research on most of the features of peri-implant disease remains at an early stage; moreover, there is not a commonly accepted treatment for it. In any case, although the evidence so far collected is limited, we need to be aware of the current state of the science regarding this topic to better understand and ultimately prevent this disease.
Classification ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Diagnosis ; Epidemiology ; Gingivitis ; Metagenomics ; Microbiota ; Mucositis ; Peri-Implantitis ; Periodontitis

Alveolar Bone Loss ; Dental Implants ; Humans ; Peri-Implantitis ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Risk Factors