AIM: To compare the effects of different nucleus chopping methods on the central corneal thickness, corneal endothelial cell(CEC)count and tear inflammatory indicators in patients with hard nucleus cataract.METHODS: Retrospective study. Totally 89 patients(89 eyes)with hard nucleus cataract who treated in our hospital were included from January 2020 to December 2022. According to different intraoperative nucleus chopping methods, the patients were divided into reverse prechop group(46 eyes)and phaco-chop group(43 eyes). The total effective rate of surgery and visual acuity recovery were compared between the two groups. Corneal related indicators(central corneal thickness, CEC count, CEC area), tear inflammatory indicators and tear film function [tear film break-up time(BUT), Chinese Dry Eye Questionnaire(CDEQ), Schirmer Ⅰ test(SⅠt)] were observed before and after surgery in both groups, and the degree of corneal edema was evaluated.RESULTS: The effective phaco time, phaco energy and cumulative complex energy parameters in the phaco-chop group were longer or higher than those in the reverse prechop group(P<0.05). The macular retinal thickness in the reverse prechop group at 7 d and 1 mo after surgery was thinner than that in the phaco-chop group, the central corneal thickness at 3 and 7 d after surgery was also thinner than that in the phaco-chop group, the CEC count at 3 mo after surgery was more than that in the phaco-chop group, the CEC loss rate was lower than that in the phaco-chop group, and the CEC area at 3 mo after surgery was smaller than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The levels of tear TNF-α and IL-6 at 7 d and 1 mo after surgery in the reverse prechop group were lower than those in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The BUT at 1 and 3 mo after surgery was longer in the reverse prechop group than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The CDEQ score in the reverse prechop group was lower than that in the phaco-chop group at 1 and 3 mo after surgery(P<0.05). The SⅠt at 1 and 3 mo after surgery was higher in the reverse prechop group compared with that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). The degree of corneal edema at 1 d after surgery was milder in the reverse prechop group than that in the phaco-chop group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with phaco-chop, the application of reverse-chopper prechop combined with phacoemulsification can better reduce the ultrasonic energy in the treatment of hard nuclear cataract, and it is more conducive to reducing the postoperative inflammatory degree, improving the tear film function and relieving the corneal edema degree.

Objective:To explore the safety and efficacy of intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of vancomycin for preventing infection in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods:A total of 124 patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA between February 2024 and May 2024 at nine hospitals were enrolled. Preoperative infection prophylaxis involved either IORA (0.5 g vancomycin administered via intraosseous regional infusion before incision) or intravenous infusion (1 g vancomycin via peripheral vein). The IORA group included 15 males and 47 females with a median age of 66.5 years (range, 60.0-70.0 years), while the intravenous group included 14 males and 48 females with a median age of 66.0 years (range, 61.8-70.3 years) years. Intraoperative samples were collected including fat and synovium tissues after incision, before prosthesis placement, and after tourniquet release; distal femoral cancellous bone during femoral osteotomy; proximal tibial cancellous bone during tibial osteotomy; proximal intercondylar cancellous bone before prosthesis placement; and peripheral blood from non-infused arms at surgery initiation and after tourniquet release. Vancomycin concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Vital sign changes were recorded from admission to 5~10 minutes post-IORA (IORA group) or post-incision (intravenous group). Follow-ups were conducted on postoperative day 1 and 3, and at 1 and 3 months, to document complications including IORA-related adverse events, periprosthetic joint infections, surgical site infections, red man syndrome, acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis and so on.Results:Vancomycin concentrations in bone, fat, and synovial tissue samples were significantly higher in the IORA group than in the intravenous group ( P<0.05), while vancomycin concentrations in blood samples were significantly lower in the IORA group than in the intravenous group ( P<0.05). Only 7.3%(41/558) of tissue samples in the IORA group had vancomycin concentrations below 2.0 μg/g (the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin against coagulase-negative staphylococcus), compared to 59.3%(331/558) in the intravenous group (χ 2=11.285, P<0.001). In the intravenous group, 16.9%(21/124) of blood samples had vancomycin concentrations exceeding 15.0 mg/L (the threshold associated with a significantly increased risk of nephrotoxicity), while all concentrations in the IORA group were below this threshold, the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=22.943, P<0.001). There were no statistically significant difference ( P>0.05) in vital signs changes before and after vancomycin administration between the two groups. Two patients in the intravenous group experienced incision exudate, while no other related complications occurred in either group. Conclusions:Compared to the traditional intravenous infusion of 1 g vancomycin, intraosseous injection of a low dose (0.5 g) of vancomycin achieves higher local tissue concentrations in the knee joint with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and is safe for infection prophylaxis. Despite guidelines not recommending the routine use of vancomycin for preventing infection after primary TKA, intraosseous injection of 0.5 g vancomycin may be considered intraoperatively for primary TKA in the following scenarios: patients in medical institutions with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, patients with potential preoperative MRSA colonization, or patients with cephalosporin allergy.

Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using self-radiopaque marker guided physician modified fenestration with stent-graft in situ fenestration technology with or without the implantation of branch stents for the treatment of aortic arch diseases.Methods:The clinical data of 653 patients with aortic arch diseases who underwent TEVAR using fenestration from Dec 2015 to Jun 2023 at two vascular surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 454 patients received branch stent implantation, while 199 did not. The incidence of non-aortic-related complications within 30 days post-operation was higher in the branch stent implantation group compared to the non-implantation group (8.6% vs. 3.5%, P=0.020). The overall follow-up rate was 93.8%, with median follow-up time of 37 months and 52 months for the branch stent implantation group and non-implantation group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of cumulative all-cause survival ( P=0.223), free from endoleak ( P=0.106), and free from branch artery occlusion ( P=0.130). Conclusions:The implantation of branch stents following in situ fenestration with stent-graft technology in TEVAR did not significantly affect overall survival, endoleak incidence, or branch artery occlusion rates in patients with aortic arch diseases. Therefore, the decision to implant branch stents should be tailored according to the specific pathology and anatomical characteristics of the aortic arch.

Background and Aims:Endovascular repair of aortic arch diseases poses a major challenge in vascular surgery due to the need to both effectively exclude the lesion and preserve perfusion of supra-aortic branch vessels.The Castor branched aortic covered stent,with its integrated design and ability to maintain left subclavian artery(LSA)patency,offers potential advantages.When combined with the chimney technique for the left common carotid artery(LCCA),it may provide a minimally invasive and feasible solution for patients with insufficient proximal landing zones.This study aims to evaluate the preliminary feasibility and safety of this combined approach and provide clinical reference for the endovascular management of complex aortic arch pathologies.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 15 patients with aortic arch diseases who underwent treatment with the Castor branched stent-graft combined with LCCA chimney stenting at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between February 2023 and December 2024.Baseline characteristics,surgical procedures,perioperative complications,and follow-up outcomes were analyzed to assess technical success,complication rates,and branch vessel patency.Results:Among the 15 patients(11 males,average age 63.8 years),primary diagnoses included aortic dissection(33.4%),aortic arch aneurysm(53.3%),and penetrating aortic ulcer(13.3%).The technical success rate was 100%,with no perioperative deaths or major complications.During the follow-up period(4-26 months,mean 12.9 months),no adverse events such as stroke,paralysis,endoleak,or stent migration occurred.The patency rate of both the LCCA and LSA remained 100%.Conclusion:The Castor branched aortic stent-graft combined with LCCA chimney technique appears to be a technically feasible and safe short-term option for treating aortic arch diseases with insufficient proximal landing zones.It may serve as a promising alternative for complex aortic arch repair;however,large-scale,multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are needed to further validate its efficacy and safety.

Objective To investigate the risk factors of latent blood loss after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods The clinical data of 112 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated with internal fixation in our hospital from May 2019 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed,and the hidden blood loss after surgery was recorded.SPSS software was used to analyze the influencing factors of hidden blood loss after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Results None of the 152 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur had serious complications or died during perioperative period,and the wound was not infected.The fixation alignment was good.The postoperative dominant blood loss was(236.37±71.52)ml,the recessive blood loss was(709.74±132.36)ml,and the total blood loss was(946.11±205.61)ml.The recessive blood loss was significantly higher than the dominant blood loss(P＜0.05).Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age,hypertension,diabetes,fracture type,preoperative anticoagulation,time from injury to operation,and operation time were all risk factors for latent blood loss after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur(P＜0.05).Conclusion Age,hypertension,diabetes,fracture type,preoperative anticoagulation,time from injury to operation and operation time are all risk factors for latent blood loss after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.According to these factors,medical staff can formulate corresponding prevention and treatment programs to reduce the latent blood loss after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.

Objective To analyze the effects of postoperative radiotherapy and other factors on the prognosis of metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma(sRCC)so as to provide reference for the clinical decision-making.Methods Data of all sRCC patients during 2004-2018 were extracted from the American Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results(SEER)database,and 337 patients were ultimately enrolled.Patients were divided into the postoperative non-radiotheropy group(n=255)and postoperative radiotherapy group(n=82)based on different treatment modalities.Baseline data were compared between the two groups.The 1-year overall survival(OS)and cancer-specific survival(CSS)rates were calculated.Kaplan-Meier(K-M)survival curves were plotted.The prognostic factors were identified with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.Results No significant differences were observed in baseline data between the two groups(P＞0.05).The 1-year OS(25.6％vs.30.1％)and CSS(26.2％vs.30.8％)in the postoperative radiotherapy group were lower than those in the postoperative no-radiotheropy group,but the differences were not statistically significant(P＞0.05).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that year of diagnosis,patients' age,tumor size,T stage,N stage and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of sRCC(P＜0.05).Patients diagnosed in 2015-2018 and treated with chemotherapy had a good prognosis,while patients＞61 years,with tumor size＞147 mm,tumor stage T3-T4,and stage N1 had a poor prognosis.Conclusion The year of diagnosis,patients'age,tumor size,tumor stage and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors,and postoperative radiotherapy did not significantly improve the prognosis of metastatic sRCC patients.

OBJECTIVES: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a life-threatening vascular emergency with extremely high in-hospital mortality. Open surgical repair (OSR) was historically the only treatment option but is associated with substantial trauma and perioperative risk. In recent years, endovascular repair (EVAR) has gained widespread use due to its minimally invasive nature and faster recovery, becoming the preferred option for anatomically suitable patients in many centers. However, controversy remains regarding the long-term survival benefits of EVAR compared with OSR and key prognostic factors affecting outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of OSR and EVAR for rAAA and identify independent predictors of postoperative survival to guide clinical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients diagnosed with rAAA and treated surgically in the Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients were divided into an OSR group and an EVAR group based on surgical approach. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up outcomes were compared between groups. Long-term survival was analyzed, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 83 patients, 32 (38.6%) underwent OSR and 51 (61.4%) received EVAR, with the proportion of EVAR steadily increasing to nearly 80% in the most recent 5 years. Patients in the EVAR group were older [(68.76±8.57) years vs (60.59±13.24) years, P=0.012], and had a lower proportion of males (76.5% vs 96.9%, P=0.013). EVAR significantly reduced operating time [(181.86±69.87) min vs (291.09±60.33) min] and hospital stay [(12.14±6.31) days vs (16.22±7.89) days (P<0.05)], but total hospitalization costs were markedly higher [(208 735.84±101 394.19) yuan vs (84 893.35±40 668.56) yuan, P<0.001]. There were no significant differences between groups in 30-day mortality (15.6% vs 15.7%), aneurysm-related mortality (9.4% vs 11.7%), overall mortality (28.1% vs 29.4%), or re-intervention rate (0 vs 5.9%) (P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 54.6 months (range, 12-144 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed comparable cumulative survival rates between OSR and EVAR (82.7% vs 76.2%, P=0.420). Cox regression identified hyperlipidemia [hazard ratio (HR)=2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 4.19, P=0.005] and elevated preoperative serum creatinine (HR=3.33, 95% CI 1.69 to 6.55, P<0.001) as significant predictors of poor prognosis. Both factors remained independently associated with mortality in the multivariate model (hyperlipidemia: HR=2.02, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.70; elevated serum creatinine: HR=2.77, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.47; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS EVAR offeres advantages in operative and recovery times, though its long-term survival outcomes are comparable to OSR. A history of hyperlipidemia and elevated preoperative creatinine levels are independent predictors of poor prognosis. Surgical approach should be chosen based on anatomical feasibility and patient condition, with close management of lipid levels and renal function to improve outcomes.
Humans ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality* ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Prognosis ; Aged ; Aortic Rupture/mortality* ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged, 80 and over

Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an established modality for functionally assessing coronary artery disease, is increasingly applied to diagnose and manage lower extremity arterial disease. By incorporating functional parameters, FFR enhances revascularization precision by quantifying the hemodynamic impact of stenotic lesions, thereby overcoming limitations of conventional imaging. Key clinical applications in lower extremity disease include functional assessment in moderate intermittent claudication, post-vascular preparation strategy optimization, and predicting revascularization outcomes and complications. Advances in pressure wire and microcatheter systems, alongside non-invasive imaging-derived FFR techniques, are improving its feasibility and applicability. However, widespread adoption is challenged by the complex anatomy of the lower extremity arterial system, frequent severe calcification and diffuse disease, and a current lack of standardized FFR cutoff values. Promoting the standardized use of FFR is crucial for shifting the clinical management paradigm from anatomy-based repair toward functional reconstruction.
Humans ; Lower Extremity/blood supply* ; Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis* ; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology*

Objective:To explore the safety and efficacy of intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of vancomycin for preventing infection in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods:A total of 124 patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA between February 2024 and May 2024 at nine hospitals were enrolled. Preoperative infection prophylaxis involved either IORA (0.5 g vancomycin administered via intraosseous regional infusion before incision) or intravenous infusion (1 g vancomycin via peripheral vein). The IORA group included 15 males and 47 females with a median age of 66.5 years (range, 60.0-70.0 years), while the intravenous group included 14 males and 48 females with a median age of 66.0 years (range, 61.8-70.3 years) years. Intraoperative samples were collected including fat and synovium tissues after incision, before prosthesis placement, and after tourniquet release; distal femoral cancellous bone during femoral osteotomy; proximal tibial cancellous bone during tibial osteotomy; proximal intercondylar cancellous bone before prosthesis placement; and peripheral blood from non-infused arms at surgery initiation and after tourniquet release. Vancomycin concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Vital sign changes were recorded from admission to 5~10 minutes post-IORA (IORA group) or post-incision (intravenous group). Follow-ups were conducted on postoperative day 1 and 3, and at 1 and 3 months, to document complications including IORA-related adverse events, periprosthetic joint infections, surgical site infections, red man syndrome, acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis and so on.Results:Vancomycin concentrations in bone, fat, and synovial tissue samples were significantly higher in the IORA group than in the intravenous group ( P<0.05), while vancomycin concentrations in blood samples were significantly lower in the IORA group than in the intravenous group ( P<0.05). Only 7.3%(41/558) of tissue samples in the IORA group had vancomycin concentrations below 2.0 μg/g (the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin against coagulase-negative staphylococcus), compared to 59.3%(331/558) in the intravenous group (χ 2=11.285, P<0.001). In the intravenous group, 16.9%(21/124) of blood samples had vancomycin concentrations exceeding 15.0 mg/L (the threshold associated with a significantly increased risk of nephrotoxicity), while all concentrations in the IORA group were below this threshold, the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=22.943, P<0.001). There were no statistically significant difference ( P>0.05) in vital signs changes before and after vancomycin administration between the two groups. Two patients in the intravenous group experienced incision exudate, while no other related complications occurred in either group. Conclusions:Compared to the traditional intravenous infusion of 1 g vancomycin, intraosseous injection of a low dose (0.5 g) of vancomycin achieves higher local tissue concentrations in the knee joint with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and is safe for infection prophylaxis. Despite guidelines not recommending the routine use of vancomycin for preventing infection after primary TKA, intraosseous injection of 0.5 g vancomycin may be considered intraoperatively for primary TKA in the following scenarios: patients in medical institutions with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, patients with potential preoperative MRSA colonization, or patients with cephalosporin allergy.

Background and Aims:Endovascular repair of aortic arch diseases poses a major challenge in vascular surgery due to the need to both effectively exclude the lesion and preserve perfusion of supra-aortic branch vessels.The Castor branched aortic covered stent,with its integrated design and ability to maintain left subclavian artery(LSA)patency,offers potential advantages.When combined with the chimney technique for the left common carotid artery(LCCA),it may provide a minimally invasive and feasible solution for patients with insufficient proximal landing zones.This study aims to evaluate the preliminary feasibility and safety of this combined approach and provide clinical reference for the endovascular management of complex aortic arch pathologies.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 15 patients with aortic arch diseases who underwent treatment with the Castor branched stent-graft combined with LCCA chimney stenting at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between February 2023 and December 2024.Baseline characteristics,surgical procedures,perioperative complications,and follow-up outcomes were analyzed to assess technical success,complication rates,and branch vessel patency.Results:Among the 15 patients(11 males,average age 63.8 years),primary diagnoses included aortic dissection(33.4%),aortic arch aneurysm(53.3%),and penetrating aortic ulcer(13.3%).The technical success rate was 100%,with no perioperative deaths or major complications.During the follow-up period(4-26 months,mean 12.9 months),no adverse events such as stroke,paralysis,endoleak,or stent migration occurred.The patency rate of both the LCCA and LSA remained 100%.Conclusion:The Castor branched aortic stent-graft combined with LCCA chimney technique appears to be a technically feasible and safe short-term option for treating aortic arch diseases with insufficient proximal landing zones.It may serve as a promising alternative for complex aortic arch repair;however,large-scale,multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are needed to further validate its efficacy and safety.