Objective To observe the value of interventional treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH)based on degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture.Methods Totally 198 patients with LDH were retrospectively enrolled.Based on findings in digital subtraction angiography(DSA),the degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture were evaluated and different treatments were performed,and the efficacies were observed.Results Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty(IDET)were performed in 48 cases with fibrous ring degeneration and rupture of intervertebral disc but without protrusion,percutaneous lumbar diskectomy(PLD)/percutaneous laser disk decompression(PLDD)+ozone ablation were performed in 25 cases with grade 1 degeneration and grade 2 rupture with mild protrusion,targeted radiofrequency+ozone ablation were done in 23 cases with grade 2 degeneration and grade 2 or above rupture with mild protrusion,collagenase dissolution+PLD were done in 100 cases with grade 2 or above degeneration and grade 2 or above rupture with moderate or above protrusion and contrast agent entered into protruded intervertebral disc,while percutaneous cement discoplasty(PCD)were performed in 2 cases with grade 3 degeneration and grade 3 rupture with intervertebral stenosis.Twelve months after treatment,among 198 cases,excellent,good,acceptable and poor therapeutic effect was observed in 75,101,16 and 6 cases,respectively,with the effective rate of 96.97%(192/198).Conclusion Interventional treatments of LDH based on the degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture were valuable.

Objective A randomized controlled trial was conducted on colonoscopy inpatient and outpatients to compare the efficacy and safety of water exchange(WE)colonoscopy and CO2 convention insufflation colonoscopy in elderly patients.Methods 340 patients underwent fully sedated colonoscopy were randomly divided into two groups according to colonoscopy with either WE colonoscopy group(WE group)and CO2 insufflation colonoscopy group(CO2 group).The two groups were compared in terms of Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS),withdrawal time,cecal intubation time,cecal intubation success rate,abdominal compression,willingness to repeat,polypdetectionrate(PDR),adenoma detection rate(ADR),and safety.Results The cecal intubation success rate was significantly higher in WE group(100.0%)compared with CO2 group(96.5%),the difference was statistically significant(P=0.013).The average cecal intubation time of WE group was(10.50±1.79)min,which was longer than that of CO2 group(7.55±1.50)min,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Comparison of withdrawal time and BBPS between the two groups,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The abdominal pressure rate was lower in WE group(5.9%)compared with CO2 group(13.5%),the difference was statistically significant(P=0.017).The rate of willingness to re-examination in the WE group was 98.2%,which was significantly higher than the 93.5%in the CO2 group.The PDR in WE group(80.6%)was higher than that in CO2 group(70.6%),the ADR in WE group(67.1%)was higher than that in CO2 group(50.6%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that WE group was an effective factor in improving ADR(O＾R=2.027,P<0.01).The overall adverse events were less than 3%,with no difference between the two groups(P=1.000).Conclusion The use of WE colonoscopy has a better improved efficacy in elderly patients,and safety should be ensured by individualized assessment of the patient's co-morbidities,bowel preparation tolerance,and willingness prior to the procedure.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for anterior internal fixation in the management of Anderson-D′Alonzo type II odontoid fractures.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 58 patients with Anderson-D′Alonzo type II odontoid fractures admitted to Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital between January 2017 and September 2024, including 35 males and 23 females, aged 18-57 years [(39.3±9.0)years]. Anderson-D′Alonzo type II fractures were further classified as type IIA in 25 patients and type IIB in 33. Twenty-seven patients underwent O-arm assisted anterior internal fixation (O-arm navigation group), while 31 received C-arm guided anterior internal fixation (C-arm guidance group). The two groups were compared in terms of the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, success rate for one-time guidewire placement, and intraoperative radiation exposure (anteroposterior and lateral views). At 3 days postoperatively, screw placement accuracy was evaluated via CT in both groups. Additionally, neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed preoperatively, at 1 week, 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Bone union time and complication rate were also analyzed.Results:All the patients were followed up for 6-20 months [(13.1±3.4)months]. The O-arm navigation group exhibited significantly shorter operative duration [(91.1± 8.9)minutes] and less intraoperative blood loss [(38.9±8.2)ml], compared with (103.3±14.5)minutes and (47.3±9.1)ml in the C-arm guidance group ( P<0.01). The success rate for one-time guidewire placement was 100% (27/27) in the O-arm navigation group, significantly higher than 52% (16/31) in the C-arm guidance group ( P<0.01). Intraoperative radiation exposure for patients in the O-arm navigation group was lower in both anteroposterior view [(11 612.6±1 603.6)μSv] and lateral views [(29 738.2±6 602.5)μSv], compared with (40 638.0±9 431.9)μSv and (47 152.0±11 759.3)μSv in the C-arm guidance group ( P<0.01). CT scans at 3 days postoperatively revealed a 100% (27/27) screw placement accuracy in the O-arm navigation group, compared with 65% (20/31) in the C-arm guidance group ( P<0.01). Before operation, at 1 weeks and 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up, NDI scores were (48.4±7.8)%, (21.0±3.1)%, (14.4±2.4)%, and (13.9±2.3)% in the O-arm navigation group, while they were (47.4±7.6)%, (20.9±3.2)%, (14.1±2.0)%, and (13.8±1.4)% in the C-arm guidance group ( P>0.05); VAS scores were 6.0(6.0, 7.0)points, 4.0(3.0, 4.0)points, 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, and 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points in the O-arm navigation group, while they were 7.0(6.0, 7.0)points, 4.0(3.0, 5.0)points, 2.0(1.0, 3.0)points, and 2.0(2.0, 2.0)points in the C-arm guidance group ( P>0.05). The NDI and VAS scores in both groups were significantly improved at 1 weeks and 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up compared to those preoperatively ( P<0.05), and were furtherly improved at 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up compared to those at 1 weeks postoperatively ( P<0.05), with no significant differences between those at 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). No significant difference was found in bone union time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The complication rate in the O-arm navigation group was 4% (1/27), lower than 29% (9/31) in the C-arm guidance group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with C-arm guidance, O-arm assisted anterior internal fixation for Anderson-D′Alonzo type II odontoid fractures can reduce operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, improve the success rate for one-time guidewire placement and screw accuracy, and decrease radiation exposure and complication rate.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of O-arm navigation-assisted and freehand posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) associated with lower cervical fractures in adults.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 29 adult AS patients with lower cervical fractures admitted to Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital from June 2020 to September 2024, including 22 males and 7 females, aged 35-72 years [(52.3±11.1)years]. Injured segments involved C 5~6 in 6 patients, C 6 in 8, C 6~7 in 8, and C 7 in 7. Accirdubg to AO classification, the fracture was classified as type B3 in 22 patients and type C in 7. All the patients underwent posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation, among whom 15 patients were treated with navigation-assisted screw placement (navigation screw placement group, with 120 screws) and 14 with freehand technique (freehand screw placement group, with 112 screws). The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume. The accuracy of screw placement, penetration rate of the pedicle cortex and fracture healing time were evaluated in the two groups. The Cobb angle before surgery and at 3 days after surgery and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification before surgery and at the last follow-up were recorded in the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and neck dysfunction index (NDI) before surgery, at 1 week, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was also investigated. Results:All the patients were followed up for 6-57 months [(29.3±14.1)months]. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume were (166.0±31.4)minutes, (256.7±70.7)ml, and (91.0±14.4)ml in the navigation screw placement group, which were shorter or less than (219.29±31.7)minutes, (342.1±60.7)ml, and (123.2±20.7)ml in the freehand screw placement group ( P<0.01). The accuracy of screw placement in the navigation screw placement group was 98.3% (118/120) and penetration rate of the pedicle cortex was 5.8% (7/120), which were both superior to 89.3% (100/112) and 18.8% (21/112) in the freehand screw placement group ( P<0.01). No significant difference was detected in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the Cobb angle before surgery and at 3 days after surgery, as well as in the ASIA grading before surgery and at the last follow-up between the two groups ( P>0.05). The Cobb angle and ASIA classification at 3 days after surgery and at the last follow-up were improved compared with those before surgery ( P<0.05). Before surgery, at 1 week, 3 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up, the VAS scores were 8.0(7.0, 9.0)points, 4.0(3.0, 4.0)points, 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, and 0.0(0.0, 1.0)points in the navigation screw placement group, which were not significantly different from 8.0(7.0, 9.0)points, 4.0(3.0, 4.0)points, 1.5(1.0, 2.0)points, and 0.0(0.0, 1.0)points in the freehand screw placement group ( P>0.05); the JOA scores were (7.5±1.4)points, (10.9±1.2)points, (13.2±1.5)points, and (15.7±1.0)points in the navigation screw placement group, which were not significantly different from (7.2±2.8)points, (10.1±3.2)points, (11.8±3.8)points, and (14.1±4.3)points in the freehand screw placement group ( P>0.05); the NDI were 48.0(44.0, 56.0)%, 30.0(30.0, 34.0)%, 18.0(16.0, 22.0)%, 8.0(6.0, 10.0)% in the navigation screw placement group, which were not significantly different from 44.0(40.0, 52.0)%, 30.0(29.0, 34.5)%, 17.0(16.0, 20.0)%, and 8.0(5.5, 10.0)% in the freehand screw placement group ( P>0.05). The VAS scores, JOA scores, and NDI were improved at 1 week, 3 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up in both groups, compared to those before surgery and they were gradually improved with the passage of the follow-up time ( P<0.05). One patient in the navigation screw placement group developed postoperative pulmonary infection and recovered after symptomatic treatment, with an incidence of complications 7% (1/15). Two patients in the freehand screw placement group had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and dural rupture and recovered after symptomatic treatment, with an incidence of complications 14% (2/14). Throughout the follow-up period, no complications such as screw breakage, implant loosening, or loss of correction were found in either group. Conclusion:Compared with freehand screw placement, the O-arm navigation system-assisted posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of AS associated with lower cervical fractures in adults demonstrates significant advantages, including reduced operative time, decreased intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume, improved accuracy of screw placement, and reduced penetration rate of the pedicle cortex.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of whole-process visualization system-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation and free-hand pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture (TLBF) without neurologic symptoms.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 64 patients with TLBF without neurologic symptoms admitted to Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital from December 2020 to October 2022, including 41 males and 23 females, aged 23-52 years [(42.1±6.6)years]. The injured vertebrae involved T 11 in 26 patients, T 12 in 17, L 1 in 12, and L 2 in 9. The Wiltse approach was used in all the patients, 31 of whom were treated with pedicle screw internal fixation assisted by the whole-process visualization system (visualization system-assisted screw placement group) and 33 of whom were treated with free-hand pedicle screw internal fixation (free-hand screw placement group). The two groups were compared in terms of operation time, single screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative total radiation dose and total length of hospital stay. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement and penetration rate of the pedicle cortex were evaluated in the two groups. The Cobb angle and lumbar visual analogue scale (VAS) before surgery, at 1 week, 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was also investigated. Results:All the patients were followed up for 10-33 months [(17.5±4.8)months]. The operation time was (106.9±11.8)minutes in the visualization system-assisted screw placement group, shorter than (121.3±11.4)minutes in the free-hand screw placement group ( P<0.01). The single screw placement time was (9.1±1.0)minutes in the visualization system-assisted screw placement group, shorter than (11.7±1.5)minutes in the free-hand screw placement group ( P<0.01). The total radiation dose was (10.4±2.4)mGy in the visualization system-assisted screw placement group, lower than (51.8±7.2)mGy in the screw placement group ( P<0.01). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss or total length of hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 96.6% (197/204) in the visualization system-assisted screw placement group, significantly higher than 89.3% (191/214) in the free-hand screw placement group ( P<0.01). Both groups showed significant improvements in Cobb angle and VAS scores at 1 week, 3 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in Cobb angle or VAS scores between the two groups at each time point ( P>0.05). In the visualization system-assisted screw placement group, one patient had incision infection at 4 days after operation, which was cured with antibiotics. One patient in the free-hand screw placement group developed the symptoms of nerve root irritation at 2 days after surgery, which disappeared at 7 days after revision. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). During the follow-up, no patients had broken screws, loosening of internal fixation, or loss of correction in either group. Conclusions:Compared with free-hand pedicle screw internal fixation, the whole-process visualization system-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of TLBF without neurologic symptoms can shorten the time of operation and screw placement, reduce the radiation dose, and improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, suggesting that it is a safer and more effective auxiliary method for pedicle screw placement.

Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of asymmetric T 1 transpedicular wedge resection Smith-Petersen osteotomy (T 1 SPO) in the treatment of stiff cervical thoracic lateral kyphosis deformity. Methods:This is a retrospective case series study. The clinical data of nine patients with stiff cervical thoracic kyphosis who underwent asymmetric T 1 SPO corrective treatment from June 2012 to October 2022 were collected. There were 7 males and 2 females, aged 45 to 68 years. The surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. The chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), cervical thoracic kyphosis Cobb angle, cervical thoracic scoliosis Cobb angle, and cervical thoracic sagittal axis (C 2-T 1 sagittal vertical axis, SVA) before surgery, after surgery, and at the last follow-up were measured and the correction rates were calculate. Results:All 9 patients successfully completed the surgery. The operation time ranged from 245 to 320 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 1 400 to 2 200 ml. All patients were followed up for 24 to 48 months. The preoperative CBVA was 93.7° to 112.0°, which improved to 25.2° to 31.7° at the last follow-up, with an correction rate of 73.4%. The preoperative cervicothoracic kyphosis Cobb angle was -57.0° to -16.6°, which improved to 10.3° to 18.5° at the last follow-up, with an correction rate of 166.7%. The preoperative scoliosis Cobb angle was 13.0° to 16.5°, which improved to 2.2° to 3.8° at the last follow-up, with an correction rate of 84.9%. The preoperative SVA was 7.8 to 12.5 cm, which improved to 4.5 to 6.8 cm at the last follow-up, with an correction rate of 42.3%. One patient experienced numbness and weakness in the left hand after surgery, which recovered after 3 months. One patient had poor healing of the surgical incision, which healed after symptomatic treatment. During the follow-up, the coronal and sagittal balance of all patients was maintained, and no other neurological complications occurred. There were no cases of screw loosening, broken screws, or broken rods, or other internal fixation failures.Conclusion:The application of asymmetric T 1 SPO technique in the treatment of stiff cervical thoracic lateral kyphosis deformity can achieve relatively satisfactory correction effects.

Hypotension is a leading cause of age-related cognitive impairment. The available literature evidences that vascular factors are associated with dementia and that hypotension alters cerebral perfusion flow and can aggravate the neurodegeneration of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite the discovery of biomarkers and the recent progress made in neurovascular biology, epidemiology, and brain imaging, some key issues remain largely unresolved: the potential mechanisms underlying the neural deterioration observed in AD, the effect of cerebrovascular alterations on cognitive deficits, and the positive effects of hypotension treatment on cognition. Therefore, further well-designed studies are needed to unravel the potential association between hypotension and cognitive dysfunction and reveal the potential benefits of hypotension treatment for AD patients. Here, we review the current epidemiological, pathobiological, and treatment-related literature on neurovascular changes and hypotension-related cognitive dysfunction and highlight the unsettled but imminent issues that warrant future research endeavors.
Humans ; Hypotension/complications* ; Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology* ; Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology* ; Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology* ; Cognition Disorders/etiology*

Globally, over 300 million surgeries are performed each year, and more than 50% of surgeries involve patients aged 65 and older. Aging poses significant challenges to perioperative brain health, as the deterioration of brain structure and function increases susceptibility to postoperative neurological complications. Protecting perioperative brain health remains a worldwide clinical challenge. With senescence, the brain undergoes a progressive decline in homeostasis across various molecular, cellular, and regional functions. Anesthetics and surgical stimuli may accelerate the disruption of brain homeostasis and exacerbate age-related neurodegeneration. This review provides a framework for understanding how anesthesia and surgery can affect brain health in the aging population and contribute to postoperative neurological complications, with a particular focus on perioperative neurocognitive disorder.

Objective To observe the value of interventional treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH)based on degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture.Methods Totally 198 patients with LDH were retrospectively enrolled.Based on findings in digital subtraction angiography(DSA),the degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture were evaluated and different treatments were performed,and the efficacies were observed.Results Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty(IDET)were performed in 48 cases with fibrous ring degeneration and rupture of intervertebral disc but without protrusion,percutaneous lumbar diskectomy(PLD)/percutaneous laser disk decompression(PLDD)+ozone ablation were performed in 25 cases with grade 1 degeneration and grade 2 rupture with mild protrusion,targeted radiofrequency+ozone ablation were done in 23 cases with grade 2 degeneration and grade 2 or above rupture with mild protrusion,collagenase dissolution+PLD were done in 100 cases with grade 2 or above degeneration and grade 2 or above rupture with moderate or above protrusion and contrast agent entered into protruded intervertebral disc,while percutaneous cement discoplasty(PCD)were performed in 2 cases with grade 3 degeneration and grade 3 rupture with intervertebral stenosis.Twelve months after treatment,among 198 cases,excellent,good,acceptable and poor therapeutic effect was observed in 75,101,16 and 6 cases,respectively,with the effective rate of 96.97%(192/198).Conclusion Interventional treatments of LDH based on the degree of degeneration and fibrous ring rupture were valuable.

Objective A randomized controlled trial was conducted on colonoscopy inpatient and outpatients to compare the efficacy and safety of water exchange(WE)colonoscopy and CO2 convention insufflation colonoscopy in elderly patients.Methods 340 patients underwent fully sedated colonoscopy were randomly divided into two groups according to colonoscopy with either WE colonoscopy group(WE group)and CO2 insufflation colonoscopy group(CO2 group).The two groups were compared in terms of Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS),withdrawal time,cecal intubation time,cecal intubation success rate,abdominal compression,willingness to repeat,polypdetectionrate(PDR),adenoma detection rate(ADR),and safety.Results The cecal intubation success rate was significantly higher in WE group(100.0%)compared with CO2 group(96.5%),the difference was statistically significant(P=0.013).The average cecal intubation time of WE group was(10.50±1.79)min,which was longer than that of CO2 group(7.55±1.50)min,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Comparison of withdrawal time and BBPS between the two groups,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The abdominal pressure rate was lower in WE group(5.9%)compared with CO2 group(13.5%),the difference was statistically significant(P=0.017).The rate of willingness to re-examination in the WE group was 98.2%,which was significantly higher than the 93.5%in the CO2 group.The PDR in WE group(80.6%)was higher than that in CO2 group(70.6%),the ADR in WE group(67.1%)was higher than that in CO2 group(50.6%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that WE group was an effective factor in improving ADR(O＾R=2.027,P<0.01).The overall adverse events were less than 3%,with no difference between the two groups(P=1.000).Conclusion The use of WE colonoscopy has a better improved efficacy in elderly patients,and safety should be ensured by individualized assessment of the patient's co-morbidities,bowel preparation tolerance,and willingness prior to the procedure.