INTRODUCTION

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms (SOVA) are rare conditions in which a portion of the aortic root dilates due to weakness of the aortic wall, which can eventually lead to rupture, leading to a shunt from the aorta into any one of the cardiac chambers. Some patients can present asymptomatically and are diagnosed incidentally, while others can present with precipitous courses with symptoms of chest pain, palpitations and heart failure. When left untreated, these patients have poor prognosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A total of six patients are presented in this case series. These patients were seen in a national tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2024. The patients had varied characteristics, with ages ranging from 24-57 years old. Most of the patients were males. The presenting symptoms are also varied, with dyspnea being the most common symptom and a murmur being the most common sign. The most commonly involved sinus was the right coronary sinus draining into the right ventricle, with half of the patients presenting with concomitant ventricular septal defects. Five out of the six patients underwent successful open repair of their ruptured SOVAs and were eventually discharged.

DISCUSSION

Early identification of the cardiac lesion is important to clinch the diagnosis and plan for eventual definitive management. Imaging studies such as transthoracic echocardiogram are needed to visualize the defect, which is classically described as a windsock deformity. Transesophageal echocardiography may present clearer images to assess the anatomy better preoperatively. Medical management is usually done to bridge the patient to more definitive therapy, either through endovascular closure if the anatomy permits it or through surgical repair. Urgent and timely repair is needed to ensure improved survival in these patients.

Human ; Sinus Of Valsalva ; Aneurysm ; Rupture ; Chest Pain ; Heart Failure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Among patients with macrovascular and microvascular disease, we investigated the association between sulodexide and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and adverse events.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting CV outcomes and adverse events in patients with vascular disease receiving sulodexide for any indication versus control. The following outcomes were investigated: any CV event, myocardial infarction, CV death, bleeding events and gastrointestinal symptoms.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with a total of 8,436 patients were included. Sulodexide resulted in a significant reduction in CV events (OR 0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.41-0.73]; p < 0.0001) and CV death (OR 0.63 [CI 0.48-0.81]; p = 0.0004). This effect was mainly related to a lower risk of CV events (OR 0.55, CI 0.41-0.73) and CV death (OR 0.60, CI 0.45-0.79) in the macrovascular disease arm. Similarly, patients with macrovascular disease on sulodexide had significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction (OR 0.68 CI 0.50-0.94; p = 0.02) compared to control. The effects of sulodexide were nonsignificant among patients with microvascular disease in terms of overall CV event, myocardial infarction and mortality reduction. The risk of bleeding and gastrointestinal adverse events was not significantly different between sulodexide and control.

CONCLUSION

Sulodexide has a beneficial effect among patients with macrovascular disease in terms of reducing the risk for MI, overall CV mortality and CV events. Larger RCTs are needed to corroborate these findings.

Human ; Sulodexide ; Glucuronyl Glucosamine Glycan Sulfate

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Depression and anxiety are common among patients with cardiovascular disease. With increased stress from the ongoing pandemic, it is important to evaluate these conditions. Hence, this study aimed to identify the prevalence of depression and anxiety among outpatient consults via telemedicine through the HADS-P questionnaire and to compare the clinical and socioeconomic profile of patients with HADS-P score of >/=11.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional descriptive study including participants, outpatients in the cardiology clinic through an online survey regarding their socioeconomic demographic profile and the HADS-P questionnaire. Patients with scores of >/=11 for anxiety or depression were identified and the two groups were compared using a chi-square test analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients were recruited. Majority were females, with a partner, unemployed and living below the poverty line. The most common cardiovascular condition was ischemic heart disease and most patients were at least functional class II. The measured prevalence of probable anxiety and depression were 22% and 8%, respectively. A significant difference between the presence of both anxiety and depression was seen in participants with no partners; and for depression alone, in employed participants.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression are common in this sample population. HADS-P is a simple way of screening patients for these conditions so that holistic care may be instituted and appropriate referrals for psychological intervention may be done.

Human ; Anxiety ; Depression ; Telemedicine