Objective: To explore possible associations of a multidisciplinary team approach compared to a non-multidisciplinary team approach on delay and completion of treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Methods: Design: Historical Cohort Study Setting: Tertiary Private Training Hospital Participants: A total of 240 records of head and neck cancer patients from January 2016 and December 2018 were included in the study; 117 underwent a multidisciplinary team approach and 123 underwent a non- multidisciplinary team approach. Results: Only 24.79% of head and neck cancer patients under the multidisciplinary team approach had treatment delays compared to 37.40% under the non-multidisciplinary team approach. The proportion of treatment delays was significantly higher (χ2 = 4.44, p = .035) with the non-multidisciplinary team approach. Comparative treatment completion of 77.78% and 69.11% under the multidisciplinary and non-multidisciplinary team approaches, respectively, were not significantly different (χ2 = 2.31, p = .129). Conclusion The multidisciplinary approach might be associated with decreased delay in treatment among patients with head and neck cancer compared to the non-multidisciplinary team approach. A possible trend toward better treatment completion rate was also observed, but it did not reach statistical significance.
patient care team ; head and neck neoplasms ; time-to-treatment ; appointment and schedules ; neoplasm staging

Humans ; Glycogen Storage Disease Type II/therapy* ; Patient Care Team

Humans ; Hospital Rapid Response Team ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Perception

Although there are many treatment options for patients with stage Ⅳ primary lung cancer, the problems in the diagnosis and treatment process may involve multiple systems and organs due to their complex condition and heterogeneity. Therefore, cooperation between different disciplines is often required in the process of clinical practice. Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) refers to a fixed working group composed of more than two related disciplines, which puts forward the best treatment strategy for individual patient in the form of regular consultation for a certain system disease, and then the related disciplines implement the treatment strategy alone or jointly. MDT is widely used for disease diagnosis and treatment, and especially suitable for cancer patients. MDT has become a standard procedure for cancer treatment worldwide, including stage Ⅳ primary lung cancer. In order to promote the healthy development of MDT and generally improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of stage Ⅳ primary lung cancer in China, Chinese Association for Clinical Oncologists and Medical Oncology Branch of Chinese International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Healthcare co-organized the national experts committee to formulate "Clinical practice guideline for multi-disciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of stage Ⅳ primary lung cancer in China" .
China ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/therapy* ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patient Care Team ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Acute Disease ; China ; Consensus ; Humans ; Patient Care Team ; Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy*

INTRODUCTION: A second-tier rapid response team (RRT) is activated for patients who do not respond to first-tier measures. The premise of a tiered response is that first-tier responses by a ward team may identify and correct early states of deterioration or establish goals of care, thereby reducing unnecessary escalation of care to the RRT. Currently, utilisation and outcomes of tiered RRTs remain poorly described. METHODS: A prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required RRT activations was conducted from February 2018 to December 2019. RESULTS: There were 951 consecutive RRT activations from 869 patients and 76.0% patients had a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ≥5 at the time of RRT activation. The majority (79.8%) of patients required RRT interventions that included endotracheal intubation (12.7%), point-of-care ultrasound (17.0%), discussing goals of care (14.7%) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (24.2%). Approximately 1 in 3 (36.6%) patients died during hospitalisation or within 30 days of RRT activation. In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years, NEWS ≥7, ICU admission, longer hospitalisation days at RRT activation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores ≥3 (OR [odds ratio] 2.24, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.45-3.46), metastatic cancer (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.71-4.08) and haematological cancer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.84-4.19) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION Critical care interventions and escalation of care are common with second-tier RRTs. This supports the need for dedicated teams with specialised critical care services. Poor functional status, metastatic and haematological cancer are significantly associated with mortality, independent of age, NEWS and ICU admission. These factors should be considered during triage and goals of care discussion.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Critical Care ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospital Rapid Response Team ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers

The liver is the most common anatomical site for hematogenous metastases of colorectal cancer, and colorectal liver metastasis is one of the most difficult and challenging situations in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In order to improve the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment in China, the Guidelines have been edited and revised for several times since 2008, including the overall evaluation, personalized treatment goals and comprehensive treatments, to prevent the occurrence of liver metastases, improve the resection rate of liver metastases and survival. The revised Guideline version 2020 includes the diagnosis and follow-up, prevention, multidisciplinary team (MDT), surgery and local ablative treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and comprehensive treatment, with state-of-the-art experience and findings, detailed content, and strong operability.
China ; Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy* ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/therapy* ; Patient Care Team

Intra-abdominal infections(IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and complications, which usually need multidisciplinary management including surgeons, intensivists, infectious disease experts, microbiologists, and clinical pharmacists. Based on international and domestic guidelines and recent advances, a number of experts' statements of consensus, with a problem-oriented approach, were made on the cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs such as early recognition, etiology identification, adequate source control, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Main recommendations include concepts of intra-abdominal infection, pathoqen diagnosis precautions; surgical intervention principles and strategies of specific causes including acute appendicitis, upper gastrointestinal perforation, lower gastrointestinal perforation, acute biliary infection, liver abscess, severe acute pancreatitis, pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic leakage, gastrointestinal perforation, as well as perforation due to endoscopic procedure etc.; principles of antimicrobial therapy, dosage of antibiotics in specific population and pathophysiological state; and systematic support of severe infection such as early resuscitation and nutrition support.
Combined Modality Therapy ; Consensus ; Humans ; Intraabdominal Infections/therapy* ; Patient Care Team

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) in general hospitals on severe trauma patients. METHODS: This study reviewed the treatment of patients with severe trauma in trauma center of Peking University People's Hospital from March 2017 to April 2019. The baseline information: the patients' gender, age, injury mechanism, etc.; the start indicators: the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), trauma index (TI), injury severity score (ISS); the start related indicators: time for activation, time for MDT to arrive, time for CT scan, time for damage control surgery; patient treatment and prognosis: ICU (intensive care unit) length of stay, number of cured and discharged patients, number of dead cases, number of patients transferred to rehabilitation hospital, were all analyzed. It discussed the composition of MDT, the initiation scheme, the indicators of initiation of MDT for severe trauma, and analyzed the correlation between the application of MDT and the prognosis of patients. RESULTS: From March 2017 to April 2019, 112 trauma patients were treated by MDT in Peking University People's Hospital. There were 69 males and 43 females. The minimum age was 15 years, the maximum age was 89 years, most of them were 36-55 years old. The main injury mechanism was traffic accident injury. The GCS, TI, ISS were 13.0±2.9, 13.0±2.8, and 21.5±11.9, respectively. It took 3.7±0.8 minutes to start the call, 6.1±0.9 minutes for MDT personnel to arrive at the emergency rescue area, 23.8±3.0 minutes for fast CT and 92.6±15.4 minutes for injury control operation. All the hospitalized patients were treated effectively. ICU (Intensive care unit) hospitalization time was 12.6±6.7 days. 55 discharged patients were cured, 5 died (1 died of hemorrhagic shock, 4 died of severe brain injury) and 52 transferred to rehabilitation hospital. CONCLUSION The treatment of severe trauma patients by MDT in trauma center of general hospitals can greatly improve the ability and level of treatment of severe trauma patients, make up for the lack of treatment of severe trauma especially multiple trauma patients in large general hospitals, and improve the treatment effect of severe trauma patients. It provides a reference model for large general hospitals to treat patients with severe trauma and multiple trauma and for the construction of trauma centers.
Adult ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Care Team ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Centers

Betacoronavirus ; Communication ; Coronavirus Infections ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Disease Outbreaks ; Humans ; Medical Staff ; Pandemics ; prevention & control ; Patient Care Team ; Personal Protective Equipment ; Pneumonia, Viral ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; therapy