Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: Transfusion reactions are major considerations in transfusions. Appropriate transfusion practices are essential to minimize the risk of transfusion reactions, such as using irradiated and leukoreduced blood components for indicated patients. This study examined the effectiveness of an electronic prescription system modification in promoting the appropriate use of these blood components. Methods: The blood component prescription data from seven years (Jan 2016∼Dec 2022) were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of irradiated units was calculated for each half-year. Each transfusion was categorized by cancer diagnosis, blood component type, and visit type. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess the changes in the use of irradiated blood units and leukoreduced red cell components before and after the system modification. Results: This study analyzed 33,701 blood component prescriptions. The average number of irradiated units per prescription increased significantly from 0.21 to 0.77 after system modification. All patient groups, excluding transfusion in the operating room, showed a significant increase in irradiated unit use (P≤0.001). In addition, the percentage of leukoreduced red cell components increased significantly after the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion Modification of the electronic prescription system was effective in promoting the appropriate use of irradiated blood components among clinicians. This intervention can reduce transfusion reactions and improve patient outcomes by ensuring the correct selection of blood components for the indicated patients.

Background: and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

Background/Aims: Hypoxemia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) leads to reduced ability to exercise, decreased quality of life, and, eventually, increased mortality. Home oxygen therapy in patients with severe COPD reduces distress symptoms and mortality rates. However, there have been few studies on physicians’ prescription behavior toward home oxygen therapy. Therefore, we investigated the respiratory specialists’ perspective on home oxygen therapy. Methods: In this cross-sectional, study, a questionnaire was completed by 30 pulmonary specialists who worked in tertiary hospitals and prescribed home oxygen therapy. The questionnaire consisted of 28 items, including 15 items on oxygen prescription for outpatients, four for inpatients, and nine on service improvement. Results: All physicians were prescribing less than 2 L/min of oxygen for either 24 (n = 10, 33.3%) or 15 hours (n = 9, 30.3%). All (n = 30) used pulse oximetry, 26 (86.7%) analyzed arterial blood gas. Thirteen physicians had imposed restrictions and recommended oxygen use only during exercise or sleep. Sixteen (53.3%) physicians were educating their patients about home oxygen therapy. Furthermore, physicians prescribed home oxygen to patients that did not fit the typical criteria for longterm oxygen therapy, with 30 prescribing it for acute relief and 17 for patients with borderline hypoxemia. Conclusions This study identified the prescription pattern of home oxygen therapy in Korea. Respiratory physicians prescribe home oxygen therapy to hypoxemic COPD patients for at least 15 hours/day, and at a rate of less than 2 L/min. More research is needed to provide evidence for establishing policies on oxygen therapy in COPD patients.