1.The beginnings and evolution of a pancreatic surgeon: a technical morphological analysis in first 5 years.
Han Lin YIN ; Ning PU ; Qiang Da CHEN ; Ji Cheng ZHANG ; Yao Lin XU ; Chen Ye SHI ; Min Zhi LYU ; Wen Hui LOU ; Wen Chuan WU
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2023;61(6):511-518
Objective: To explore the development of the pancreatic surgeon technique in a high-volume center. Methods: A total of 284 cases receiving pancreatic surgery by a single surgeon from June 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. The clinical characteristics and perioperative medical history were extracted from the medical record system of Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University. Among these patients,there were 140 males and 144 females with an age (M (IQR)) of 61.0 (16.8) years(range: 15 to 85 years). The "back-to-back" pancreatic- jejunal anastomosis procedure was used to anastomose the end of the pancreas stump and the jejunal wall. Thirty days after discharge,the patients were followed by outpatient follow-up or telephone interviews. The difference between categorical variables was analyzed by the Chi-square test or the CMH chi-square test. The statistical differences for the quantitative data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H test and further analyzed using the LSD test or the Nemenyi test,respectively. Results: Intraoperative blood loss in pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2015 and 2020 were 300,100(100),100(100),100(0),100(200) and 150 (200) ml,respectively. Intraoperative blood loss in distal pancreatectomy was 250 (375),100 (50),50 (65), 50 (80),50 (50),and 50 (100) ml,respectively. Intraoperative blood loss did not show statistical differences in the same operative procedure between each year. The operative time for pancreaticoduodenectomy was respectively 4.5,5.0(2.0),5.5(0.8),5.0(1.3),5.0(3.3) and 5.0(1.0) hours in each year from 2015 to 2020,no statistical differences were found between each group. The operating time of the distal pancreatectomy was 3.8 (0.9),3.0 (1.5),3.0 (1.8),2.0 (1.1),2.0 (1.5) and 3.0(2.0) hours in each year,the operating time was obviously shorter in 2018 compared to 2015 (P=0.026) and 2020 (P=0.041). The median hospital stay in 2020 for distal pancreatectomy was 3 days shorter than that in 2019. The overall incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula gradually decreased,with a incident rate of 50.0%,36.8%,31.0%,25.9%,21.1% and 14.8% in each year. During this period,in a total of 3,6,4,2,0 and 20 cases received laparoscopic operations in each year. The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B and C) gradually decreased,the incident rates were 0,4.8%,7.1%,3.4%,4.3% and 1.4%,respectively. Two cases had postoperative abdominal bleeding and received unscheduled reoperation. The overall rate of unscheduled reoperation was 0.7%. A patient died within 30 days after the operation and the overall perioperative mortality was 0.4%. Conclusion: The surgical training of a high-volume center can ensure a high starting point in the initial stage and steady progress of pancreatic surgeons,to ensure the safety of pancreatic surgery.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Pancreatic Fistula/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Blood Loss, Surgical
;
Pancreatectomy/methods*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Surgeons
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery*
2.Advances in the study of postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis.
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2023;61(7):609-613
Postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is an acute inflammation of the remnant pancreas in the early postoperative period caused by a variety of factors. With the progress of related research,PPAP has been confirmed as an independent risk factor for many severe complications such as postoperative pancreatic fistula. In some cases, it progresses to necrotizing PPAP, increasing the risk of mortality. Currently, the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery has standardized and graded PPAP as an independent complication, taking into account factors including serum amylase, radiological features, and clinical impact. This review summarizes how the concept of PPAP was proposed, as well as the latest progress in the research related to its etiology, prognosis, prevention, and treatment. However, given the large heterogeneity of relevant studies and the fact that they were mostly retrospective, in the future, it is necessary to place more emphasis on PPAP and elucidate the problems through more standardized studies to optimize strategies for the prevention and management of complications after pancreatic surgery.
Humans
;
Pancreatitis/complications*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Acute Disease
;
Pancreas
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Pancreatic Fistula/etiology*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
3.The guideline for prevention and treatment of common complications after pancreatic surgery (2022).
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2023;61(7):1-18
In order to further standardize the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery, the editorial board of the Chinese Journal of Surgery organized relevant experts to formulate this guideline under the promotion of the Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery in China Society of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association and Pancreatic Disease Committee of China Research Hospital Association. According to the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation system, this guide discusses the hot issues on postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, chylous fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, abdominal infection, delayed gastric emptying, etc., quantitatively evaluates the level of evidence in clinical studies, and forms recommendations after repeatedly consulting. It is hoped to provide reference for pancreatic surgeons in the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications.
Humans
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Pancreatectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control*
;
China
4.A preliminary study on the prevention of hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by wrapping gastroduodenal artery stump in the left external liver lobe and the left caudate lobe.
Shu Bin ZHANG ; Xin Bo ZHOU ; Zi Xuan HU ; Zhong Qiang XING ; Jian Hua LIU
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2023;61(2):145-149
Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of embedding the stump of gastroduodenal artery between the left lateral lobe of the liver and the left caudate lobe to prevent bleeding after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 41 patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy at the second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.There were 27 males and 14 females, aged (63.0±9.2)years (range: 48 to 78 years), and the body mass index was (24.1±3.2)kg/m2 (range: 15.4 to 31.6 kg/m2). After routine laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, the stump of gastroduodenal artery was embedded between the left lateral lobe and the left caudate lobe of the liver, and the hepatic parenchyma of the left lateral lobe and the left caudate lobe were sutured with absorbable sutures.The occurrence and recovery of postoperative complications (pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, postoperative abdominal bleeding, abdominal infection, liver abscess) were observed. Results: All the operations of 41 patients were completed successfully.The operation time was (277.5±52.0) minutes (range: 192 to 360 minutes). The entrapment time of gastroduodenal artery stump was (3.1±0.6) minutes (range: 2.3 to 4.2 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss (M(IQR)) was 300 (200) ml (range: 50 to 800 ml).The results of ultrasound examination of hepatic artery on the first day after operation showed that the blood flows of hepatic artery were unobstructed.Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 3 cases, including grade B pancreatic fistula in 2 cases (1 case with abdominal infection) and biochemical leakage in 1 case. Three patients with pancreatic fistula were discharged successfully after continuous abdominal drainage. There was no biliary fistula, abdominal bleeding, abdominal infection, liver abscess or postoperative liver dysfunction. Conclusion: The encasement of the gastroduodenal artery stump by the left outer and left caudate lobes of the liver may be an effective way to prevent bleeding from the rupture of the gastroduodenal artery stump after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, which is easy and safe to perform.
Female
;
Male
;
Humans
;
Hepatic Artery
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Laparoscopy
;
Liver Abscess
;
Intraabdominal Infections
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control*
5.Analysis of influencing factors on surgical outcome and exploration of technical principles during pancreaticojejunostomy.
Jian Qi WANG ; Mei Li FAN ; Hong Chi JIANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(3):219-222
Pancreaticojejunostomy is the most common anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy and middle pancreatectomy. The detailed surgical technics of pancreaticojejunostomy vary dramatically, but none of them can achieve zero fistula rate. In recent years,with the development of new surgical concept,application of new surgical technology, high-tech materials and instruments,the incidence of pancreatic fistula has decreased. At the same time,researches on investigating the risk factors of pancreaticojejunostomy are gradually deepening. Based on years of surgical experience on pancreaticojejunostomy and current literatures, this paper analyzes the factors affecting the effect of pancreaticojejunostomy, such as the patient's basic physical state,pancreatic texture and diameter of the pancreatic duct,pathology and course of the disease,surgical technology and perioperative management,and summarizes six technical principles for pancreaticojejunostomy to be shared with surgical comrades:appropriate tension,protection of blood supply,hermetic closure of pancreatic section,accurate connection of pancreatic duct and intestinal mucosa,individualization,learning and accumulation of experience.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreaticojejunostomy/adverse effects*
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
;
Treatment Outcome
6.Well-trained gynecologic oncologists can perform bowel resection and upper abdominal surgery safely
Kyoko NISHIKIMI ; Shinichi TATE ; Kazuyoshi KATO ; Ayumu MATSUOKA ; Makio SHOZU
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):3-
pancreatic fistula after splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy in the 2 periods were 2 of 34 (6.0%), 1 of 33 (3.0%), and 3 of 15 (20.0%) patients in the initial learning period, and 12 of 147 (8.2%), 1 of 118 (0.8%), and 11 of 84 (13.1%) patients in the post-learning period, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (p=0.270, p=0.440, p=0.520, respectively).CONCLUSION: Bowel resection and upper abdominal surgery can be performed safely by gynecologic oncologists.]]>
Anastomotic Leak
;
Certification
;
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
;
Diaphragm
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Learning
;
Obstetrics
;
Ovarian Neoplasms
;
Pancreatectomy
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Pleural Effusion
;
Pneumothorax
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Splenectomy
7.Endoscopic Management of Pancreaticopleural Fistula in a Child with Hereditary Pancreatitis
Dahye LEE ; Eun Joo LEE ; Ju Whi KIM ; Jin Soo MOON ; Yong Tae KIM ; Jae Sung KO
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2019;22(6):601-607
Pancreaticopleural fistula (PPF) a fistulous connection between the pancreas and pleural space due to prolonged chronic pancreatitis (CP). PPF is a very rare complication which presents in 0.4% of chronic pancreatitis cases, especially among children. We report a case involving a 3-year-old boy who presented with pleural effusion caused by a PPF, a complication of hereditary pancreatitis, which was, for the first time in Korea, successfully managed with endoscopic treatment. Chest radiography and computed tomography showed massive pleural effusion. Percutaneous catheter drainage was performed. High amylase levels were observed in the pleural fluid and serum, suggesting PPF. The patient was managed with bowel rest and octreotide infusion. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed CP, and pleural effusion was successfully managed with stent placement. PRSS1 genetic screening revealed R122H mutation.
Amylases
;
Catheters
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
;
Drainage
;
Fistula
;
Genetic Testing
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Octreotide
;
Pancreas
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Pancreatitis
;
Pancreatitis, Chronic
;
Pleural Effusion
;
Radiography
;
Stents
;
Thorax
8.Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transgastric Drainage of an Intra-Abdominal Abscess following Gastrectomy
Satoru KIKUCHI ; Tetsushi KUBOTA ; Shinji KURODA ; Masahiko NISHIZAKI ; Shunsuke KAGAWA ; Hironari KATO ; Hiroyuki OKADA ; Toshiyoshi FUJIWARA
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(4):373-376
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transgastric drainage has been performed as a less invasive procedure for pancreatic fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses occurring after surgery in recent years. However, there are no reports of EUS-guided transgastric drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses following gastrectomy. This case report describes 2 patients who developed an intra-abdominal abscess following gastrectomy and underwent EUS-guided transgastric drainage. Both patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction for gastric cancer. The intra-abdominal abscesses were caused by postoperative pancreatic fistula that developed following gastrectomy. One patient underwent naso-cystic drainage and the other underwent only a needle puncture of the abscess cavity. EUS-guided drainage was performed safely and effectively, although 1 patient developed gastroduodenal anastomotic leakage related to this procedure. In summary, EUS-guided transgastric drainage is safe and technically feasible even in post-gastrectomy patients. However, it is necessary to be careful if this procedure is performed in the early period following gastrectomy.
Abdominal Abscess
;
Abscess
;
Anastomotic Leak
;
Drainage
;
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
;
Needles
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Punctures
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Ultrasonography
9.Outcomes of Infected versus Symptomatic Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis Treated with a Minimally Invasive Therapy
Jong Jin HYUN ; Nadav SAHAR ; Anand SINGLA ; Andrew S ROSS ; Shayan S IRANI ; S Ian GAN ; Michael C LARSEN ; Richard A KOZAREK ; Michael GLUCK
Gut and Liver 2019;13(2):215-222
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and if infected, typically necessitates intervention. Clinical outcomes of infected WON have been described as poorer than those of symptomatic sterile WON. With the evolution of minimally invasive therapy, we sought to compare outcomes of infected to symptomatic sterile WON. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who were undergoing dual-modality drainage as minimally invasive therapy for WON at a high-volume tertiary pancreatic center. The main outcome measures included mortality with a drain in place, length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, and development of pancreatic fistulae. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients in our analysis, 98 had infected WON. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Patients with infected WON trended toward higher mortality although not statistically significant (4.1% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Patients with infected WON had longer length of hospitalization (29.8 days vs 17.3 days, p<0.01), and developed more spontaneous pancreatic fistulae (23.5% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that infected WON was associated with higher odds of spontaneous pancreatic fistula formation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.85). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that infected WON has worse outcomes than sterile WON but also demonstrates that WON, once considered a significant cause of death, can be treated with good outcomes using minimally invasive therapy.
Cause of Death
;
Cohort Studies
;
Drainage
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Length of Stay
;
Mortality
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Necrosis
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Pancreatitis
;
Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing
;
Retrospective Studies
10.Current Definition of and Controversial Issues Regarding Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas
Giovanni MARCHEGIANI ; Stefano ANDRIANELLO ; Roberto SALVIA ; Claudio BASSI
Gut and Liver 2019;13(2):149-153
The International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) made the first attempt to standardize the outcome measure of fistulas in the field of pancreatic surgery by publishing the definition and classification of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) in 2005. POPFs were determined by any measurable volume of fluid output via an operatively placed drain with amylase activity greater than three times the upper normal serum value. Taking into account more than 10 years of reported experience worldwide, the updated definition published in 2016 by the reconvened International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) attempted to overcome the limits of the previous classification. The crucial concept of POPF clinical significance was introduced by eliminating grade A from the fistula scenario. The wider use of interventional procedures has also made it necessary to recode grade C POPFs, which now have clearer boundaries, toward the worst end of the severity scale. Grade B still represents the most prevalent and heterogeneous category of POPFs, both in terms of clinical burden and management. In the near future, further efforts will be required to better stratify grade B POPFs to standardize treatment strategies and compare outcomes among institutions.
Amylases
;
Classification
;
Fistula
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
;
Pancreatectomy
;
Pancreatic Fistula
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Pancreaticojejunostomy

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail