OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of palliative care on drug use, medical service utilization and medical expenditure of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: A cohort of patients including pal-liative care and standard care was constructed using the medical records of the patients in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2018 to 2020, and coarsened exact matching was used to match the two groups of patients. The average monthly opioid consumption, hospitalization rate, intensive care unit (ICU) rate and operation rate, and the average monthly total cost were selected to evaluate drug use, medical service utilization and medical expenditure. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compare the differences between the two groups before and after exposure and the change in the palliative care group. The net impact of palliative care on the patients was calculated using the difference-in-differences analysis. RESULTS: In this study, 180 patients in the palliative care group and 3 101 patients in the stan-dard care group were finally included in the matching, and the matching effect of the two groups was good (L₁ < 0.1). Before and after exposure, the average monthly opioid consumption in the palliative care group was significantly higher than that in the standard care group (Before exposure: 0.3 DDD/person-month vs. 0.1 DDD/person-month, P < 0.01; After exposure: 0.7 DDD/person-month vs. 0.1 DDD/person-month, P < 0.01; DDD refers to defined daily dose), palliative care significantly increased the average monthly opioid consumption in the patients (0.3 DDD/person-month, P < 0.01). The hospitalization rate (48.9% vs. 74.3%, P < 0.01) and operation rate (3.9% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.01) of the patients in palliative care group were significantly lower than those in standard care group, and the ICU rate became similar between the two groups (1.1% vs. 1.6%, P=0.634). Palliative care significantly reduced the patients ' hospitalization rate (-25.6%, P < 0.01), ICU rate (-4.9%, P < 0.01) and operation rate (-14.5%, P < 0.01). Before and after exposure, the average monthly total costs of pal-liative care group were slightly higher than those of standard care group (Before exposure: 20 092.3 yuan vs. 19 132.8 yuan, P=0.725; After exposure: 9 719.8 yuan vs. 8 818.8 yuan, P=0.165). Palliative care increased the average monthly total cost by 2 208.8 yuan, but it was not statistically significant (P=0.316). CONCLUSION Palliative care can increase the opioid consumption in advanced cancer patients, reduce the rates of hospitalization, ICU and surgery, but has no significant effect on medical expenditure.
Humans ; Palliative Care/economics* ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Analgesics, Opioid/economics* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Hospitalization/economics* ; Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data* ; Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data* ; Adult ; Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data* ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data*

INTRODUCTIONIn end-stage heart failure (HF) that is not eligible for mechanical assist device or heart transplant, palliative care serves to maximise symptom control and quality of life. We sought to evaluate the impact of home-based advance care programme (ACP) on healthcare utilisation in end-stage HF patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODSProspectively collected registry data on all end-stage HF recruited into ACP between July 2008 and July 2010 were analysed. Chart reviews were conducted on HF database and hospital electronic records. Phone interview and home visit details by ACP team were extracted to complete data entry. HF and all-cause hospitalisations 1 year before, and any time after ACP inception were defined as events. For the latter analysis, follow-up duration adjustment to event episodes was performed to account for death less than a year.

RESULTSForty-four patients (mean age 79 years, 39% men) were followed up for 15±8 months. Fifty-seven percent had diabetes, 80% ischaemic heart disease, and 60% chronic kidney disease. All reported functional class III/IV at enrolment. Mean serum sodium was 136±6 mmol/L, and creatinine 186±126 mmol/L. Thirty (68%) died within the programme. Mean time to death was 5.5 months. Mean all-cause and HF hospitalisations were 3.6 and 2.0 per patient before enrolment, but improved to 1.0 and 0.6 respectively after ACP. Thirty-six (71%) patients had fewer HF hospitalisations. When only those who survived more than a year were considered (n = 14), 10 (71%) and 9 (64%) experienced reduced HF (mean: 1.4 episodes per patient) and all-cause hospitalisations (mean: 2.2 episodes per patient) respectively.

CONCLUSIONHome-based advance care programme is potentially effective in reducing healthcare utilisation of end-stage HF patients, primarily by reducing HF rehospitalisations, and in probably saving costs as well.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Services ; economics ; utilization ; Heart Failure ; complications ; economics ; therapy ; Home Care Services, Hospital-Based ; economics ; Hospitalization ; economics ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Myocardial Ischemia ; complications ; Palliative Care ; economics ; methods ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; complications ; Tertiary Care Centers