1.Efficacy analysis of autologous facet joint bone block in lumbar interbody fusion of osteoporosis patients.
Da Wei WANG ; Hua Dong WANG ; Li LI ; Xin YIN ; Wei HUANG ; Ji Dong GUO ; Ya Feng YANG ; Yi Hao LIU ; Yang ZHENG
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2023;55(5):899-909
OBJECTIVE:
To compare and analyze the feasibility of autologous facet joint bone block as an alternative to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in lumbar intervertebral fusion surgery for patients with osteoporosis.
METHODS:
From December 2018 to June 2021, the case data of patients with osteoporosis (T value ≤ -2.5 on dual energy X-ray bone density) who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Fourth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. All the cases were followed up for no less than 12 months and were divided into two groups according to the differences of interbody fusion materials: the autologous facet joint bone block group (autogenous bone group) and the PEEK cage group (PEEK group). The general data [such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, distribution of fusion segments, bone mineral density of lumbar (BMD), incidence of preoperative complications], the perioperative data (such as duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion rate), and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Imaging parameters (disc height, lumbar lordosis angle, segment lordosis angle, segmental lordosis angle, disc height improvement rate, and fusion rate) and lumbar functional scores [visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) score for lower back pain] were compared to evaluate the clinical efficacy between the kinds of intervertebral fusion materials 1 week, 3 months and 6 months postoperative and at the last follow-up.
RESULTS:
A total of 118 patients were enrolled, including 68 cases in the autogenous bone group and 50 cases in the PEEK group, there were no statistical differences in age, gender, BMI, primary diagnosis, distribution of fusion segments, BMD, incidence of preoperative complications, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion rate, incidence of postoperative complications, all the preoperative imaging parameters and all the lumbar function scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative superficial surgical site infections occurred in 3 patients in the autogenous bone group and 2 patients in the PEEK group. At the last follow-up, 3 cases of intervertebral graft collapse occurred in the autogenous bone group and 5 cases in the PEEK group, 1 case of graft subsidence in the autogenous bone group and 1 case in the PEEK group. All the imaging parameters showed significant differences between postoperation and preoperation (P < 0.05), and all the imaging parameters showed significant differences between 1 week and 3 months postoperative in both groups (P < 0.05). The height, angle of fusion gap in the autogenous bone group were lower than those in the PEEK group 1 week postoperatively (P < 0.05), and the fusion gap height improvement rate in the autogenous bone group was lower than that in the PEEK group (P < 0.05). The cases in both groups started to show final fusion 3 months after surgery, and the fusion rate in the autogenous bone group was 75% 6 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher than the rate of 56% in the PEEK group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the final fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The ODI, the postoperative VAS score was significantly lower than that in preoperation, while the postoperative JOA score was significantly higher than that in preoperation (P < 0.05). The ODI was lower while the JOA score was higher of the autogenous bone group than that of the PEEK group 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In osteoporosis patients, good interbody fusion rate and improvement of lumbar vertebral function can be obtained by using autologous facet joint bone block or PEEK cage, while the fusion rate and the improvement of lumbar function with autologous facet joint bone block are better than those with PEEK cage 6 months post-operatively. PEEK cage is superior to autologous facet joint bone block in intervertebral distraction and improvement of lumbar lordosis. Significant disc space subsidence occurred in osteoporotic patients within 3 months after lumbar interbody fusion, and the subsidence of PEEK cage was more obvious than that of autologous facet joint bone block.
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Lordosis
;
Zygapophyseal Joint
;
Spinal Fusion/methods*
;
Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ketones
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Osteoporosis
;
Blood Loss, Surgical
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage
2.Construction and evaluation of a nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.
Xin LI ; Xiao-Yong LEI ; Da-Wei KANG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(11):1036-1040
OBJECTIVE:
To construct and evaluate nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS:
A total of 538 patients who underwent THA from April 2013 to February 2019 were selected as the research subjects, including 318 males and 220 females, aged 40 to 60 years old with an average age of (50.79±6.37) years old. All patients with THA were divided into non-fracture group (506 patients) and fracture group (32 pathents) according to the 3-year follow-up results. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with THA. A nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA was constructed, and the validity and discrimination of the prediction model were evaluated.
RESULTS:
The proportion of patients with osteoporosis, trauma history, and hip revision in the fracture group were higher than those in the non-fracture group(P<0.05), and the proportion of bone cement prosthesis was lower than that in the non-fracture group(P<0.05). The osteoporosis status[OR=4.177, 95%CI(1.815, 9.617), P<0.05], trauma history[OR=7.481, 95%CI(3.104, 18.031), P<0.05], and hip revision[OR=11.371, 95%CI(3.220, 40.153, P<0.05] were independent risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA, cemented prosthesis [OR=0.067, 95%CI(0.019, 0.236), P<0.05] was an independent protective factor for postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA(P<0.05). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed that χ2=7.864, P=0.325;the area under the curve (AUC) for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA was 0.892 with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 77.7% by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve.
CONCLUSION
The nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures after THA constructed in this study has good discrimination, which is beneficial to clinical prediction of periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA, and facilitates individualized fracture prevention.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects*
;
Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery*
;
Nomograms
;
Reoperation/adverse effects*
;
Risk Factors
;
Osteoporosis/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Hip Prosthesis
3.Research progress on the influence of Modic changes on lumbar interbody fusion and its treatment measure.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2023;37(8):1026-1030
OBJECTIVE:
To review the research progress of Modic changes and its influence on lumbar interbody fusion.
METHODS:
The domestic and foreign literature related to Modic changes and its influence on lumbar interbody fusion was extensively reviewed. The etiology of Modic changes was summarized, and the treatment measures of Modic changes on lumbar interbody fusion were discussed.
RESULTS:
The etiology of Modic changes is not clear, which may be related to mechanical factors, autoimmune factors, low toxic infection factors, and genetic factors. Modic changes may lead to fusion failure and cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion. Preoperative evaluation of endplate sclerosis, reduction of iatrogenic endplate injury, fine operating of intervertebral space, management of osteoporosis, and selection of appropriate cage can prevent or reduce fusion failure or cage subsidence.
CONCLUSION
Modic changes may lead to fusion failure and cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion, and active perioperative intervention of Modic changes is helpful to improve the clinical prognosis.
Humans
;
Lumbosacral Region/surgery*
;
Osteoporosis
;
Spinal Fusion
;
Treatment Failure
4.Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thromboembolism in spinal fracture.
Aoran MAHESHATI ; Yi YANG ; Hali HABULIHAN
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(8):717-723
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the incidence of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) before surgery in patients with spinal fracture and analyze its risk factors.
METHODS:
The clinical data of 1 046 patients with spinal fracture who underwent surgery from October 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including patient's age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, complications, the time from injury to diagnosis of DVT, blood index results on admission. The complications included hypertension, osteoporosis, diabetes, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, obesity, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypoproteinemia, renal insufficiency, spinal cord injury;blood index results on admission included hematocrit (HCT), creatinine (Cre), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein(LDL), D-dimer(D-D), fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products(FDP), and C-reactive protein(CRP). The patients were divided into group according to whether DVT was diagnosed by the lower extremity venous ultrasonography after admission to pre-operation. The patients with DVT were set as the DVT group, and the patients without DVT were set as the non-DVT group. First, the above-mentioned possible risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis, and then the risk factors of DVT before spinal fracture surgery were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression.
RESULTS:
Among 1 046 patients with spinal fracture, 137 had DVT before operation and 909 had no DVT. There were significant differences in age, the incidence of preoperative osteoporosis, diabetes, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, the levels of LDL, plasma D-D, FDP, and CRP between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that osteoporosis (OR=3.116, 95%CI:1.816-5.346, P<0.001), hypoproteinemia (OR=2.508, 95%CI:1.583-3.974, P<0.001), preoperative serum LDL>4.645 mmol/L(OR=2.586, 95%CI:1.394-4.798, P<0.001), plasma D-D>558.00 ng/ml (OR=23.916, 95%CI:15.108-37.860, P<0.001), FDP>13.81 µg/ml(OR=3.873, 95%CI:2.614-5.739, P<0.001) and age were independent risk factors for the occurrence of DVT before spinal fracture surgery, and the incidence of DVT in patients aged 36-50, 51-65 and over 65 years was 2.49, 2.59 and 4.02 times of those aged 18-35 years, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The incidence of preoperative DVT in patients with spinal fracture is 13.10%(137/1 046). Preoperative complicating osteoporosis, hypoalbuminemia, serum LDL>4.645 mmol/L, plasma D-D> 558.00 ng/ml, FDP> 13.81 µg/ml and age are risk factors for DVT. And the older the patient, the higher the risk of DVT.
Fractures, Bone/complications*
;
Humans
;
Hypoalbuminemia/complications*
;
Incidence
;
Osteoporosis/complications*
;
Prevalence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*
;
Venous Thromboembolism
5.Risk factors of hidden blood loss in percutaneous vertebral augmentation.
Zhi-Hua WU ; Ling MO ; Huan-Tong CHENG ; De LIANG ; Jian-Chao CUI ; Jing-Jing TANG ; Hui REN ; Zhen-Song YAO ; Xiao-Bing JIANG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(8):732-735
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the risk factors of hidden blood loss in osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures during percutaneous vertebral augmentation.
METHODS:
From October 2018 to December 2019, 360 patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures who received percutaneous vertebral augmentation were enrolled in this study. The factors analyzed included gender, age, surgical methods, disease course, height, weight, the operative segment, bone mineral density, amount of bone cement, operative time, percentage of height loss, percentage of vertebral height restoration, cement leakage, blood clotting function, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit and other internal diseases. Total blood loss was calculated by Gross's formula, influential factors of the hidden blood loss were further analyzed by t-test, multivariate linear regression and one-way ANOVA analysis.
RESULTS:
Surgical methods, the operative segment, disease course, cement leakage, preoperative hemoglobin, cement leakage via the basivertebral and segmental vein were significantly correlated with hidden blood loss(P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Patients with percutaneous kyphoplasty, two-level and multi-level surgery, the course of the disease beyond 6 weeks, cement leakage via the basivertebral and segmental vein, and lower preoperative hemoglobin had more perioperative hidden blood loss.
Bone Cements/adverse effects*
;
Fractures, Compression/etiology*
;
Humans
;
Kyphoplasty/methods*
;
Osteoporosis/complications*
;
Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Spinal Fractures/etiology*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Vertebroplasty/adverse effects*
6.Experimental study on improving stability of anchor by adding anchor.
Yi-Long DONG ; Yue-Nan QIAN ; Lue LIU ; Chun-Yuan CAI
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(9):808-811
OBJECTIVE:
To explore whether anchor placement could improve holding force of anchors under the condition of osteoporosis, in order to solve the problem of clinical treatment for rotator cuff injury associated with osteoporosis.
METHODS:
Twenty one bone modules, which included 13 males and 8 females aged from 60 to 95 years old with an average of (77.6±10.3) years old, and were divided into three experimental groups named as group A, B and C, and 7 in each group. A single anchor was inserted in group A, two parallel anchors were screwed in group B, and a single anchor was screwed in group C, then after the anchor was pulled out, anchor was screwed back and another anchor was screwed in close to the anchor. X-ray examination was performed in all three groups to observe situation of anchor in osteoporosis module; the maximum axial pull-out force (Fmax) of the three groups was measured.
RESULTS:
Fmax of group A, B and C was (170.35±31.21) N, (314.47±23.47) N, and(292.74±25.36) N, respectively. Compared with group A, there were statistical difference of Fmax in group B and C(P<0.05), while no difference of Fmax between group B and C(P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
In the case of loose anchors in the osteoporosis module, holding force of anchors could be improved by adding anchor, which provide a remedy for single anchor failure in clinical operation.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Osteoporosis/surgery*
;
Radiography
;
Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery*
;
Suture Anchors
;
Suture Techniques
7.Case-control study on endplate injury of lumbar spine with two different intervertebral fusion methods.
Zhong-You ZENG ; Hong-Fei WU ; Shi-Yang FAN ; Sun-Wu FAN ; Xiang-Qian FANG ; Xing ZHAO ; Yong-Xing SONG ; Wei YU ; Fei PEI ; Guo-Hao SONG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(10):933-942
OBJECTIVE:
To summarize and compare the endplate injury occurrence characteristics and clinical results of transforaminal intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach and oblique lateral intervertebral fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar disease.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis of 213 cases of lumbar disease admitted from January 2016 to June 2019, including 73 males and 140 females. The age ranged from 24 to 81 years old, with an average of(54.9±10.5) years old. The courses of disease ranged from 6 to 180 months, with an average of (40.30±28.71) months. There were 35 cases of degenerative lumbar intervertebral disc disease, 22 cases of giant lumbar disc herniation, 15 cases of discogenic low back pain, 9 cases of primary lumbar intervertebral inflammation at the turn of inflammation, 52 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 47 cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, 33 cases of lumbar spondylolysis with or without spondylolisthesis. There were 191 cases of single-segment lesions, including 5 cases on L2, 3, 24 cases on L3, 4, 162 cases on L4, 5. And there were 22 cases of two-segment lesions, including 3 cases on L2, 3 and L3, 4, and 19 cases on L3, 4 and L4, 5. One hundred and ten cases were taken by bilateral pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion under the posterior muscle space approach (abbreviated as posterior fusion group), and 103 cases were taken by oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation under the posterior muscle space approach (oblique lateral fusion group). Observed the characteristics of endplate injury in the two groups, and compared the clinical and imaging results and complications of the two groups.
RESULTS:
There were 8 cases of endplate injury occurred in 9 segments in the posterior fusion group. According to the number of cases, the incidence rate was 7.27%(8/110), 1 case was male, 7 cases were female, with an average age of (63.22±3.51) years old. Among the 8 cases, there were 7 cases of bone loss or osteoporosis before the operation, 5 cases using banana fusion cages, 3 cases using anatomical fusion cages. Three cases occurred in the upper endplate of the vertebral body and 6 cases in the inferior endplate of the vertebral body. In the oblique lateral fusion group, there were 21 cases of endplate injury in 24 segments, and the incidence rate was 20.39%(21/103). There were 4 males and 17 females, with an average age of (62.50±5.02) years old. Among the 21 cases, 16 cases were bone loss or osteoporosis before operation. There were 5 cases used large fusion cages, 4 cases had abnormal endplate anatomy, and 3 cases had iliac crest hypertrophy. It occurred in 20 segments of the upper endplate of the vertebral body, and 4 segments of the lower endplate of the vertebral body. Two of the 21 cases of endplate injury combined with vertebral body fractures. The incidence of endplate injury of the posterior fusion group was significantly lower than that of the oblique lateral fusion group. No incision infection occurred in the two groups, the follow-up time was ranged from 12 to 48 months, and the median follow-up period was 12 months. In the follow-up, 22 cases occurred fusion cage subsidence in the posterior fusion group, 43 cases in the oblique lateral fusion group, and 1 case in each group occurred fusion cage displacement. There was no loosening, displacement or breakage of the internal fixation. The incidence of complications in the oblique lateral fusion group 33.98%(35/103) was significantly higher than that in the posterior fusion group 23.64%(26/110), P=0.039. The height of the intervertebral space in both groups recovered well after the operation, but it was lost to varying degrees during follow-up. The fusion rate of the posterior fusion group was 94.5%(104/110), and 96.1%(99/103) in the oblique lateral fusion group(P=0.083). At the latest follow-up, the clinical symptoms of the two groups of patients were significantly improved.
CONCLUSION
Two methods in treating single or two-segment lumbar spine lesions obtained good clinical effects. The characteristics of endplate injury in the two fusion methods are not completely the same. Although the endplate injury did not affect the final clinical results of the two fixed fusion methods, it still needs to be paid attention to and emphasize the prevention and effective treatment of endplate injury, especially for oblique lateral intervertebral fusion.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Spondylolisthesis/surgery*
;
Spinal Fusion/methods*
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Spinal Fractures
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Osteoporosis
;
Inflammation
8.Zero profile anchored spacer(ROI-C) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis with osteoporosis.
Ji-Fu ZHAO ; Qian WAN ; Wen-Bo CUI
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2021;34(1):68-72
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the clinical efficacy of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) in treating cervical spondylosis with osteoporosis.
METHODS:
From May 2013 to May 2018, a total of 145 patients with cervical spondylosis were treated by ROI-C through anterior cervical spine approach. Among them, 31 patients were aged ≥60 years and had osteoporosis by bone density measurement, and they were retrospectively analyzed. Including 9 males and 22 females, aged 60-84 years old with an average of (69.12±7.65) years. There were 23 cases of single-segment fusion, 6 cases of two-stage fusion, and 2 cases of three-stage fusion;and 41 devices of ROI-C fusion was placed in the patients. Operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded;Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analogue scale(VAS) were respectively used to evaluate the neurological function and neck pain before and after operation. The cervical curvature (expressed as Cobb angle), the height of the intervertebral space at the surgical segment, and the intervertebral fusion were observed at postoperative and follow-up periods were observed by image data.
RESULTS:
All patients were followed up for 12-24(15.6±4.4) months after operation. The operation time were from 75 to 113 (101.33±10.25) min and intraoperative blood loss were from 14 to 51 (33.18 ± 16.56) ml. Among these 23 patients with fusion of single segment, the operation time were 75 to 98 (85.47±8.70) min and intraoperative blood loss were 14 to 30(21.18±6.56) ml. JOA scores of all included patients were increased from 9.66±2.12 preoperatively to 14.36±1.24 at the final follow-up (
CONCLUSION
Anterior cervical approach with ROI-C for the treatment of elderly patients with cervical spondylosis and osteoporosis had reliable clinical effect, short operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and can effectively restore cervical curvature and intervertebral space height, and has advantages of fewer complications and higher successful rate of fusion.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Osteoporosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Fusion
;
Spondylosis/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
10.Progress on effect of osteoporosis on rotator cuff repair.
Jian-Ping ZHOU ; Guang-Rui ZHANG ; Jia-Xin LIU ; Ding WU ; Li-Ping AN ; Ming-Tao ZHANG ; Xiang-Dong YUN
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2020;33(10):982-985
The rate of rotator cuff injury repair and retear is high in elderly patients due to the combination of different degrees of osteoporosis. To solve this problem, many surgeons try to reduce retear rate of rotator cuff injuries in these patients by increasing the initial fixation strength of anchors and changing local bone conditions. The rapid advances of tissue engineering have made it possible to use growth factors as an aid. However, repair of rotator cuff injury with osteoporosis is still a great challenge for clinical workers. How to better increase anchor fixation strength, improve micro-environment of tendon and bone healing, reduce the rotator cuff retear rate have become the research focus in recent years. The paper reviewed literatures on the relationshipbetween osteoporosis and rotator cuff injury, effect of osteoporosis in rotator cuff tendon healing, methods of reducing osteoporosis on rotator cuff tendon healing, in order to guide clinical treatment, improve operative effect and postoperative satisfaction.
Aged
;
Arthroplasty
;
Humans
;
Osteoporosis
;
Rotator Cuff/surgery*
;
Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery*
;
Tendons/surgery*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail