OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical effect of the L-shape technique combined with concentrated growth factor on the horizontal bone defects of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Twenty-five implants from 25 patients who underwent single maxillary anterior tooth implantation with simultaneous bone grafting were selected as the study subjects. Based on the bone grafting techniques, the patients were divided into a test group (L-shaped technique with guided bone regeneration combined with concentrated growth factor, 11 cases) and a control group (traditional guided bone regeneration combined with concentrated growth factor, 14 cases). The early discomfort and wound healing conditions in the two groups at two weeks after surgery were compared. The horizontal bone thickness, vertical bone thickness, and grayscale values in the augmentation area were measured immediately postsurgery and six months after surgery. Implant stability, hard tissue resorption within six months, and grayscale values were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Differences in early discomfort, wound healing, implant stability, and grayscale values between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Vertical bone thickness in the test group was significantly better than that in the control group at six months after surgery (P<0.05). The variation in horizontal bone thickness in the test group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The application of the L-shape technique with concentrated growth factor for horizontal bone defects in the anterior maxillary area yielded satisfactory short-term results in terms of bone augmentation, early discomfort, wound healing, and implant stability at six months after surgery.
Humans ; Maxilla/diagnostic imaging* ; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Wound Healing ; Bone Transplantation/methods* ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods* ; Bone Regeneration ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Middle Aged

In the realm of oral implantology, currently, there is no unanimous consensus or authoritative guideline regarding how to conduct implant restoration for cases involving oroantral communication or oroantral fistula. In these cases, the bony plate of the maxillary sinus floor is discontinuous, the oro-sinus mucosa is in communication, and a vertical alveolar bone defect exists. This paper presents a case of a patient with two oroantral communications who successfully underwent implant restoration via simple staged surgeries. Following a 2-year clinical follow-up, the implant remains in good condition, and the patient expresses satisfaction. The objective of this paper is to offer a simple, safe, and readily-promotable new approach for such cases.
Humans ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods* ; Dental Implants ; Maxillary Sinus/surgery* ; Oroantral Fistula/surgery*

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the short- to medium-term clinical efficacy of demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) particles applied during the immediate implantation of alveolar bone defects in the posterior region. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with 110 simple taper retentive implants were included in the conducted study and divided into Groups A and B in accordance with the bone grafting materials. Cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiographs were taken immediately after implant surgery, immediate crown repair, and final follow-up time. The average follow-up time for Groups A and B was recorded. The primary observed clinical indicators were overall survival rate of the implant, bone resorption of the mesial and distal margins of the implant, buccal bone width resorption at the platform level and 1 mm below the platform, and bone height of the implant. Implant complication was a secondary observed clinical indicator. RESULTS: During the 1-to-5-year follow-up observation period, the mean follow-up of Group A was 38.2 months while that of Group B was 39.9 months. In Group A, two implants failed, one of which fractured, and implant overall survival rate was 96.4%. Four implants failed in Group B due to peri-implantitis, and implant overall survival rate was 92.6%. No statistically significant difference in implant overall survival rate was found between the two groups (P>0.05). In Group A, the average bone resorption in the mesial and distal margins of the implants was (1.011±2.047) mm and (0.841±2.183) mm, respectively. In Group B, the average bone resorption of the mesial and distal margins of the implants was (1.546±1.778) mm and (1.431±1.909) mm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups (P>0.05). In Group A, buccal bone width resorption at the platform level and 1 mm below the platform of the implant was (0.782±2.084) mm and (0.681±2.307) mm, respectively. In Group B, buccal bone width resorption at the platform level and 1 mm below the platform of implant was (1.071±1.474) mm and (0.949±1.909) mm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). In Group A, the buccal bone height of resorption of the implant was (1.044±2.214) mm. In Group B, the buccal bone height of resorption of the implant was (1.075±1.456) mm. No statistically significant difference in bone height was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS During the 1-to-5-year follow-up observation period, DDM particles can effectively increase the height and width of alveolar bone, and they can achieve the same effect of maintaining alveolar bone contour and bone augmentation compared with deproteinized inorganic calf bone. DDM particles can be used as a potential new bone grafting material for the treatment of bone defects in clinical practice.
Humans ; Follow-Up Studies ; Dentin ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implants ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery* ; Middle Aged ; Bone Transplantation ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods* ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and Bio-Gide ^® collagen membrane, combined with Bio-Oss ^® sticky bone respectively in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty patients who needed alveolar ridge preservation after maxillary anterior tooth extraction were selected and randomly assigned to the Bio-Gide group and the CGF group. In both groups, the extraction sockets were tightly filled with the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone. In the Bio-Gide group used Bio-Gide^® collagen membrane to cover the upper edge of the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone and closed the wound. The CGF group, the CGF membrane was covered on the upper edge of the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone and the wound was closed. The soft tissue wound healing status at 10 days after ARP, the changes in alveolar ridge height and width immediately after ARP and at 6 months after ARP, and the doctor-patient satisfaction at 6 months after ARP were compared and evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after ARP, there was no statistically significant difference in the changes of alveolar bone width and height between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the CGF group showed better performance in soft tissue healing after ARP and doctor-patient satisfaction, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the Bio-Gide^® collagen membrane, the combined application of CGF membrane and Bio-Oss^® sticky bone can lead to better soft tissue healing after ARP of maxillary anterior teeth and higher doctor-patient satisfaction, showing obvious advantages in ARP of maxillary anterior teeth.
Humans ; Maxilla/surgery* ; Tooth Extraction ; Alveolar Process/surgery* ; Membranes, Artificial ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods* ; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Minerals/therapeutic use* ; Collagen ; Wound Healing ; Tooth Socket/surgery* ; Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control* ; Adult

In recent years, digital bone harvesting and grafting technology in dental implantology has emerged as a cutting-edge advancement in the field of oral medicine, gaining widespread application in the treatment of complex bone defect cases. By integrating digital imaging, virtual design, and precise surgical guidance, this technology has significantly enhanced the success rate of dental implants and improved patient outcomes. However, the rapid development of this technology has also highlighted the lack of standardized clinical protocols, necessitating the establishment of unified guidelines through expert consensus. This article provides a detailed overview of the development process of the group standard Clinical Protocol for Bone Harvesting and Grafting under Digital Guidance in Oral Implantology and offers an in-depth interpretation of its key components, aiming to serve as a valuable reference for clinical practice and academic research.
Humans ; Bone Transplantation/methods* ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods* ; Dental Implantation/methods* ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods* ; Clinical Protocols

Immediate implant-supported fixed restoration in edentulous jaws demonstrates a success rate comparable to that of conventional implant restoration. However, this approach still presents a certain degree of technique sensitivity. In the field of immediate implant-supported fixed restoration in dentistry, a repeatable and stable jaw relation is the prerequisite for the design and fabrication of prostheses. It also reduces chairside denture placement and occlusal adjustment time and lowers the risk of occlusion-related complications. For patients with terminal dentition, the precise transfer of jaw relation following full-arch implantation serves as the fundamental basis for implant-supported occlusal reconstruction and functional restoration. This process is also a key research focus and challenge in the area of implant-supported occlusal rehabilitation. This review summarizes the procedures and methods for determining and transferring jaw relation in immediate implant-supported fixed restoration. It aims to serve as a basis for clinical decision making in implant-supported fixed restorations for terminal dentition patients.
Humans ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; Jaw, Edentulous/surgery*

Dynamic navigation technology can "real-time guide" the implantologist to place the implant in the alveolar bone of the missing tooth area according to the preoperative design of the optimal site and path, making the whole implant surgery process more safe and precise. In order to further promote the standardized application of oral implant dynamic navigation technology, China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics has convened distinguished experts to engage in deliberations and develop the standard. This standard covers the basic requirements, indications and contraindications, operation procedures, common complications and treatment measures, and accuracy verification. This standard can be used as a reference for the use of dynamic navigation technology in implant surgery.
Humans ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/standards* ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/standards* ; Dental Implants ; Surgical Navigation Systems/standards*

OBJECTIVE: To assess the osteogenesis height in maxillary sinus segment one year after zygomatic implantation by imaging methods, and evaluate the influence of patient factors, maxillary sinus anatomical factors and surgical factors on postoperative osteogenesis height. METHODS: This study is a retrospective study, including patients who underwent zygomatic implantation and whose zygomatic implants passed through the maxillary sinus at the Department of Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from July 2017 to January 2022. Preoperative and postoperative cone beam CT (CBCT)was taken to measure and calculate the average osteogenesis height (AOH) in maxillary sinus segment of the zygomatic implants, then the residual bone height, the width and morphology of the maxillary sinus floor in the buccal and palatal directions were measured. Besides, the integrity of Schneiderian membrane during implant surgery, and the general information of the patients and zygomatic implants were recorded. By comparing anatomical situations and surgical characteristics, the differences of AOH under different conditions were analyzed. Then AOH was divided into two groups (obvious osteogenesis group and non-obvious osteogenesis group) using the median as the threshold, and the influencing factors of osteogenesis were evaluated using mixed effect generalized linear model univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47 zygomatic implants were implanted in 24 patients. During the average follow-up period of 12.1 months, there was no implant failure, and the implant survival rate was 100%. Postoperative CBCT showed that 43 zygomatic implants had osteogenic images in the maxillary sinus segment, most of which originated from the floor of the maxillary sinus, and the median AOH was 3.1 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0 mm]. In terms of maxillary sinus width, there were 31 cases (66.0%) of wide type and 16 cases (34.0%) of narrow type. In the aspect of buccal and palatal morphology, 17 cases were taper (36.2%), 20 cases were round (42.6%), and 10 cases were flat (21.3%). The median of residual bone height was 2.8 mm (IQR: 2.2 mm) before operation. Univa-riate analysis of mixed effect generalized linear model showed that postoperative obvious osteogenic rate was related to the residual bone height (OR=2.09, P=0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that the resi-dual bone height (OR=2.55, P=0.022) and the shape of a taper maxillary sinus (OR=11.44, P=0.040) had a significant impact on the postoperative obvious osteogenic rate. CONCLUSION The maxillary sinus floor showed osteogenic images 1 year after the zygomatic implantation surgery. Larger residual bone height and the shape of a taper maxillary sinus may be favorable factors for osteogenesis.
Humans ; Maxillary Sinus/surgery* ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Retrospective Studies ; Zygoma/diagnostic imaging* ; Male ; Female ; Osteogenesis/physiology* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Dental Implants ; Aged ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*

Using digital technologies in concurrently performing missing tooth implantation and preparation of remaining teeth is a solution to reduce the number of visits and improve efficiency. This paper proposes a digital process for simultaneously implanting and preparing teeth. It integrates implant surgical guide and 3D-printed tooth preparation guide into a single guide and completes guided implant placement and precise tooth preparation. Based on "repair-oriented" virtual implant planning, the implant surgical guide can improve the efficiency and predictability of implant placement, and its linear accuracy is about 1 mm. The tooth preparation guide precisely guides tooth preparation and restoration space visualization, ensuring the quality of the tooth preparation. The two guides have different design accuracy requirements, and thus their combination improves the overall guiding accuracy requirements. The concurrent application of the two guides minimizes the clinical operation time, number of visits, and economic burden of patients.
Humans ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Technology ; Tooth Preparation ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Implants ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Implant treatment in the esthetic area requires stable osseointegration and successful esthetic outcomes. Achieving this goal requires careful consideration of accurate implant axis and ideal three-dimensional position. Owing to the high esthetics and the special anatomical structure of the maxillary, a successful implant means a synthesized deli-beration of the residual bone dimensions, soft-tissue thickness, and the relationship of the residual alveolar ridge with the planned restoration. This article offers an in-depth analysis of the clinical decisions and key factors affecting the implant direction in the esthetic area.
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods* ; Dental Implants ; Esthetics, Dental ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods* ; Osseointegration ; Maxilla/surgery* ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth