1.Risk factors for erectile dysfunction after penile fracture and surgical repair: 12 years of clinical experience.
Mehmet OZTURK ; Muharrem BATURU ; Ozlem BASGUT ; Omer TURGUT ; Yasin KURT ; Omer BAYRAK
Asian Journal of Andrology 2025;27(6):738-742
Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency that may cause erectile dysfunction (ED). We analyzed the factors affecting erectile function in patients who underwent surgical repair for the management of penile fractures. Eighty-two patients who underwent penile fracture surgery in the Department of Urology, University of Gaziantep (Gaziantep, Türkiye) between January 2012 and January 2023 were evaluated. Age, body mass index, time elapsed from the incident of penile fracture to surgery, size, laterality, level of the defect, causes of fracture, presenting signs and symptoms, and relevant complications were recorded. Erectile function of the patients was evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative 3 rd and 6 th months according to the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scoring system. The factors decreasing the erection quality of the patients after surgical repair of penile fractures were investigated using IIEF-5 scoring system. Only age, defect size, and time elapsed from fracture onset to surgery were found to be effective on the occurrence of ED ( P = 0.005, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off values were 12.5 mm for defect size ( P < 0.001), 8.5 h for the time elapsed from fracture onset to surgery ( P = 0.036), and 40.5 years for the age of the patients ( P = 0.005). Delayed surgery, defect size, and advanced age had significant and negative effects on erectile function in cases of penile fracture. Before repair of the defect, patients should be given appropriate counseling about the possibility of ED, and early penile rehabilitation should be initiated.
Humans
;
Male
;
Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology*
;
Penis/surgery*
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Risk Factors
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Young Adult
;
Rupture/surgery*
;
Age Factors
;
Aged
;
Penile Erection
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Level of Work-Related Anxiety and Potential Causes of Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in the Emergency Department
Turgut DOLANBAY ; Abdussamed VURAL ; Mustafa Cihan ALTAY ; Nesibe Sultan ÇINAROGLU
Psychiatry Investigation 2024;21(11):1299-1307
Objective:
The present study evaluated the work-related anxiety scores of healthcare workers in emergency departments (ED) and aimed to determine the factors affecting these scores.
Methods:
The data was obtained through a survey administered to the emergency staff. Beck’s Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) work anxiety interview were used to predict and determine the type of anxiety experienced by the participants. The survey was administered to 147 volunteers, and questionnaires from 130 participants were included in the study.
Results:
It was found that 43.8% of the participants had a BAI score greater than 7. The study results showed a negative correlation and a linear regression model between age and the BAI score. Additionally, the BAI score was significantly higher in female, singles, physicians, those who were dissatisfied with their jobs, and those who were dissatisfied with their salaries (p<0.05). The results also showed that having a history of anxiety disorder or depression, being a physician, and being dissatisfied with one’s job were 6.277, 5.583, and 4.005 times higher, respectively, in terms of suspicion of anxiety (p<0.001). In the MINI job anxiety interview, work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (38.6%) was predicted most frequently, and indiscriminative work-related social phobia (5.3%) was predicted least frequently in participants at risk for anxiety according to the BAI score.
Conclusion
This study suggests that teaching healthcare workers how to cope with workplace trauma and workplace-related situational phobias can be an effective solution to prevent anxiety disorders in healthcare workers working in ED.
3.Level of Work-Related Anxiety and Potential Causes of Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in the Emergency Department
Turgut DOLANBAY ; Abdussamed VURAL ; Mustafa Cihan ALTAY ; Nesibe Sultan ÇINAROGLU
Psychiatry Investigation 2024;21(11):1299-1307
Objective:
The present study evaluated the work-related anxiety scores of healthcare workers in emergency departments (ED) and aimed to determine the factors affecting these scores.
Methods:
The data was obtained through a survey administered to the emergency staff. Beck’s Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) work anxiety interview were used to predict and determine the type of anxiety experienced by the participants. The survey was administered to 147 volunteers, and questionnaires from 130 participants were included in the study.
Results:
It was found that 43.8% of the participants had a BAI score greater than 7. The study results showed a negative correlation and a linear regression model between age and the BAI score. Additionally, the BAI score was significantly higher in female, singles, physicians, those who were dissatisfied with their jobs, and those who were dissatisfied with their salaries (p<0.05). The results also showed that having a history of anxiety disorder or depression, being a physician, and being dissatisfied with one’s job were 6.277, 5.583, and 4.005 times higher, respectively, in terms of suspicion of anxiety (p<0.001). In the MINI job anxiety interview, work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (38.6%) was predicted most frequently, and indiscriminative work-related social phobia (5.3%) was predicted least frequently in participants at risk for anxiety according to the BAI score.
Conclusion
This study suggests that teaching healthcare workers how to cope with workplace trauma and workplace-related situational phobias can be an effective solution to prevent anxiety disorders in healthcare workers working in ED.
4.Level of Work-Related Anxiety and Potential Causes of Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in the Emergency Department
Turgut DOLANBAY ; Abdussamed VURAL ; Mustafa Cihan ALTAY ; Nesibe Sultan ÇINAROGLU
Psychiatry Investigation 2024;21(11):1299-1307
Objective:
The present study evaluated the work-related anxiety scores of healthcare workers in emergency departments (ED) and aimed to determine the factors affecting these scores.
Methods:
The data was obtained through a survey administered to the emergency staff. Beck’s Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) work anxiety interview were used to predict and determine the type of anxiety experienced by the participants. The survey was administered to 147 volunteers, and questionnaires from 130 participants were included in the study.
Results:
It was found that 43.8% of the participants had a BAI score greater than 7. The study results showed a negative correlation and a linear regression model between age and the BAI score. Additionally, the BAI score was significantly higher in female, singles, physicians, those who were dissatisfied with their jobs, and those who were dissatisfied with their salaries (p<0.05). The results also showed that having a history of anxiety disorder or depression, being a physician, and being dissatisfied with one’s job were 6.277, 5.583, and 4.005 times higher, respectively, in terms of suspicion of anxiety (p<0.001). In the MINI job anxiety interview, work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (38.6%) was predicted most frequently, and indiscriminative work-related social phobia (5.3%) was predicted least frequently in participants at risk for anxiety according to the BAI score.
Conclusion
This study suggests that teaching healthcare workers how to cope with workplace trauma and workplace-related situational phobias can be an effective solution to prevent anxiety disorders in healthcare workers working in ED.
5.Level of Work-Related Anxiety and Potential Causes of Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in the Emergency Department
Turgut DOLANBAY ; Abdussamed VURAL ; Mustafa Cihan ALTAY ; Nesibe Sultan ÇINAROGLU
Psychiatry Investigation 2024;21(11):1299-1307
Objective:
The present study evaluated the work-related anxiety scores of healthcare workers in emergency departments (ED) and aimed to determine the factors affecting these scores.
Methods:
The data was obtained through a survey administered to the emergency staff. Beck’s Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) work anxiety interview were used to predict and determine the type of anxiety experienced by the participants. The survey was administered to 147 volunteers, and questionnaires from 130 participants were included in the study.
Results:
It was found that 43.8% of the participants had a BAI score greater than 7. The study results showed a negative correlation and a linear regression model between age and the BAI score. Additionally, the BAI score was significantly higher in female, singles, physicians, those who were dissatisfied with their jobs, and those who were dissatisfied with their salaries (p<0.05). The results also showed that having a history of anxiety disorder or depression, being a physician, and being dissatisfied with one’s job were 6.277, 5.583, and 4.005 times higher, respectively, in terms of suspicion of anxiety (p<0.001). In the MINI job anxiety interview, work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (38.6%) was predicted most frequently, and indiscriminative work-related social phobia (5.3%) was predicted least frequently in participants at risk for anxiety according to the BAI score.
Conclusion
This study suggests that teaching healthcare workers how to cope with workplace trauma and workplace-related situational phobias can be an effective solution to prevent anxiety disorders in healthcare workers working in ED.
6.Level of Work-Related Anxiety and Potential Causes of Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in the Emergency Department
Turgut DOLANBAY ; Abdussamed VURAL ; Mustafa Cihan ALTAY ; Nesibe Sultan ÇINAROGLU
Psychiatry Investigation 2024;21(11):1299-1307
Objective:
The present study evaluated the work-related anxiety scores of healthcare workers in emergency departments (ED) and aimed to determine the factors affecting these scores.
Methods:
The data was obtained through a survey administered to the emergency staff. Beck’s Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) work anxiety interview were used to predict and determine the type of anxiety experienced by the participants. The survey was administered to 147 volunteers, and questionnaires from 130 participants were included in the study.
Results:
It was found that 43.8% of the participants had a BAI score greater than 7. The study results showed a negative correlation and a linear regression model between age and the BAI score. Additionally, the BAI score was significantly higher in female, singles, physicians, those who were dissatisfied with their jobs, and those who were dissatisfied with their salaries (p<0.05). The results also showed that having a history of anxiety disorder or depression, being a physician, and being dissatisfied with one’s job were 6.277, 5.583, and 4.005 times higher, respectively, in terms of suspicion of anxiety (p<0.001). In the MINI job anxiety interview, work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (38.6%) was predicted most frequently, and indiscriminative work-related social phobia (5.3%) was predicted least frequently in participants at risk for anxiety according to the BAI score.
Conclusion
This study suggests that teaching healthcare workers how to cope with workplace trauma and workplace-related situational phobias can be an effective solution to prevent anxiety disorders in healthcare workers working in ED.
7.Association between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing 64-Multidetector Computed Tomography.
Ozgul Malcok GUREL ; Muhammed Bora DEMIRCELIK ; Mukadder Ayse BILGIC ; Hakki YILMAZ ; Omer Caglar YILMAZ ; Muzaffer CAKMAK ; Beyhan ERYONUCU
Korean Circulation Journal 2015;45(5):372-377
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been found to be associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether the RDW measures are associated with the coronary artery calcification score (CACS) in patients who did not present with obvious coronary heart disease (CHD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 527 consecutive patients with a low to intermediate risk for CHD but without obvious disease were enrolled in this study. The study subjects underwent coronary computerized tomography angiography and CACS was calculated. The patients were divided into two groups based on CACS: Group I (CACS< or =100) and Group II (CACS>100). The two groups were compared in terms of classic CHD risk factors and haematological parameters, particularly the RDW. RESULTS: Group I patients were younger than Group II patients. The Framingham risk score (FRS) in patients of Group II was significantly higher than that in patients of Group I. Group II patients had significantly elevated levels of haemoglobin, RDW, neutrophil count, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio compared with Group I patients. CACS was correlated with age, RDW, and ejection fraction. In the multivariate analysis, age, RDW, and FRS were independent predictors of CACS. Using the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a RDW value of 13.05% was identified as the best cut-off for predicting the severity of CACS (>100) (area under the curve=0.706). CONCLUSION: We found that the RDW is an independent predictor of the CACS, suggesting that it might be a useful marker for predicting CAD.
Angiography
;
Coronary Disease
;
Coronary Vessels*
;
Erythrocytes*
;
Humans
;
Mortality
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neutrophils
;
Risk Factors

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail