Purpose: During diagnostic cerebral angiography, catheter navigation requires manual contrast “puff” injections, while subsequent 2D/3D runs often use automated power injectors. Using power injectors for navigation puffs has not been described. We present a closed-circuit dual-port injector system (Nemoto Press Duo Elite) that integrates both navigation puff delivery and diagnostic run injection into a single automated platform, eliminating all manual tableside contrast handling. A foot pedal interface enables operator-controlled puff timing, potentially reducing contrast waste and air embolism risk while improving single-operator ergonomics with future remote robotic implications. Materials and Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study compared 19 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography with foot pedal-controlled puff injections (June–July 2023) to 19 historical controls using manual hand injections (May 2021). Both groups used 90% contrast concentration. Fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, contrast utilization, and safety outcomes were compared. Results: Groups were demographically matched (mean age 52.1±14.2 vs. 50.2±12.9 years; 73.7% female). All 38 procedures achieved diagnostic adequacy with no complications. The foot pedal group demonstrated significantly shorter procedure time per vessel (11.5±4.4 vs. 18.9±10.5 min/vessel, P=0.010) with no significant differences in fluoroscopy time (P=0.171), radiation dose (P=0.690), or contrast delivered (88.7±30.9 vs. 88.2±42.5 mL, P=0.966). A trend toward improved contrast efficiency was observed (23.4±9.4 vs. 27.4±10.4 mL/vessel, P=0.226). Despite undergoing significantly more 3D rotational runs (1.3±1.0 vs. 0.6±0.7, P=0.030), the foot pedal group maintained comparable safety metrics, strengthening the non-inferiority findings. Conclusion A closed-circuit dual-port injector system integrating automated navigation puff delivery with diagnostic run injection demonstrates non-inferiority to manual injection for diagnostic cerebral angiography, with shorter procedure time per vessel (39% reduction, P=0.010), though interpretation is limited by differences in indication distribution. By eliminating manual tableside contrast handling, this approach enables precise digital contrast accounting and reduces air embolism risk, establishing a foundation for remote and robotic angiography applications.

We reviewed our experience using transulnar access (TUA) to obtain intraoperative cerebral angiography during prone surgery for vascular pathology, where conventional transfemoral and transradial access can be difficult. Ten consecutive patients treated between April 2020 and August 2025 were included. Ulnar artery access was obtained in the supine position before the patient was turned prone for surgery, and angiography was performed after the procedure without repositioning. Eight patients had arteriovenous malformations and 2 had dural arteriovenous fistulas. In all cases, intraoperative angiography was successfully completed through the ulnar artery. The mean ulnar artery diameter was 2.4 mm, indicating adequate vessel size for catheterization, and mean fluoroscopy time was 7.5 minutes. No immediate access-site complications occurred, and no case required conversion to another access route. These findings suggest that TUA is technically feasible and may provide a practical option for intraoperative cerebral angiography when prone positioning limits access to traditional arterial sites. Although the study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design, the consistent procedural success supports further investigation.