A 26-year-old Filipino woman, gravida 4 para 0 (G4P0), with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN), presented at 7 weeks of gestation. Her history included three previous pregnancy losses, including a stillbirth due to eclampsia. Following pregnancy confirmation, medications were adjusted to pregnancy-compatible immunosuppressants and antihypertensives. At 13 weeks, her disease remained quiescent, with persistent proteinuria and stable platelets. The patient remains under outpatient surveillance with plans for referral to tertiary maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) care. This case illustrates management challenges in lupus nephritis during pregnancy, emphasizing early risk stratification, safe pharmacotherapy, and coordinated multidisciplinary care in a low-resource setting.

Human ; Female ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ; Lupus Nephritis ; Pregnancy

Stroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, demanding extensive and often prolonged rehabilitation. This case report describes the recovery of Mr. Julio, a 60-year-old male, who suffered an ischemic stroke at age 58, resulting in left-sided hemiparesis and balance issues. Even with delays in formal rehabilitation, he made a remarkable recovery over nearly three years. This is because of his strong intrinsic motivation, sustained adherence to therapy, and family support. His symptoms included left-sided weakness, numbness, vertigo, vomiting, and critically high blood pressure. Crucially, his diagnosis was confirmed by MRI only three months later and formal physical therapy started only after six months. Treatment included an emergency TPA, blood pressure control, antiplatelets, and a sustained home- based physical therapy regimen. This case highlights how patient-driven factors can lead to significant recovery even in resource-limited settings, emphasizing the role of motivation and adherence in long-term stroke rehabilitation.

Human ; Male ; Middle Aged: 45-64 Yrs Old ; Ischemic Stroke ; Treatment Adherence And Compliance ; Motivation

Background: Dizziness is a commonly encountered symptom in the primary care which can be caused, most of the time by benign condition and rarely due to serious conditions needing higher level of care. Objective: To develop a clinical guideline and pathway that will serve as guide in the diagnosis and management of adult patients with dizziness in primary care and outpatient setting Methods: A guideline development team was formed which is composed of family and community medicine specialists from different institutions. Searching, selection and assessment of the latest evidence on dizziness diagnosis and management was done using the search terms: “dizziness”, “diagnosis”, “management”, and “primary care”. Formulation of the recommendation was done using Grade approach and graded with modified GRADEPro and expert panel consensus. External review was also done by an expert in otorhinolaryngology. Recommendations: Clinical Assessment •Recommendation1.Askforthepatient’sdescriptionofdizzinessandclassifythepatientintooneofthefourtypes: vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and lightheadedness and classify as acute/episodic or chronic/sustained. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation2.Obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers,associatedsymptoms,riskfactorsfor atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation3.Performaphysicalexaminationfocusingonvitalsigns,HEENT(includingotoscopy),cardiovascular and neurologic examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation4.PerformspecialphysicalexaminationslikeDix-Hallpikemaneuverforacuteepisodictriggeredvertigo to check for BPPV (most common cause of peripheral vertigo), HINTS plus test for spontaneous episodic vertigo to check for stroke and hyperventilation provocation test for patients suspected of anxiety (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation5.Elicitredflagsthatshouldwarrantreferrallikeseveredizzinessandassociated,alteredmentalstatus, loss of consciousness and abnormal vital signs. Other symptoms like chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, neurologic deficit may warrant referral for evaluation and management. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation6.Forpatientsconsultingviatelemedicine,obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers, associated symptoms, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life, and observe and conduct self-physical examination (vital signs, mental status, ocular and facial nerve) (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Diagnostic •Recommendation7.Laboratorytestingisnotroutinelyrecommendedamongpatientswithdizziness.However,testingmay be requested if there is a need to identify a definite etiology to guide treatment and should be guided by the classification of dizziness, possible etiology, and the medical history and physical examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence).Recommendation8.Forpatientswithvertigoandwithauditorysymptoms(i.e.,hearingloss,tinnitusandauralfullness, etc.), pure tone audiometry speech test may be requested if available. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation9.Forpatientswithpresyncope/syncopeandachronicmedicalconditionisbeingconsidered,complete blood count may be requested for those with probable blood dyscrasia, serum blood glucose may be requested for those with diabetes, electrocardiogram and lipid profile may be requested for those with cardiovascular disease. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation10.Forpatientswithdisequilibriumandwithanabnormalneurologicphysicalexaminationfinding,CT scan may be requested. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Pharmacologic •Recommendation11.Empirictrialofshortcourse(7days)pharmacologictreatmentforsymptomreliefshouldbeoffered. Referral should be considered if the dizziness become more severe or it did not improve in 7 days. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation12.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigo,offerhistamineanalogue(betahistine)orantihistamine (meclizine, diphenhydramine, dimenhydrinate or cinnarizine) for symptom relief. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation13.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigoassociatedwithmigraine(vestibularmigraine),aside from symptom relief, offer any of the triptans as preventive medication. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation14.Forpatientswhosedizzinessisdescribedasdisequilibrium(gaitimbalance)orpresyncope(near faintness) or dizziness with anxiety attack, offer symptomatic treatment and intervention based on the underlying cause or consider referral to appropriate specialist. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Non-pharmacologic •Recommendation15.Allpatientsshouldbeprovidedwithhealtheducationoncauses,triggersandfollowup.(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation16.Allpatientsshouldbeadvisedonappropriatedietandlifestylemodification.(StrongRecommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation17.Dependingonthenatureofvertigo,educateandtrainthepatientoncanalrepositioningmaneuver and vestibular rehabilitation. Referral to rehabilitation medicine may be considered. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation18.Thepatient’sfamilymustalsobeprovidedwithhealtheducationandidentifyacaregivertoassist and promote compliance to management. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation19.Encouragecommunity-basedvestibularrehabilitationactivitiessuchasgroupbalancetraining exercise. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Patient Outcomes •Recommendation20.Thepatientshouldknowthenatureofdizziness,causesandpotentialcomplicationsanddevelop skills in postural exercises. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation21.Decreaseinfrequencyandseverityshouldexpectedwithin48hoursandresolutionisexpectedwithin a month. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation22.Improvedqualityoflifeshouldalsobeelicited.(StrongRecommendation,ModerateQualityEvidence) •Recommendation23.Referraltoappropriatespecialtyshouldbedoneifnoresolutionorprogressionofsymptomsor impaired quality of life for more than a month. (Strong Recommendation, Expert Opinion) Implementation The committee shall disseminate the guidelines through presentations and via journal publications. The QA committee shall be in charge of implementation of the guideline and pathway.
Community Health Services ; Dizziness ; Partnership Practice

Background: Primary care providers must evaluate their facilities and determine their capacity to comply with the requirements of the Universal Health Care (UHC) Act. Objective: This study describes the facility profiles of PAFP members in terms of the UHC requirements for licensing, certification and accreditation of health facilities. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four cities using the PAFP UHC Readiness survey. The study population included active members of PAFP who voluntarily answered the survey during workshops held between January to February 2020 Results: A total of 195 family physicians participated. Most of them work in hospital facilities (49.40%), while others have solo practice (27.38%), or are in group practice (20.24%). Most (69.61%) of the facilities have PHIC accreditation and SEC or DTI registration (74.47%). The availability of structures, equipment and pharmacies vary across the cities. Only half of the facilities have information technologies for clinical records (54.36%) or management (59.49%). Similarly, there are facilities which lack human resource personnel and only 54.10% of the facilities are networked with other facilities. The facilities’ revenues are mostly from fee-for-service (60%) and the cost of payments widely vary among the areas. Most of the facilities are managed financially by the owner and the income of the facility is the main source of capital for investment Conclusion Family physicians have existing structures and systems in their facilities but improvements on information technologies and networking are needed. They should also ensure affordability of care to patients while ensuring sustainability of facility operations
Universal Health Care ; Physicians, Family

Background: Universal Health Care law calls for strong primary care where essential services are responsive to the health needs of individuals, families, and communities. Similar to other countries, family physicians are the biggest workforce in primary care, but little is known about the kind of care that they provide. This study aimed to determine the process of care rendered by family physicians in the country to assess their readiness in implementing the standards of primary care services according to the Universal Health Care law. Methods: Cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire that includes 6 key elements of UHC was conducted to family physicians participating in the pilot project of the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians practice networks. Process of care is part of the big data collected in the survey. The process of care variables was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: There were 195 family physicians who completed the survey. There were about 14.87% from Luzon, 18.46% from NCR, 27.18% from the Visayas, and 39.49% from Mindanao. Overall, the participants provide comprehensive, coordinated, and continuing care. Few utilized electronic medical records (9%). Preventive services provided are immunization (82.05%), alcohol and smoking cessation (77.44%), nutrition advice (76.92%), and exercise prescription (73.33%). Conclusion Family physicians in the pilot sites provide comprehensive, coordinated, and continuing care. The majority also offer common preventive services such as immunization, smoking cessation, nutrition advice, and exercise prescription. Some process needed for UHC needs improvement such as the use of EMR and quality assurance activities.
Primary Health Care ; Universal Health Care ; Family Practice