Background: s/Aims: To evaluate the impact of unplanned conversion to open surgery on resection margin status and postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally-invasive resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods: This study performed a proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression using random-effects modelling in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least 15 patients that reported conversion to open surgery in individuals receiving minimally-invasive CRLM resection were included. The association of unplanned conversion with postoperative outcomes was analyzed. Results: Eighty-six studies encompassing 18,138 patients were analyzed. The overall conversion rate was 5.8% (95% CI 5%–6.6%).Conversion was associated with improved R0 resection rates (coefficient: 2.167, p < 0.001) but was also linked to increased postoperative mortality (coefficient: 7.585, p = 0.001) and morbidity (coefficient: 1.737, p = 0.003); there was no significant impact on 5-year overall survival (coefficient: 0.700, p = 0.989) or 5-year disease-free survival (coefficient: –72.900, p = 0.157). Specifically, conversion due to oncological concern was associated with higher rates of R0 resection (coefficient: 0.638, p = 0.005); conversion resulting from iatrogenic injuries was associated with lower R0 resection rates (coefficient: –1.478, p < 0.001); conversion for technical difficulties was associated with lower postoperative morbidity (coefficient: –0.380, p = 0.006). Conclusions Unplanned conversion to open may carry prognostic and oncological implications for minimally-invasive resection of CRLM. Although conversion due to bleeding and iatrogenic injury is routinely considered, conversion prompted by technical difficulties or oncological concerns should not be considered failure, as it may be associated with improved patient outcomes.

Background: s/Aims: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) may have a potential application as either a “back-up therapy” or for margin accentuation during trial dissection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The aim of this report was to describe our experience with IRE in terms of its potential applications mentioned above. Methods: A clinical policy to use IRE in LAPC patients undergoing exploratory surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was initiated in 2017. If resection was feasible, IRE was used for margin accentuation. If not, then IRE was undertaken as a “back-up therapy” of non-resectable tumor. Data on baseline characteristics, perioperative 90-day morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results: IRE was successfully performed in 18 (95%) patients. IRE was abandoned in one case for technical reasons. Nine patients who were found to have an unresectable disease underwent IRE as a “back-up therapy” while the remaining patients received IRE for margin accentuation. Complications were recorded in 33% patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. In the group receiving IRE for margin accentuation, the median RFS was 10.0 months (range, 4.5–15.0 months). The median OS of our cohort was 22 months (range, 14.75–27.50 months). Conclusions This report shows that in patients with LAPC undergoing exploratory surgery following NAT, IRE seems technically feasible for margin accentuation or as a “back-up therapy”. More data are needed to determine procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and any effects of IRE on cancer-related survival.

Background: s/Aims: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) may have a potential application as either a “back-up therapy” or for margin accentuation during trial dissection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The aim of this report was to describe our experience with IRE in terms of its potential applications mentioned above. Methods: A clinical policy to use IRE in LAPC patients undergoing exploratory surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was initiated in 2017. If resection was feasible, IRE was used for margin accentuation. If not, then IRE was undertaken as a “back-up therapy” of non-resectable tumor. Data on baseline characteristics, perioperative 90-day morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results: IRE was successfully performed in 18 (95%) patients. IRE was abandoned in one case for technical reasons. Nine patients who were found to have an unresectable disease underwent IRE as a “back-up therapy” while the remaining patients received IRE for margin accentuation. Complications were recorded in 33% patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. In the group receiving IRE for margin accentuation, the median RFS was 10.0 months (range, 4.5–15.0 months). The median OS of our cohort was 22 months (range, 14.75–27.50 months). Conclusions This report shows that in patients with LAPC undergoing exploratory surgery following NAT, IRE seems technically feasible for margin accentuation or as a “back-up therapy”. More data are needed to determine procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and any effects of IRE on cancer-related survival.

Background: s/Aims: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) may have a potential application as either a “back-up therapy” or for margin accentuation during trial dissection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The aim of this report was to describe our experience with IRE in terms of its potential applications mentioned above. Methods: A clinical policy to use IRE in LAPC patients undergoing exploratory surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was initiated in 2017. If resection was feasible, IRE was used for margin accentuation. If not, then IRE was undertaken as a “back-up therapy” of non-resectable tumor. Data on baseline characteristics, perioperative 90-day morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results: IRE was successfully performed in 18 (95%) patients. IRE was abandoned in one case for technical reasons. Nine patients who were found to have an unresectable disease underwent IRE as a “back-up therapy” while the remaining patients received IRE for margin accentuation. Complications were recorded in 33% patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. In the group receiving IRE for margin accentuation, the median RFS was 10.0 months (range, 4.5–15.0 months). The median OS of our cohort was 22 months (range, 14.75–27.50 months). Conclusions This report shows that in patients with LAPC undergoing exploratory surgery following NAT, IRE seems technically feasible for margin accentuation or as a “back-up therapy”. More data are needed to determine procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and any effects of IRE on cancer-related survival.