OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of stanozolol combined with avatrombopag in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with relapsed/refractory tumors. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with relapsed/refractory CIT admitted to the Hematology Department of Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences between March 2023 to December 2023 were enrolled. These patients received a combined therapy of stanozolol and avatrombopag. The clinical efficacy, onset time, changes in platelet levels and blood cell counts before and after treatment, and adverse reactions of patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The combination therapy demonstrated remarkable efficacy with a total effective rate of 100%. Among the 25 patients, 19 achieved complete remission and 6 achieved partial remission. The median onset time was 42.5（range: 35-48）days. The average platelet count of the 25 patients increased from (25.73±17.75)×10⁹/L before treatment to (146.4±49.59)×10⁹/L after 3 months of treatment, with a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05). 18 patients who previously required platelet transfusion were all weaned off platelet transfusion after 3 months of treatment, with a median time to be free from platelet transfusion was 26 (range: 18-51) days. During the treatment, both neutrophils and hemoglobin exhibited various degrees of elevation. Two patients experienced a slight increase in alanine aminotransferase(ALT) levels, which normalized after treatment with oral hepatoprotective drug. One patient had a PLT increase exceeding 350×10⁹/L, and the treatment with avatrombopag was suspended, and aspirin and other drugs were given to prevent thrombosis. No thrombose events or CIT-related bleeding events were observed in all patients. CONCLUSION The combination therapy of stanozolol and avatrombopag is significantly effective for treating relapsed/refractory CIT patients, with a high response rate and good safety, making it a suitable clinical treatment option.
Humans ; Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced* ; Stanozolol/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Thiophenes/therapeutic use* ; Adult ; Platelet Count ; Treatment Outcome ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Recurrence ; Thiazoles

Objective To investigate the effect of liquid-liquid phase separation(LLPS)of YTH domain family protein 2(YTHDF2)on the sodium arsenite-induced malignant transformation of skin cells,providing a new intervention target for the prevention and control of sodium arsenite-induced carcinogenesis.Methods The HaCaT cell model of malignant transformation was constructed by continuous treatment with 1 μmol/L sodium arsenite for 22 weeks,including cells with normal YTHDF2 LLPS(YTHDF2-wt)and cells with inhibited YTHDF2 LLPS(YTHDF2-mut).Confocal microscopy was employed to observe and characterize the LLPS droplets formed by YTHDF2 during sodium arsenite-induced malignant transformation of skin cells.Cell proliferation,scratch healing,and colony formation assays were performed to detect malignant phenotypes.Western blotting,quantitative reverse transcription PCR,and immunofluorescence experiments were conducted to examine the effects of YTHDF2 LLPS on the mRNA and protein levels of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten(PTEN)during sodium arsenite-induced malignant transformation of skin cells.Results After 4 weeks of sodium arsenite treatment,LLPS droplets of YTHDF2 appeared in YTHDF2-wt cells,and the number of droplets gradually increased as the treatment time was prolonged(F=35.252,P<0.001),while no phase-separated droplets were observed in YTHDF2-mut cells.Compared with YTHDF2-mut cells,YTHDF2-wt cells showed enhanced proliferation at the time points of 48 h(t=3.654,P=0.006)and 72 h(t=5.458,P<0.001)after 22 weeks of sodium arsenite treatment.The scratch healing rate of YTHDF2-wt cells was increased at the 8th(t=12.137,P<0.001)and 22th(t=4.484,P=0.011)weeks of sodium arsenite treatment.The number of colonies formed by YTHDF2-wt cells was higher at the 4th(t=3.365,P=0.027),8th(t=5.580,P=0.005),and 22th(t=3.328,P=0.029)weeks of sodium arsenite treatment.Compared with YTHDF2-mut cells,YTHDF2-wt cells showed down-regulated protein(t=-3.119,P=0.036)and mRNA(t=4.051,P=0.015) levels of PTEN after 22 weeks of sodium arsenite treatment.Immunofluorescence results showed that after 4 weeks of sodium arsenite treatment,YTHDF2 LLPS droplets in YTHDF2-wt cells were localized to stress granules,translation-related membrane-less organelles.Conclusions During sodium arsenite-induced malignant transformation of skin cells,YTHDF2 undergoes LLPS and localizes to stress granules,translation-related membrane-less organelles.YTHDF2 LLPS participates in sodium arsenite-induced malignant transformation of skin cells by down-regulating the mRNA level of the key tumor suppressor PTEN.
Arsenites/toxicity* ; Sodium Compounds/toxicity* ; Humans ; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects* ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase/metabolism* ; Cell Proliferation ; Skin/cytology* ; RNA-Binding Proteins ; Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Cell Line

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of aristolochic acid (AA)-associated cancer in patients with AA nephropathy (AAN). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with AAN at Peking University First Hospital from January 1997 to December 2014. Long-term surveillance and follow-up data were analyzed to investigate the influence of different factors on the prevalence of cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of liver cancer, and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of urinary cancer during 1 year after taking AA-containing medication to 2014. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients diagnosed with AAN were included in this study. From the initiation of taking AA to the termination of follow-up, 39 patients were diagnosed with cancer. No cases of liver cancer were observed throughout the entire follow-up period, with urinary cancer being the predominant type (34/39, 87.17%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, follow-up period, and diabetes were potential risk factors, however, the dosage of the drug was not significantly associated with urinary cancer. CONCLUSIONS No cases of liver cancer were observed at the end of follow-up. However, a high prevalence of urinary cancer was observed in AAN patients. Establishing a direct causality between AA and HCC is challenging.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Incidence ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Kidney Diseases/chemically induced* ; Aristolochic Acids/adverse effects*

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer, making the treatment of lung cancer enter the era of immunotherapy, but ICIs will also have adverse reactions, and the incidence of immune-induced hematological toxicity is not very high. Immunotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare adverse event.We report one case of thrombocytopenia induced by ICIs and review the literature on thrombocytopenia associated with ICIs and discuss the clinical features, possible mechanisms, and optimal treatment. 
.
Humans ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects*

Humans ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Colitis-Associated Neoplasms ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects* ; Colitis/chemically induced* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy*

Studies have investigated the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use on the incidence and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the results have been inconsistent. We searched the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to March 2022; 13 studies covering 84 003 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with or without ADT met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore the association between ADT use and the infection risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and severity of COVID-19. After synthesizing the evidence, the pooled RR in the SARS-CoV-2 positive group was equal to 1.17, and the SARS-CoV-2 positive risk in PCa patients using ADT was not significantly different from that in those not using ADT (P = 0.544). Moreover, no significant results concerning the beneficial effect of ADT on the rate of intensive care unit admission (RR = 1.04, P = 0.872) or death risk (RR = 1.23, P = 0.53) were found. However, PCa patients with a history of ADT use had a markedly higher COVID-19 hospitalization rate (RR = 1.31, P = 0.015) than those with no history of ADT use. These findings indicate that ADT use by PCa patients is associated with a high risk of hospitalization during infection with SARS-CoV-2. A large number of high quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
Male ; Humans ; Prostatic Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects* ; COVID-19 ; Androgens/therapeutic use* ; SARS-CoV-2

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of troxatabine in advanced or relapsed malignant tumors resistant to standard therapy in China. Methods: This is a phase Ⅰ prospective study. During dose escalation, patients in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences received a single-dose intravenous infusion of troxacitabine. The planned dosing groups were 1.8, 3.6, 4.8, 6.4 and 8.0 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The data of all patients were collected for safety analyses. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled from April 2018 to May 2019. The major adverse events were fatigue (89.5%, 17/19), leukopenia (84.2%, 16/19) and neutropenia (78.9%, 15/19). The dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose was 6.4 mg/m(2). The best effect was stable disease (43.8%). The half-life of elimination phase from 15.91 hours to 76.63 hours in each dose group. Conclusions: The toxicity of troxacitabine is well tolerant. We recommend that the dose for Phase Ⅱ clinical trial should be 6.4 mg/m(2).
Humans ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Neutropenia/chemically induced* ; Prospective Studies

Objective: To explore the application and efficacy of paclitaxel liposome in the treatment of advanced breast cancer among Chinese population in the real world. Methods: The clinical characteristics of patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome as salvage treatment from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2019 in 11 hospitals were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression model were used for the multivariate analysis. Results: Among 647 patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome, the first-line treatment accounted for 43.3% (280/647), the second-line treatment accounted for 27.7% (179/647), and the third-line and above treatment accounted for 29.1% (188/647). The median dose of first-line and second-line treatment was 260 mg per cycle, and 240 mg in third line and above treatment. The median period of paclitaxel liposome alone and combined chemotherapy or targeted therapy is 4 cycles and 6 cycles, respectively. In the whole group, 167 patients (25.8%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with capecitabine±trastuzumab (TX±H), 123 patients (19.0%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome alone (T), and 119 patients (18.4%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with platinum ± trastuzumab (TP±H), 108 patients (16.7%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with trastuzumab ± pertuzumab (TH±P). The median PFS of first-line and second-line patients (5.5 and 5.5 months, respectively) were longer than that of patients treated with third line and above (4.9 months, P<0.05); The ORR of the first line, second line, third line and above patients were 46.7%, 36.8% and 28.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that event-free survival (EFS) and the number of treatment lines were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The common adverse events were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, hand foot syndrome and abnormal liver function. Conclusion: Paclitaxel liposomes is widely used and has promising efficacy in multi-subtype advanced breast cancer.
Humans ; Female ; Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Paclitaxel/adverse effects* ; Liposomes/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Trastuzumab/therapeutic use* ; Capecitabine/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects*

Objective: This study aims to investigate the associations between genetic variations of pyroptosis pathway related key genes and adverse events (AEs) of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood which was collected from 347 patients before CRT. Sequenom MassARRAY was used to detect the genotypes of 43 haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNPs) in eight pyroptosis genes, including absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), caspase-1 (CASP1), caspase-4(CASP4), caspase-5 (CASP5), caspase-11 (CASP11), gasdermin D (GSDMD), gasdermin E (GSDME) and NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3). The associations between 43 htSNPs and AEs were evaluated by the odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by unconditional logistic regression models, adjusted for sex, age, clinical stage, tumor grade, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), surgical procedure, and tumor location. Results: Among the 347 patients with rectal cancer underwent concurrent CRT with capecitabine after surgery, a total of 101(29.1%) occurred grade ≥ 2 leukopenia. rs11226565 (OR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.79, P=0.008), rs579408(OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.03-2.29, P=0.034) and rs543923 (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.98, P=0.040) were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade ≥ 2 leukopenia. One hundred and fifty-six (45.0%) had grade ≥ 2 diarrhea, two SNPs were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade ≥ diarrhea, including CASP11 rs10880868 (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.91, P=0.020) and GSDME rs2954558 (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.31, P=0.050). In addition, sixty-six cases (19.0%) developed grade ≥2 dermatitis, three SNPs that significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥2 dermatitis included GSDME rs2237314 (OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.16-0.83, P=0.017), GSDME rs12540919 (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.27-0.99, P=0.045) and NLRP3 rs3806268 (OR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.03-2.22, P=0.037). There was no significant difference in the association between other genetic variations and AEs of rectal cancer patients (all P>0.05). Surgical procedure and tumor location had great impacts on the occurrence of grade ≥2 diarrhea and dermatitis (all P<0.01). Conclusion: The genetic variants of CASP4, CASP11, GSDME and NLRP3 are associated with the occurrence of AEs in patients with rectal cancer who received postoperative CRT, suggesting they may be potential genetic markers in predicting the grade of AEs to achieve individualized treatment of rectal cancer.
Humans ; Pyroptosis ; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism* ; Gasdermins ; Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Caspases/metabolism* ; Diarrhea/chemically induced* ; Leukopenia/genetics* ; Genetic Variation ; Dermatitis

Objective: To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. Methods: The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.
Humans ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use* ; Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Fluorouracil ; Colonic Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects*