1.Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma.
Junwei FENG ; Weimin LIANG ; Yue WANG ; Zhi TANG ; MuFuSha A ; Baoxiu XU ; Niezhenghao HE ; Peng HAO
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2024;38(1):40-45
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the accuracy and effectiveness of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma.
METHODS:
A clinical data of 36 patients with limb osteoid osteomas admitted between June 2016 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 patients underwent orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted surgery group), and 20 patients underwent tumor resection after lotcated by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy (open surgery group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, lesion site, tumor nidus diameter, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ( P>0.05). The operation time, lesion resection time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, lesion resection accuracy, and postoperative analgesic use frequency were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS scores for pain severity were compared preoperatively and at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS:
Compared with the open surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had a longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less fluoroscopy frequency, less postoperative analgesic use frequency, and higher lesion resection accuracy ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in lesion resection time ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up after surgery, with a follow-up period of 3-24 months (median, 12 months) in the two groups. No postoperative complication such as wound infection or fracture occurred in either group during follow-up. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up. The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 days and 3 months after surgery when compared with preoperative value ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in robot-assisted surgery group than that in open surgery group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores at 3 months between the two groups ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Compared with open surgery, robot-assisted resection of limb osteoid osteomas has longer operation time, but the accuracy of lesion resection improve, intraoperative blood loss reduce, and early postoperative pain is lighter. It has the advantages of precision and minimally invasive surgery.
Humans
;
Robotics
;
Osteoma, Osteoid/surgery*
;
Orthopedics
;
Blood Loss, Surgical
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
Bone Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Analgesics
;
Treatment Outcome
2.One case of recurrent giant cell tumor of the larynx and literature review.
Yinhao LIU ; Kai XU ; Qimiao FENG ; Xiang LU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(11):1073-1076
Giant cell tumors originating in the larynx are extremely rare. This article presents a case of a recurrent postoperative giant cell tumor of the larynx(GCTL). The patient, a 28-year-old male, underwent a total thyroidectomy in June 2022 due to a thyroid mass. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was giant cell tumor of soft tissues. The patient was readmitted in June 2023 due to the recurrence of the neck mass and underwent partial laryngectomy and partial hypopharyngectomy to completely remove the tumor. Based on postoperative pathology, immunohistochemistry(H3.3 G34W+), and genetic testing, the neck mass was ultimately diagnosed as GCTL. The patient did not receive radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and at the 12-month postoperative follow-up, there was no evidence of tumor recurrence.
Humans
;
Male
;
Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Adult
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Giant Cell Tumors/surgery*
;
Laryngectomy
;
Thyroidectomy
3.Clinical analysis of endoscopic transnasal resection of skull base chondrosarcoma.
Xiaotong YANG ; Bo YAN ; Wei WEI ; Junqi LIU ; Zhenlin WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(12):1127-1133
Objective:To explore the surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of endoscopic transnasal approaches in the treatment of skull base chondrosarcomas. Methods:Data from patients diagnosed with skull base chondrosarcomas and treated via endoscopic transnasal surgery at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, from 2013 to 2022 were collected. This retrospective study analyzed the patients' clinical presentations, histopathological grading, involved sites and extents, and complications following the endoscopic transnasal surgery. Disease-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:Complete data from 31 patients showed that the primary tumor site was in the petroclival region in 27 cases(87%), and the anterior skull base in 4 cases(13%). Pathological grades were Grade Ⅰ(12 cases), Grade Ⅱ(16 cases), and Grade Ⅲ(3 cases). Total resection was achieved in 25 cases, with residual disease post-surgery in 6 cases. The average follow-up duration was 35.7 months(ranging from 6 to 120 months). Among those who achieved complete resection, recurrence occurred in 5 cases(5/25), with a five-year disease-free survival rate of 80%. Postoperative complications included transient abducens nerve palsy in 6 patients and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in 4 patients. There were no cases of death or permanent cranial nerve palsy. Total resection rate(P=0.001) and involvement of the cerebellopontine angle and jugular foramen(P=0.037) were identified as independent risk factors for residual disease and recurrence of chondrosarcoma. Conclusion:The endoscopic transnasal approach is a safe and feasible treatment option for skull base chondrosarcomas.
Humans
;
Chondrosarcoma/surgery*
;
Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Male
;
Female
;
Endoscopy/methods*
;
Middle Aged
;
Skull Base/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Adult
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Nose/surgery*
4.Clinical efficacy of endoscopic plasma resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.
Junfang BAO ; Liuye CHEN ; Xian MA ; Jia CHANG ; Fei AN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(12):1170-1173
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of plasma resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma(JNA) under nasal endoscope. Methods:The clinical data of 12 cases with JNA treated in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery of the 940th Hospital from 2015.01 to 2020.01 were analyzed retrospectively. All of them were young males. Imaging examination, digital subtraction angiography(DSA) and selective blood supply artery embolization were performed before operation, and then plasma was used to remove the tumor under nasal endoscope. The patients were followed up for at least 30 months. During the follow-up, the nasal cavity was observed under nasal endoscope and the tumor recurrence was observed by imaging examination. Results:In 12 cases, the vision was clear, the amount of bleeding was less, the operation time was within 2 h, and the postoperative recovery time was short. 12 cases were followed up and no tumor recurrence was found by nasal endoscopy and imaging examination. Conclusion:Selective external carotid artery embolization before operation and plasma resection of JNA under nasal endoscope during operation is a safe and effective treatment, which can effectively improve the cure rate and reduce the recurrence rate.
Humans
;
Angiofibroma/surgery*
;
Male
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Endoscopy/methods*
;
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Adolescent
;
Young Adult
;
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
5.Effects of Fertility-Sparing Surgery on Prognosis and Fertility of Patients With Ovarian Borderline Tumors.
Xiao-Xiao LIN ; Lin TANG ; Ming-Jie YANG ; Bai-Lei ZHANG
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2024;46(6):890-898
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with ovarian borderline tumors (BOT). Methods A total of 121 BOT patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery between January 2010 and October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The univariate analysis,multivariate analysis,and survival curves were employed to evaluate the clinicopathological and surgical variables and fertility. Results The 121 BOT patients included in this study showed the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of 65.8% and the recurrence rate of 30.5%.A total of 53 patients attempted to conceive and 40 (33.06%) of the patients achieved successful pregnancy.Different methods of fertility-sparing surgery did not affect the tumor recurrence rate,RFS,or pregnancy rate.The multivariate analysis indicated that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ≥Ⅱ was an independent risk factor affecting both postoperative recurrence and RFS (P=0.011,OR=6.504,95%CI=1.534-27.58;P=0.033,HR=2.589,95%CI=1.082-6.194) in BOT patients.Tissue type (mucinous) was negatively correlated with the risk of recurrence after fertility-sparing surgery (P=0.011,OR=0.270,95%CI=0.099-0.739).The two unilateral surgical methods showed differences in the amount of intraoperative bleeding (P=0.010),postoperative hospital stay (P=0.001),duration of antibiotic use (P=0.002),and tumor rupture rate (P=0.030),which were not significantly different between the two bilateral surgical methods. Conclusions For young patients with fertility requirements,fertility-sparing surgery is safe and effective.After a comprehensive assessment of clinicopathological factors,unilateral cystectomy and bilateral cystectomy may be recommended as the preferred choice of treatment.For the patients with advanced FIGO stages who strongly prefer fertility sparing,fertility-sparing surgery can be performed with fully informed consent,and these patients should attempt to achieve pregnancy as soon as possible after the surgery.
Humans
;
Female
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Adult
;
Fertility Preservation/methods*
;
Prognosis
;
Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Fertility
;
Young Adult
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Rate
6.Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(1):16-26
Pelvic exenteration is often required for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision (PRC-bTME) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Some patients with radical resection can achieve long-term survival, but they need to face risks, such as huge surgical trauma, serious perioperative complications, permanent loss of organ function and decline in quality of life. Preoperative evaluation of PRC-bTME and LRRC should emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration, and develop individualized diagnosis and treatment strategies. The principles of function preservation and risk-benefit balance in surgery oncology should be followed, and R0 resection should be emphasized. Perioperative complications, surgical trauma and organ function loss should be minimized to achieve the best quality control and balance point. This consensus was formulated by the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Gastrointestinal Surgery Committee of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. The draft was formed based on the summary of domestic and foreign research progress and expert experience. After discussion, review and modification by experts, an anonymous voting was conducted for each major opinion, and in-depth verification was carried out according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. Finally, the Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration with primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition) was formed. This consensus mainly summarizes the indications and contraindications of PE for PRC-bTME and LRRC, preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, perioperative treatment, as well as the resection scope, surgical methods, reconstruction of related organs, safety and complications of PE, postoperative follow-up and other issues, in order to provide guidance for PE in patients with PRC-bTME and LRRC.
Humans
;
Consensus
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*
;
Pelvic Exenteration
;
Quality of Life
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
China
7.Evaluation of lateral lymph node metastasis in mid-low rectal cancer and planning of multi-disciplinary treatment.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(1):51-57
After the implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, lateral local recurrence becomes the major type of local recurrence after surgery in rectal cancer. Most lateral recurrence develops from enlarged lateral lymph nodes on an initial imaging study. Evidence is accumulating to support the combined use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral lymph node dissection. The accuracy of diagnosing lateral lymph node metastasis remains poor. The size of lateral lymph nodes is still the most commonly used variable with the most consistent accuracy and the cut-off value ranging from 5 to 8 mm on short axis. The morphological features, differentiation of the primary tumor, circumferential margin, extramural venous invasion, and response to chemoradiotherapy are among other risk factors to predict lateral lymph node metastasis. Planning multiple disciplinary treatment strategies for patients with suspected nodes must consider both the risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the most promising regimen for patients with a high risk of recurrence. Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy seemingly improves the local control of positive lateral nodes. However, its impact on the safety of surgery in patients with no response to the treatment or regrowth of lateral nodes remains unclear. For patients with smaller nodes below the cut-off value or shrunken nodes after treatment, a close follow-up strategy must be performed to detect the recurrence early and perform a salvage surgery. For patients with stratified lateral lymph node metastasis risks, plans containing different multiple disciplinary treatments must be carefully designed for long-term survival and better quality of life.
Humans
;
Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology*
;
Quality of Life
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Lymph Nodes/pathology*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Lymph Node Excision/methods*
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods*
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*
8.Influence of postoperative complications on prognosis of gastric cancer-The manifestation of gastric surgeon's skill, responsibility and empathy.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(2):126-131
Radical gastrectomy combined with perioperative comprehensive treatment is the main curable strategy for gastric cancer patients, and postoperative complications are the issue that gastric surgeons have to face. Complications not only affect the short-term postoperative recovery, but also facilitate tumor recurrence or metastasis, thus resulting in poor prognosis. Therefore, unifying the diagnostic criteria for postoperative complications, bringing the surgeons' attention to complications, and understanding the potential mechanism of complications undermining long-term survival, will be helpful to the future improvement of the clinical diagnosis and treatment as well as prognosis for gastric cancer patients in China. Meanwhile, surgeons should constantly hone their operative skills, improve their sense of responsibility and empathy, and administer individualized perioperative management based on patients' general conditions, so as to minimize the occurrence of postoperative complications and their influence on prognosis.
Humans
;
Stomach Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Empathy
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*
;
Prognosis
;
Gastrectomy/methods*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Surgeons
;
Retrospective Studies
9.Difficulties and challenges of pelvic exenteration in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(3):215-221
In recent years, with advances in pelvic oncology and surgical techniques, surgeons have redefined the boundaries of pelvic surgery. Combined pelvic exenteration is now considered the treatment of choice for some patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer, but it is only performed in a few hospitals in China due to the complexity of the procedure and the large extent of resection, complications, and high perioperative mortality. Although there have been great advances in oncologic drugs and surgical techniques and equipment in recent years, there are still many controversies and challenges in the preoperative assessment of combined pelvic organ resection, neoadjuvant treatment selection and perioperative treatment strategies. Adequate understanding of the anatomical features of the pelvic organs, close collaboration of the clinical multidisciplinary team, objective assessment and standardized preoperative combination therapy creates the conditions for radical surgical resection of recurrent and complex locally advanced rectal cancer, while the need for rational and standardized R0 resection still has the potential to bring new hope to patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.
Humans
;
Pelvic Exenteration/methods*
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*
;
Rectum/surgery*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Pelvis/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Retrospective Studies
10.Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition).
Jian Qiang TANG ; Xin WANG ; Xi Shan WANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(3):222-226
The China PelvEx Collaborative, under the direction of Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Gastrointestinal Surgery Committee of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health, has formulated and issued the Chinese expert consensus for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition) , with the academic support of the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Chinese Journal of Colorectal Disease (Electronic Edition). This Consensus refers to the expert consensus developed by the International PelvEx Collaboration, incorporates the latest international multi-center research results and combines the latest research results in China. The Consensus unifies some definitions, clarifies the surgical indications, and puts forward the definition and preventive measures of "empty pelvic syndrome" earlier. For the controversial classification of local recurrent rectal cancer, the Chinese classification was proposed for the first time in Consensus. At the same time, the definition of pelvic exenteration is controversial, and a more consistent cognition is proposed. It is believed that, with the in-depth research on complicated rectal cancer, C-PelvEx will gather more higher-level data from clinical research in several domestic centers, so as to further enrich the content of the updated Consensus.
Humans
;
Consensus
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*
;
Pelvic Exenteration
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail