BACKGROUND

This first clinical practice guideline (CPG) on osteoporosis prevention and management in the Philippines is the output of a shared undertaking by a multidisciplinary CPG development team spearheaded by the Osteoporosis Society of the Philippines Foundation, Inc. and joined by the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians; the Philippine College of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; the Philippine Orthopedic Association; the Philippine Obstetrics and Gynecological Society and the Philippine Rheumatology Association. This guideline seeks to augment and update the "Consensus statements on osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention and management in the Philippines," initially published in 2011, incorporating evidence-based practices developed in the last decade.

METHODOLOGY

The steering committee formulated and prioritized clinical questions based on meetings and stakeholder consultations. A PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format was used to develop clinical questions and guide the systematic search for evidence. The development of guidelines followed the ADAPTE process. Once completed, panel discussions were done using the Evidence to Decision Framework. After the panel discussions, the final recommendations were revised.

RESULTS

Thirty-four recommendations were formulated to address 27 clinical questions related to screening, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment, surgical management, follow-up, and continuity of care. With these recommendations, the developers aim to establish a standard of care in the prevention, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in both in-patient and out-patient cases that are appropriate to the Philippine context. Specifically, the CPG development group aims to use these recommendations to define the standard of care for osteoporosis as part of universal healthcare services once the program is implemented nationally. Relevant stakeholders may also use the recommendations to inform public and private payor policies for patients with fragility fractures, as well as by local government units or private companies looking to establish orthogeriatric centers with fracture liaison services.

CONCLUSION

This guideline is helpful for physicians and other allied health personnel in screening, diagnosis, management and prevention of primary osteoporosis and fragility fractures among postmenopausal women and older men.

Human ; Philippines ; Guideline ; Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction for congenital hand anomalies, if indicated, is generally recommended during early childhood to optimize function before formal education starts and minimize the psychosocial impact. There have been limited reports on these conditions persisting beyond the recommended age for surgery. OBJECTIVE: The research aimed to explore the common reasons why patients consult for late surgery and determine the baseline function of the patients prior to reconstructive surgery using the Filipino Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (Fil-DASH). METHODS: An observational, chart review of cases from 2013-2021 was done. The reasons and indications were extracted from the history and Fil-DASH scores were recorded with available data. The results were presented using summary statistics and tabulation of qualitative data. RESULTS: Twenty-five hands in 20 patients underwent reconstruction of congenital anomalies persisting beyond childhood. The most common indication for surgery was concerns regarding work opportunities. Hope for a better function, cosmesis, social pressure and hygiene were the other reasons mentioned. Most of the patients did not complain of significant problems in doing activities of daily living. This was supported by their Fil-DASH scores and employment status prior to surgery. CONCLUSION In this population, the indications to request for reconstruction of congenital anomalies beyond childhood were not necessarily due to loss of function but to increase opportunities for employment, improved appearance and hope for increased function. The results may aid in the understanding of the natural history of congenital hand anomalies and guide the physicians with more specific advice for parents with children presenting with these conditions.

Reconstruction of chronic boutonniere deformity remains to be a challenging procedure especially when combined with other debilitating injuries in the same extremity. The balance to properly tension the reconstruction with active motion is often prevented by the need to perform the procedure under sedation of block to tolerate the use of tourniquet. We present a case of a young patient who successfully underwent restoration of active proximal interphalangeal (PIP) extension with a Palmaris longus graft while wide awake under local anesthesia and no tourniquet (WALANT) before subsequently having nerve transfers for upper type brachial plexus injury.