1.Relevance of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in non-operative management of patients with blunt liver and splenic injuries.
Vivek KUMAR ; Ramesh VAIDYANATHAN ; Dinesh BAGARIA ; Pratyusha PRIYADARSHINI ; Abhinav KUMAR ; Narendra CHOUDHARY ; Sushma SAGAR ; Amit GUPTA ; Biplab MISHRA ; Mohit JOSHI ; Kapil Dev SONI ; Richa AGGARWAL ; Subodh KUMAR
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2025;28(4):307-312
PURPOSE:
Non-operative management (NOM) has been validated for blunt liver and splenic injuries. Literature on continuous intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring as a part of NOM remains to be equivocal. The study aimed to find any correlation between clinical parameters and IAP, and their effect on the NOM of patients with blunt liver and splenic injury.
METHOD:
A prospective cross-sectional study conducted at a level I trauma center from October 2018 to January 2020 including 174 patients who underwent NOM following blunt liver and splenic injuries. Hemodynamically unstable patients or those on ventilators were excluded, as well as patients who suffered significant head, spinal cord, and/or bladder injuries. The study predominantly included males (83.9%) with a mean age of 32.5 years. IAP was monitored continuously and the relation of IAP with various parameters, interventions, and outcomes were measured. Data were summarized as frequency (percentage) or mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) as indicated. χ2 or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, while for continuous variables parametric (independent t-test) or nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum test) were used as appropriate. Clinical and laboratory correlates of IAP < 12 with p < 0.200 in the univariable logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. A p < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS:
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) was seen in 19.0% of the study population. IAH was strongly associated with a high injury severity score (p < 0.001), and other physiological parameters like respiratory rate (p < 0.001), change in abdominal girth (AG) (p < 0.001), and serum creatinine (p < 0.001). IAH along with the number of solid organs involved, respiratory rate, change in AG, and serum creatinine was associated with the intervention, either operative or non-operative (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.013, respectively). On multivariable analysis, IAP (p = 0.006) and the mean change of AG (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with the need for intervention.
CONCLUSION
As a part of NOM, IAP should be monitored as a continuous vital. However, the decision for any intervention, either operative or non-operative cannot be guided by IAP values alone.
Humans
;
Male
;
Adult
;
Female
;
Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology*
;
Spleen/injuries*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Liver/injuries*
;
Middle Aged
;
Monitoring, Physiologic/methods*
;
Pressure
;
Abdominal Injuries/physiopathology*
;
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
;
Young Adult
2.Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of the Adrenal Glands: Analysis of 21 Patients.
Rajesh PURI ; Ragesh Babu THANDASSERY ; Narendra S CHOUDHARY ; Hardik KOTECHA ; Smruti Ranjan MISRA ; Suraj BHAGAT ; Manish PALIWAL ; Kaushal MADAN ; Neeraj SARAF ; Haimanti SARIN ; Mridula GULERIA ; Randhir SUD
Clinical Endoscopy 2015;48(2):165-170
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology of adrenal masses helps in etiological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of adrenal masses in cases where other imaging methods failed and/or were not feasible. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with adrenal masses, in whom adrenal FNA was performed because conventional imaging modalities failed and/or were not feasible, were prospectively evaluated over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients (mean age, 56+/-12.2 years; male:female ratio, 2:1), 12 had pyrexia of unknown origin and the other nine underwent evaluation for metastasis. The median lesion size was 2.4x1.6 cm. Ten patients were diagnosed with tuberculosis (shown by the presence of caseating granulomas [n=10] and acid-fast bacilli [n=4]). Two patients had EUS-FNA results suggestive of histoplasmosis. The other patients had metastatic lung carcinoma (n=6), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1), and adrenal lipoma (n=1) and adrenal myelolipoma (n=1). EUS results were not suggestive of any particular etiology. No procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is a safe and effective method for evaluating adrenal masses, and it yields diagnosis in cases where tissue diagnosis is impossible or has failed using conventional imaging modalities.
Adrenal Glands*
;
Biopsy, Fine-Needle*
;
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Diagnosis
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endosonography
;
Fever
;
Granuloma
;
Histoplasmosis
;
Humans
;
Lipoma
;
Lung
;
Myelolipoma
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Tuberculosis

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail