The impact of Streptococcus pneumoniae coinfection on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prognosis remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent a pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUA) test to assess its clinical utility. Results showed that PUA-positive patients required more oxygen support, high-flow nasal cannula, and dexamethasone compared to PUA-negative patients.Furthermore, the significantly higher incidence of a National Early Warning Score ≥5 in the PUA-positive group (P<0.001) suggests that a positive PUA test is associated with a severe disease course. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups, and antibiotics were used in almost all patients (96.2%). While the PUA test may help guide antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients, its interpretation should be approached with caution.

The impact of Streptococcus pneumoniae coinfection on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prognosis remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent a pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUA) test to assess its clinical utility. Results showed that PUA-positive patients required more oxygen support, high-flow nasal cannula, and dexamethasone compared to PUA-negative patients.Furthermore, the significantly higher incidence of a National Early Warning Score ≥5 in the PUA-positive group (P<0.001) suggests that a positive PUA test is associated with a severe disease course. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups, and antibiotics were used in almost all patients (96.2%). While the PUA test may help guide antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients, its interpretation should be approached with caution.

The impact of Streptococcus pneumoniae coinfection on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prognosis remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent a pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUA) test to assess its clinical utility. Results showed that PUA-positive patients required more oxygen support, high-flow nasal cannula, and dexamethasone compared to PUA-negative patients.Furthermore, the significantly higher incidence of a National Early Warning Score ≥5 in the PUA-positive group (P<0.001) suggests that a positive PUA test is associated with a severe disease course. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups, and antibiotics were used in almost all patients (96.2%). While the PUA test may help guide antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients, its interpretation should be approached with caution.

Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a condition characterized by episodic, excessive vasoconstriction in the fingers and toes, triggered by cold or stress. This leads to a distinctive sequence of color changes in the digits. Pallor indicates reduced blood flow due to oxygen deprivation, while erythema appears as reperfusion. RP can be primary, with no identifiable underlying cause, or secondary, associated with other conditions. These conditions include autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic sclerosis, vascular diseases; and neurological conditions. While the exact cause of RP remains unclear, genetic and hormonal (estrogen) factors are likely contributors. The pathogenesis of RP involves a complex interaction between the vascular wall, nerves, hormones, and humoral factors, disrupting the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation. In primary RP, the vascular abnormalities are primarily functional. However, in secondary RP, both functional and structural components occur in blood vessels. This explains why digital tissue damage frequently occurs in secondary RP but not primary RP. Diagnosis of RP is primarily clinical. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have aided in diagnosis and monitoring, but nail fold capillaroscopy remains the gold standard for distinguishing between primary and secondary RP. If there are signs of acute ischemic injury, vascular imaging, particularly preoperatively, is crucial to rule out other vasoocclusive conditions. Management of RP focuses on alleviating symptoms and preventing tissue damage. Vasodilator medications are the first-line treatment when general measures like warmth and stress management are not sufficient. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as nifedipine, are commonly used for vasodilation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs are alternative options for patients who do not respond to CCBs or have ischemic tissue damage. Bosentan, an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, has shown effectiveness in treating and preventing digital ulcers, especially in patients with multiple ulcers. For severe cases, botulinum toxin injections or sympathectomy surgery can be used to control RP symptoms. However, botulinum toxin injections require repeated administration, and sympathectomy’s long-term effectiveness is uncertain.Fat grafting is a promising surgical therapy for promoting healing and preventing tissue injury.

Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is a condition characterized by episodic, excessive vasoconstriction in the fingers and toes, triggered by cold or stress. This leads to a distinctive sequence of color changes in the digits. Pallor indicates reduced blood flow due to oxygen deprivation, while erythema appears as reperfusion. RP can be primary, with no identifiable underlying cause, or secondary, associated with other conditions. These conditions include autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic sclerosis, vascular diseases; and neurological conditions. While the exact cause of RP remains unclear, genetic and hormonal (estrogen) factors are likely contributors. The pathogenesis of RP involves a complex interaction between the vascular wall, nerves, hormones, and humoral factors, disrupting the balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilation. In primary RP, the vascular abnormalities are primarily functional. However, in secondary RP, both functional and structural components occur in blood vessels. This explains why digital tissue damage frequently occurs in secondary RP but not primary RP. Diagnosis of RP is primarily clinical. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have aided in diagnosis and monitoring, but nail fold capillaroscopy remains the gold standard for distinguishing between primary and secondary RP. If there are signs of acute ischemic injury, vascular imaging, particularly preoperatively, is crucial to rule out other vasoocclusive conditions. Management of RP focuses on alleviating symptoms and preventing tissue damage. Vasodilator medications are the first-line treatment when general measures like warmth and stress management are not sufficient. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as nifedipine, are commonly used for vasodilation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs are alternative options for patients who do not respond to CCBs or have ischemic tissue damage. Bosentan, an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, has shown effectiveness in treating and preventing digital ulcers, especially in patients with multiple ulcers. For severe cases, botulinum toxin injections or sympathectomy surgery can be used to control RP symptoms. However, botulinum toxin injections require repeated administration, and sympathectomy’s long-term effectiveness is uncertain.Fat grafting is a promising surgical therapy for promoting healing and preventing tissue injury.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risks of adverse events including stroke and all-cause death. Understanding the pattern of causes of death (COD) with the relative risks in patients with AF compared to the non-AF population is essential in planning optimal care for patients with AF. We aimed to analyze the COD and its relative risks in patients with AF, using a nationwide population-based cohort. Methods: Using the Korean nationwide claims database, people aged 40 or older who received health examinations in 2009 were included if they had no missing values (n = 6,877,929).In total the study included 40,585 people with AF and 6,837,344 without AF. COD was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes. Comparison between the AF and non-AF groups was performed with Multivariate Cox proportional regression model. Results: In the AF group, cardiovascular diseases were the most common COD, causing 39.8% of all deaths, compared with 19.0% for non-AF subjects. The AF group was associated with a higher risk of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases by almost 3-fold than the matched non-AF group (hazard ratios [HR], 3.082; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 2.963–3.205 for cardiovascular diseases; HR, 2.981; 95% CI, 2.799–3.175 for cerebrovascular diseases, all P < 0.001). Among patients with AF, the risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular death were well-stratified by CHA2DS2 -VASc scores. The risk of cerebrovascular death was 11 times higher among patients with a CHA2DS2 -VASc score ≥ 7. Conclusion Compared to non-AF individuals, patients with AF had a higher risk of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and the mortality risks were wellstratified by the CHA2DS2 -VASc score. Integrated care management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases for patients with AF might help mitigate mortality.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risks of adverse events including stroke and all-cause death. Understanding the pattern of causes of death (COD) with the relative risks in patients with AF compared to the non-AF population is essential in planning optimal care for patients with AF. We aimed to analyze the COD and its relative risks in patients with AF, using a nationwide population-based cohort. Methods: Using the Korean nationwide claims database, people aged 40 or older who received health examinations in 2009 were included if they had no missing values (n = 6,877,929).In total the study included 40,585 people with AF and 6,837,344 without AF. COD was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes. Comparison between the AF and non-AF groups was performed with Multivariate Cox proportional regression model. Results: In the AF group, cardiovascular diseases were the most common COD, causing 39.8% of all deaths, compared with 19.0% for non-AF subjects. The AF group was associated with a higher risk of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases by almost 3-fold than the matched non-AF group (hazard ratios [HR], 3.082; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 2.963–3.205 for cardiovascular diseases; HR, 2.981; 95% CI, 2.799–3.175 for cerebrovascular diseases, all P < 0.001). Among patients with AF, the risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular death were well-stratified by CHA2DS2 -VASc scores. The risk of cerebrovascular death was 11 times higher among patients with a CHA2DS2 -VASc score ≥ 7. Conclusion Compared to non-AF individuals, patients with AF had a higher risk of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and the mortality risks were wellstratified by the CHA2DS2 -VASc score. Integrated care management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases for patients with AF might help mitigate mortality.

Background: The association between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes has yet to be determined in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We aimed to investigate whether mildly reduced renal function is associated with the prognosis in patients with HCM. Methods: Patients with HCM were enrolled at two tertiary HCM centers. Patients who were on dialysis, or had a previous history of heart failure (HF) or stroke were excluded. Patients were categorized into 3 groups by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): stage I (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 538), stage II (eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 953), and stage III–V (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , n = 265). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for HF (HHF), or stroke during median 4.0-year follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to adjust for covariates. Results: Among 1,756 HCM patients (mean 61.0 ± 13.4 years; 68.1% men), patients with stage III–V renal function had a significantly higher risk of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39–5.27; P = 0.003), which was largely driven by increased incidence of cardiovascular death and HHF compared to those with stage I renal function. Even in patients with stage II renal function, the risk of MACE (vs. stage I: aHR, 2.21’ 95% CI, 1.23–3.96; P = 0.008) and HHF (vs. stage I: aHR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.23–5.58; P = 0.012) was significantly increased. Conclusion This real-world observation showed that even mildly reduced renal function (i.e., eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) in patients with HCM was associated with an increased risk of MACEs, especially for HHF.

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for a large proportion of healthcare-associated infections and have a significant impact on morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Adherence to the recommended infection prevention practices can effectively reduce the incidence of CAUTIs. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of CAUTIs and the efficacy of prevention programs across hospitals of various sizes. Methods: Intervention programs, including training, surveillance, and monitoring, were implemented. Data on the microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs, urinary catheter utilization ratio, rate of CAUTIs per 1,000 device days, and factors associated with the use of indwelling catheters were collected from 2017 to 2019. The incidence of CAUTIs and associated data were compared between university hospitals and small- and medium-sized hospitals. Results: Thirty-two hospitals participated in the study, including 21 university hospitals and 11 small- and medium-sized hospitals. The microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs and their resistance rates did not differ between the two groups. In the first quarter of 2018, the incidence rate was 2.05 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.44 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. After implementing interventions, the rate gradually decreased in the first quarter of 2019, with 1.18 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 0.79 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. However, by the end of the study, the infection rate increased to 1.74 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.80 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. Conclusion We implemented interventions to prevent CAUTIs and evaluated their outcomes. The incidence of these infections decreased in the initial phases of the intervention when adequate support and personnel were present. The rate of these infections may be reduced by implementing active interventions such as consistent monitoring and adherence to guidelines for preventing infections.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.