1.Factors Associated with Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients : A Retrospective Study at a Level I Trauma Center
Juhong PARK ; Namkyu YOO ; Byung Hee KANG
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2026;69(1):135-141
Objective:
: The indications for repeated brain computed tomography (CT) for delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) remain inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for DICH in patients with severe trauma.
Methods:
: Patients with blunt trauma, admitted to a level I trauma center between January 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent repeat brain CT but had a normal initial brain CT were included. The patients were divided into the DICH and normal groups, and their general characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multi-logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors. Patients with DICH were also interviewed.
Results:
: Of 784 patients, 37 (4.7%) were included in the DICH group. The DICH group presented with more severe injury. In multi-logistic regression, age over 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.681; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.250–5.753; p=0.011), lowest systolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg during resuscitation (OR, 2.678; 95% CI, 1.247–5.750; p=0.012), severe abdominal injury (OR, 2.667; 95% CI, 1.213–5.864; p=0.015) and cervical spine fracture (OR, 2.408; 95% CI, 1.084–5.351; p=0.031) were associated with DICH. Among the 37 patients with DICH, one patient underwent an invasive procedure, and no mortality was reported.
Conclusion
: The incidence of DICH may be higher in patients with severe trauma and repeat brain CT could be considered in selected high-risk cases, even when the initial scan is normal.
2.Clinical outcomes of subtotal cholecystectomy performed for difficult cholecystectomy.
Minho SHIN ; Namkyu CHOI ; Youngsun YOO ; Yooseok KIM ; Sungsoo KIM ; Seongpyo MUN
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2016;91(5):226-232
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) can be an alternative surgical technique for difficult cholecystectomies. Surgeons performing LSC sometimes leave the posterior wall of the gallbladder (GB) to shorten the operation time and avoid liver injury. However, leaving the inflamed posterior GB wall is a major concern. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC), LSC, and LSC removing only anterior wall of the GB (LSCA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between January 2006 to December 2015 and analyzed the outcomes of SLC, LSC, and LSCA. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 patients underwent SLC. 22 patients underwent LSC; and 27 patients underwent LSCA. The mean operating times of SLC, LSC, and LSCA were 41, 74, and 68 minutes, respectively (P < 0.01). Blood loss was 5, 45, and 33 mL (P < 0.05). The mean lengths of postoperative hospitalization were 3.4, 5.4, and 5.8 days. Complications occurred in 24 SLC patients (2.3%), 2 LSC patients (9%), and 1 LSCA patient (3.7%). There was no mortality among the LSC and LSCA patients. CONCLUSION: LSC and LSCA are safe and feasible alternatives for difficult cholecystectomies. These procedures help surgeons avoid bile duct injury and conversion to laparotomy. LSCA has the benefits of shorter operation time and less bleeding compared to LSC.
Bile Ducts
;
Cholecystectomy*
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Gallbladder
;
Hemorrhage
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Laparotomy
;
Liver
;
Medical Records
;
Mortality
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Surgeons

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail