Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition where spinal canal narrowing causes symptoms such as neurogenic claudication, radiculopathy, and lower back pain. While non-operative and surgical approaches yield similar long-term outcomes, surgical intervention—particularly decompression—can provide earlier symptom relief, functional recovery, and fall prevention in selected patients with refractory symptoms. Recent advancements in surgical technologies and image guidance have brought about a paradigm shift in LSS management. Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) has gained global traction as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional decompression methods, offering superior visualization, less soft tissue damage, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. High-quality studies, including randomized controlled trials, have shown promising outcomes for this technique. Furthermore, the integration of navigation systems, robot-assisted instrumentation, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics and surgical planning tools is transforming spinal surgery by enhancing precision in preoperative evaluation and intraoperative execution. These innovations enable accurate targeting, reduce complications, and improve reproducibility across diverse surgical settings. This review provides an updated overview of LSS, covering its pathophysiology, clinical assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Special emphasis is placed on the growing role of BESS and the transformative impact of digital technologies such as navigation, robotics, and AI in the evolving landscape of spinal stenosis care.

Background: Laminoplasty is a common and effective surgery for decompression of the spinal cord in multilevel cervical myelopathy. The midline splitting technique (MST) and the unilateral open door technique (UODT) are the two most commonly performed laminoplasty techniques with continuous debate on which is preferable. This study aimed to add light to the matter by comparing and exploring the possible causes of different outcomes. Methods: A total of 101 patients who underwent laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy were included in this study.Radiographic measurements including C2–7 Cobb angle, C2–7 range of motion (ROM), Pavlov ratio of the most compressed level, and canal area with diameter were compared. Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score and complications including C5 palsy, axial neck pain, hinge fractures, and spacer displacement were also compared. Statistical analysis was performed using independent samples t-test, chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and linear mixed model. Results: C2–7 ROM, canal diameter, Pavlov ratio, and mJOA score did not demonstrate differences between the two techniques.The UODT group had greater postoperative canal expansion but had more loss of C2–7 lordosis than did the MST group. Of the complications, hinge fractures were more common in the UODT group, with more loss of C2–7 lordosis in patients with hinge fractures. On the other hand, spacer displacement occurred only in the MST group, with lesser canal expansion in patients with spacer displacement. Conclusions The two laminoplasty techniques both demonstrated effectiveness in treating patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy. However, care should be given to avoid hinge fractures and spacer displacement since both can possibly lead to unfavorable outcomes.