1.Molecular determinants of outcome to gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
Daeseong KIM ; Nam Suk SIM ; Seonjeong WOO ; Min Hwan KIM ; Choong-kun LEE ; Seung Soo HONG ; Sung Hyun KIM ; Ho Kyoung HWANG ; Chang Moo KANG ; Woo Jung LEE ; Jung Hyun JO ; Taek CHUNG ; Sohyun HWANG ; Beodeul KANG ; Jung Sun KIM ; Chang-Il KWON ; Sangwoo KIM ; Hong Jae CHON ; Chang Gon KIM ; Young Nyun PARK ; Hye Jin CHOI
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2026;32(2):721-736
Background/Aims:
Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. We investigated genomic determinants of clinical benefit from gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in advanced BTC.
Methods:
Clinical and genomic data using TruSight Oncology 500 were analyzed from patients treated with GAP (N=198) or GC (N=89) as first-line therapy.
Results:
With a median follow-up of 33.0 months, GAP modestly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–0.989) without significant overall survival (OS) difference compared to GC. Genomic profiling revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (35.2%), KRAS (16.4%), SMAD4 (10.5%), and TNFRSF14 (10.5%), involving RTK/RAS (44.3%), TP53 (41.8%), and PI3K (20.2%) pathways. Single-gene mutations did not predict treatment benefit. However, pathway-level analysis identified PI3K pathway activation as significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.148; 95% CI 1.478–3.124) and OS (HR 2.096; 95% CI 1.413–3.109) in patients receiving GAP, an effect not observed with GC. Importantly, GAP conferred clinical benefit only in patients without PI3K pathway activation, while no survival advantage was seen in those with such alterations (Pinteraction=0.023 for PFS, Pinteraction=0.003 for OS). Similar results were obtained in the independent validation cohort treated with GAP (N=103) or GC (N=64) for BTC.
Conclusions
Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing identified PI3K pathway activation as key molecular determinant that differentiates patient outcomes between GAP and GC treatments in advanced BTC.
2.Unveiling Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients with Graves’ Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
Jung A KIM ; Kyeong Jin KIM ; Jimi CHOI ; Kyoung Jin KIM ; Eyun SONG ; Ji Hee YU ; Nam Hoon KIM ; Hye Jin YOO ; Ji A SEO ; Nan Hee KIM ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Sei Hyun BAIK ; Sin Gon KIM
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(1):125-134
Background:
Antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment is the preferred initial treatment for Graves’ disease (GD) in South Korea, despite higher treatment failure rates than radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy or thyroidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of treatment failure associated with the primary modalities for GD treatment in real-world practice.
Methods:
We included 452,001 patients diagnosed with GD between 2004 and 2020 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database. Treatment failure was defined as switching from ATD, RAI, or thyroidectomy treatments, and for ATD specifically, inability to discontinue medication for over 2 years.
Results:
Mean age was 46.2 years, with females constituting 70.8%. Initial treatments for GD included ATDs (98.0%), thyroidectomy (1.3%), and RAI (0.7%), with a noted increment in ATD application from 96.2% in 2004 to 98.8% in 2020. During a median follow- up of 8.5 years, the treatment failure rates were 58.5% for ATDs, 21.3% for RAI, and 2.1% for thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for treatment failure with ATD was 2.81 times higher than RAI. RAI treatments ≥10 mCi had 37% lower failure rates than doses <10 mCi.
Conclusion
ATDs are the most commonly used for GD in South Korea, followed by thyroidectomy and RAI. Although the risk of treatment failure for ATD is higher than that of RAI therapy, initial RAI treatment in South Korea is relatively limited compared to that in Western countries. Further studies are required to evaluate the cause of low initial RAI treatment rates in South Korea.
3.Prognostic Evaluation and Survival Prediction for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Following Hepatectomy
Seok-Joo CHUN ; Yu Jung JUNG ; YoungRok CHOI ; Nam-Joon YI ; Kwang-Woong LEE ; Kyung-Suk SUH ; Kyoung Bun LEE ; Hyun-Cheol KANG ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Kyung Su KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(1):229-239
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess prognostic factors associated with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to predict 5-year survival based on these factors.
Materials and Methods:
Patients who underwent definitive hepatectomy from 2006 to 2022 at a single institution was retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria involved a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cHCC-CCA.
Results:
A total of 80 patients with diagnosed cHCC-CCA were included in the analysis. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 months, while distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), hepatic progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 50.8, 21.5, and 85.1 months, respectively. In 52 cases of recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence was the most common initial recurrence (34/52), with distant metastasis in 17 cases. Factors associated with poor DMFS included tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and histologic compact type. Postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor necrosis, LVI, and close/positive margin were associated with poor OS. LVI emerged as a key factor affecting both DMFS and OS, with a 5-year OS of 93.3% for patients without LVI compared to 35.8% with LVI. Based on these factors, a nomogram predicting 3-year and 5-year DMFS and OS was developed, demonstrating high concordance with actual survival in the cohort (Harrell C-index 0.809 for OS, 0.801 for DMFS, respectively).
Conclusion
The prognosis of cHCC-CCA is notably poor when combined with LVI. Given the significant impact of adverse features, accurate outcome prediction is crucial. Moreover, consideration of adjuvant therapy may be warranted for patients exhibiting poor survival and increased risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
4.Unveiling Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients with Graves’ Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
Jung A KIM ; Kyeong Jin KIM ; Jimi CHOI ; Kyoung Jin KIM ; Eyun SONG ; Ji Hee YU ; Nam Hoon KIM ; Hye Jin YOO ; Ji A SEO ; Nan Hee KIM ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Sei Hyun BAIK ; Sin Gon KIM
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(1):125-134
Background:
Antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment is the preferred initial treatment for Graves’ disease (GD) in South Korea, despite higher treatment failure rates than radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy or thyroidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of treatment failure associated with the primary modalities for GD treatment in real-world practice.
Methods:
We included 452,001 patients diagnosed with GD between 2004 and 2020 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database. Treatment failure was defined as switching from ATD, RAI, or thyroidectomy treatments, and for ATD specifically, inability to discontinue medication for over 2 years.
Results:
Mean age was 46.2 years, with females constituting 70.8%. Initial treatments for GD included ATDs (98.0%), thyroidectomy (1.3%), and RAI (0.7%), with a noted increment in ATD application from 96.2% in 2004 to 98.8% in 2020. During a median follow- up of 8.5 years, the treatment failure rates were 58.5% for ATDs, 21.3% for RAI, and 2.1% for thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for treatment failure with ATD was 2.81 times higher than RAI. RAI treatments ≥10 mCi had 37% lower failure rates than doses <10 mCi.
Conclusion
ATDs are the most commonly used for GD in South Korea, followed by thyroidectomy and RAI. Although the risk of treatment failure for ATD is higher than that of RAI therapy, initial RAI treatment in South Korea is relatively limited compared to that in Western countries. Further studies are required to evaluate the cause of low initial RAI treatment rates in South Korea.
5.Unveiling Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients with Graves’ Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
Jung A KIM ; Kyeong Jin KIM ; Jimi CHOI ; Kyoung Jin KIM ; Eyun SONG ; Ji Hee YU ; Nam Hoon KIM ; Hye Jin YOO ; Ji A SEO ; Nan Hee KIM ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Sei Hyun BAIK ; Sin Gon KIM
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(1):125-134
Background:
Antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment is the preferred initial treatment for Graves’ disease (GD) in South Korea, despite higher treatment failure rates than radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy or thyroidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of treatment failure associated with the primary modalities for GD treatment in real-world practice.
Methods:
We included 452,001 patients diagnosed with GD between 2004 and 2020 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database. Treatment failure was defined as switching from ATD, RAI, or thyroidectomy treatments, and for ATD specifically, inability to discontinue medication for over 2 years.
Results:
Mean age was 46.2 years, with females constituting 70.8%. Initial treatments for GD included ATDs (98.0%), thyroidectomy (1.3%), and RAI (0.7%), with a noted increment in ATD application from 96.2% in 2004 to 98.8% in 2020. During a median follow- up of 8.5 years, the treatment failure rates were 58.5% for ATDs, 21.3% for RAI, and 2.1% for thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for treatment failure with ATD was 2.81 times higher than RAI. RAI treatments ≥10 mCi had 37% lower failure rates than doses <10 mCi.
Conclusion
ATDs are the most commonly used for GD in South Korea, followed by thyroidectomy and RAI. Although the risk of treatment failure for ATD is higher than that of RAI therapy, initial RAI treatment in South Korea is relatively limited compared to that in Western countries. Further studies are required to evaluate the cause of low initial RAI treatment rates in South Korea.
6.Prognostic Evaluation and Survival Prediction for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Following Hepatectomy
Seok-Joo CHUN ; Yu Jung JUNG ; YoungRok CHOI ; Nam-Joon YI ; Kwang-Woong LEE ; Kyung-Suk SUH ; Kyoung Bun LEE ; Hyun-Cheol KANG ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Kyung Su KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(1):229-239
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess prognostic factors associated with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to predict 5-year survival based on these factors.
Materials and Methods:
Patients who underwent definitive hepatectomy from 2006 to 2022 at a single institution was retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria involved a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cHCC-CCA.
Results:
A total of 80 patients with diagnosed cHCC-CCA were included in the analysis. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 months, while distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), hepatic progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 50.8, 21.5, and 85.1 months, respectively. In 52 cases of recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence was the most common initial recurrence (34/52), with distant metastasis in 17 cases. Factors associated with poor DMFS included tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and histologic compact type. Postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor necrosis, LVI, and close/positive margin were associated with poor OS. LVI emerged as a key factor affecting both DMFS and OS, with a 5-year OS of 93.3% for patients without LVI compared to 35.8% with LVI. Based on these factors, a nomogram predicting 3-year and 5-year DMFS and OS was developed, demonstrating high concordance with actual survival in the cohort (Harrell C-index 0.809 for OS, 0.801 for DMFS, respectively).
Conclusion
The prognosis of cHCC-CCA is notably poor when combined with LVI. Given the significant impact of adverse features, accurate outcome prediction is crucial. Moreover, consideration of adjuvant therapy may be warranted for patients exhibiting poor survival and increased risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
7.Unveiling Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients with Graves’ Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
Jung A KIM ; Kyeong Jin KIM ; Jimi CHOI ; Kyoung Jin KIM ; Eyun SONG ; Ji Hee YU ; Nam Hoon KIM ; Hye Jin YOO ; Ji A SEO ; Nan Hee KIM ; Kyung Mook CHOI ; Sei Hyun BAIK ; Sin Gon KIM
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(1):125-134
Background:
Antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment is the preferred initial treatment for Graves’ disease (GD) in South Korea, despite higher treatment failure rates than radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy or thyroidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of treatment failure associated with the primary modalities for GD treatment in real-world practice.
Methods:
We included 452,001 patients diagnosed with GD between 2004 and 2020 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database. Treatment failure was defined as switching from ATD, RAI, or thyroidectomy treatments, and for ATD specifically, inability to discontinue medication for over 2 years.
Results:
Mean age was 46.2 years, with females constituting 70.8%. Initial treatments for GD included ATDs (98.0%), thyroidectomy (1.3%), and RAI (0.7%), with a noted increment in ATD application from 96.2% in 2004 to 98.8% in 2020. During a median follow- up of 8.5 years, the treatment failure rates were 58.5% for ATDs, 21.3% for RAI, and 2.1% for thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for treatment failure with ATD was 2.81 times higher than RAI. RAI treatments ≥10 mCi had 37% lower failure rates than doses <10 mCi.
Conclusion
ATDs are the most commonly used for GD in South Korea, followed by thyroidectomy and RAI. Although the risk of treatment failure for ATD is higher than that of RAI therapy, initial RAI treatment in South Korea is relatively limited compared to that in Western countries. Further studies are required to evaluate the cause of low initial RAI treatment rates in South Korea.
8.Prognostic Evaluation and Survival Prediction for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Following Hepatectomy
Seok-Joo CHUN ; Yu Jung JUNG ; YoungRok CHOI ; Nam-Joon YI ; Kwang-Woong LEE ; Kyung-Suk SUH ; Kyoung Bun LEE ; Hyun-Cheol KANG ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Kyung Su KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(1):229-239
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess prognostic factors associated with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to predict 5-year survival based on these factors.
Materials and Methods:
Patients who underwent definitive hepatectomy from 2006 to 2022 at a single institution was retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria involved a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cHCC-CCA.
Results:
A total of 80 patients with diagnosed cHCC-CCA were included in the analysis. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 months, while distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), hepatic progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 50.8, 21.5, and 85.1 months, respectively. In 52 cases of recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence was the most common initial recurrence (34/52), with distant metastasis in 17 cases. Factors associated with poor DMFS included tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and histologic compact type. Postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor necrosis, LVI, and close/positive margin were associated with poor OS. LVI emerged as a key factor affecting both DMFS and OS, with a 5-year OS of 93.3% for patients without LVI compared to 35.8% with LVI. Based on these factors, a nomogram predicting 3-year and 5-year DMFS and OS was developed, demonstrating high concordance with actual survival in the cohort (Harrell C-index 0.809 for OS, 0.801 for DMFS, respectively).
Conclusion
The prognosis of cHCC-CCA is notably poor when combined with LVI. Given the significant impact of adverse features, accurate outcome prediction is crucial. Moreover, consideration of adjuvant therapy may be warranted for patients exhibiting poor survival and increased risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
9.Evidence‑based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions
Sung‑Hoon JUNG ; Youngil KOH ; Min Kyoung KIM ; Jin Seok KIM ; Joon Ho MOON ; Chang‑Ki MIN ; Dok Hyun YOON ; Sung‑Soo YOON ; Je‑Jung LEE ; Chae Moon HONG ; Ka‑Won KANG ; Jihyun KWON ; Kyoung Ha KIM ; Dae Sik KIM ; Sung Yong KIM ; Sung‑Hyun KIM ; Yu Ri KIM ; Young Rok DO ; Yeung‑Chul MUN ; Sung‑Soo PARK ; Young Hoon PARK ; Ho Jin SHIN ; Hyeon‑Seok EOM ; Sang Eun YOON ; Sang Mee HWANG ; Won Sik LEE ; Myung‑won LEE ; Jun Ho YI ; Ji Yun LEE ; Ji Hyun LEE ; Ho Sup LEE ; Sung‑Nam LIM ; Jihyang LIM ; Ho‑Young YHIM ; Yoon Hwan CHANG ; Jae‑Cheol JO ; Jinhyun CHO ; Hyungwoo CHO ; Yoon Seok CHOI ; Hee jeong CHO ; Ari AHN ; Jong Han CHOI ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Kihyun KIM
Blood Research 2025;60():9-
Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy, is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Recent treatment advances have significantly improved patient outcomes associated with MM.In this study, we aimed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treat‑ ment of MM. We identified 12 key clinical questions essential for MM management, guiding the extensive literature review and meta-analysis of the study. Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by integrating patient preferences with survey data. These recommendations include current and emerging diagnostic tools, thera‑ peutic agents, and treatment strategies. By prioritizing a patient-centered approach and rigorous data analysis, these guidelines were developed to enhance MM management, both in Korea and globally.
10.Seroprevalence of Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) in Korean Plasmapheresis Donors
JungWon KANG ; Ji Yeong SEON ; Deuk Yeong KO ; Taeeun KIM ; Jaehyun KIM ; Nam-Sun CHO ; Kyoung Young CHOI
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 2025;36(3):134-142
Background:
Hepatitis A is an acute type of hepatitis caused by the hepatitis A virus (HAV), which is mainly transmitted through the fecal-oral route and also rarely through blood transfusion. Studies on the seroprevalence of HAV immunoglobulin G in blood donors are necessary to predict the risk of releasing HAV infected blood products during epidemic and to establish effective transfusion recipient safety strategies. However, studies on the seroprevalence of HAV IgG in Korean blood donors have been rare.
Methods:
Blood samples from 10,000 plasmapheresis donors collected from 6th March to 23rd May 2024, were tested for the HAV IgG and analyzed based on age, region, and gender. The test was performed by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay on an Alinity i system (Abbott Laboratories, Lake Forest, IL, USA).
Results:
The overall seroprevalence of HAV IgG was 57.6% (5,759/10,000) for the research subjects. Significant differences between age cohorts or gender were found (16∼19 years, 65.6%; 20∼29 years, 65.5%; 30∼39 years, 28.4%; 40∼49 years, 41.5%; 50∼59 years, 82.6%; >60 years, 97.9% and Men, 59.6%; Women, 51.5%). However, there was no significant difference according to region.
Conclusion
To prepare for a potential outbreak of HAV, it is recommended that HAV vaccination be prioritized for Korean blood donors in their 30s and 40s, alongside the continued surveillance of HAV IgG seroprevalence among them.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail