Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

The sixth edition of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) was published in 2025. This review compared KMAP-DD 2025 with four major international clinical practice guidelines: Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Major Depressive Disorders, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Depression Guideline, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines for Mood Disorders, and British Association for Psychopharmacology Guideline. While KMAP-DD is based on expert consensus, and others on evidence-based methods, overall treatment strategies for depressive episodes were fairly consistent. Especially, KMAP-DD 2025 offers more structured recommendations in areas lacking strong evidence, such as premenstrual dysphoric disorder, perinatal depression, and depression with medical comorbidities. KMAP-DD 2025 also reflected Korean clinical practice patterns emphasizing rapid symptom relief and early use of combination strategies. Despite limitations as a consensus-based guideline, KMAP-DD 2025 complements evidence-based approaches and provides practical, situation-specific guidance for real-world clinical decision-making in Korea.

Background: To investigate the clinicopathologic pattern of prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level below the low-risk threshold (< 10 ng/mL), which is often a deciding factor for biopsy. Methods: A nationwide database of PCa at the time of biopsy from 2010 to 2020 was constructed from 39 hospitals. Patients were categorized into age groups of < 64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, and ≥ 75 years considering guidelines that recommend PSA testing only for those aged 55–69 years during the study period, the average age of Korean PCa registrants of 70.3 years (2010–2020), and the average life expectancy of Korean males of 80.3 years (2020). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 70.3 ± 8.2 years, which was normally distributed (kurtosis = 0.095). Among 14,548 subjects, 54.1%, 39.5%, and 6.4% of them had high-risk disease, intermediate-risk disease, and low-risk disease, respectively. Based on three risk parameters, a marked increase in high-risk cancer was observed in the oldest age group (linear combination, P < 0.001). The same pattern was observed among patients with low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL), who were divided into PSA tiers as follows: 4–5 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 5–6 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 6–7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 7–8 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 8–9 ng/mL (P = 0.009), and 9–10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). In all PSA tiers between 4 and 10 ng/mL, multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk cancer in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. In the lowest tier (4–5 ng/mL), 35.2% of those aged over 75 years had high-risk PCa. Conclusion The older the patient, the more aggressive the PCa. Moreover, there was an increase in high-risk PCa in older males compared with younger males even with a PSA level below the low-risk threshold of 10 ng/mL, suggesting the need to strengthen cancer screening policies in the older population.

Background: To investigate the clinicopathologic pattern of prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level below the low-risk threshold (< 10 ng/mL), which is often a deciding factor for biopsy. Methods: A nationwide database of PCa at the time of biopsy from 2010 to 2020 was constructed from 39 hospitals. Patients were categorized into age groups of < 64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, and ≥ 75 years considering guidelines that recommend PSA testing only for those aged 55–69 years during the study period, the average age of Korean PCa registrants of 70.3 years (2010–2020), and the average life expectancy of Korean males of 80.3 years (2020). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 70.3 ± 8.2 years, which was normally distributed (kurtosis = 0.095). Among 14,548 subjects, 54.1%, 39.5%, and 6.4% of them had high-risk disease, intermediate-risk disease, and low-risk disease, respectively. Based on three risk parameters, a marked increase in high-risk cancer was observed in the oldest age group (linear combination, P < 0.001). The same pattern was observed among patients with low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL), who were divided into PSA tiers as follows: 4–5 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 5–6 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 6–7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 7–8 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 8–9 ng/mL (P = 0.009), and 9–10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). In all PSA tiers between 4 and 10 ng/mL, multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk cancer in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. In the lowest tier (4–5 ng/mL), 35.2% of those aged over 75 years had high-risk PCa. Conclusion The older the patient, the more aggressive the PCa. Moreover, there was an increase in high-risk PCa in older males compared with younger males even with a PSA level below the low-risk threshold of 10 ng/mL, suggesting the need to strengthen cancer screening policies in the older population.

Background: To investigate the clinicopathologic pattern of prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level below the low-risk threshold (< 10 ng/mL), which is often a deciding factor for biopsy. Methods: A nationwide database of PCa at the time of biopsy from 2010 to 2020 was constructed from 39 hospitals. Patients were categorized into age groups of < 64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, and ≥ 75 years considering guidelines that recommend PSA testing only for those aged 55–69 years during the study period, the average age of Korean PCa registrants of 70.3 years (2010–2020), and the average life expectancy of Korean males of 80.3 years (2020). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 70.3 ± 8.2 years, which was normally distributed (kurtosis = 0.095). Among 14,548 subjects, 54.1%, 39.5%, and 6.4% of them had high-risk disease, intermediate-risk disease, and low-risk disease, respectively. Based on three risk parameters, a marked increase in high-risk cancer was observed in the oldest age group (linear combination, P < 0.001). The same pattern was observed among patients with low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL), who were divided into PSA tiers as follows: 4–5 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 5–6 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 6–7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 7–8 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 8–9 ng/mL (P = 0.009), and 9–10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). In all PSA tiers between 4 and 10 ng/mL, multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk cancer in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. In the lowest tier (4–5 ng/mL), 35.2% of those aged over 75 years had high-risk PCa. Conclusion The older the patient, the more aggressive the PCa. Moreover, there was an increase in high-risk PCa in older males compared with younger males even with a PSA level below the low-risk threshold of 10 ng/mL, suggesting the need to strengthen cancer screening policies in the older population.

Background: To investigate the clinicopathologic pattern of prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level below the low-risk threshold (< 10 ng/mL), which is often a deciding factor for biopsy. Methods: A nationwide database of PCa at the time of biopsy from 2010 to 2020 was constructed from 39 hospitals. Patients were categorized into age groups of < 64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, and ≥ 75 years considering guidelines that recommend PSA testing only for those aged 55–69 years during the study period, the average age of Korean PCa registrants of 70.3 years (2010–2020), and the average life expectancy of Korean males of 80.3 years (2020). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 70.3 ± 8.2 years, which was normally distributed (kurtosis = 0.095). Among 14,548 subjects, 54.1%, 39.5%, and 6.4% of them had high-risk disease, intermediate-risk disease, and low-risk disease, respectively. Based on three risk parameters, a marked increase in high-risk cancer was observed in the oldest age group (linear combination, P < 0.001). The same pattern was observed among patients with low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL), who were divided into PSA tiers as follows: 4–5 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 5–6 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 6–7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 7–8 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 8–9 ng/mL (P = 0.009), and 9–10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). In all PSA tiers between 4 and 10 ng/mL, multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk cancer in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. In the lowest tier (4–5 ng/mL), 35.2% of those aged over 75 years had high-risk PCa. Conclusion The older the patient, the more aggressive the PCa. Moreover, there was an increase in high-risk PCa in older males compared with younger males even with a PSA level below the low-risk threshold of 10 ng/mL, suggesting the need to strengthen cancer screening policies in the older population.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported experiences with automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and identify patient characteristics associated with discomfort, to inform screening modality selection and improve resource use. Methods: A survey was prospectively conducted on 140 patients who underwent ABUS for breast cancer screening. The survey assessed patient satisfaction, discomfort, and pain before and after the procedure. Factors such as age, breast density, and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed to determine their impact on patient experiences. Results: The majority of patients expressed satisfaction with ABUS. However, younger patients, those with small or dense breasts, and those with a low BMI reported lower satisfaction and higher pain scores. Conclusion Based on patient-reported outcomes, ABUS could complement handheld ultrasound in breast screening.Selecting modalities by age, BMI, breast size, and density may enhance satisfaction and resource use. Personalized strategies may improve screening experience and efficiency.

Objective: Since its development in 2002 by the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology and the Korean Society for Affective Disorders, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) has undergone five revisions. Methods: To improve survey efficiency, reflect general clinical practice, and facilitate comparisons with previous KMAP-DD revisions, the overall structure of the questionnaire was retained. The six sections of the questionnaire were as follows:1) pharmacological treatment strategies for major depressive disorder with and without psychotic features; 2) pharmacological treatment strategies for persistent depressive disorder and other depressive disorder subtypes; 3) consensus on treatment-resistant depression; 4) selection of an antidepressant in consideration of safety, adverse effects, and comorbid physical conditions; 5) treatment strategies for special populations (children/adolescents, elderly, and women); and 6) non-pharmacological biological therapies. First-, second-, and third-line treatment recommendations were statistically derived. Results: Compared to KMAP-DD 2021, only minor changes were noted, due to the limited introduction of new medications or treatment modalities. Nonetheless, notable shifts included an increased preference for atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), and higher preference of combination strategies involving AAPs and mood stabilizers, indicating a more proactive and intensive treatment trend in Korea. Conclusion KMAP-DD is expected to serve as a valuable clinical resource by providing expert consensus-based recommendations on specific treatment strategies and pharmacological options for major depressive disorders, thereby supporting the integration of real-world clinical practice with evidence-based medicine.

Purpose: Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen-induced hypotension is a clinically significant issue that remains difficult to predict.Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with hypotension in patients with repeated IV acetaminophen administration. Materials and Methods: This observational cohort study included patients who received IV acetaminophen in the critical care unit of the Yongin Severance Hospital in 2020. All IV acetaminophen administration records for each patient were reviewed, and the blood pressure records within 2 h after IV acetaminophen administration were examined. Changes in blood pressure within 2 h of IV acetaminophen administration were monitored to identify hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, a decrease in systolic blood pressure by 30 mm Hg, or a decrease in mean arterial pressure by 15%. Results: There were 1547 instances of IV acetaminophen administration among 398 patients. Of these, 416 instances (26.9%) resulted in hypotension among 204 patients (51.3%). A history of IV acetaminophen-induced hypotension did not predict subsequent hypotensive episodes, and there was no consistent tendency. The use of beta-blocker [odds ratio (OR)=1.50], gastrointestinal (GI) infection (OR=1.42), and septic shock (OR=1.68) were significant risk factors for IV acetaminophen-induced hypotension in multivariate analysis. In subgroup analysis of cases with beta-blocker, heart failure (OR=1.91), urinary tract infection (OR=2.16), GI infection (OR=1.83) were significant risk factors. Conclusion Severe infections, heart failure, and the use of beta-blockers are associated with IV acetaminophen-induced hypotension. However, IV acetaminophen-induced hypotension is inconsistent and depends on the patient’s condition.