We evaluated the content fidelity of written discharge instructions (WDIs) for pediatric patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). In May 2023, copies of WDIs were collected from 55 academic hospitals across South Korea. Each document was scored for the fidelity of medical advice based on the “Counsel” section of the Pediatric mTBI Guideline Checklist of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (maximum 10 points). Among respondent 46 emergency departments, 21 (45.7%) provided WDIs to patients with mTBI. The median score was 6.0 (interquartile range, 4.0-7.0), indicating that the fidelity of the WDIs needs improving.

Background/Aims: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a rare but important cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The clinical course of GAVE is not well-known, and recurrent bleeding from GAVE is a therapeutic challenge. Therefore, we investigated the clinical course of GAVE and identified the risk factors for bleeding from it. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with GAVE using upper GI endoscopy at Asan Medical Center between January 2004 and December 2019 and evaluated the clinical course and risk factors for bleeding from GAVE. Results: Of the 348 patients (mean age, 62.3 ± 10.7 years; male, 62%), bleeding from GAVE occurred in 123 (35%) patients during follow-up (median, 17.3 months; interquartile range [IQR], 4.2–46.6). GI bleeding from GAVE was significantly associated with Child–Pugh class B or C liver cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–4.16), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.52–5.07), use of antithrombotic agents (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.13–4.82), and involvement of the duodenal bulb (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.76–5.86). Rebleeding occurred in 39 of 123 patients (32%), in whom CKD (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.12–5.81) was significantly associated with rebleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis was most commonly performed using argon plasma coagulation, and the median number of endoscopic hemostasis performed was 2 (IQR, 1–3). Conclusions A careful follow-up for bleeding is needed in GAVE patients with liver cirrhosis, CKD, use of antithrombotic agents, and duodenal bulb involvement.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the association between exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and the risk of parkinsonism according to the GBCA type. Materials and Methods: Individuals aged ≥40 years who underwent first-ever magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations between 2011 and 2014 were identified from the Korean nationwide population-based health insurance claims database and followed up until 2022. Individuals were divided into those who underwent at least one GBCA-enhanced MRI, and those who underwent only non-enhanced MRI. GBCA-exposed individuals were further categorized into those exposed only to linear or macrocyclic GBCAs, after excluding those exposed to both types. The primary event of interest was allcause parkinsonism. Secondary events included all-cause parkinsonism requiring medication, Parkinson’s disease (PD), atypical parkinsonism, and secondary parkinsonism. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models for exposure to linear and macrocyclic GBCAs, with the non-enhanced MRI group serving as a reference. The models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and comorbidities. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, renal function, and history of cancer. Results: A total of 222,977 individuals were included in this study. Among them, 92,230, 48,335, and 82,412 individuals underwent non-enhanced, linear GBCA-enhanced, and macrocyclic GBCA-enhanced MRI, respectively. Exposure to linear GBCAs slightly increased the risk of all-cause parkinsonism (adjusted HR, 1.13 [97.5% confidence interval, 1.08–1.19]), while exposure to macrocyclic GBCAs did not increase the risk (adjusted HR, 1.00 [97.5% confidence interval, 0.95–1.05]).The results were similar for all-cause parkinsonism requiring medication, PD, and secondary parkinsonism, whereas no significant association was observed for atypical parkinsonism. Conclusion Exposure to linear GBCAs may slightly increase the risk of parkinsonism in adults, whereas exposure to macrocyclic GBCAs may not. Caution should be exercised when using linear GBCAs until further evidence emerges.

In patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), initial recurrence risk stratification based on clinical, histopathological, and perioperative data remains the key determinant for guiding management strategies during the first 1-2 years post-treatment. However, the adoption of ongoing risk stratification (ORS), which dynamically reassesses risk by integrating longitudinal clinical data and treatment response, enables more precise long-term prognostic assessment and facilitates highly individualized management. Building upon recent guidelines, the 2026 KTA guideline has been further refined by incorporating robust evidence from large-scale national cohorts and comprehensive systematic reviews. These updated recommendations outline contemporary concepts of ORS, risk-adapted TSH suppression targets, optimized surveillance modalities for recurrence detection, and disease-specific long-term follow-up strategies. Reflecting the paradigm shift toward de-escalated treatment, this revision integrates evolved perspectives on TSH suppression intensity, the clinical interpretation of thyroglobulin levels, and tailored follow-up intervals. These evidence-based recommendations aim to minimize unnecessary treatment and excessive surveillance in the large proportion of patients with excellent prognosis after initial therapy, while ensuring that each patient receives appropriately tailored and effective long-term management.

Background/Aims: Findings on the impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on metabolic parameters are inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of H. pylori eradication on metabolic parameters and body composition, including body fat mass and skeletal muscle mass. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of asymptomatic patients who underwent health screenings, including bioelectrical impedance analysis, before and after H. pylori eradication between 2005 and 2021. After matching individuals based on key factors, we compared lipid profiles, metabolic parameters, and body composition between 823 patients from the eradicated group and 823 patients from the non-eradicated groups. Results: Blood pressure, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and glycated hemoglobin values were significantly lower in the eradicated group than in the non-eradicated group. However, changes in body mass index (BMI), body fat mass, appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), waist circumference, and lipid profiles were not significantly different between the two groups. In a subgroup analysis of individuals aged >45 years, blood pressure, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and glycated hemoglobin changes were significantly lower in the eradicated group than in the noneradicated group. BMI values were significantly higher in the eradicated group than in the noneradicated group; however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding changes in body weight, body fat mass, ASM, or waist circumference. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the eradicated group than in non-eradicated group. Conclusions H. pylori eradication significantly reduced blood pressure, glucose levels, and systemic inflammation and improved lipid profiles in patients aged >45 years. BMI, body fat mass, ASM, and waist circumference did not significantly differ between patients in the eradicated group and those in the non-eradicated group.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.